Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study.

BACKGROUND: Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS: Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS: FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.

Using tumour pathology to identify people at high genetic risk of breast and colorectal cancers.

Genes have been identified for which germline mutations are associated with high lifetime risks of breast, colorectal and other cancers. Identification of mutation carriers through genetic testing is important as it could help lower cancer incidence and mortality. The translation of genetic information into better health outcomes is expensive because of the costs of genetic counselling as well as laboratory testing. Approaches to triage for mutation screening of known genes which rely on cancer family history are not necessarily sensitive and specific or the most cost-effective. Recent population-based research has shown that the cancers and precancerous lesions arising in mutation carriers have specific molecular and morphological characteristics. People with colorectal cancer, especially those diagnosed at a young age, whose tumours exhibit microsatellite instability and some specific pathology and immunohistochemically-defined features are more likely to carry a germline mutation in one of four mismatch repair genes. Some morphological and immunohistochemically-defined features are associated with breast cancers arising in women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations, especially if at a young age. Screening paradigms based on molecular and morphological features that predict mutation status, especially if focused on early-onset disease, have the potential to identify mutation carriers with greater sensitivity and specificity, and in a more cost-effective way, than those based on family history alone. Genetic testing results could help inform treatment if those affected are tested soon after diagnosis using pathology-led selection strategies to identify cases most likely to carry germline mutations. We propose how this new approach could be undertaken by having genetic testing and counselling prioritised to those with the greatest probability of carrying a germline mutation in these known cancer predisposition genes.

Morphological predictors of BRCA1 germline mutations in young women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Knowing a young woman with newly diagnosed breast cancer has a germline BRCA1 mutation informs her clinical management and that of her relatives. We sought an optimal strategy for identifying carriers using family history, breast cancer morphology and hormone receptor status data. METHODS: We studied a population-based sample of 452 Australian women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed before age 40 years for whom we conducted extensive germline mutation testing (29 carried a BRCA1 mutation) and a systematic pathology review, and collected three-generational family history and tumour ER and PR status. Predictors of mutation status were identified using multiple logistic regression. Areas under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were estimated using five-fold stratified cross-validation. RESULTS: The probability of being a BRCA1 mutation carrier increased with number of selected histology features even after adjusting for family history and ER and PR status (P<0.0001). From the most parsimonious multivariate model, the odds ratio for being a carrier were: 9.7 (95% confidence interval: 2.6-47.0) for trabecular growth pattern (P=0.001); 7.8 (2.7-25.7) for mitotic index over 50 mitoses per 10 high-powered field (P=0.0003); and 2.7 (1.3-5.9) for each first-degree relative with breast cancer diagnosed before age 60 years (P=0.01).The area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (0.83-0.90). CONCLUSION: Pathology review, with attention to a few specific morphological features of invasive breast cancers, can identify almost all BRCA1 germline mutation carriers among women with early-onset breast cancer without taking into account family history.

Cell cycle genes and ovarian cancer susceptibility: a tagSNP analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the cell cycle is a hallmark of many cancers including ovarian cancer, a leading cause of gynaecologic cancer mortality worldwide. METHODS: We examined single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (n=288) from 39 cell cycle regulation genes, including cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and CDK inhibitors, in a two-stage study. White, non-Hispanic cases (n=829) and ovarian cancer-free controls (n=941) were genotyped using an Illumina assay. RESULTS: Eleven variants in nine genes (ABL1, CCNB2, CDKN1A, CCND3, E2F2, CDK2, E2F3, CDC2, and CDK7) were associated with risk of ovarian cancer in at least one genetic model. Seven SNPs were then assessed in four additional studies with 1689 cases and 3398 controls. Association between risk of ovarian cancer and ABL1 rs2855192 found in the original population [odds ratio, OR(BB vs AA) 2.81 (1.29-6.09), P=0.01] was also observed in a replication population, and the association remained suggestive in the combined analysis [OR(BB vs AA) 1.59 (1.08-2.34), P=0.02]. No other SNP associations remained suggestive in the replication populations. CONCLUSION: ABL1 has been implicated in multiple processes including cell division, cell adhesion and cellular stress response. These results suggest that characterization of the function of genetic variation in this gene in other ovarian cancer populations is warranted.

Tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate oncogenes and susceptibility to ovarian cancer.

Low-moderate risk alleles that are relatively common in the population may explain a significant proportion of the excess familial risk of ovarian cancer (OC) not attributed to highly penetrant genes. In this study, we evaluated the risks of OC associated with common germline variants in five oncogenes (BRAF, ERBB2, KRAS, NMI and PIK3CA) known to be involved in OC development. Thirty-four tagging SNPs in these genes were genotyped in approximately 1800 invasive OC cases and 3000 controls from population-based studies in Denmark, the United Kingdom and the United States. We found no evidence of disease association for SNPs in BRAF, KRAS, ERBB2 and PIK3CA when OC was considered as a single disease phenotype; but after stratification by histological subtype, we found borderline evidence of association for SNPs in KRAS and BRAF with mucinous OC and in ERBB2 and PIK3CA with endometrioid OC. For NMI, we identified a SNP (rs11683487) that was associated with a decreased risk of OC (unadjusted P(dominant)=0.004). We then genotyped rs11683487 in another 1097 cases and 1792 controls from an additional three case-control studies from the United States. The combined odds ratio was 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.99) and remained statistically significant (P(dominant)=0.032). We also identified two haplotypes in ERBB2 associated with an increased OC risk (P(global)=0.034) and a haplotype in BRAF that had a protective effect (P(global)=0.005). In conclusion, these data provide borderline evidence of association for common allelic variation in the NMI with risk of epithelial OC.

Validating genetic risk associations for ovarian cancer through the international Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.

The search for genetic variants associated with ovarian cancer risk has focused on pathways including sex steroid hormones, DNA repair, and cell cycle control. The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) identified 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes in these pathways, which had been genotyped by Consortium members and a pooled analysis of these data was conducted. Three of the 10 SNPs showed evidence of an association with ovarian cancer at P< or =0.10 in a log-additive model: rs2740574 in CYP3A4 (P=0.011), rs1805386 in LIG4 (P=0.007), and rs3218536 in XRCC2 (P=0.095). Additional genotyping in other OCAC studies was undertaken and only the variant in CYP3A4, rs2740574, continued to show an association in the replication data among homozygous carriers: OR(homozygous(hom))=2.50 (95% CI 0.54-11.57, P=0.24) with 1406 cases and 2827 controls. Overall, in the combined data the odds ratio was 2.81 among carriers of two copies of the minor allele (95% CI 1.20-6.56, P=0.017, p(het) across studies=0.42) with 1969 cases and 3491 controls. There was no association among heterozygous carriers. CYP3A4 encodes a key enzyme in oestrogen metabolism and our finding between rs2740574 and risk of ovarian cancer suggests that this pathway may be involved in ovarian carcinogenesis. Additional follow-up is warranted.

Progesterone receptor variation and risk of ovarian cancer is limited to the invasive endometrioid subtype: results from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium pooled analysis.

There is evidence that progesterone plays a role in the aetiology of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Therefore, genes involved in pathways that regulate progesterone may be candidates for susceptibility to this disease. Previous studies have suggested that genetic variants in the progesterone receptor gene (PGR) may be associated with ovarian cancer risk, although results have been inconsistent. We have established an international consortium to pool resources and data from many ovarian cancer case-control studies in an effort to identify variants that influence risk. In this study, three PGR single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), for which previous data have suggested they affect ovarian cancer risk, were examined. These were +331 C/T (rs10895068), PROGINS (rs1042838), and a 3' variant (rs608995). A total of 4788 ovarian cancer cases and 7614 controls from 12 case-control studies were included in this analysis. Unconditional logistic regression was used to model the association between each SNP and ovarian cancer risk and two-sided P-values are reported. Overall, risk of ovarian cancer was not associated with any of the three variants studied. However, in histopathological subtype analyses, we found a statistically significant association between risk of endometrioid ovarian cancer and the PROGINS allele (n=651, OR=1.17, 95% CI=1.01-1.36, P=0.036). We also observed borderline evidence of an association between risk of endometrioid ovarian cancer and the +331C/T variant (n=725 cases; OR=0.80, 95% CI 0.62-1.04, P=0.100). These data suggest that while these three variants in the PGR are not associated with ovarian cancer overall, the PROGINS variant may play a modest role in risk of endometrioid ovarian cancer.

