Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes for Medial Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Medial epicondylitis (ME) is a pathological condition that arises in laborers and athletes secondary to repetitive wrist flexion and forearm pronation causing degeneration of the common flexor tendon. Although nonoperative management has demonstrated high rates of success, no standardized surgical technique has been established for situations when operative management is indicated. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the surgical treatment options for ME and evaluate the associated patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We hypothesized that surgical management of ME would vary across studies but no technique would prove to be superior. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Searches were conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane databases between 1980 and April 2020. All level 1 to 4 studies were identified that focused on surgical management and PROs in the setting of ME. Description of surgical technique and PROs were required for inclusion. Investigators independently dually abstracted and reviewed the studies for eligibility. Weighted means were calculated for demographic characteristics and available PROs. RESULTS: Overall, 851 studies were identified according to the search criteria. A total of 16 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and therefore were evaluated. Three surgical techniques were found: open (13 studies), arthroscopic (2 studies), and percutaneous (1 study). Descriptions of the open technique were subdivided into those with (7 studies) and without (6 studies) common flexor tendon repair. Analysis included 479 elbows; patients were primarily male (58.3%) with a weighted mean age of 47.2 years. Weighted mean follow-up was 4.6 years. Tennis and manual laborer were the most common sport and occupation, respectively. Surgical success ranged from 63% to 100%, with a low complication rate of 4.3%. Success rates for return to sports and work were 81%-100% and 66.7%-100%, respectively, and only 1 study reported a return to work rate <90%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates that surgical intervention for refractory ME often has a high success rate. Regardless of surgical technique performed, patients generally demonstrated an improvement in PROs, and an encouraging number returned to work with limited complications. Further investigation is necessary to determine superiority among open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous techniques.

Return to Sport Rates and Subjective Outcomes Are Similar After Open or Endoscopically Assisted Compartment Release for Chronic Lower-Extremity Exertional Compartment Syndrome.

Purpose: To retrospectively compare return to sport rates and subjective outcomes of patients who underwent open or endoscopic compartment release for the surgical management of chronic exertional compartment syndrome. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent lower-extremity fasciotomy for chronic exertional compartment syndrome from June 2012 to June 2020. Eligibility included patients 15 to 45 years of age who identified as an athlete and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Fasciotomies for trauma or infection were excluded. One surgeon exclusively performed each type of surgery. Postoperative outcome measures included the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, the Marx Activity Scale, and a return to play survey. Results: In total, 24 patients (13 endoscopically assisted fasciotomies, 11 open fasciotomies) had a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 2.1 years; 19 patients returned to their sporting activity. No significant difference existed between return to play rates (P = .630) or return to play times (P = .351). There were no significant differences between the groups in the Lower Extremity Functional Scale score, Marx Activity Scale score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, pain score at rest, and during sporting activity. Overall satisfaction rates were found to be significantly greater in the endoscopically assisted fasciotomy group (P = .041). Conclusions: In this small sample of heterogenous groups of patients, we found no significant differences in return to sport rates or subjective results after surgery. Patients experienced a high subjective recurrence rate. The endoscopically assisted fasciotomy group reported greater subjective patient satisfaction compared with the open fasciotomy group. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study, retrospective.

The Influence of Psychosocial Factors on Hip Surgical Disorders and Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the associations between mental health and preoperative or postoperative outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. METHODS: The literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE and PsychINFO databases following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. RESULTS: Nine studies were identified that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All studies assessing patient-reported outcomes found significantly lower patient-reported outcomes (modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific Subscale, and International Hip Outcome Tool scores) related to worse mental health functioning before surgery. Specifically, preoperative Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living and Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific Subscale were significantly greater in control patients than patients in the mental health group by 11.6 points (mean difference; 95% confidence interval 7.58-15.79, P < .001) and 10 points (95% confidence interval 5.14-14.87, P < .001), without significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 28.59, P = .25; I2 = 0, P = .93), respectively. Patients with lower mental health status also had lower rates of achieving a minimal clinically important difference in 5 studies included in this review. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review finds consistent evidence supporting the association between negative psychological function and worse preoperative and postoperative outcomes for patients with hip disorders. Understanding both the effect of mental health on surgical outcomes and the potential benefits of psychological intervention may represent an opportunity to improve patient outcomes following hip arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

Outcomes After Repair of Quadriceps Tendon Rupture in Patients Aged 40 Years and Younger.

