Monitoring depth of anesthesia.

Devices which monitor some aspect of anesthetic drug effects have evolved in the past few years into imperfect, but very useful, clinical tools. With appropriate respect for their limitations these monitors can be used to reduce anesthetic drug utilization and turnover time. The intriguing hypothesis that such monitors will reduce the risk of intraoperative awareness is currently under test.

Inhaled nonimmobilizers do not alter the middle latency auditory-evoked response of rats.

UNLABELLED: General anesthetics cause surgical immobility and oblivion (unconsciousness and amnesia). A class of compounds known as "nonimmobilizers" were predicted to be anesthetic, based on their physiochemical properties, but found to cause only amnesia. In humans, cerebrocortical electrical activity after auditory stimulation is depressed by concentrations of anesthetics which impair auditory recall. We sought to use these evoked responses to characterize the effects of the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N) and conventional inhaled anesthetics on early sensory processing in rats. Unrestrained rats with chronically implanted epidural silver screw electrodes were put into a chamber. On separate days, the same population of rats were exposed to isoflurane, desflurane, nitrous oxide, or 2N, each at several subminimum alveolar concentration of anesthetic required to eliminate movement in response to a noxious stimulus concentrations. After equilibration at each concentration, auditory-evoked responses were obtained. The behavioral state (activity and righting reflex) and electroencephalogram were also examined. 2N did not significantly change the middle latency auditory-evoked response, whereas the anesthetics all slowed conduction and depressed amplitude in a dose-dependent fashion. 2N neither depressed the righting reflex, nor induced epileptiform activity. IMPLICATIONS: Although the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N) suppresses learning, we find that 2N does not depress middle latency auditory-evoked responses. This suggests that 2N may suppress learning by depressing transmission through rostral subcortical structures, such as the amygdala, rather than by acting on the brainstem or neocortical structures.

Forty-hertz midlatency auditory evoked potential activity predicts wakeful response during desflurane and propofol anesthesia in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Suppression of response to command commonly indicates unconsciousness and generally occurs at anesthetic concentrations that suppress or eliminate memory formation. The authors sought midlatency auditory evoked potential indices that successfully differentiated wakeful responsiveness and unconsciousness. METHODS: The authors correlated midlatency auditory evoked potential indices with anesthetic concentrations permitting and suppressing response in 22 volunteers anesthetized twice (5 days apart), with desflurane or propofol. They applied stepwise increases of 0.5 vol% end-tidal desflurane or 0.5 microg/ml target plasma concentration of propofol to achieve sedation levels just bracketing wakeful response. Midlatency auditory evoked potentials were recorded, and wakeful response was tested by asking volunteers to squeeze the investigator's hand. The authors measured latencies and amplitudes from raw waveforms and calculated indices from the frequency spectrum and the joint time-frequency spectrogram. They used prediction probability (PK) to rate midlatency auditory evoked potential indices and concentrations of end-tidal desflurane and arterial propofol for prediction of responsiveness. A PK value of 1.00 means perfect prediction and a PK of 0.50 means a correct prediction 50% of the time (e.g., by chance). RESULTS: The approximately 40-Hz power of the frequency spectrum predicted wakefulness better than all latency or amplitude indices, although not all differences were statistically significant. The PK values for approximately 40-Hz power were 0.96 during both desflurane and propofol anesthesia, whereas the PK values for the best-performing latency and amplitude index, latency of the Nb wave, were 0.86 and 0.88 during desflurane and propofol (P = 0.10 for -40-Hz power compared with Nb latency), and for the next highest, latency of the Pb wave, were 0.82 and 0.84 (P < 0.05). The performance of the best combination of amplitude and latency variables was nearly equal to that of approximately 40-Hz power. The approximately 40-Hz power did not provide a significantly better prediction than anesthetic concentration; the PK values for concentrations of desflurane and propofol were 0.91 and 0.94. Changes of 40-Hz power values of 20% (during desflurane) and 16% (during propofol) were associated with a change in probability of nonresponsiveness from 50% to 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The approximately 40-Hz power index and the best combination of amplitude and latency variables perform as well as predictors of response to command during desflurane and propofol anesthesia as the steady-state concentrations of these anesthetic agents. Because clinical conditions may limit measurement of steady-state anesthetic concentrations, or comparable estimates of cerebral concentration, the approximately 40-Hz power could offer advantages for predicting wakeful responsiveness.

Ethanol directly depresses AMPA and NMDA glutamate currents in spinal cord motor neurons independent of actions on GABAA or glycine receptors.

