Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 30(5): 461-466, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31061001

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Intragastric balloon (IGB) treatment of obesity is a minimally invasive outpatient procedure that has been shown to help weight loss in some patients. The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term results regarding the effectiveness, tolerability, and patient satisfaction in a cohort of patients undergoing the IGB insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort study design, patients who had their IGB inserted/removed between the years 2009 and 2016 were contacted by phone and asked to answer a short questionnaire. The baseline characteristics, pre- and post- IGB weight, as well as their current weight were recorded. Different parameters of satisfaction were noted in addition to whether patients resorted to alternative weight-reduction measures. RESULTS: Ninety-nine eligible patients were contacted, and 65 consented to the study. The average weight loss achieved at the end of the treatment period (3 to 10 months) was approximately a 12% decrease from the baseline. Only 39% of patients were satisfied with the procedure, and less than 50% were satisfied with the weight loss achieved. When assessing the long-term follow-up, years after the IGB removal (3.3±1.76 years), the vast majority of patients (78.7%) regained weight or resorted to further bariatric measures. CONCLUSION: IGB leads to weight loss among most patients, but it does not appear to fulfill patients' expectations. Further, the initial weight loss is not sustainable over time.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/psicologia , Balão Gástrico , Obesidade/psicologia , Obesidade/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Cirurgia Bariátrica/instrumentação , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 24(11): 637-642, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28902473

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The impact of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with malignant biliary obstruction is still unclear. We examined short-term surgical outcomes among drained and non-drained patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical resection for their malignancies with biliary obstruction were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files from 2014 to 2015. Mortality and morbidity were compared among patients who had PBD to those who did not undergo biliary drainage prior to surgery. RESULTS: A total of 2,306 patients were included; of these 1,803 (77.8%) had PBD. The postoperative mortality was 3.0% and 2.2% among direct surgery (DS) group and PBD group, respectively (P = 0.3). Postoperative complications were higher in the PBD group compared to the DS group (27.1% vs. 19.5%; P = 0.0005). Patients in the PBD group had higher risk of sepsis (13.5% vs. 7.2%; P = 0.0001), wound infections (16.5% vs. 10.9%; P = 0.002) and pancreatic fistula (17.5% vs. 12.4%; P = 0.006) compared to the DS group. CONCLUSION: Preoperative biliary drainage is associated with increased risk of sepsis and wound infections, but does not impact the postoperative mortality of patients undergoing PBD.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar/métodos , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Icterícia Obstrutiva/cirurgia , Idoso , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Icterícia Obstrutiva/patologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 29(9): 1017-1021, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28520575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with gallstone disease can present with elevated liver function tests (LFTs). It is often challenging to differentiate those with a common bile duct (CBD) stone from those without a CBD stone on the basis of the LFTs levels. In this study, we aim to evaluate the predictors of a CBD stones among patients presenting with symptomatic gallbladder disease and elevated LFTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined all patients who had undergone a cholecystectomy between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and increased LFTs were included. Patient characteristics, imaging findings, lab findings, endoscopic interventions, and operative report were recorded and evaluated. The diagnosis of CBD stones was made on the basis of ERCP and IOC findings. RESULTS: We included 354 patients in the final analysis. Of these, 113 (32%) had confirmed choledocholithiasis. The prevalence of CBD stones among biliary colic, acute cholecystitis, and pancreatitis patients was 47, 25, and 26%, respectively. γ-Glutamyl transferase and direct bilirubin had the highest sensitivities for CBD stones among these patients (83 vs. 79%). In the setting of biliary colic, total bilirubin was highly predictive of CBD stones with a positive predictive value of 85%. In the setting of acute cholecystitis, elevated LFTs were even less significant in predicting stones, with a positive predictive value of less than 40% for most. CONCLUSION: Although γ-glutamyl transferase and bilirubin levels showed a relatively higher sensitivity for CBDS compared with the other LFTs, these were not reliable enough because of high false-positive as well as false-negative values, especially in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.


Assuntos
Colecistite Aguda/patologia , Coledocolitíase/patologia , Cólica/patologia , Ducto Colédoco/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Bilirrubina/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colecistectomia , Colecistite Aguda/sangue , Colecistite Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Coledocolitíase/sangue , Coledocolitíase/diagnóstico por imagem , Coledocolitíase/cirurgia , Cólica/sangue , Cólica/diagnóstico por imagem , Cólica/cirurgia , Ducto Colédoco/diagnóstico por imagem , Ducto Colédoco/cirurgia , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Função Hepática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , gama-Glutamiltransferase/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...