Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurosurgery ; 94(3): 622-629, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37861310

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pain outcomes may be influenced by preoperative substance use, which is often underreported due to associated stigma. This study examined the impact of urine toxicology-identified preoperative opioid and marijuana use on pain outcomes after elective spinal surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective spinal surgery between September 2020 and May 2022 were recruited for this prospective cohort study. Detailed chart review was completed to collect demographic, urine toxicology, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and pain medication data. Comparisons between self-reported and urine toxicology-identified substance use, preoperative/postoperative VAS ratings, and postoperative pain medication use were made using χ 2 tests, Student t -tests, and logistic regression, respectively. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and race. RESULTS: Among 111 participants (mean age 58 years, 59% female, 95% with ≥1 comorbidity), urine toxicology overestimated drug use (47% vs 16%, P < .001) and underestimated alcohol use (16% vs 56%, P < .001) at preoperative baseline relative to patient reports. Two weeks postoperatively, participants with preoperative opioid metabolites reported no significant improvements in pain from baseline (6.67 preoperative vs 5.92 postoperative, P = .288) unlike nonusers (6.56 preoperative vs 4.61 postoperative, P < .001). They also had worse postoperative VAS (5.92 vs 4.61, P = .030) and heavier reliance on opioid medications (odds ratio = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.21-7.89, P = .019). Conversely, participants with preoperative marijuana reported similar improvements in pain from baseline (users: 6.88 preoperative vs 4.36 postoperative, P = .001; nonusers: 6.49 preoperative vs 5.07 postoperative, P = .001), similar postoperative pain (4.36 vs 5.07, P = .238), and similar postoperative reliance on opioid medications (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.38-2.44, P = .928). Trends were maintained among the 83 patients who returned for the 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Although urine toxicology-identified preoperative opioid use was associated with poor postoperative pain relief and reliance on postoperative opioids for pain management after elective spinal surgery, preoperative marijuana use was not. Preoperative marijuana use, hence, should not delay or be a contraindication to elective spinal surgery.


Assuntos
Cannabis , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 165(8): 2283-2292, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37344735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronically elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) seen in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) can cause the development of skull base encephaloceles and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Surgical repair and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement are mainstays of treatment. Venous sinus stenting (VSS) is a newly accepted treatment modality. The goal of this study was thus to determine if VSS can be used to treat symptoms and prevent recurrence after surgical encephalocele repair. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients that had surgical repair of encephaloceles followed by VSS for symptomatic stenosis with elevated pressure gradient. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients underwent a combined encephalocele repair and VSS. Seventy-two percent were female; 46% had headaches, 69% pulsatile tinnitus, and 92% CSF rhinorrhea or otorrhea. One had seizures. Mean lumbar opening pressure was 23.3 ± 2.6 cm H2O; the average sagittal-to-jugular pressure gradient was 12.7 ± 1.8 cmH2O and was elevated in all patients. Four patients had middle fossa craniotomy for repair of tegmen defect (one bilateral); one had a retrosigmoid craniotomy for repair of a sigmoid plate defect. Eight had an endoscopic endonasal repair for sphenoid or cribriform plate encephalocele. There were no VSS procedural complications or complications associated with dual antiplatelet therapy. One patient had meningitis after endoscopic repair that was treated with antibiotics. One patient had recurrence of both CSF leak and venous stenosis adjacent to the stent requiring repeat repair and VSS. There was no further recurrence. CONCLUSION: In patients with dural sinus stenosis and encephaloceles requiring repair, VSS can be performed safely within weeks of surgery for relief of symptoms, resolution of underlying pathology, and prevention of CSF leak recurrence.


Assuntos
Encefalocele , Base do Crânio , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Encefalocele/cirurgia , Encefalocele/complicações , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Base do Crânio/diagnóstico por imagem , Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...