Background: Injury to the quadriceps tendon is rare and most commonly occurs in middle-aged men. Few reports are available regarding outcomes after quadriceps tendon rupture in younger patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: To review the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent quadriceps tendon repair at age ≤40 years. We hypothesized that this cohort would experience better clinical outcomes in comparison to historical older controls. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Using an institutional database, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent quadriceps tendon repair between January 2009 and December 2017. Patients were included in the study if they were aged ≤40 years at the time of surgery and had sustained an isolated, complete tendon rupture. Patient and injury characteristics were recorded. Patients were contacted to complete a custom survey, the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the Lysholm scale, and the Tegner scale. Results: Included were 38 patients (86.8% male; mean age, 32.0 ± 6.9 years; age range, 15-40 years), with a mean follow-up of 5.9 ± 2.3 years (range, 2.4-11.3 years). At final follow-up, the mean IKDC score was 74.1 ± 22.6 (range, 26.4-100.0), and the mean Lysholm score was 85.4 ± 20.0 (range, 30-100), which were similar if not inferior to historical controls of patients >40 years. Only 16 patients (42.1%) had unchanged or higher Tegner scores after surgery, whereas 22 patients (57.9%) reported lower postoperative activity level. Overall, 91.2% (31/34) of workers returned at a mean 3.9 months after surgery, whereas 63% (12/19) of athletes were able to return to play at 8.8 months. At final follow-up, 12 patients (31.6%) reported persistent pain and stiffness in their knees. Additionally, 3 patients (7.9%) reported pain without stiffness, and 4 (10.5%) reported stiffness without pain. Patients reporting pain or stiffness had significantly lower IKDC scores, Lysholm scores, postoperative Tegner scores, and change in their Tegner score at final follow-up in comparison to those who did not report pain or stiffness. Conclusion: Although patients aged ≤40 years had satisfactory outcomes after quadriceps tendon repair, this injury resulted in significant long-term sequelae in a substantial percentage of patients, despite their youth. Further, this group did not have better outcomes compared with historical controls aged > 40 years.

Articular Cartilage Damage Worsens from First-time to Recurrent Patellar Dislocation-A Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Purpose: To compare the frequency and severity of articular cartilage injury on longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients after their initial dislocation and subsequent recurrent dislocations for those undergoing patellar stabilization surgery. Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2017, patients undergoing patellar stabilization surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with an MRI after both the initial dislocation and subsequent dislocation events were included. The MRI scans were blindly examined to assess the Outerbridge classification grade of articular cartilage injury following each dislocation. Comparison was performed of each MRI for grade of articular cartilage damage and location. Results: Thirty-five patients undergoing patellar stabilization surgery with recurrent instability were eligible. The incidence of articular cartilage injury following initial dislocation was 45.7%. Following a second dislocation, the incidence of articular cartilage injury increased to 62.9%, a statistically significant increase of 17.2% (P = .031). Furthermore, of the 16 patients with articular cartilage injury following their initial dislocation, 56.2% of patients (9) had an increase in grade of articular cartilage injury following the second dislocation, whereas 43.8% (7) of patients had no progression in their articular cartilage injury. Six (17.1%) patients had no articular cartilage injury following their initial dislocation but did have articular cartilage injury following their second dislocation. Conclusions: Articular cartilage injury following patellar dislocation is common, and delayed surgical treatment may lead to an increase in articular cartilage damage. The incidence of articular cartilage injury following recurrent patellar dislocation was high (62.9%), and the majority of patients experienced an increase in their articular cartilage injury grade between their initial and recurrent dislocation on MRI evaluation. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Safer Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of a Return-to-Play Checklist.

