Use of implementation strategies to promote the uptake of knee osteoarthritis practice guidelines and improve patient outcomes: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Translation of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to practice remains suboptimal. The primary purpose of this systematic review was to describe the use of implementation strategies to promote KOA CPG recommended care. METHODS: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 23, 2023, and subsequently updated and expanded on January 16, 2024. Implementation strategies were mapped per the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care criteria. The review was registered prospectively (CRD42023402383). RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included in the final review. All (100% (n=4) studies that included the domains of provide interactive assistance, train and educate stakeholders (89%(n=18)), engage consumers (87%(n=15)) and support clinicians (79%(n=14)) reported change to provider adherence. Studies that reported a change to disability included train and educate stakeholders, engage consumers and adapt and tailor to context. Studies that used train and educate stakeholders, engage consumers, and support clinicians reported a change in pain and quality of life. Most studies had a low to moderate RoB. CONCLUSION: Implementation strategies have the potential to impact clinician uptake of CPG's and patient reported outcomes (PROs). The implementation context, using an active learning strategy with a patient partner, restructuring funding models, and integrating taxonomies to tailor multifaceted strategies should be prioritized. Further experimental research is recommended to determine which implementation strategies are most effective.

Developing a Computer Vision Model to Automate Quantitative Measurement of Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Increasing deformity of the lower extremities, as measured by the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), is associated with poor patient outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA). Automated calculation of HKAA is imperative to reduce the burden on orthopaedic surgeons. We proposed a detection-based deep learning (DL) model to calculate HKAA in THA and TKA patients and assessed the agreement between DL-derived HKAAs and manual measurement. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 1,379 long-leg radiographs (LLRs) from patients scheduled for THA or TKA within an academic medical center. There were 1,221 LLRs used to develop the model (randomly split into 70% training, 20% validation, and 10% held-out test sets); 158 LLRs were considered "difficult," as the femoral head was difficult to distinguish from surrounding tissue. There were 2 raters who annotated the HKAA of both lower extremities, and inter-rater reliability was calculated to compare the DL-derived HKAAs with manual measurement within the test set. RESULTS: The DL model achieved a mean average precision of 0.985 on the test set. The average HKAA of the operative leg was 173.05 ± 4.54°; the nonoperative leg was 175.55 ± 3.56°. The inter-rater reliability between manual and DL-derived HKAA measurements on the operative leg and nonoperative leg indicated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation (2,k) = 0.987 [0.96, 0.99], intraclass correlation (2, k) = 0.987 [0.98, 0.99, respectively]). The standard error of measurement for the DL-derived HKAA for the operative and nonoperative legs was 0.515° and 0.403°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A detection-based DL algorithm can calculate the HKAA in LLRs and is comparable to that calculated by manual measurement. The algorithm can detect the bilateral femoral head, knee, and ankle joints with high precision, even in patients where the femoral head is difficult to visualize.

Patient-reported outcome measures in physical therapy practice for neck pain: an overview of reviews.

BACKGROUND: Understanding which patient-reported outcome measures are being collected and utilized in clinical practice and research for patients with neck pain will help to inform recommendations for a core set of measures that provide value to patients and clinicians during diagnosis, clinical decision-making, goal setting and evaluation of responsiveness to treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a review of systematic reviews using a qualitative synthesis on the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients presenting with neck pain to physical therapy. METHODS: An electronic search of systematic reviews and guideline publications was performed using MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), and Web of Science (Clarivate) databases to identify reviews that evaluated physical therapy interventions or interventions commonly performed by a physical therapist for individuals with neck pain and included at least one patient-reported outcome measure. The frequency and variability in which the outcome measures were reported among the studies in the review and the constructs for which they measured were evaluated. The evaluation of a core set of outcome measures was assessed. Risk of bias and quality assessment was performed using A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2. RESULTS: Of the initial 7,003 articles, a total of 37 studies were included in the final review. Thirty-one PROMs were represented within the 37 reviews with eleven patient-reported outcome measures in three or more reviews. The eleven PROMs assessed the constructs of disability, pain intensity, psychosocial factors and quality of life. The greatest variability was found amongst individual measures assessing psychosocial factors. Assessment of psychosocial factors was the least represented construct in the included studies. Overall, the most frequently utilized patient reported outcome measures were the Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The most frequently used measures evaluating the constructs of disability, pain intensity, quality of life and psychosocial functioning included the Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, Short-Form-36 health survey and Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire respectively. Overall risk of bias and quality assessment confidence levels ranged from critically low (2 studies), low (12 studies), moderate (8 studies), and high (15 studies). CONCLUSION: This study identified a core set of patient-reported outcome measures that represented the constructs of disability, pain intensity and quality of life. This review recommends the collection and use of the Neck Disability Index and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale or Visual Analog Scale. Recommendation for a QoL measure needs to be considered in the context of available resources and administrative burden. Further research is needed to confidently recommend a QoL and psychosocial measure for patients presenting with neck pain. Other measures that were not included in this review but should be further evaluated for patients with neck pain are the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical function, PROMIS Pain Interference and the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) tool.

