Antibody response to SARS-CoV2 among COVID-19 confirmed cases, and correlates with neutralizing assay in a subgroup of patients in Delhi National Capital Region, India

BackgroundPlaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is the gold standard to detect neutralizing capacity of the serum antibodies. Neutralizing antibody confers protection against further infection. The present study was done with the objective to measure the antibody level against SARS-CoV2 among laboratory confirmed COVID-19 cases and to evaluate whether the presence of anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies indicate virus neutralizing capacity. MethodsOne hundred COVID-19 confirmed cases were recruited. Sociodemographic details and history of COVID-19 vaccination, contact with positive COVID-19 cases, and symptoms were ascertained using a self-developed semi-structured interview schedule. Serum samples of the participants were collected within three months from date of the positive report of COVID-19. The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgA, IgG and IgM antibodies), receptor binding domain antibodies (anti-RBD), and neutralizing antibodies were measured. FindingsAlmost all participants had Anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies (IgA, IgG and IgM) (99%) and Anti-RBD IgG antibodies (97%). However, only 69% had neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV2. Anti-RBD antibody levels were significantly higher among participants having neutralizing antibodies compared to those who didnt. InterpretationThe present study highlights that presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV2, or presence of anti-RBD antibody doesnt necessarily imply presence of neutralizing antibodies. FundingWorld Health Organisation

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Wave in India: Advent, Phylogeny and Evolution

SARS-CoV-2 evolution has continued to generate variants, responsible for new pandemic waves locally and globally. Varying disease presentation and severity has been ascribed to inherent variant characteristics and vaccine immunity. This study analyzed genomic data from 305 whole genome sequences from SARS-CoV-2 patients before and through the third wave in India. Delta variant was responsible for disease in patients without comorbidity(97%), while Omicron BA.2 caused disease primarily in those with comorbidity(77%). Tissue adaptation studies brought forth higher propensity of Omicron variants to bronchial tissue than lung, contrary to observation in Delta variants from Delhi. Study of codon usage pattern distinguished the prevalent variants, clustering them separately, Omicron BA.2 isolated in February grouped away from December strains, and all BA.2 after December acquired a new mutation S959P in ORF1b (44.3% of BA.2 in the study) indicating ongoing evolution. Loss of critical spike mutations in Omicron BA.2 and gain of immune evasion mutations including G142D, reported in Delta but absent in BA.1, and S371F instead of S371L in BA.1 could possibly be due to evolutionary trade-off and explain very brief period of BA.1 in December 2021, followed by complete replacement by BA.2.

Effectiveness of BBV152 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths among healthcare workers in the setting of high delta variant transmission in New Delhi, India

BackgroundDelta variant transmission resulted in surge of SARS CoV-2 cases in New Delhi, India during the early half of year 2021. Health Care Workers (HCWs) received vaccines on priority for prevention of infection. Real life effectiveness of BBV152 vaccine against severe disease including hospitalization and death was not known. ObjectiveTo estimate effectiveness of BBV152 vaccine among HCWs against SARS CoV-2 infection, hospitalization or death DesignObservational study Settinga multi -speciality tertiary care public funded hospital in New Delhi, India. Participants12,237 HCWs InterventionsBBV152 vaccine (Covaxin, Bharat Biotech limited, Hyderabad, India); whole virion inactivated vaccine; two doses four weeks apart Measurementsvaccine effectiveness after receipt of two doses of BBV152 protecting against any SARS CoV-2 infection, symptomatic infections or hospitalizations or deaths, and hospitalizations or deaths. ResultsThe mean age of HCWs was 36({+/-}11) years, 66% were men and 16% had comorbidity. After adjusting for potential covariates viz age, sex, health worker type category, body mass index, and comorbidity, the vaccine effectiveness (95% Confidence Interval) in fully vaccinated HCWs and [≥]14 days elapsed after the receipt of second dose was 44% (37 to 51, p<0.001) against symptomatic infection, hospitalization or death due to SARS CoV-2, and 61% (37 to 76, p<0.001) against hospitalization or death, respectively. ConclusionsBBV152 vaccine with complete two doses offer a modest response to SARS CoV-2 infection in real life situations against a backdrop of high delta variant community transmission. Efforts in maximizing receipt of full vaccines should be invested for HCWs, who are at higher occupational risk for infection.

