Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Open Heart ; 7(2)2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33004619

RESUMO

The use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in guiding revascularisation improves patient outcomes and has been well-established in clinical guidelines. Despite this, the uptake of FFR has been limited, likely attributable to the perceived increase in procedural time and use of hyperaemic agents that can cause patient discomfort. This has led to the development of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative non-hyperaemic pressure ratio (NHPR). Since its inception, the use of iFR has been supported by an increasing body of evidence and is now guideline recommended. More recently, other commercially available NHPRs including diastolic hyperaemia-free ratio and resting full-cycle ratio have emerged. Studies have demonstrated that these indices, in addition to mean distal coronary artery pressure to mean aortic pressure ratio, are mathematically analogous (with specific nuances) to iFR. Additionally, there is increasing data demonstrating the equivalent diagnostic performance of alternative NHPRs in comparison with iFR and FFR. These NHPRs are now integral within most current pressure wire systems and are commonly available in the catheter laboratory. It is therefore key to understand the fundamental differences and evidence for NHPRs to guide appropriate clinical decision-making.


Assuntos
Pressão Arterial , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Circulação Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Cateteres Cardíacos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Transdutores de Pressão , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 46(4): 149-53, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20105252

RESUMO

AIM: To objectively measure levels of physical activity in children, following treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). METHODS: Nineteen children who had completed treatment for ALL 6 months-5 years prior to study enrollment wore an accelerometer for 2 weekdays and 2 weekend days. RESULTS: The children spent an average of 141 +/- 74 min/day engaged in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), an amount similar to that previously documented in healthy children. Only three of the 19 subjects averaged less MVPA than the recommended amount (at least 60 min/day). MVPA levels were significantly higher on weekdays than weekend days (P= 0.006). Overall, boys engaged in significantly more MVPA than girls (P= 0.029). MVPA time was negatively correlated with age (r =-0.80) and age at diagnosis (r =-0.87). No trend between MVPA and time off treatment or body mass index was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of childhood ALL appear to be engaging in similar amounts of MVPA as those of the healthy children and are meeting recommended levels of physical activity.


Assuntos
Atividade Motora , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Sobreviventes , Adolescente , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Monitorização Fisiológica/instrumentação , Obesidade/etiologia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Vitória
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...