Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Engl J Med ; 385(11): 971-981, 2021 09 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34496173

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mobile stroke units (MSUs) are ambulances with staff and a computed tomographic scanner that may enable faster treatment with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) than standard management by emergency medical services (EMS). Whether and how much MSUs alter outcomes has not been extensively studied. METHODS: In an observational, prospective, multicenter, alternating-week trial, we assessed outcomes from MSU or EMS management within 4.5 hours after onset of acute stroke symptoms. The primary outcome was the score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better outcomes according to a patient value system, derived from scores on the modified Rankin scale of 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more disability). The main analysis involved dichotomized scores on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale (≥0.91 or <0.91, approximating scores on the modified Rankin scale of ≤1 or >1) at 90 days in patients eligible for t-PA. Analyses were also performed in all enrolled patients. RESULTS: We enrolled 1515 patients, of whom 1047 were eligible to receive t-PA; 617 received care by MSU and 430 by EMS. The median time from onset of stroke to administration of t-PA was 72 minutes in the MSU group and 108 minutes in the EMS group. Of patients eligible for t-PA, 97.1% in the MSU group received t-PA, as compared with 79.5% in the EMS group. The mean score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale at 90 days in patients eligible for t-PA was 0.72 in the MSU group and 0.66 in the EMS group (adjusted odds ratio for a score of ≥0.91, 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75 to 3.36; P<0.001). Among the patients eligible for t-PA, 55.0% in the MSU group and 44.4% in the EMS group had a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days. Among all enrolled patients, the mean score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale at discharge was 0.57 in the MSU group and 0.51 in the EMS group (adjusted odds ratio for a score of ≥0.91, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.37; P<0.001). Secondary clinical outcomes generally favored MSUs. Mortality at 90 days was 8.9% in the MSU group and 11.9% in the EMS group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute stroke who were eligible for t-PA, utility-weighted disability outcomes at 90 days were better with MSUs than with EMS. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; BEST-MSU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02190500.).


Assuntos
Ambulâncias , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , AVC Isquêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Unidades Móveis de Saúde , Tempo para o Tratamento , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tecidual/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , AVC Isquêmico/complicações , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Stroke ; 49(6): 1528-1530, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29720439

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mobile stroke units (MSUs) can speed treatment with intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator). We previously showed substantial agreement between a telemedicine-based vascular neurologist (TM-VN) and an onboard vascular neurologist (OB-VN) for the evaluation of patients with stroke for tPA eligibility on an MSU. However, the time efficiency of the telemedicine-based evaluation remained uncertain. In this study, we examined the speed of decision and treatment from MSU arrival for the TM-VN compared with an OB-VN. METHODS: In 50 consecutive situations, the TM-VN served as the primary decision maker. Times from MSU arrival to tPA decision and tPA bolus were compared with the same metrics for when the OB-VN served as the primary decision maker. RESULTS: Time to tPA decision for the TM-VN was 21 minutes (interquartile range, 16.25-26) versus 18 minutes (interquartile range, 14-22) for the OB-VN (P=0.01). Initiation of tPA bolus was 24 minutes (interquartile range, 19.75-30) for the TM-VN versus 24 minutes (interquartile range, 19-27.75) for the OB-VN (P=0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment by a TM-VN is comparable with an OB-VN in making decisions about tPA administration on an MSU and does not lead to treatment delays. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02190500.


Assuntos
Unidades Móveis de Saúde , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Telemedicina , Ativador de Plasminogênio Tecidual/uso terapêutico , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Telemedicina/métodos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...