Molecular signature of postmortem lung tissue from COVID-19 patients suggests distinct trajectories driving mortality

The precise molecular mechanisms behind life-threatening lung abnormalities during severe SARS-CoV-2 infections are still unclear. To address this challenge, we performed whole transcriptome sequencing of lung autopsies from 31 patients suffering from severe COVID-19 related complications and 10 uninfected controls. Using a metatranscriptome analysis of lung tissue samples we identified the existence of two distinct molecular signatures of lethal COVID-19. The dominant "classical" signature (n=23) showed upregulation of unfolded protein response, steroid biosynthesis and complement activation supported by massive metabolic reprogramming leading to characteristic lung damage. The rarer signature (n=8) potentially representing "Cytokine Release Syndrome" (CRS) showed upregulation of cytokines such IL1 and CCL19 but absence of complement activation and muted inflammation. Further, dissecting expression of individual genes within enriched pathways for patient signature suggests heterogeneity in host response to the primary infection. We found that the majority of patients cleared the SARS-CoV-2 infection, but all suffered from acute dysbiosis with characteristic enrichment of opportunistic pathogens such as Staphylococcus cohnii in "classical" patients and Pasteurella multocida in CRS patients. Our results suggest two distinct models of lung pathology in severe COVID-19 patients that can be identified through the status of the complement activation, presence of specific cytokines and characteristic microbiome. This information can be used to design personalized therapy to treat COVID-19 related complications corresponding to patient signature such as using the identified drug molecules or mitigating specific secondary infections.

The effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in preventing severe illness and death- real-world data from a cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

BackgroundDue to the unprecedented speed of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development, their efficacy trials and issuance of emergency use approvals and marketing authorizations, additional scientific questions remain that need to be answered regarding vaccine effectiveness, vaccination regimens and the need for booster doses. While long-term studies on the correlates of protection, vaccine effectiveness, and enhanced surveillance are awaited, studies on breakthrough infections help us understand the nature and course of this illness among vaccinated individuals and guide in public health preparedness. MethodsThis observational cohort study aimed at comparing the differences in clinical, biochemical parameters and the hospitalization outcomes of 53 fully vaccinated individuals with those of unvaccinated (1,464) and partially vaccinated (231) individuals, among a cohort of 2,080 individuals hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. ResultsCompleting the course of vaccination protected individuals from developing severe COVID-19 as evidence by lower proportions of those with hypoxia, abnormal levels of inflammatory markers, requiring ventilatory support and death compared to unvaccinated and partially vaccinated individuals. There were no differences in these outcomes among patients who received either vaccine type approved in India. ConclusionWith a current rate of only 9.5% of the Indian population being fully vaccinated, efforts should be made to improve the vaccination rates as a timely measure to prepare for the upcoming waves of this highly transmissible pandemic. Vaccination rates of the communities may also guide in the planning of the health needs and appropriate use of medical resources. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSThe Government of India started vaccinating its citizens from the 16th of January 2021, after emergency use authorization had been received for the use of two vaccines, BBV152, a COVID-19 vaccine based on the whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine strain NIV-2020-770, (Covaxin) and the recombinant replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the spike protein ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Corona Virus Vaccine (Covishield). These have been approved by the Indian regulatory authority based on randomized controlled studies. In these studies, was found that the vaccines led to more than 90% reduction in symptomatic COVID-19 disease. However, there is scarce evidence of the efficacy of these vaccines in real-world scenarios. A few studies have looked at vaccinated cohorts such as health care workers in whom the vaccines had an efficacy similar to the RCTs. In a study of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, it was found that mortality in fully vaccinated patients was 12.5% as compared to 31.5% in the unvaccinated cohort. Added-value of this studyThis cohort of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection was studied during the peak of the second wave of COVID-19 in India during which the delta variant of concern was the predominant infecting strain and had 26% patients who were partially vaccinated and 71.4% who were unvaccinated. Only 3% of the patients were fully vaccinated and developed a breakthrough infection. At the time of presentation, 13% of the individuals with breakthrough infection and 48{middle dot}5% in the non-vaccinated group were hypoxic. Inflammatory markers were significantly lower in the completely vaccinated patients with breakthrough infection. The need for use of steroids and anti-viral agents such as remdesivir was also significantly low in the breakthrough infection group. A significantly less proportion of the individuals with breakthrough infection required oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support. Very few deteriorated or progressed to critical illness during their hospital stay. Only 3 individuals (5.7%) out of the 53 who developed breakthrough infection succumbed to illness while case fatality rates were significantly higher in the unvaccinated (22.8%) and partially vaccinated (19.5%) groups. Propensity score weighted multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed lower odds of developing hypoxia, critical illness or death in those who were completely vaccinated. Implications of all the available evidenceThe real-world effectiveness of the vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 seems to be similar to the randomized controlled trials. The vaccines are very effective in reducing the incidence of severe COVID-19, hypoxia, critical illness and death. The reduced need for oxygen supplementation, mechanical ventilation and the requirement of corticosteroids or other expensive medications such as anti-viral drugs could go a long way in redistributing scarce health care resources. All nations must move forward and vaccinate the citizens, as the current evidence suggests that prevention is better than cure.

