RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Diffuse glioma constitutes 28% of primary brain tumors. Until recently morphologic appearance was the only criterion for classifying these tumors. However, WHO 2016 incorporates molecular information in the primary diagnosis of gliomas such as Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), Alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X inked (ATRX) as well as 1p/19q codeletion on FISH. In a resource-limited setup where FISH is not available, Alpha internexin (INA) has been suggested as a surrogate IHC marker. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Pathology for two years. Tissue blocks and clinical as well as radiological details were obtained from departmental archives. After assessing the morphologic details, routine IHC markers such as GFAP, Ki67 and P53 along with molecular markers like IDH-1, ATRX, and lNA were applied. RESULTS: Out of 55 cases of diffuse glioma, 23 cases of astrocytoma and 32 cases of oligodendroglioma with an overall mean age of presentation of 41.49 ± 12.47 years. IDH-1 expression among diffuse glioma was 89.1% in our study. Alteration in the ATRX gene expression was observed in 95.7% of astrocytomas. 75% of oligodendrogliomas expressed INA with no significant difference in expression between the two grades. Based on the algorithmic approach using molecular surrogate markers, diffuse gliomas were categorized into six distinct groups. IDH-mutant, ATRX loss of expression astrocytoma and IDH-mutant, INA positive oligodendroglioma are two categories that do not require further molecular testing. This comprises 72.7% of the cases and these do not warrant further workup. CONCLUSION: Implementation of combined phenotypic-genotypic diagnosis with the use of histomorphology and immunohistochemical surrogates for molecular genetic alterations will yield more homogeneous and narrowly defined diagnostic entities which will provide better prognostication and definitive treatment. It also is cost-effective in a resource-limited setup.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coexistent malignancy and tuberculosis (TB) are rarely encountered. Cancer patients are a highly vulnerable subgroup during this Covid crisis. Delayed treatment for malignancy because of COVID-19 pandemic leads to higher chances to get infections. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to present the clinicopathologic profile of the patients with coexistent carcinoma and TB during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic between April 2020 to May 2021 in the Department of Pathology of our Institute. 11 patients with coexistent malignancy and caseous necrotizing granulomatous inflammation with Langhans giant cells and or acid-fast bacilli (AFB) positivity were included in the study. Cases of ill-defined granulomas coexistent malignancy were excluded. We studied varied clinical and histopathologic features of these cases. RESULTS: Eleven cases were reported with coexistent malignancy and tuberculosis, of which 8 were reported in 2021 and 3 cases were reported in 2020. Adenocarcinoma comprised 9 cases (81.8%) and the remaining 2 were squamous cell carcinoma (18.1%). Out of 11, 10 (90.9%) were new TB cases. Of these, 10 were extrapulmonary TB and one pulmonary TB case with cancer. Regarding chemotherapy, four patients accepted that chemotherapy was delayed because of the COVID-19 crisis. CONCLUSION: In this covid pandemic, India being the 2nd most populous country and endemic for TB, there is a higher chance of latent and active TB. The coexistence of two different pathologies is rare, even in a region with a high incidence of TB. Delayed chemotherapy in a pandemic situation leads to an increased incidence of infectious diseases such as TB.
