A regional trauma system to optimize the pre-hospital triage of trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-hospital triage is a key element in a trauma system that aims to admit patients to the most suitable trauma center, and may decrease intra-hospital mortality. We evaluated the performance of a pre-hospital procedure in a regional trauma system through measurements of the quality of pre-hospital medical assessment and the efficacy of a triage protocol. METHODS: Our regional trauma system included 13 hospitals categorized as Level I, II or III trauma centers according to their technical facilities. Each patient was graded A, B or C by an emergency physician, according to the seriousness of their injuries at presentation on scene. The triage was performed according to this grading and the categorization of centers. This study is a registry analysis of a three-year period (2009 to 2011). RESULTS: Of the 3,428 studied patients, 2,572 were graded using the pre-hospital grading system (Graded group). The pre-hospital gradation was closely related with injury severity score (ISS) and intra-hospital mortality rate. The triage protocol had a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90% to 93%) and a specificity of 41% (95% CI 39% to 44%) to predict adequate admission of patients with ISS more than 15. A total of 856 patients were not graded at the scene (Non-graded group). Undertriage rate was significantly reduced in the Graded group compared with the Non-graded group, with a relative risk of 0.47 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.56) according to the definition of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (P <0.001). Where adjusted for trauma severity, the expected mortality rate at discharge from hospital was higher than observed mortality, with a difference of +2.0% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.6%; P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a regional trauma system with a pre-hospital triage procedure was effective in detecting severe trauma patients and in lowering the rate of pre-hospital undertriage. A beneficial effect on outcome of such an organization is suggested.

Mechanism, glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP): a new simple prehospital triage score to predict mortality in trauma patients.

OBJECTIVES: Prehospital triage of trauma patients is of paramount importance because adequate trauma center referral improves survival. We developed a simple score that is easy to calculate in the prehospital phase. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective observational study. SETTING: Prehospital physician-staffed emergency system in university and nonuniversity hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: We evaluated 1360 trauma patients receiving care from a prehospital mobile intensive care unit in 22 centers in France during 2002. The association of prehospital variables with in-hospital death was tested using logistic regression, and a simple score (the Mechanism, Glasgow coma scale, Age, and Arterial Pressure [MGAP] score) was created and compared with the triage Revised Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, and Trauma Related Injury Severity Score. The model was validated in 1003 patients from 2003 through 2005. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four independent variables were identified, and each was assigned a number of points proportional to its regression coefficient to provide the MGAP score: Glasgow Coma Scale (from 3-15 points), blunt trauma (4 points), systolic arterial blood pressure (>120 mm Hg: 5 points, 60 to 120 mm Hg: 3 points), and age <60 yrs (5 points). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of MGAP was not significantly different from that of the triage Revised Trauma Score or Revised Trauma Score, but when sensitivity was fixed >0.95 (undertriage of 0.05), the MGAP score was more specific and accurate than triage Revised Trauma Score and Revised Trauma Score, approaching those of Trauma Related Injury Severity Score. We defined three risk groups: low (23-29 points), intermediate (18-22 points), and high risk (<18 points). In the derivation cohort, the mortality was 2.8%, 15%, and 48%, respectively. Comparable characteristics of the MGAP score were observed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The MGAP score can accurately predict in-hospital death in trauma patients.

Comparison of respiratory rate and peripheral oxygen saturation to assess severity in trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: Physiological variables are important in the assessment of trauma patients. The role of respiratory rate (RR) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) remains a matter of debate. We therefore assessed the role of RR and SpO(2) in predicting death in trauma patients. DESIGN: Prospective analysis of a multicentric cohort of trauma patients in 2002. PATIENTS: A cohort of 1,481 trauma patients cared for by a prehospital mobile intensive care unit (mean age 38 +/- 17 years, 91% blunt and 9% penetrating trauma). INTERVENTION: None. RESULTS: Systolic arterial blood pressure, heart rate, Glasgow coma scale, RR and SpO(2) were recorded and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS) calculated. TRISSn was obtained by neutralizing RR. Systolic arterial blood pressure (99.9%), heart rate (99.9%), and Glasgow coma scale (99.3%) were recorded in most patients, but not RR (63%) and SpO(2) (67%). In patients with both RR and SpO(2) recording (n=675), the discrimination and calibration of TRISS was not significantly modified when RR was neutralized. Whatever the manner of expressing RR and SpO(2) (continuous, five classes, dichotomous), none was significant in predicting mortality with TRISSn. Initial SpO(2) was abnormal (< 90%) and recorded again at the hospital in 97 patients, and the proportion of patients with a non-measurable SpO(2) significantly decreased (8 vs. 42%, p < 0.001) and measurable SpO(2) markedly increased (median 99 vs. 85%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Respiratory rate and SpO(2) do not add significant value to other variables when predicting mortality in severe trauma patients.