Ethanol is a general anesthetic agent as defined by abolition of movement in response to noxious stimulation. This anesthetic endpoint is due to spinal anesthetic actions. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that ethanol acts directly on motor neurons to inhibit excitatory synaptic transmission at glutamate receptors. Whole cell recordings were made in visually identified motor neurons in spinal cord slices from 14- to 23-day-old rats. Currents were evoked by stimulating a dorsal root fragment or by brief pulses of glutamate. Ethanol at general anesthetic concentrations (50-200 mM) depressed both responses. Ethanol also depressed glutamate-evoked responses in the presence of tetrodotoxin (300 nM), showing that its actions are postsynaptic. Block of inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acidA and glycine receptors by bicuculline (50 microM) and strychnine (5 microM), respectively, did not significantly reduce the effects of ethanol on glutamate currents. Ethanol also depressed glutamate-evoked currents when the inhibitory receptors were blocked and either D, L-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (40 microM) or 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione disodium (10 microM) were applied to block N-methyl-D-aspartate or alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid/kainate receptors, respectively. The results show that ethanol exerts direct depressant effects on both alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid and N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate currents in motor neurons. Enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acidA and glycine inhibition is not required for this effect. Direct depression of glutamatergic excitatory transmission by a postsynaptic action on motor neurons thus may contribute to general anesthesia as defined by immobility in response to a noxious stimulus.

Bispectral EEG index during nitrous oxide administration.

BACKGROUND: Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a commonly used sedative for painful diagnostic procedures and dental work. The authors sought to characterize the effects of N2O on quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) variables including the bispectral index (BIS), a quantitative parameter developed to correlate with the level of sedation induced by a variety of agents. METHODS: Healthy young adult volunteers (n = 13) were given a randomized sequence of N2O/O2 combinations via face mask. Five concentrations of N2O (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% atm) were administered for 15 min (20 min for the first step). EEG was recorded from bilateral frontal poles continuously. At the end of each exposure, level of sedation was assessed using primarily the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale. RESULTS: One subject withdrew from the study because of emesis at 50% N2O. N2O (50%) increased theta, beta, 40-50 Hz, and 70-110 Hz band powers. BIS and spectral edge frequency during 50% N2O/O2 did not differ significantly from baseline values. Abrupt decreases from higher to lower concentrations frequently evoked a profound, transient slowing of activity. No significant change in OAA/S was detected during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Although the spectral content of the EEG changed during N2O administration, reflecting some pharmacologic effect, the subjects remained cooperative and responsive throughout, and therefore N2O can only be considered a weak sedative at the tested concentrations. Despite changes in the lower and higher frequency ranges of EEG activity, the BIS did not change, which is consistent with its design objective as a specific measure of hypnosis.

A multicenter study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis for monitoring anesthetic effect.

Bispectral analysis (BIS) of the electroencephalogram (EEG) has been shown in retrospective studies to predict whether patients will move in response to skin incision. This prospective multicenter study was designed to evaluate the real-time utility of BIS in predicting movement response to skin incision using a variety of general anesthetic techniques. Three hundred patients from seven study sites received an anesthetic regimen expected to give an approximately 50% movement response at skin incision. EEG was continuously recorded via an Aspect B-500 monitor and BIS was calculated in real time from bilateral frontocentral channels displayed on the monitor. Half of the patients were randomized to a treatment group in which anesthetic drug doses were increased to produce a lower BIS. In the control group, BIS was recorded, but no action taken on the data displayed. A determination of movement in response to skin incision was made in the 2 min succeeding incision. Retrospective pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using STANPUMP to estimate effect-site concentrations of intravenously administered anesthetics. BIS values were significantly higher in the control group (66 +/- 19) versus the BIS-guided group, in which additional anesthesia was administered to produce a lower BIS (51 +/- 19). The movement response rate was significantly higher in the control group at 43% compared with 13% in the BIS-guided group, but response rates were low at sites which used larger doses of opioids. Logistic regression analysis showed that BIS, estimated opioid effect-site concentrations, and heart rate (in that order) were the best predictors of movement at skin incision. This study demonstrates that dosing anesthetic drugs to lower BIS values achieves a lower probability of movement in response to surgical stimulation. BIS is a significant predictor of patient response to incision, but the utility of the BIS depends on the anesthetic technique being used. When drugs such as propofol or isoflurane are used as the primary anesthetic, changes in BIS correlate with the probability of response to skin incision. When opioid analgesics are used, the correlation to patient movement becomes much less significant, so that patients with apparently "light" EEG profiles may not move or otherwise respond to incision. Therefore, the adjunctive use of opioid analgesics confounds the use of BIS as a measure of anesthetic adequacy when movement response to skin incision is used as the primary end point.