Silent Hypoxia in Coronavirus disease-2019: Is it more dangerous?-A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundHypoxia in patients with COVID-19 is one of the strongest predictors of mortality. Silent hypoxia is characterized by the presence of hypoxia without dyspnea.. Silent hypoxia has been shown to affect the outcomes in previous studies. Research QuestionAre the outcomes in patients presenting with silent hypoxia different from those presenting with dyspneic hypoxia? Study design and MethodsThis was a retrospective study of a cohort of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were hypoxic at presentation. Clinical, laboratory, and treatment parameters in patients with silent hypoxia and dyspneic hypoxia were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to identify the factors predicting mortality. ResultsAmong 2080 patients with COVID-19 admitted to our hospital, 811 patients were hypoxic with SpO2<94% at the time of presentation. 174 (21.45%) did not have dyspnea since the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. 5.2% of patients were completely asymptomatic for COVID-19 and were found to be hypoxic only on pulse oximetry. The case fatality rate in patients with silent hypoxia was 45.4% as compared to 40.03% in dyspneic hypoxic patients (P=0.202). The odds ratio of death was 1.1 (95% CI 0.41-2.97) in the patients with silent hypoxia after adjusting for baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, treatment, and in-hospital complications, which did not reach statistical significance (P=0.851). InterpretationSilent hypoxia may be the only presenting feature of COVID-19. Since the case fatality rate is comparable between silent and dyspneic hypoxia, it should be recognized early and treated as aggressively. Since home isolation is recommended in patients with COVID-19, it is essential to use pulse oximetry at the home setting to identify these patients.

Clinical features, demography and predictors of outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a tertiary care hospital in India-A cohort study

BackgroundThe second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic hit India from early April 2021 to June 2021 and more than 400,000 cases per day were reported in the country. We describe the clinical features, demography, treatment trends, baseline laboratory parameters of a cohort of patients admitted at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi with SARS-CoV-2 infection and their association with the outcome. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study describing the clinical, laboratory and treatment patterns of consecutive patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to identify the clinical and biochemical predictors of developing hypoxia, deterioration during the hospital stay and death. FindingsA total of 2080 patients were included in the study. The case fatality rate was 19.5%. Amongst the survivors, the median duration of hospital stay was 8 (5-11) days. Out of 853 (42.3%%) of patients who had COVID-19 Acute respiratory distress syndrome at presentation, 340 (39.9%) died. Patients aged 45-60 years [OR (95% CI): 1.8 (1.2-2.6)p =0.003] and those aged >60 years [OR (95%CI): 3.4 (2.3-5.2), p<0.001] had a higher odds of death as compared to the 18-44 age group. Vaccination reduced the odds of death by 30% [OR (95% CI): 0.7 (0.5-0.9), p=0.036]. Patients with hyper inflammation at baseline as suggested by leucocytosis [OR (95% CI): 2.1 (1.4-3.10), p <0.001], raised d-dimer >500 mg/dL [OR (95% CI): 3.2 (2.2-4.6), p <0.001] and raised C-reactive peptide >0.5 mg/L [OR (95% CI): 3.8 (1.1-13), p=0.037] had higher odds of death. Patients who were admitted in the second week had lower odds of death and those admitted in the third week had higher odds of death. InterpretationThis is the largest cohort of patients admitted with COVID-19 from India reported to date and has shown that vaccination status and early admission during the inflammatory phase can change the course of illness of these patients. Strategies should be made to improve vaccination rates and early admission of patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 to improve outcomes. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSThe COVID-19 pandemic has been ravaging the world since December 2019 and the cases in various regions are being reported in waves. We found that the case fatality rates ranging from 1.4% to 28.3% have been reported in the first wave in India. Older age and the presence of comorbidities are known predictors of mortality. There are no reports regarding the effectiveness of vaccination, correlation of mortality with the timing of admission to the health care facility and inflammatory markers in the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India. Added-value of this studyThis study reports the real-world situation where patients get admitted at varying time points of their illness due to the mismatch between the availability of hospital beds and the rising number of COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. It reports the odds of developing severe hypoxia necessitating oxygen therapy and death thus helping identify priority groups for admission. Implications of all the available evidenceThis study found increased odds of requiring oxygen support or death in patients older than 45 years of age, with comorbidities, and those who had hyper-inflammation with raised C-reactive peptide, d-dimer or leukocytosis. Patients who were admitted in the second week of illness had lower odds of death as compared to those admitted in the third week implying that treatment with corticosteroids in the second week of the illness during the inflammatory phase could lead to reduced mortality. These findings would help triage patients and provide guidance for developing admission policy during times where hospital beds are scarce. Vaccination was found to reduce the odds of deterioration or death and should be fast-tracked to prevent further waves of the pandemic.

Safety and immunogenicity trial of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-BBV152: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised control trial

BackgroundBBV152 is a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine formulated with a TLR 7/8 agonist molecule adsorbed to alum (Algel-IMDG). MethodsWe conducted a double-blind randomized controlled phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of BBV152. A total of 375 participants were randomized equally to receive three vaccine formulations (n=100 each) prepared with 3 g with Algel-IMDG, 6 g with Algel-IMDG, and 6 g with Algel, and an Algel only control arm (n=75). Vaccines were administered on a two-dose intramuscular accelerated schedule on day 0 (baseline) and day 14. The primary outcomes were reactogenicity and safety. The secondary outcomes were immunogenicity based on the anti-IgG S1 response (detected with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and wild-type virus neutralization [microneutralization and plaque reduction neutralization assays]). Cell-mediated responses were also evaluated. ResultsReactogenicity was absent in the majority of participants, with mild events. The majority of adverse events were mild and were resolved. One serious adverse event was reported, which was found to be unrelated to vaccination. All three vaccine formulations resulted in robust immune responses comparable to a panel of convalescent serum. No significant differences were observed between the 3-g and 6-g Algel-IMDG groups. Neutralizing responses to homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV-2 strains were detected in all vaccinated individuals. Cell-mediated responses were biased to a Th-1 phenotype. ConclusionsBBV152 induced binding and neutralising antibody responses and with the inclusion of the Algel-IMDG adjuvant, this is the first inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine that has been reported to induce a Th1-biased response. Vaccine induced neutralizing antibody titers were reported with two divergent SARS-CoV-2 strains. BBV152 is stored between 2{degrees}C and 8{degrees}C, which is compatible with all national immunization program cold chain requirements. Both Algel-IMDG formulations were selected for the phase 2 immunogenicity trials. Further efficacy trials are underway. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04471519

