Malignant mixed epithelial and stromal tumour of the kidney: a case report and a literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Mixed epithelial and stromal tumour of the kidney (MEST) is a rare and distinctive neoplasm accounting for 0.2% of all renal cancers. Most of these tumours behave in a benign fashion but 13 cases with malignant transformation have already been reported. We present the first case of an extremely aggressive MEST with rapid recurrence after radical treatment, demonstrating objective response to chemotherapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old female presented to the hospital complaining of gross hematuria. Computed tomography (CT) revealed an intraparenchymal mass in the left kidney forming a tumour thrombus in the inferior vena cava (IVC). Metastatic disease was ruled out and, under the clinical diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma, left radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy was performed. The histopathological examination confirmed malignant MEST of the kidney. At the follow-up 12 months after surgery, a recurrent tumour in the left paravertebral area and a tumour thrombus in the IVC were detected. A second surgery was recommended and the mass from the paravertebral area was removed, so resection of the IVC with prosthetic replacement was performed. The histopathologic examination confirmed a recurrent malignant MEST. At the follow-up three months after the second surgery disease progression was diagnosed, so chemotherapy with ifosfamide and doxorubicin was initiated. The CT scan performed 14 months after the chemotherapy confirmed a stable process of the disease with no signs of progression. CONCLUSIONS: A literature review and our case report confirm the existence of extremely aggressive malignant MEST that shows response to chemotherapy. However, more reports are needed to improve our understanding about the biology of the MEST to develop any recommendations on personalized therapy.

Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitor Treatment in Men With Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: An Adaptive Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a peripherally active fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor ASP3652 on safety and efficacy outcomes in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Inhibition of FAAH is hypothesized to reduce the excitability of urinary tract afferents including nociceptors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this adaptive, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adult male patients with moderate to severe CP/CPPS were treated for 12 weeks with an oral dose of ASP3652 (25, 75, 150, or 300 mg twice daily, or 300 mg once daily), or placebo. A Bayesian model was used for adaptive prospective modeling of randomization, study continuation decisions, and analysis of the efficacy variables. RESULTS: The study was stopped for futility at preplanned interim analysis when 239 patients were randomized (226 were included in the intention-to-treat set): the 25 mg group showed the largest reduction of the primary end point National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index total score (7.0 points), but the placebo group showed a mean reduction of 7.3 points (difference: 0.3 [95% confidence interval: -1.9, 2.6]). Micturition outcomes improved compared with placebo in all ASP3652 groups; for example, in the 300 mg twice daily group, voiding frequency decreased by -1.10 (95% CI: -2.0, -0.2) voids/24 hours vs placebo. Safety outcomes were comparable across the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: ASP3652 was generally safe and well-tolerated. It did not show efficacy on pain symptoms in patients with CP/CPPS. However, the results indicate that FAAH inhibition may attenuate lower urinary tract symptoms. Dedicated studies in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction are needed to confirm this.

Atorvastatin treatment for men with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of atorvastatin in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and prostatic enlargement due to presumed BPH. METHODS: This was a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical study. Eligible patients were aged > or =50 yr, with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) > or = 13, total prostate volume (TPV) > or = 30 ml, and maximum urinary flow rate 5-15 ml/s. All patients had serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) 100-190 mg/dl at baseline. Patients received either atorvastatin 80 mg daily (n=176) or placebo (n=174) for 26 wk. End points included IPSS, TPV, transition zone volume (TZV), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), serum PSA, and lipids. RESULTS: There was no difference between the effects of atorvastatin and placebo on the primary end point of mean change from baseline in IPSS after 26 wk of double-blind treatment (-4.5 vs. -4.3; p=0.263). Similarly, no effect was seen on the lower urinary tract secondary end points including TPV (-1.6 vs. -1.9 ml; p=0.654), TZV (-0.0 vs. -0.8 ml; p=0.421), Q(max) (+1.1 vs. +0.7 ml/s; p=0.612), and PSA (-0.24 vs. -0.14 ng/ml; p=0.235). Atorvastatin had a significant effect on serum lipid levels compared with placebo (eg, LDL: -75.6 vs. -6.1 mg/dl; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin is not effective over 6 mo in the treatment of men with LUTS and prostatic enlargement due to presumed BPH who have serum LDL in the range 100-190 mg/dl.

[Treatment of patients with urinary tract obstruction and significant renal impairment]. / Ligoniu, serganciu ryskiu inkstu funkcijos pazeidimu, kuri sukele slapimo taku obstrukcija, gydymas.

Prognosis of renal function changes due to obstructive uropathy and prediction of remaining renal function after release of obstruction, have great impact on treatment we choose. There were analyzed various aspects of treatment and course of disease in 26 cases of obstructive uropathy with significant renal function impairment. It was found, that recovery of renal function after adequate kidney drainage was slower in cases of infravesical obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux in comparison with cases of ureteral obstruction. The renal function recovers more rapidly in cases with thicker parenchyma. Active surgical intervention and creation of adequate urine outflow from the obstructed kidney is method of choice at the beginning of treatment, even in cases with prolonged anamnesis of obstruction, significant renal failure and septic complications.