Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 32(7): 938-940, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35795949

RESUMO

Ectopic pelvic kidney is a known congenital anomaly; however, the presence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in an ectopic kidney is rare with the evidence available in the form of a few case reports only. In this case report, we present a case of metastatic RCC in the pelvic kidney which became a diagnostic challenge because of atypical contrast-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) characteristics and unusual pattern of lymph node involvement including cervical lymph node in the absence of visceral metastasis. Because of its unusual location and uncertain vascular anatomy, ectopic kidney poses a surgical challenge. Owing to the rarity of this condition, optimal surgical approach, metastatic potential, routes of metastasis, and effectiveness of systemic agents in pelvic RCC compared to RCC in a normally located kidney, are largely unknown. Key Words: Renal cell carcinoma, Pelvic kidney, Lymph node metastasis.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Metástase Linfática
2.
Urol Int ; 105(7-8): 605-610, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33508839

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To validate the in-house built Styrofoam box bench-top training model for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed in the setting of a half-day RIRS course. During the course, participants performed RIRS on a locally built bench-top model. We recruited 26 participants, comprising 20 trainees and 6 experts. Trainees and experts were asked to fill a self-administered questionnaire assessing various components of RIRS to assess the face and content validity. For construct validity, experts using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) rated trainees and the mean OSATS score of junior versus senior residents was compared. RESULTS: As per trainees, the model was 86% (4.3/5) realistic, which was backed by experts who found this model to be 87.6% (4.38/5) realistic. The overall face validity of the model was 86.4% (4.32/5). The overall content validity of this model was 83.4% (4.17/5). Majority of the participants thought that this tool is useful for learning technique (4.38 ± 0.49) and safe-conduct (4.31 ± 0.73) of the procedure. The trainees concurred that the skills acquired are transferable to the operating room (4.23 ± 0.76). However, the construct validity by comparing mean OSATS score of junior versus senior residents was 19.5 ± 3.5 and 23 ± 4.5. A p value of 0.11 could not be established. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated the face, content, and construct validity of the bench-top training model for RIRS. Further evaluation is necessary to compare its effectiveness against other available models to demonstrate concurrent validity.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência/métodos , Rim/cirurgia , Modelos Anatômicos , Treinamento por Simulação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/educação , Urologia/educação , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA