Inadequate benzodiazepine dosing may result in progression to refractory and non-convulsive status epilepticus.

Status epilepticus (SE) is defined as ongoing seizures lasting longer than five minutes or multiple seizures without recovery. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are first-line agents for the management of SE. Our objective was to evaluate BZD dosing in SE patients and its effects on clinical/electrographic outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted from a prospective database of SE patients admitted to a university-based neurocritical care unit. The initial presentation and progression to refractory SE (RSE) and non-convulsive SE (NCSE) with coma was evaluated. Outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), rates of intubation, ventilator-dependent days, and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). The lorazepam equivalent (LE) dosage of BZDs administered was calculated and we analysed variations in progression if 4 mg or more of LE (adequate BZDs) was administered. Among 100 patients, the median dose of LE was 3 mg (IQR: 2-5 mg). Only 31% of patients received adequate BZDs. Only 18.9% of patients with NCSE without coma received adequate BZDs (p=0.04). Among patients progressing to RSE, 75.4% had not received adequate BZDs (p=0.04) and among patients developing NCSE with coma, 80.6% did not receive adequate BZDs (p=0.07). Escalating doses of BZDs were associated with a decrease in cumulative incidences of RSE (correlation coefficient r=-0.6; p=0.04) and NCSE with coma (correlation coefficient r=-0.7; p=0.003). Outcome measures were not influenced by BZD dosing. The majority of our patients were not adequately dosed with BZDs. Inadequate BZD dosing progressed to RSE and had a tendency to lead to NCSE with coma. Our study demonstrates the need to develop a hospital-wide protocol to guide first responders in the management of SE.

Apixaban for the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Venous thrombosis affecting cerebral veins and sinuses (CVT) is an uncommon neurological condition. Traditionally patients are treated with intravenous heparin followed by an oral vitamin K antagonist like warfarin. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may offer advantages over warfarin. There is evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of both dabigatran and rivaroxaban. No data, however, has been published describing the use of apixaban in patients with CVT. METHODS: Report of three cases of CVT and review literature on available treatment options; efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with systemic thrombosis. RESULTS: All patients presented with typical features of CVT. After confirming the diagnosis, they were acutely treated with heparin and later discharged on apixaban. During follow up visits, they tolerated apixaban well and did not have any bleeding complications. Follow up scans showed resolution of the thrombus and recanalization. CONCLUSION: CVT is an uncommon neurological condition and is often complicated by associated intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Although not recommended in current guidelines, apixaban may be a safe and effective option for the treatment of CVT.