Volatile anesthetics depress spinal motor neurons.

BACKGROUND: Depression of spinal alpha-motor neurons apparently plays a role in the surgical immobility induced by isoflurane. Using the noninvasive technique of F-wave analysis, the authors tested the hypothesis that depressed motor neuron excitability is an effect common to other clinically relevant inhaled anesthetics. METHODS: The authors measured F-wave amplitude in rats anesthetized with desflurane, enflurane, halothane, or sevoflurane. Each animal received one anesthetic at five equipotent anesthetic concentrations (0.6, 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC] and 0.8 MAC with 65% N2O). F waves were detected as late potentials in electromyographic responses evoked in the intrinsic muscles of the hind paw after monopolar stimulation of the ipsilateral posterior tibial nerve. RESULTS: All tested inhaled anesthetics depressed F-wave amplitude but not M-wave (orthodromic, early muscle activation) amplitude, and increased M-F latency in a dose-dependent manner. At 1.0 MAC, the estimated F/M ratio was 70 +/- 13% SD of that at baseline (0.6 MAC). Nitrous oxide added to 0.8 MAC of the potent vapors depressed F/M ratio by 63 +/- 17%. CONCLUSIONS: All anesthetics tested appeared to depress the excitability of spinal motor neurons. This effect may contribute to surgical immobility, and its magnitude is comparable at equipotent concentrations of agents. The authors hypothesize that this effect is due to hyperpolarization, although, currently, there is insufficient information to discriminate between pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms.

Nitrous oxide depresses spinal F waves in rats.

BACKGROUND: Evoked, recurrent electromyographic activity (F waves) reflect alpha-motor neuron excitability. Based on observations that other inhaled anesthetics do so, we hypothesized that nitrous oxide, alone or in combination with isoflurane, would depress F-wave activity and correlate with depression of movement response to tail clamp or electric stimulation. METHODS: In study 1, the authors examined the effect of nitrous oxide in combination with isoflurane in 13 normocapnic Sprague-Dawley rats anesthetized with 1.0% isoflurane (0.7 minimum alveolar concentration) in oxygen. The tibial nerve was stimulated at the popliteal fossa, and evoked electromyographic activity [M (direct neuromuscular junctional response) and F waves] were recorded from ipsilateral foot muscles. The effect of the addition of 30% or 70% nitrous oxide was measured. F-wave amplitude/M-wave amplitude ratio (F/M) was determined from each stimulus-electromyographic response pair. F/M vs. movement response to 60-s tail clamp was assessed after each recording session. F-wave amplitude/M-wave amplitude ratio at adjacent doses that permitted and prevented movement were compared. In study 2, the authors examined the effect of (hyperbaric) nitrous oxide as the sole anesthetic agent on F waves. In 11 rats anesthetized with isoflurane, stimulation and recording electrodes were placed as described above, with additional electrodes for stimulation placed in the tail. Rats were placed in a pressure chamber pressurized with nitrous oxide/oxygen to 3.4 atm. Thirty m were allowed for isoflurane washout. Electromyographic activity was evoked and recorded at 1.0, 1.6, 2.2 and 2.7 atm N2O (random order). Movement in response to 60 s of 15 V, 50-Hz tail stimulation was evaluated after each recording session. RESULTS: Nitrous oxide with or without isoflurane produced a dose-dependent decrease in F/M. By interpolation of this data, the authors found that 2 atm N2O alone, or 44% N2O added to 1.0% isoflurane at 1.0 atm, produced 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration anesthesia. At the deepest level of isoflurane/ nitrous oxide that permitted movement, mean F/M was 20.6 +/- 17.5%; at the lowest concentration that blocked movement, rats had a mean F/M of 13.7 +/- 13.9% (P = 0.01). At the minimal hyperbaric nitrous oxide blocking movement, rats had a mean F/M of 3.7 +/- 2.9%, whereas the F/M at the highest nitrous oxide dose that permitted movement was 4.4 +/- 2.7% (P < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Because nitrous oxide depressed F-wave but not M-wave activity, the data suggest a central (spinal) rather than neuromuscular junctional site of action of this agent. The direct correlation between nitrous oxide dose, F-wave amplitude depression, and surgical immobility suggests the possibility of using F-wave activity to predict the likelihood of anesthetic-induced immobility. However, the mechanism of action of nitrous oxide may differ from that of the potent inhaled agents.

Preoperative valproate administration does not increase blood loss during temporal lobectomy.

Surgical treatment is increasingly used for patients with medically re fractory seizures. Valproate (VPA) is an effective, widely used anticonvulsant in this patient population, but believed by some researchers to increase surgical bleeding because of quantitative thrombocytopenia and functional defects in platelet aggregation. Because we have observed no clinical evidence that perioperative administration of VPA increases blood loss or complications related to postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing temporal lobectomy at our institution, we sought to test this hypothesis. We made a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent epilepsy surgery at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, from September 1986 through January 1993. Patients who had a temporal lobectomy and whose medical records documented preoperative platelet counts and pre- and postoperative hematocrit and hemoglobin values were included. We excluded patients who had cranial surgery before temporal lobectomy and those with intracranial neoplasms or vascular malformations. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received VPA in the immediate preoperative period and those who had not received VPA recently. We compared the estimated surgical blood loss and the estimated change in red blood cell (RBC) volume between groups by unpaired t tests. The charts of 87 consecutive patients qualified for inclusion in the study. Patients in the VPA group had relative (but not absolute) thrombocytopenia preoperatively (235 +/- 64 vs. 277 +/- 69 k in the No-VPA group). There were no differences in the estimated blood loss, RBC volume, or in the incidence of postoperative transfusion. VPA apparently does not increase complications of hemostasis during therapeutic surgical resections for epilepsy. Therefore, we do not recommend routinely discontinuing VPA before craniotomy.

Halothane selectively inhibits bradykinin-induced synovial plasma extravasation.

BACKGROUND: In vitro studies demonstrate that halothane, but not isoflurane, inhibits bradykinin-induced calcium currents and prostacyclin release in cultured endothelial cells. Because bradykinin is an important endogenous mediator of inflammation, we assessed the effects of halothane, isoflurane, and pentobarbital on plasma extravasation, a component of tissue inflammation induced by bradykinin, in rats. METHODS: We anesthetized 23 rats with halothane (0.8 or 1.3 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]), isoflurane (1.3 MAC), or pentobarbital (total of 85 mg/kg intraperitoneally). Their tracheas were intubated and their lungs mechanically ventilated. After intravenous administration of Evans blue dye, we perfused normal saline followed by bradykinin or platelet-activating factor, another inflammatory mediator, intraarticularly via needles placed in the knee joint. We collected perfusate and estimated extravasation by measuring dye in the perfusate using spectrophotometry. RESULTS: Bradykinin increased plasma extravasation eight- to ninefold above baseline in both pentobarbital- and isoflurane-anesthetized rats. In contrast, bradykinin-induced plasma extravasation at 0.8 MAC and 1.3 MAC of halothane was approximately 40% (P < 0.01) and 15% (P < 0.001), respectively, of that in pentobarbital- and isoflurane-anesthetized rats. Baseline plasma extravasation was lower in rats anesthetized with either concentration of halothane compared with pentobarbital or isoflurane (all P < 0.001). Platelet-activating factor-induced plasma extravasation was similar for all anesthetics. CONCLUSION: Halothane, but not isoflurane or pentobarbital, inhibits both baseline and bradykinin-induced peripheral plasma extravasation, demonstrating that volatile anesthetics differentially modulate this important component of inflammation.

Anesthetic depression of spinal motor neurons may contribute to lack of movement in response to noxious stimuli.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that anesthetics produce immobility by an action on the spinal cord. We postulated that immobility results from a depression of alpha-motor neuron excitability in vivo, and that this depression would be reflected in a depression of recurrent, (F)-wave activity. METHODS: The lungs of 15 normocapnic, normothermic, normotensive rats were mechanically ventilated with 0.5, 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 MAC isoflurane, in random sequence, with at least 30 min of equilibration at each step. In addition, at 1.2 MAC, inspired carbon dioxide was altered to create hypercapnia and hypocapnia. The sizes of the orthodromic (M) wave and F wave were measured in ten sequential trials as the activity in the intrinsic muscles of the ipsilateral foot evoked by stimulation of the tibial nerve. RESULTS: M-wave amplitude did not change. F-wave amplitude did not decrease between 0.5 and 0.8 MAC but decreased 50% between 0.8 and 1.2 MAC (P < 0.001) and 60% between 1.2 and 1.6 MAC (P < 0.05). Hypocapnia (17 mmHg) increased F-wave amplitude by 15%, and hypercapnia (73 mmHg) reduced it by 60% compared with normocapnia at 1.2 MAC (31 mmHg) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Anesthetics may cause and moderate hypercapnia may contribute to surgical immobility by depressing excitability of alpha-motor neurons. Monitoring F waves may indicate the adequacy of this aspect of anesthesia and may detect states in which spontaneous or nocifensive movements might occur.

