A multidisciplinary intervention to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatrics and neonatal intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: To date, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are the most common healthcare-associated infections in high-risk neonates and children. These infections are associated with significantly longer hospital stays, increased health care cost, and mortality in the health care systems. Application of evidence-based preventive interventions has proven to decrease CLABSI rate. The purpose of this study is to reduce the undesired relative high CLABSI rate through the adoption of standardized quality improvement interventions. METHODS: and Methods: The study employed a pre-post-intervention design. Phase one is a retrospective calculation of 12 months of surveillance period as a baseline. Phase 2 establishes a multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention, which includes the formation of a dedicated central line insertion team, provision of central line kit at the bedside, training and educating the team, and selecting bundle checklist. In the third phase, we performed auditing and calculating the checklist compliance and monthly feedback for 12 consecutive post-intervention months. During phase 1 and 3, we calculated the following measures; CLABSI per 1000 catheter-days, duration of central line use, and device utilization ratio. RESULTS: During the post-intervention phase the CLABSI rate significantly reduced by 59.5% from 7.5 to 3.0 per 1000 central line day, and the duration of use of the central line decreased from 21.3 ± 9.9 to 11.0 ± 3.2 days (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of quality improvement multidisciplinary intervention; central line insertion and maintenance care bundle, dedicated IV team, education and feedback effectively reduced the rate of CLABSI within our pediatrics and neonatal ICUs.

Risk factors and distribution of MDROs among patients with healthcare associated burn wound infection.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with burn wounds are more susceptible to develop healthcare associated (HA) infection. Bacterial isolates from HA burn wound infection vary from one place to the other and also differ in terms of antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of HA burn wound infection, risk factors and to determine the microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolated pathogens. METHODS: This was a one-year retrospective descriptive study conducted between January 2017 and December 2017, in Al-Babtain Burn and Plastic Surgery center, Kuwait. The identification of bacterial isolates was conducted by conventional biochemical methods according to standard microbiological techniques and commercially available kits using analytical profile index procedure. RESULTS: Total body surface area >35% affected and length of stay more than 14 days were statistically significant risk factors for HA burn infection (RR of 10.057 and 5.912, respectively). Analysis of microbiological profile of these positive cultures indicated that the most common isolated organism was Acinetobacter baumannii followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Multidrug resistant organisms composed 65.85% of the positive isolates. Vancomycin, tigecycline, teicoplanin and linezolid showed 100% effectiveness for all Gram positive isolates. For Gram negative organisms, imipenem and meropenem showed 38.71% and 41.93% efficacy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Identification of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns helps to tailor the required antibiotic policy to minimize the acquired infections among these vulnerable patients.