A two-arm, randomized, controlled, multi-centric, open-label Phase-2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Itolizumab in moderate to severe ARDS patients due to COVID-19

An uncontrolled increase in cytokine production may lead to systemic hyperinflammation, vascular hypo-responsiveness, increased endothelial permeability, hypercoagulation, multi-organ dysfunction and eventually death in moderate to severely ill COVID-19 patients. Targeting T-cells, an important driver of the hyperinflammatory response, in the treatment of COVID-19, could potentially reduce mortality and improve survival rates. Itolizumab is an anti-CD6 humanized monoclonal antibody with an immunomodulating action on Teffector cells that downregulates T-cell activation, proliferation and subsequent production of various chemokines and cytokines. The efficacy and safety of Itolizumab for the treatment of cytokine release syndrome in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 was evaluated in a multi-centric, open-label, two-arm, controlled, randomized, phase 2 study. Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to arm A (best supportive care + Itolizumab) and arm B (best supportive care). The primary outcome of interest was reduction in all-cause mortality 30 days after enrolment. Thirty-six patients were screened, 5 were treated as first dose sentinels and the rest were randomized, whilst 4 patients were considered screen failures. Two patients in the Itolizumab treatment arm discontinued prior to receiving the first dose and were replaced. At the end of 1 month, there were 3 deaths in arm B, and none in arm A (p= 0.0296). At the end of the follow-up period, more patients in Arm A had improved SpO2 without increasing FiO2 (p=0.0296), improved PaO2 (p=0.0296), and reduction in IL-6 (43 pg/ml vs 212 pg/ml; p=0.0296) and tumor necrotic factor- (9 pg/ml vs 39 pg/ml; p=0.0253) levels. Itolizumab was generally safe and well tolerated, and transient lymphopenia (11 patients in Arm A) and infusion reactions (7 patients) were the commonly reported treatment related safety events. These encouraging results indicate that larger clinical trials are warranted to establish the role of Itolizumab in controlling immune hyperactivation in COVID-19.

Low Dose Radiation Therapy for COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Pilot Study

BackgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) has declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as pandemic in March 2020. Currently there is no vaccine or specific effective treatment for COVID-19. The major cause of death in COVID-19 is severe pneumonia leading to respiratory failure. Radiation in low doses (<100 cGy) has been known for its anti-inflammatory effect and therefore, low dose radiation therapy (LDRT) to lungs can potentially mitigate the severity of pneumonia and reduce mortality. We conducted a pilot trial to study the feasibility and clinical efficacy of LDRT to lungs in the management of patients with COVID-19. MethodsFrom June to Aug 2020, we enrolled 10 patients with COVID-19 having moderate to severe risk disease [National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of [≥]5]. Patients were treated as per the standard COVID-19 management guidelines along with LDRT to both lungs with a dose of 70cGy in single fraction. Response assessment was done based on the clinical parameters using the NEWS. ResultsAll patients completed the prescribed treatment. Nine patients had complete clinical recovery mostly within a period ranging from 3-7 days. One patient, who was a known hypertensive, showed clinical deterioration and died 24 days after LDRT. No patients showed the signs of acute radiation toxicity. ConclusionResults of our study (90% response rate) suggest the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of LDRT in COVID-19 patients having moderate to severe risk disease. This mandates a randomized controlled trial to establish the clinical efficacy of LDRT in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Clinico-pathological features in fatal Covid-19 Infection: A Preliminary Experience of a Tertiary Care Centre in North India using Post-Mortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Biopsies