Background: Questions remain regarding the traditional protocols used in rehabilitation and clearance for return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose/Hypothesis: To investigate the impact on injury rates after return to sports by developing and validating a Safer Return to Play Following ACL Reconstruction Checklist consisting of subjective and objective functional tests that can be quickly and easily implemented into a sports medicine practice. It was hypothesized that patients who successfully passed the checklist before returning to sports would experience lower rates of ipsilateral and contralateral knee injuries at a 2-year follow-up as compared with patients who returned to play before completing the checklist. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: First, a systematic review was performed to generate a list of the most common outcome measures used to assess return to play after ACLR. To refine our checklist, we conducted a survey with an expert panel of 10 medical professionals utilizing the Delphi technique. After the creation of the checklist, validation was performed by prospectively evaluating patients who had undergone ACLR for injury of the ipsilateral or contralateral knee, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Results: After our systematic review of 60 studies, 7 criteria were included in the final checklist. During the period studied, October 2014 to December 2017, a total of 222 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. At a minimum 2 years of follow-up, there were 146 patients who successfully passed the checklist and 38 who did not. Overall, 24 (16.4%) patients who had passed the checklist sustained an injury to either knee, as compared with 10 (26.3%) from the group that did not pass the checklist (P = .162). Of the group that passed the checklist, 8 (5.5%) patients sustained an injury to the ipsilateral knee, as compared with 7 (18.4%) in the group that did not pass (P = .017). Conclusion: Prospective validation of our checklist demonstrated that patients who successfully passed the checklist before returning to play experienced a significantly lower incidence of ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury as compared with patients who did not pass the checklist.

Adolescent Quadriceps Tendon Rupture, an Early Complication After ACL Reconstruction: A Case Report.

CASE: A healthy adolescent male patient initially presented with complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after a plant-twist injury during a high school football game. Four weeks after ACL reconstruction with autograft bone-patella tendon-bone, the patient slipped and fell, sustaining hyperflexion of the knee, resulting in rupture of the ipsilateral quadriceps tendon. CONCLUSION: Although this rare complication has previously been reported in the adult population, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first known report of an adolescent patient sustaining a quadriceps tendon rupture after ACL reconstruction.

Criteria for return to play after operative management of acromioclavicular joint separation: a systematic review.

Background: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation is a common cause of shoulder injury among athletes. High-grade injuries may require operative fixation, and comprehensive return-to-play guidelines have not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to summarize criteria for return to play after operative management of AC joint separation. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed from January 1999 to April 2020 to evaluate clinical evidence regarding criteria for return to play after operative management of isolated AC joint separation. Results: Sixty-three studies with at least 1 explicitly stated return-to-play criterion were identified out of an initial database search of 1253 published articles. Eight separate categories of return-to-play criteria were identified, the most common of which was time from surgery (95.2%). Return-to-play timelines ranged from 2 to 12 months, the most common timeline being 6 months (37.8%). Only 4 (6.3%) studies used conditional criteria to guide return to play, which included range of motion, strength, clinical stability, radiographic stability, functional assessment, safety assessment, and hardware removal. Conclusion: Most published studies use only time-based criteria for return to play after surgery for AC joint separation, and only a small number of studies use additional subjective or objective criteria. While this systematic review helps provide a foundation for developing a comprehensive return-to-play checklist, further investigation is needed to establish safe and effective guidelines that will enable athletes to safely return to sport and minimize the recurrence of injury.

Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in javelin throwers: an analysis of return to play rates and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although results after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) in baseball players have been well documented, the literature is replete regarding the outcomes after UCLR in javelin throwers. PURPOSE: To report outcomes after UCLR in javelin throwers. HYPOTHESIS: UCLR in javelin throwers will result in a high rate of return to play similar to that of previously published studies from athletes of other sports. METHODS: All patients who were identified preoperatively as javelin throwers and underwent UCLR between 2011 and 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Patients were assessed with the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow score, Timmerman-Andrews Elbow score, Conway-Jobe score, patient satisfaction, return to sport rate questionnaire, and the occurrence of any postoperative complications. RESULTS: Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Complete follow-up was available in 16 (88.9%) patients. The average age at surgery was 21.2 ± 2.0 (range, 18.6-24.9) years. At the final follow-up, the average Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow score and Timmerman-Andrews Elbow score were 77.3 (range, 18.7-98.4) and 91.8 (range, 70.0-100.0), respectively. Outcomes on the Conway-Jobe scale were as follows: excellent (n = 6; 37.5%), good (n = 4; 25%), fair (n = 6; 37.5%). Ten (62.5%) patients returned to play at an average of 12.2 ± 3.6 (range, 6.0-18.0) months after surgery. Two (12.5%) patients sustained a shoulder injury postoperatively; however, neither required surgery. CONCLUSION: UCLR in javelin throwers results in good outcomes with a low rate of reinjury/reoperation. However, the return to play rate (62.5%) and good/excellent outcomes per the Conway-Jobe scale (68.8%) are lower than what has been previously reported in baseball players and javelin throwers. Further investigation regarding outcomes in javelin throwers after UCLR is warranted.

Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Criteria Following Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (UCLR) is a viable treatment option for patients with UCL insufficiency, especially in the overhead throwing athlete. Within the clinical literature, there is still no universally agreed upon optimal rehabilitation protocol and timing for return to sport (RTS) after UCLR. HYPOTHESIS: There will be significant heterogeneity with respect to RTS criteria after UCLR. Most surgeons will utilize time-based criteria rather than functional or performance-based criteria for RTS after UCLR. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: All level 1 to 4 studies that evaluated UCLR with a minimum 1-year follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Studies lacking explicit RTS criteria, studies that treated UCL injury nonoperatively or by UCL repair, or studies reporting revision UCLR were excluded. Each study was analyzed for methodologic quality, RTS, timeline of RTS, and RTS rate. RESULTS: Overall, 1346 studies were identified, 33 of which met the inclusion criteria. These included 3480 athletes across 21 different sports. All studies reported RTS rates either as overall rates or via the Conway-Jobe scale. Timelines for RTS ranged from 6.5 to 16 months. Early bracing with progressive range of motion (ROM) (93.9%), strengthening (84.8%), and participation in an interval throwing program (81.8%) were the most common parameters emphasized in these rehabilitation protocols. While all studies included at least 1 of 3 metrics for the RTS value assessment, most commonly postoperative rehabilitation (96.97%) and set timing after surgery (96.97%), no article completely defined RTS criteria after UCLR. CONCLUSION: Overall, 93.9% of studies report utilizing bracing with progressive ROM, 84.8% reported strengthening, and 81.8% reported participation in an interval throwing program as rehabilitation parameters after UCLR. In addition, 96.97% reported timing after surgery as a criterion for RTS; however, there is a wide variability within the literature on the recommended time from surgery to return to activity. Future research should focus on developing a comprehensive checklist of functional and performance-based criteria for safe RTS after UCLR.