BRCA1 promoter deletions in young women with breast cancer and a strong family history: a population-based study.

Women diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 40 years who have a strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer were selected from an Australian population-based case-control-family study for large deletion screening within the BRCA1 promoter. Deletions within the BRCA1 promoter region are usually not detected by the methods applied in routine clinical mutation detection strategies. Fifty-one of the 66 women (77%) who met our inclusion criteria were tested for promoter deletions using linkage disequilibrium analysis of two BRCA1 polymorphic sites (C/G1802 and Pro871Leu) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Two cases of BRCA1 promoter deletion involving exons 1A-2 and exons 1A-23 were detected. The morphology of the breast cancers arising in these women with BRCA1 promoter deletions was consistent with the morphology associated with other germline BRCA1 mutations. Large genomic deletions that involve the promoter regions of BRCA1 make up 20% (2/10) of all known BRCA1 mutations in this group of young women with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Our data support the inclusion of testing for large genomic alterations in the BRCA1 promoter region in routine clinical mutation detection within BRCA1.

Genetic intra-tumour heterogeneity in epithelial ovarian cancer and its implications for molecular diagnosis of tumours.

Genetic analysis of solid tumours using DNA or cDNA expression microarrays may enable individualized treatment based on the profiles of genetic changes that are identified from each patient. This could result in better response to adjuvant chemotherapy and, consequently, improved clinical outcome. So far, most research studies that have tested the efficacy of such an approach have sampled only single areas of neoplastic tissue from tumours; this assumes that the genetic profile within solid tumours is homogeneous throughout. The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of genetic intra-tumour heterogeneity (ITH) within a series of epithelial ovarian cancers. Several different regions (five to eight regions) of tumour tissue from 16 grade 3, serous epithelial ovarian cancers were analysed for genetic alterations using a combination of microsatellite analysis and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, in order to establish the extent of ITH. Maximum parsimony tree analysis was applied to the genetic data from each tumour to evaluate the clonal relationship between different regions within tumours. Extensive ITH was identified within all ovarian cancers using both microsatellite and SNP analysis. Evolutionary analysis of microsatellite data suggested that the origin of all tumours was monoclonal, but that subsequent clonal divergence created mixed populations of genetically distinct cells within the tumour. SNP analysis suggested that ITH was not restricted to random genetic changes, but affected genes that have an important functional role in ovarian cancer development. The frequent occurrence of ITH within epithelial ovarian cancers may have implications for the interpretation of genetic data generated from emerging technologies such as DNA and mRNA expression microarrays, and their use in the clinical management of patients with ovarian cancer. The basis of genetic ITH and the possible implications for molecular approaches to clinical diagnosis of ovarian cancers may apply to other tumour types.

Oral contraceptive use and ovarian cancer risk among carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Women with mutations of the genes BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at increased risk of ovarian cancer. Oral contraceptives protect against ovarian cancer in general, but it is not known whether they protect against the disease in carriers of these mutations. We obtained self-reported lifetime histories of oral contraceptive use from 451 women who carried mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios associated with oral contraceptive use, comparing the histories of 147 women with ovarian cancer (cases) to those of 304 women without ovarian cancer (controls) who were matched to cases on year of birth, country of residence and gene (BRCA1 vs BRCA2). Reference ages for controls had to exceed the ages at diagnosis of their matched cases. After adjusting for parity, the odds-ratio for ovarian cancer associated with use of oral contraceptives for at least 1 year was 0.85 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.53-1.36). The risk decreased by 5% (1-9%) with each year of use (P for trend=0.01). Use for 6 or more years was associated with an odds-ratio of 0.62 (0.35-1.09). These data support the hypothesis that long-term oral contraceptive use reduces the risk of ovarian cancer among women who carry mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2.