BackgroundThe Covid-19 pandemic began in China in December 2019. India is the second most affected country, as of November 2020 with more than 8.5million cases. Covid-19 infection primarily involves the lung with severity of illness varying from influenza-like illness to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Other organs have also found to be variably affected. Studies evaluating the histopathological changes of Covid-19 are critical in providing a better understanding of the disease pathophysiology and guiding treatment. Minimally invasive biopsy techniques (MITS/B) provide an easy and suitable alternative to complete autopsies. In this prospective single center study we present the histopathological examination of 37 patients who died with complications of Covid-19. MethodsThis was an observational study conducted in the Intensive Care Unit of JPN Trauma Centre AIIMS. A total of 37 patients who died of Covid-19 were enrolled in the study. Post-mortem percutaneous biopsies were taken by the help of surface landmarking/ultrasonography guidance from lung, heart, liver, and kidneys; after obtaining ethical consent. The biopsy samples were then stained with haematoxylin and eosin stain. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using CD61 and CD163 in all lung cores. SARS-CoV-2 virus was detected using IHC with primary antibodies in selected samples. Details regarding demographics, clinical parameters, hospital course, treatment details, and laboratory investigations were also collected for clinical correlation. ResultsA total of 37 patients underwent post-mortem minimally invasive tissue sampling. Mean age of the patients was 48.7years and 59.5% of them were males. Respiratory failure was the most common complication seen in 97.3%. Lung histopathology showed acute lung injury and diffuse alveolar damage in 78% patients. Associated bronchopneumonia was seen in 37.5% patients and scattered microthrombi were visualised in 21% patients. Immunostaining with CD61 and CD163 highlighted megakaryocytes, and increased macrophages in all samples. Immunopositivity for SARS-CoV-2 was observed in Type II pneumocytes. Acute tubular injury with epithelial vacuolization was seen in 46% of the renal biopsies but none of them showed evidence of microvascular thrombosis. 71% of the liver tissue cores showed evidence of Kupfer cell hyperplasia. 27.5% had evidence of submassive hepatic necrosis and 14% had features of acute on chronic liver failure. All the heart biopsies showed non-specific features such as hypertrophy with nucleomegaly with no evidence of myocardial necrosis in any of the samples. ConclusionsThe most common finding in this cohort is the diffuse alveolar damage with demonstration of SARS-CoV-2 protein in the acute phase of DAD. Microvascular thrombi were rarely identified in the lung, liver and kidney. Substantial hepatocyte necrosis, hepatocyte degeneration, Kupffer cell hypertrophy, micro, and macrovesicular steatosis unrelated to microvascular thrombi suggests that liver might be a primary target of Covid-19. This study highlights the importance of MITS/B in better understanding the pathological changes associated with Covid-19.

Management of mild COVID-19: Policy implications of initial experience in India

ObjectivesOngoing pandemic due to COVID-19 has spread across countries, surprisingly with variable clinical characteristics and outcomes. This study was aimed at describing clinical characteristics and outcomes of admitted patients with mild COVID-19 illness in the initial phase of pandemic in India. DesignRetrospective (observational) study. SettingCOVID facilities under AIIMS, New Delhi, where, isolation facilities were designed to manage patients with mild illness and dedicated COVID ICUs was created to cater patients with moderate to severe illness. ParticipantsPatients aged 18 years or more, with confirmed illness were eligible for enrolment. Patients who were either asymptomatic or mildly ill at presentation were included. Patients with moderate to severe illness at admission, or incomplete clinical symptomatology records were excluded. MethodsData regarding demographic profile, comorbidities, clinical features, hospital course, treatment, details of results of RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 done at baseline and at day 14, chest radiographs (wherever available) as well as laboratory parameters was obtained retrospectively from the hospital records. Main outcome measuresFinal outcome was noted in terms of course of the disease, patients discharged, still admitted (at time of conclusion of study) or death. ResultsOut of 231 cases included, majority were males(78{middle dot}3%) with a mean age of 39{middle dot}8 years. Comorbidities were present in 21{middle dot}2% of patients, diabetes mellitus and hypertension being most common. The most common symptoms were dry cough(81, 35%), fever(64, 27{middle dot}7%), sore throat(36, 15{middle dot}6%), and dyspnoea(24, 10{middle dot}4%); asymptomatic infection was noted in 108(46.8%) patients. Presence of comorbidities was an independent predictor of symptomatic disease (OR- 2{middle dot}66; 95% CI 1{middle dot}08 to 6{middle dot}53, p= 0{middle dot}03). None of the patients progressed to moderate to severe COVID-19. There were no deaths in this cohort. ConclusionsPatients with mild disease at presentation had a stable disease course and therefore such cases can be managed outside hospital setting. A large proportion of patients remained asymptomatic throughout the course of infection and those with comorbidities are more likely to be symptomatic. Trial registrationNot applicable