Neonatal Myxomas: Case Report and Literature Review.

Myxomas are rare tumors in neonates and tend to have a different presentation compared to adults. We present an infant with a left atrial myxoma presenting with episodic tachycardia who underwent successful surgical excision. In addition, we performed a review of the literature, identifying 17 cases of neonatal myxomas. Unlike adults, neonatal myxomas are more common in males and occur more often on the right side of the heart. Constitutional symptoms such as fever or embolism are rare among neonates. Most patients have favorable outcomes following surgical excision, refuting earlier claims that neonatal myxomas are associated with poor outcomes.

Safety Checklist Implementation Did Not Reduce Central Venous Catheter Duration in Pediatric Cardiac ICU Patients.

The Center for Disease Control recommends prompt removal of nonessential central venous catheters (CVCs) to reduce the risk for central line-associated bloodstream infections. Safety checklists have been trialed to reduce nonessential CVC days, but pediatric studies are lacking. Our specific aim was to detect >10% reduction in mean CVC duration after implementation of a safety checklist addressing CVCs in our unit. METHODS: All patients admitted to the Congenital Cardiovascular Care Unit at New York University Langone Medical Center who had a CVC placed between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, were included. We implemented a checklist addressing CVC use in our unit on June 7, 2013, and modified it on March 10, 2016. We analyzed quarterly mean CVC duration and postsurgical CVC duration over the study period using statistical process control charts. RESULTS: We placed 778 CVCs for 7,947 CVC days during the study period. We noted special cause variation from Q4 2013 to Q2 2014 and a centerline shift in mean CVC duration from 8.91 to 11.10 days in Q1 2015. In a subgroup analysis of the 657 lines placed in surgical patients, there was a centerline shift in mean CVC duration from 6.48 to 8.86 days in Q4 2013. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated an unexpected increase in mean CVC duration after the implementation of a safety checklist designed to decrease nonessential CVC days. Additional studies are needed to identify the ideal method to detect and remove nonessential CVCs and reduce the risk of preventable harm.

Using the value-based care paradigm to compare physical therapy access to care models in cervical spine radiculopathy: a case report.

Background: The efficiency and effectiveness of multiple physical therapy care delivery models can be measured using the value-based care paradigm. Entering physical therapy through direct access can decrease health-care utilization and improve patient outcomes. Limited evidence exists which compares direct access physical therapy to referral using the value-based care paradigm specific to cervical spine radiculopathy. Case Description: The patient was a 39-year-old woman who presented to physical therapy through physician referral with the diagnoses of acute cervical radiculopathy. The patient was evaluated, provided guideline adherent treatment and discharged with a home exercise program. Sixteen months from being discharged, the same patient returned through direct access due to an acute onset of cervical spine symptoms and was evaluated and provided treatment that same morning. Outcomes: Direct access physical therapy saved the patient and third-party payer $434.30 and $3264.75 respectively. A 5×'s higher efficiency per visit and a 6.2×'s higher value in reducing disability was demonstrated when the patient accessed physical therapy directly. Physician referral and direct access entry pathways demonstrated neck disability index improvements of 6% and 16%, respectively. Discussion: This case report describes a clinical example of previous research that demonstrates improved cost efficiency, outcomes, and increased value with a patient who presented to physical therapy with cervical radiculopathy through two different access to care models. The results of this case demonstrate a clinical example of the use of the value-based care paradigm in comparing value and efficiency of two access to care models in a patient with cervical radiculopathy without other neurological deficits.

Successful Phenobarbital Desensitization After DRESS Reaction in the Management of Refractory Status Epilepticus.

PURPOSE: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is associated with antiepileptic drug use and is a rare but life-threatening side effect. We present a case of phenobarbital-induced DRESS in a patient who subsequently required phenobarbital and was successfully desensitized. SUMMARY: A 5-year-old male presented with medically refractory status epilepticus (SE). He had been trialed on several antiepileptic medications without achieving burst suppression. Burst suppression was achieved with a pentobarbital infusion, and thus, phenobarbital was initiated as the pentobarbital was weaned. After five days of phenobarbital, the patient developed signs and symptoms concerning for DRESS; a punch biopsy confirmed the drug reaction. Two months later, he again developed SE unresponsive to antiepileptic infusions. Burst suppression was achieved with pentobarbital, and it was decided to transition the patient to phenobarbital. Due to concerns of phenobarbital-induced DRESS, the patient underwent a phenobarbital desensitization consisting of 6 doses sequentially administered in 10-fold increasing concentrations before achieving therapeutic dosing. Three days later, the patient achieved therapeutic phenobarbital levels, was weaned off of pentobarbital, and remained seizure-free without recurrence of DRESS. CONCLUSIONS: Graded desensitization may be an option to minimize recurrence of DRESS in patients where avoidance of the offending agent is not possible.