The electroencephalogram does not predict depth of isoflurane anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The power spectrum of the electroencephalogram (EEG) may be analyzed to provide quantitative measures of EEG activity (e.g., spectral edge, which defines the highest EEG frequency at which significant activity is found). The current study tested the hypothesis that spectral edge and similar measures distinguish different functional depths of anesthesia in humans. METHODS: Three groups were studied. Group 1 consisted of 34 surgical patients (ASA physical status 1 or 2) who received 0.6, 1.0 and 1.4 MAC isoflurane anesthesia. A subgroup (group 2) of group 1 was tested during 1.0 MAC isoflurane anesthesia at surgical incision. Group 3 consisted of 16 volunteers who listened to an audiotape while receiving 0.15, 0.3, and 0.45 MAC isoflurane or 0.3, 0.45, and 0.6 MAC nitrous oxide in oxygen. The audiotape contained information designed to test implicit and explicit memory formation. We tested the ability of six EEG parameters (spectral-edge, 95th percentile power frequency, median power, and zero crossing frequencies and total power in the alpha- [8-13 Hz] and delta- [< 4 Hz] power ranges) to predict movement after surgical incision, purposeful response to command, or memory of information presented during anesthetic administration. RESULTS: Isoflurane decreased EEG activity in group 1 in a dose-related fashion. The 55% of group 2 who made purposeful movements in response to incision did not differ in their EEG from nonresponders (e.g., spectral edge 19.8 +/- 3.1 vs. 19.3 +/- 2.6 Hz, mean +/- SD). In group 3, memory of the information presented did not correlate with values of any EEG parameter. Response to verbal command was associated with lower anesthetic concentrations and with smaller alpha- and delta-band power (298 +/- 66 vs. 401 +/- 80 watts; and 75 +/- 20 vs. 121 +/- 49 watts, mean +/- SD), but there was no difference in values for other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that our EEG measures do not predict depth of anesthesia as defined by the response to surgical incision, the response to verbal command or the development of memory.

Anesthetic potency is not altered after hypothermic spinal cord transection in rats.

BACKGROUND: In essence, the clinical goal of general anesthesia is to produce a state of unresponsiveness and amnesia. These endpoints are commonly achieved with drugs like isoflurane, but the sites and mechanisms by which these specific endpoints are achieved remain unknown. Blocking the somatic motor response to painful stimuli is widely used as an indicator of anesthetic adequacy, and the concentration of anesthetic agent (minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]) required to achieve this unresponsiveness is the benchmark of anesthetic potency. Recent work has demonstrated that precollicular decerebration does not alter MAC in rats, suggesting that the forebrain is not a major site of action of isoflurane in blocking motor responses. The brain stem contains systems that modulate pain processing in the spinal cord. The current study was undertaken to assess the relative roles of the brain stem and spinal cord as sites of anesthetic action in blocking somatic responsiveness. METHODS: In seven rats, anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. MAC was determined by observing the response to tail clamp and fore- and hind limb toe pinch at three times: after intubation, after cervical laminectomy, and after staged hypothermic spinal cord transection. RESULTS: MAC determined by tail clamp did not change during the protocol (1.28 +/- 0.08% [mean +/- standard deviation] baseline vs. 1.25 +/- 0.18% postlaminectomy vs. 1.03 +/- 0.40% posttransection). In one animal, the MAC value decreased from a prelesion value of 1.2% to 0.25%, accounting for most of the variance in the postlesion mean; the MAC value as determined by withdrawal to rear paw pinch was unchanged from its prelesion value in this animal. The MAC values as determined by toe pinch in all animals remained unchanged after spinal transection of the lesion both rostrally and caudally. CONCLUSIONS: Somatic motor responsiveness and its sensitivity to isoflurane appeared to be unaltered despite acute loss of descending cortical and bulbar controls. This observation suggests that the site of anesthetic inhibition of motor response may be in the spinal cord.