Acute Phase Proteins as Predictors of Survival in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Requiring Mechanical Ventilation.

Few studies have tried to assess prognostic variables in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). We evaluated serum C reactive protein, (CRP) pre-albumin (PA) and transferrin (TR) levels in AE-COPD patients requiring MV as prognostic markers of in hospital mortality. 93 AE-COPD patients on MV were evaluated. Detailed clinical evaluation was done daily. Serum CRP & PA were measured on admission, 3rd, 8th and 16th day; TR was measured on admission, 8th and 16th day. Demographics, baseline parameters, CRP, PA and TR were correlated with mortality. Of 93 patients, 49 (52.69%) survived whereas 44 patients (47.31%) died. APACHE II, serum urea & albumin were similar in survivors & non-survivors. Baseline CRP (≥10.5 mg/dl) had sensitivity of 60.5%, specificity of 60.2%, with area under curve (AUC) of 0.62 as predictor of mortality. CRP (≥7 mg/dl) on day 3 had sensitivity (65.5%) and specificity (63.3%) with AUC 0.70 as predictor of mortality. Baseline serum prealbumin was 11.00 (0.09-29.26) mg/dl, and similar in survivors & non-survivors (p = 0.7). Prealbumin at day 8 (n = 50) < 13.5 mg/dl had sensitivity 54.6%, and specificity 51.4% with AUC 0.54 (95% CI 0.34-0.75) as predictor of mortality. Transferrin at day 8 (n = 50) of <148.9 had sensitivity 63.4% and specificity 61.4% with AUC 0.61 with respect to mortality. High CRP levels at baseline, persistently elevated CRP (on day 3) may predict mortality in AE-COPD patients requiring MV. Further studies are required to establish prognostic variables in this patient population.

Assessment of core capacities for antimicrobial stewardship practices in indian hospitals: Report from a multicentric initiative of global health security agenda.

Introduction: Antimicrobial-resistant HAI (Healthcare associated infection) are a global challenge due to their impact on patient outcome. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (AMSP) is needed at institutional and national levels. Assessment of core capacities for AMSP is an important starting point to initiate nationwide AMSP. We conducted an assessment of the core capacities for AMSP in a network of Indian hospitals, which are part of the Global Health Security Agenda-funded work on capacity building for AMR-HAIs. Subjects and Methods: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's core assessment checklist was modified as per inputs received from the Indian network. The assessment tool was filled by twenty hospitals as a self-administered questionnaire. The results were entered into a database. The cumulative score for each question was generated as average percentage. The scores generated by the database were then used for analysis. Results and Conclusion: The hospitals included a mix of public and private sector hospitals. The network average of positive responses for leadership support was 45%, for accountability; the score was 53% and for key support for AMSP, 58%. Policies to support optimal antibiotic use were present in 59% of respondents, policies for procurement were present in 79% and broad interventions to improve antibiotic use were scored as 33%. A score of 52% was generated for prescription-specific interventions to improve antibiotic use. Written policies for antibiotic use for hospitalised patients and outpatients were present on an average in 72% and 48% conditions, respectively. Presence of process measures and outcome measures was scored at 40% and 49%, respectively, and feedback and education got a score of 53% and 40%, respectively. Thus, Indian hospitals can start with low-hanging fruits such as developing prescription policies, restricting the usage of high antibiotics, enforcing education and ultimately providing the much-needed leadership support.