Ovarian cancer survival in Ashkenazi Jewish patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical characteristics and survival of Ashkenazi Jewish ovarian cancer patients with and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. METHODS: An unselected series of 118 Ashkenazi Jewish ovarian cancer patients were screened for the three common founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Patient survival and other clinical characteristics of the tumours were compared in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and those without mutations. RESULTS: Twenty-seven individuals with invasive carcinomas were found to have mutations (14 with 185delAG and one with 5382insC in BRCA1 and 12 with 6174delT in BRCA2). No mutations were identified in the 20 patients with borderline tumours. For the invasive carcinomas, there was a survival advantage for BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients compared to patients without mutations, though the differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the histopathological characteristics of the tumours between the patient groups. CONCLUSION: These results are similar to those of other studies and suggest that ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers may have a distinct clinical behaviour.

Perception and recognition memory in monkeys following lesions of area TE and perirhinal cortex.

Monkeys with lesions of perirhinal cortex (PR group) and monkeys with lesions of inferotemporal cortical area TE (TE group) were tested on a modified version of the delayed nonmatching to sample (DNMS) task that included very short delay intervals (0.5 sec) as well as longer delay intervals (1 min and 10 min). Lesions of the perirhinal cortex and lesions of area TE produced different patterns of impairment. The PR group learned the DNMS task as quickly as normal monkeys (N) when the delay between sample and choice was very short (0.5 sec). However, performance of the PR group, unlike that of the N group, fell to chance levels when the delay between sample and choice was lengthened to 10 min. In contrast to the PR group, the TE group was markedly impaired on the DNMS task even at the 0.5-sec delay, and three of four monkeys with TE lesions failed to acquire the task. The results provide support for the idea that perirhinal cortex is important not for perceptual processing, but for the formation and maintenance of long-term memory. Area TE is important for the perceptual processing of visual stimuli.

Primary ovarian dysgerminoma in a patient with a germline BRCA1 mutation.

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene are associated with increased risk for the development of ovarian cancer. All such cancers thus far reported have been of the epithelial histologic type. We identified an ovarian dysgerminoma in a 16-year-old woman (proband) with a family history of ovarian cancer during a review of histopathologic characteristics of ovarian cancers from women enrolled in the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry. Mutation analysis of DNA from this patient's peripheral blood leukocytes revealed a germline BRCA1 mutation (3312insG). The mutation was also present in the mother with breast cancer, a maternal aunt and a distant cousin with ovarian cancer, and a maternal grandfather and an uncle with skin cancer. The development of the proband's dysgerminoma may be unrelated to her germline BRCA1 mutation. Alternatively, such dysgerminomas may be caused by BRCA1 mutations, but occur so infrequently compared with epithelial cancers that they are seldom identified. Analysis of a larger series of ovarian germ cell tumors may resolve this question.

Histopathology of familial ovarian tumors in women from families with and without germline BRCA1 mutations.

Breast cancers from patients with germline BRCA1 mutations show characteristic histopathologic features. However, similar studies of BRCA1-associated ovarian cancers have reported inconsistent findings. Interobserver differences in histopathologic classification are a significant source of variation, and most studies have obtained histopathologic information from pathology reports rather than from review of histopathology slides. We therefore reviewed the histopathology slides and pathology reports to determine histologic type, grade, and stage for cancers of the ovary or peritoneum in 217 women from 126 families enrolled in the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry. Peripheral blood DNA from at least 1 affected member of each family was analyzed for BRCA1 mutations, and tumors from BRCA1 mutation-positive families were compared with those from BRCA1-negative families. Of 66 patients from 36 BRCA1-positive families, 64 had ovarian carcinoma, 1 had an ovarian carcinoma in situ, and 1 had a dysgerminoma. Of 151 patients from 90 BRCA1-negative families, 135 had ovarian carcinoma, 10 had ovarian borderline tumors, 3 had ovarian sex cord/stromal tumors, and 3 had primary peritoneal carcinoma. There were fewer grade 1 (P <.001) and stage I (P =.10) cancers in patients from BRCA1-positive families than in patients from BRCA1-negative families. Neither mucinous nor borderline tumors were found in the BRCA1-positive families. Ovarian cancers arising in women from BRCA1-positive families are more likely to be high grade and nonmucinous than cancers arising in women from BRCA1-negative families. The absence of borderline tumors in patients from BRCA1-positive families adds to accumulating evidence that BRCA1 mutations do not play a role in the development of these tumors. HUM PATHOL 31:1420-1424.

