Does the Presence of Matted Nodes in Colon Adenocarcinoma Influence 5-Year Overall Survival?

Background and Objectives: Colon cancer (CC) is prevalent globally, constituting 11.9% of cases in Mexico. Lymph node metastases are established prognostic indicators, with extracapsular lymph node extension (ENE) playing a crucial role in modifying prognosis. While ENE is associated with adverse factors, certain aspects, like matted nodes (lymph node conglomerates), are underexplored. Matted nodes, clusters of lymph nodes infiltrated by cancer cells, are recognized as an independent prognostic factor in other cancers. This study investigates the prognostic implications of matted nodes in CC. Materials and Methods: From a retrospective analysis of 502 CC consecutive cases treated with colectomy (2005-2018), we identified 255 (50.8%) cases with lymph node metastasis (our study group), which were categorized into two groups: (1) lymph node metastasis alone (n = 208), and (2) lymph node metastasis with matted nodes (n = 47). A comparative survival analysis was performed. Results: Of the 255 patients, 38% had lymph node metastasis. Patients with matted nodes (18.4%) showed an association with higher pN stage and lymphovascular invasion. The 5-year survival rate for patients with matted nodes was 47.7%, compared to 60% without (p = 0.096); however, this association demonstrated only a statistical tendency. Multivariate analysis identified clinical stage and adjuvant chemotherapy use as independent factors contributing to survival. Conclusions: This study underscores matted nodes as potential prognostic indicators in CC, emphasizing their association with higher pN stage and reduced survival. Although the patients with matted nodes showed lower survival, this figure did not search statistical significance, but a tendency was detected, which necessitates precise further research, which is essential for validating these findings and integrating matted nodes into the broader context of colorectal cancer management.

Pupil dilation evaluation of two mydriatic dosing profiles delivered by the Optejet®.

Aim: To compare pupil dilation achieved by a single microdose versus two microdoses of tropicamide-phenylephrine fixed combination (TR-PH FC) delivered by the Optejet®. Patients & methods: In this assessor-masked, crossover, noninferiority study, 60 volunteers underwent two treatment visits and received either one (∼8 µl) or two sprays (∼16 µl) of TR-PH FC to both eyes in randomly assigned order. Results: At 35 min postdose, mean change in pupil diameter was 4.6 mm and 4.9 mm following one or two sprays, respectively. The estimated treatment group difference was -0.249 mm (standard error: 0.036; 95% CI: -0.320, -0.177). No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: A single microdose was noninferior to two microdoses of TR-PH FC and achieved clinically significant mydriasis in a timely manner. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04907474 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Pupil dilation efficacy and efficiency were evaluated using microdosing via the Optejet^®. The Optejet^® is a new ophthalmologic drug device that utilizes piezoelectric technology to deliver a fine, controlled, horizontal microdroplet spray with precise volume (∼8 µl), spray pattern and velocity. A single spray versus two sprays of tropicamide-phenylephrine fixed combination (TR-PH FC) were administered to both eyes anesthetic free. Efficacy and safety were evaluated at specific time intervals. The primary end point was the mean change in pupil diameter at 35 min compared with baseline. At 35 min, clinically relevant dilation was observed, with a mean change of 4.55 mm ± 0.68 for one spray and 4.88 ± 0.60 for two sprays. The treatment group difference of one spray of TR-PH FC was noninferior to two sprays (p < 0.001). Rapid dilation was observed at 15 min, and the proportions of eyes that achieved a pupil diameter of ≥6.0 mm were 74% and 83% of patients at 15 min with one spray and two sprays, respectively. The mydriatic agent was well tolerated with the delivery system even in the absence of topical anesthetic, with no ocular or system adverse events reported. Mydriasis is a vital component of routine eye healthcare, and the current standard-of-care mydriatic eye drops potentially have limitations, including contamination, spillage and burning/stinging. Delivery of a mydriatic with the Optejet^® may improve patient care flow in the clinical office setting.

Type 2 diabetes-associated polymorphisms correlate with SIRT1 and TGF-ß1 gene expression.

The polymorphisms rs3758391 and rs1800470 located in SIRT1 and TGF-ß1 have been associated with type 2 diabetes in different populations but its functional effect is not clear. In this study, we evaluated their effect on the expression of SIRT1 and TGF-ß1 in peripheral blood as well as their participation in the formation of DNA-protein complexes in a pancreas-derived cell line. It has been described that SIRT1 and TGF-ß1 participate in cell growth and regulation of production and secretion of insulin in the pancreas. Anthropometric and biochemical profiles of 127 adults were measured. Genotypes for rs3758391 and rs1800470 were determined using TaqMan assays. Expression analysis of SIRT1 and TGF-ß1 were performed using real-time PCR. Gene expression of these genes increased 1.8 ± 0.6- and 1.3 ± 0.6-fold in patients carrying the TT genotype of rs3758391 and rs1800470 when compared to carriers of the CC genotype. Then, we tested whether these single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (and rs932658, which is in linkage disequilibrium with rs3758391) are located in regulatory DNA-protein binding sites by electrophoretic mobility shift assays using nuclear extract from the pancreas-derived cell line BxPC-3. The electrophoretic mobility shift assay showed no binding of nuclear proteins to DNA. In conclusion, the genotypes of rs3758391 and rs1800470 are associated with modifications in the expression of the genes SIRT1 and TGF-ß1, respectively, but none of the tested SNPs are located in regulatory DNA-protein binding sites.

Primary prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin in cirrhotic patients with ascites: a randomized, double blind study.

UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION AND AIM. There is scarce information about primary prophylaxis in cirrhotic patients. The aim was to assess the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis for bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and ascites. MATERIAL AND METHODS. A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg/day or placebo for one month. A basal evaluation and repeated assessments at 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks afterwards, or whenever a primary endpoint occurred were done. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: probability curves were constructed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS. 95 patients were randomized to ciprofloxacin group (n = 49; 51.6%) and placebo group (n = 46; 48.4%). Six-teen (32.6%) patients in the ciprofloxacin group developed bacterial infections and thirteen (28.2%) patients developed bacterial infections in the placebo group (p = NS). The probability to remain free of bacterial infections did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.38). Probability of survival at 24 weeks was 91% in placebo group and 98% in the ciprofloxacin group (p = 0.28). The absolute risk reduction was 5%, the relative risk reduction was 6% and the NNT was 20 patients. CONCLUSION. Primary prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin for one month in cirrhotic patients with ascites who do not have a currently accepted indication, did not show a preventive effect on the development of bacterial infections at one month follow-up. Moreover in women could increases the odds for UTI. The administration of ciprofloxacin seemed to decrease the risk of mortality.