RESUMO
The aim of the study was to compare the acoustic characteristics of voice between Auditory Brainstem Implantees, Cochlear Implantees and normal hearing children. Voice parameters such as fundamental frequency, formant frequencies, perturbation measures, and harmonic to noise ratio were measured in a total of 30 children out of which 10 were Auditory Brainstem Implantees, 10 were Cochlear Implantees and 10 were normal hearing children. Parametric and nonparametric statistics were done to establish the nature of significance between the three groups. Overall deviancies were seen in the implanted group for all acoustic parameters. However abnormal deviations were seen in individuals with Auditory Brainstem Implants indicating the deficit in the feedback loop impacting the voice characteristics. The deviancy in feedback could attribute to the poor performance in ABI and CI. The CI performed comparatively better when compared to the ABI group indicating a slight feedback loop due to the type of Implant. However, there needs to be additional evidence supporting this and there is a need to carry out the same study using a larger sample size and a longitudinal design.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To compare the frequency parameters of voice between children using cochlear implant (CI) and those with normal hearing and establishing a trend of development of voice characteristics across chronological and implant ages. METHODS: The study included 87 children aged 12 to 72 months, with a mean age of 41 months. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included 44 children using CIs, and group 2 included 43 children with normal hearing and age-appropriate speech and language characteristics. Both groups were categorized into 3 subgroups based on their chronological ages, group A (12-32 months), B (33-52 months), and C (53-72 months). The CI group (i.e., group 2) was further subdivided based on implant ages as group D (1-4 months), E (5-8 months), and F (9-12 months). RESULTS: Comparison of vocal frequency parameters across chronological ages revealed a decline with increasing age in both groups; however, stability was not maintained in the CI group. There was a statistically significant difference in the vocal frequency parameters between normal hearing children and those with CI. Comparing across implant ages, there was a significant difference between groups D and F. CONCLUSION: For better communication abilities of individuals with CI, along with early implantation and rehabilitation, there is a need to also focus therapy on providing training on speech modulations, especially on voice characteristics.