Neural correlates of olfactory recognition memory in the rat orbitofrontal cortex.

The orbitofrontal cortex (OF) is strongly and reciprocally connected with the perirhinal (PR) and entorhinal areas of the medial temporal lobe and plays an important role in odor recognition memory. This study characterized firing patterns of single neurons in the OF of rats performing a continuous odor-guided delayed nonmatch to sample (DNMS) task. Most OF neurons fired in association with one or more task events, including the initiation of trials, the sampling of odor stimuli, and the consumption of rewards. OF neurons also exhibited sustained odor-selective activity during the memory delay, and a large proportion of OF cells had odor-specific enhanced or suppressed responses on stimulus repetition. Most OF neurons were activated during several task events, or associated with complex behavioral states. The incidence of cells that fired in association with the critical match/non-match judgement was increased as the DNMS rule was learned, and was higher in OF than in perirhinal and entorhinal cortex. Furthermore, the classification of match and nonmatch trials was correlated with accuracy in performance of that judgement. These findings are consistent with the view that OF is a high order association cortex that plays a role both in the memory representations for specific stimuli and in the acquisition and application of task rules.

Frequent loss of BRCA1 mRNA and protein expression in sporadic ovarian cancers.

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 gene cause inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers. However, somatic mutations of BRCA1 are rare in sporadic breast and ovarian tumours. To establish whether BRCA1 is altered during the development of sporadic ovarian cancer by mechanisms other than somatic mutation, we have analysed 57 sporadic epithelial ovarian tumours for BRCA1 protein and RNA expression. Reduced or absent protein expression was observed in 90% of tumours. Decreased protein expression was significantly associated with a reduction in the levels of RNA expression. Somatic mutations of BRCA1 and LOH at the BRCA1 locus were detected in 3.5% and 44% of informative tumours, respectively; there was no significant correlation between the levels of protein and RNA expression and the DNA mutation and/or LOH status. Together, these data suggest that expression of BRCA1 is down-regulated at the level of transcription during the development of sporadic ovarian cancers.

Ovarian carcinoma in situ with germline BRCA1 mutation and loss of heterozygosity at BRCA1 and TP53.

BACKGROUND: The two-hit hypothesis for the genesis of cancer predicts that cancer can develop when the wild-type allele of a tumor suppressor gene is lost in an individual with a germline mutation in that gene. Neither loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for BRCA1 nor mutations of the TP53 (also known as p53) gene have been documented prior to invasion in ovarian cancers arising in women with germline BRCA1 mutations. Such documentation is difficult because lesions are rarely identified in ovarian epithelium. We, therefore, looked for LOH at microsatellite polymorphisms linked to the BRCA1 and TP53 tumor suppressor loci in an incidental carcinoma in situ of the ovary removed prophylactically from a woman with a germline BRCA1 mutation. METHODS: By use of laser-capture microdissection, we obtained pure populations of atypical ovarian epithelial cells and normal stromal cells. DNA was extracted, amplified with primers flanking polymorphic microsatellites linked to BRCA1 (D17S855 and D17S579) and TP53 (TP53 and D17S786), and analyzed for LOH at these microsatellites. We also tested for p53 expression in the abnormal epithelium by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Both of the markers linked to TP53 showed LOH, as did an intragenic BRCA1-linked marker (D17S855). The other microsatellite marker for BRCA1 was uninformative. Immunohistochemical staining with an antibody to p53 showed strong immunoreactivity confined to the atypical epithelium. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1, as well as TP53, can undergo LOH prior to stromal invasion in BRCA1-associated ovarian cancer. Strong immunoreactivity for p53 suggests the presence of mutated p53 in these cells as well. These findings suggest that loss of function of these two tumor suppressor genes occurs early in ovarian carcinogenesis in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Increased frequency of TP53 mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 ovarian tumours.

