U-Dos Double-Bundle and Single-Bundle Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Study.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are very common among athletes. If these injuries are not repaired, meniscus and cartilage damage will arise, with serious consequences in the joint. Different options for ACL reconstruction have been described, aiming for anteroposterior, lateral, and rotational stability. Using single- or double-bundle grafts has been one of the most discussed topics, aiming for better rotational stability. We performed a prospective randomized study to evaluate the outcomes of ACL reconstruction using double- or single-bundle grafts for 72 patients with acute ACL injuries. Patients were blindly randomized into 2 groups of 36 knees before surgery using a blind envelope that contained the technique to be used: double-bundle U-Dos technique (DB group) or single-bundle technique (SB group). All patients had a preoperative and postoperative evaluation and were followed with the same parameters at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 months. Both anteroposterior and rotational stability were evaluated using a KT-1000 arthrometer (MEDmetric) and an experimental Pivot-Shift Meter (ORMEDS) device. Functional outcomes were measured using the Tegner-Lysholm scale. The DB group had fewer ACL re-tears, fewer meniscal injuries, and better Tegner-Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. This group also had better KT-1000 and Pivot-Shift Meter values. After 2-year follow-up, the DB group had significantly better results than the SB group. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):13-18.].

Comparación cuantitativa de la ejecución de la maniobra de Lachman para su estandarización a través de software para dispositivo móvil / Quantitative comparison of the execution of the Lachman maneuver for its standardization through software for mobile devices

Introducción: la maniobra de Lachman es ampliamente empleada como recurso diagnóstico para detectar lesiones en el ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) y, por su simplicidad, se tiende a pensar que no existe una variabilidad significativa en su ejecución. El presente estudio comparativo está centrado en utilizar los sensores integrados en un dispositivo móvil para encontrar, a través del índice de correlación intraclase, si las variaciones tanto intraobservador como interobservador son significativas. Materiales y métodos: se efectuaron dos ensayos llamados "Lachmatón", con doce residentes de ortopedia a modo de evaluadores y sujetos de prueba; el primer ensayo ayudó a identificar y describir las diferencias de los gestos de ejecución entre los evaluadores, mientras que el segundo permitió medir el incremento de la similitud de ejecución entre estos al ser instruidos, en contraste con el primer ensayo, donde no habían recibido ninguna instrucción; esto fue posible al medir la similitud características estadísticas y morfológicas de las señales adquiridas a través del índice de correlación intraclase. Resultados: se identificaron dos gestos importantes y que emiten señales con distinta forma al aplicarse, o no, a la ejecución de la maniobra: 1) fijar el pie y, 2) fijar el fémur. Se encontró una diferencia significativa entre ambos ensayos, así como entre los dos estilos más usados por los evaluadores. Conclusión: el uso de los sensores integrados en un dispositivo móvil para medir diferencias en la ejecución de la maniobra de Lachman ayudó a determinar los gestos que permiten una mayor reproducibilidad de esta maniobra. Nivel de Evidencia: III

Introduction: the Lachman maneuver was amplified as a diagnostic resource to detect injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and it tends to be thought, due to its simplicity, that there is no significant accumulation in its execution. This comparative study focuses on using the sensors integrated into a mobile device to find out whether the intraobserver or interobserver variations are significant, through the intraclass correlation coefficient. Materials and methods: two trials called "Lachmatón" will be carried out with twelve orthopedic residents as evaluators and test subjects; the first trial helped to identify and describe the differences in performance gestures between raters, while the second allowed measuring the increase in performance similarity between raters as instructors, in contrast to the first trial, where neither could instruction; This was possible by measuring the similarity of the statistical and morphological characteristics of the signals obtained through the intraclass achievement index.Results: two important gestures were identified, which emit signals in different ways when applied or not to the execution of the maneuver: 1) fix the foot and, 2) fix the femur. You will find that there is a significant difference between you and the evaluators. Conclusion: the use of sensors integrated into a mobile device to measure differences in the execution of the Lachman maneuver helped to determine the gestures that allow a greater reproducibility of this maneuver. Level of Evidence: III