The Long chain Diol Index: A marine palaeotemperature proxy based on eustigmatophyte lipids that records the warmest seasons.

Long chain 1,13- and 1,15-diols are lipids which are omnipresent in marine environments, and the Long chain Diol Index (LDI), based on their distributions, has previously been introduced as a proxy for sea surface temperature. The main biological sources for long chain 1,13- and 1,15-diols have remained unknown, but our combined lipid and 23S ribosomal RNA (23S rRNA) analyses on suspended particulate matter from the Mediterranean Sea demonstrate that these lipids are produced by a marine eustigmatophyte group that originated before the currently known eustigmatophytes diversified. The 18S rRNA data confirm the existence of early-branching marine eustigmatophytes, which occur at a global scale. Differences between LDI records and other paleotemperature proxies are generally attributed to differences between the seasons in which the proxy-related organisms occur. Our results, combined with available LDI data from surface sediments, indicate that the LDI primarily registers temperatures from the warmest month when mixed-layer depths, salinity, and nutrient concentrations are low. The LDI may not be applicable in areas where Proboscia diatoms contribute 1,13-diols, but this can be recognized by enhanced contributions of C28 1,12 diol. Freshwater input may also affect the correlation between temperature and the LDI, but relative C32 1,15-diol abundances help to identify and correct for these effects. When taking those factors into account, the calibration error of the LDI is 2.4 °C. As a well-defined proxy for temperatures of the warmest seasons, the LDI can unlock important and previously inaccessible paleoclimate information and will thereby substantially improve our understanding of past climate conditions.

PHYLOGENETIC POSITION OF ATTHEYA LONGICORNIS AND ATTHEYA SEPTENTRIONALIS (BACILLARIOPHYTA)(1).

The phylogenetic position of diatoms belonging to the genus Attheya is presently under debate. Species belonging to this genus have been placed in the subclasses Chaetocerotophycidae and Biddulphiophycidae, but published phylogenetic trees based on 18S rDNA, morphology, and sexual reproduction indicate that this group of diatoms may be a sister group of the pennates. To clarify the position of Attheya, we studied the morphology, 18S rDNA, 16S rDNA of the chloroplasts, the rbcL large subunit (LSU) sequences of the chloroplasts, and the sterol composition of three different strains of Attheya septentrionalis (Østrup) R. M. Crawford and one strain of Attheya longicornis R. M. Crawford et C. Gardner. These data were compared with data from more than 100 other diatom species, covering the whole phylogenetic tree, with special emphasis on species belonging to the genera that have been suggested to be related to the genus Attheya. All data suggest that the investigated Attheya species form a separate group of diatoms, and there is no indication that they belong to either the Chaetocerotophycidae or the Biddulphiophycidae. Despite applying these various approaches, we were unable to determine the exact phylogenetic position of the investigated Attheya species within the diatoms.

The rise of the rhizosolenid diatoms.

The 18S ribosomal DNA molecular phylogeny and lipid composition of over 120 marine diatoms showed that the capability to biosynthesize highly branched isoprenoid (HBI) alkenes is restricted to two specific phylogenetic clusters, which independently evolved in centric and pennate diatoms. The molecular record of C25 HBI chemical fossils in a large suite of well-dated marine sediments and petroleum revealed that the older cluster, composed of rhizosolenid diatoms, evolved 91.5 +/- 1.5 million years ago (Upper Turonian), enabling an accurate dating of the pace of diatom evolution that is unprecedented. The rapid rise of the rhizosolenid diatoms probably resulted from a major reorganization of the nutrient budget in the mid-Cretaceous oceans, triggered by plate tectonics.