We screened 81 ovarian tumours (30 BRCA1 associated, 18 BRCA2 associated, and 33 sporadic) for somatic TP53 mutations using both DNA analysis and immunostaining. TP53 mutations were significantly more frequent in tumours with mutations in BRCA1 (70% by immunostaining and 60% by DNA analysis) and BRCA2 (67% and 50%) compared to sporadic controls (39% and 30%) (P = 0.009). A higher proportion of tumours with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were poorly differentiated, and TP53 mutant tumours in all categories were also more likely to be poorly differentiated. The poor differentiation of tumours with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations may be directly related to the role of these genes in DNA repair, and the need to overcome cell cycle checkpoints, often through loss of TP53. These results are consistent with the model of BRCA-induced tumorigenesis in which loss of checkpoint control is necessary for tumour development.

Genotype and intellectual phenotype in untreated phenylketonuria patients.

Previous studies have shown that genotype correlates with biochemical phenotype in treated phenylketonuria. If there is a strong correlation between genotype and intellectual phenotype of untreated patients, it would be possible to determine which individuals would have normal intelligence without treatment. In this study, 42 families with untreated phenylketonuria were analyzed to examine whether there was an association between genotype and untreated intellectual phenotype. Previously 12 of the 42 families were genotyped; now the genotyping of these patients is almost complete (40/42), a more thorough investigation was possible. Although the predicted phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) enzyme activity, based on genotype, showed an association with the patients' intellectual phenotype, the extensive overlap between the groups means the association is of little clinical value. Unrelated individuals with the same genotype and also siblings were found to have very different intellectual phenotypes. These phenotypic differences could not be explained by a difference in diet; therefore, we propose that another gene or genes may be modifying the intellectual phenotype of untreated patients. A preliminary search for possible modifying genes was performed. The possibility that a modifying gene was linked to the PAH gene on chromosome 12 was investigated using markers closely linked to the gene; however, no evidence for a modifying gene close to the PAH gene was found. Tyrosine hydroxylase was chosen as a candidate gene, because it can perform the same reaction as PAH. Using a common polymorphism within the gene, we found that this gene did not cause the discordant results and thus, did not modify the PAH phenotype.

Dissociation between the effects of damage to perirhinal cortex and area TE.

Perirhinal cortex and area TE are immediately adjacent to each other in the temporal lobe and reciprocally interconnected. These areas are thought to lie at the interface between visual perception and visual memory, but it has been unclear what their separate contributions might be. In three experiments, monkeys with bilateral lesions of the perirhinal cortex exhibited a different pattern of impairment than monkeys with bilateral lesions of area TE. In experiment 1, lesions of the perirhinal cortex produced a multimodal deficit in recognition memory (delayed nonmatching to sample), whereas lesions of area TE impaired performance only in the visual modality. In experiment 2, on a test of visual recognition memory (the visual paired comparison task) lesions of the perirhinal cortex impaired performance at long delays but spared performance at a very short delay. In contrast, lesions of area TE impaired performance even at the short delay. In experiment 3, lesions of the perirhinal cortex and lesions of area TE produced an opposite pattern of impairment on two visual discrimination tasks, simple object discrimination learning (impaired only by perirhinal lesions), and concurrent discrimination learning (impaired only by TE lesions). Taken together, the findings suggest that the perirhinal cortex, like other medial temporal lobe structures, is important for the formation of memory, whereas area TE is important for visual perceptual processing.