Return-to-Play Rates and Clinical Outcomes of Baseball Players After Concomitant Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Selective Ulnar Nerve Transposition.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) leading to medial elbow instability and possible ulnar neuritis is common in overhead-throwing athletes. Treatment may require UCL reconstruction (UCLR) and concomitant ulnar nerve transposition (UNT) for those with preoperative ulnar neuritis. PURPOSE: To evaluate the return-to-play (RTP) rates, clinical outcomes, and rates of persistent ulnar neuritis after concomitant UCLR and UNT in a cohort of baseball players with confirmed preoperative ulnar neuritis. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Eligible patients were those who underwent concomitant UCLR and UNT at a single institution between January 2008 and June 2018 and who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Additional inclusion criteria were athletes who identified as baseball players and who had a confirmed history of ulnar neuritis. Patients were contacted at a minimum of 2 years from surgery and assessed with the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) Shoulder and Elbow Score, Andrew-Timmerman (A-T) Elbow Score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and a custom RTP questionnaire. RESULTS: Included were 22 male baseball players with a mean age of 18.9 ± 2.1 years (range, 16-25 years). The mean follow-up was 6.1 ± 2.4 years (range, 2.5-11.7 years). Preoperatively, all 22 patients reported ulnar nerve sensory symptoms, while 4 (18.2%) patients reported ulnar nerve motor symptoms. At the final follow-up, 7 (31.8%) patients reported persistent ulnar nerve sensory symptoms, while none of the patients reported persistent ulnar nerve motor symptoms. Overall, 16 (72.7%) players were able to return to competitive play at an average of 11.2 months. The mean postoperative patient-reported outcome scores for the KJOC Shoulder and Elbow Score, MEPS, A-T Elbow Score, and SANE score were 77.9 ± 20.9 (range, 14-100), 92.7 ± 12.7 (range, 45-100), 86.1 ± 17.1 (range, 30-100), and 85.5 ± 14.8 (range, 50-100), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that after concomitant UCLR and UNT for UCL insufficiency and associated ulnar neuritis, baseball players can expect reasonably high RTP rates and subjective outcomes; however, rates of persistent sensory ulnar neuritis can be as high as 30%.

Long-Term Sports Participation and Satisfaction After UCL Reconstruction in Amateur Baseball Players.

BACKGROUND: While the incidence of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) has increased across all levels of play, few studies have investigated the long-term outcomes in nonprofessional athletes. PURPOSE: To determine the rate of progression to higher levels of play, long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and long-term patient satisfaction in nonprofessional baseball players after UCLR. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We evaluated UCLR patients who were nonprofessional baseball athletes aged <25 years at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Patients were assessed with the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow Score (KJOC), the Timmerman-Andrews (T-A) Elbow score, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and a custom return-to-play questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 91 baseball players met the inclusion criteria, and 67 (74%) patients were available to complete the follow-up surveys at a mean follow-up of 8.9 years (range, 5.5-13.9 years). At the time of the surgery, the mean age was 18.9 ± 1.9 years (range, 15-24 years). Return to play at any level was achieved in 57 (85%) players at a mean time of 12.6 months. Twenty-two (32.8%) of the initial cohort returned to play at the professional level. Also, 43 (79.1%) patients who initially returned to play after surgery reported not playing baseball at the final follow-up; of those patients, 12 reported their elbow as the main reason for eventual retirement. The overall KJOC, MEPS, and T-A scores were 82.8 ± 18.5 (range, 36-100), 96.7 ± 6.7 (range, 75-100), and 91.9 ± 11.4 (range, 50-100), respectively . There was an overall satisfaction score of 90.6 ± 21.5 out of 100, and 64 (95.5%) patients reported that they would undergo UCLR again. CONCLUSION: In nonprofessional baseball players after UCLR, there was a high rate of progression to higher levels of play. Long-term PRO scores and patient satisfaction were high. The large majority of patients who underwent UCLR would undergo surgery again at long-term follow-up, regardless of career advancement.

Rehabilitation and Return-to-Play Criteria After Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) is a treatment option that allows for the transfer of size-matched allograft cartilage and subchondral bone into articular defects of the knee. Although long-term studies show good functional improvement with OCA, there continues to be wide variability and a lack of consensus in terms of postoperative rehabilitation protocols and return to sport. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature and evaluate the reported rehabilitation protocols after OCA of the knee, including weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) restrictions as well as return-to-play criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing Allied Health Literature, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane databases were searched according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for studies on knee OCA. Studies were included if they reported return-to-play data or postsurgical rehabilitation protocols. RESULTS: A total of 62 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 3451 knees in 3355 patients. Concomitant procedures were included in 30 of these studies (48.4%). The most commonly cited rehabilitation protocols included weightbearing restrictions and ROM guidelines in 100% and 90% of studies, respectively. ROM was most commonly initiated within the first postoperative week, with approximately half of studies utilizing continuous passive motion. Progression to weightbearing as tolerated was reported in 60 studies, most commonly at 6 weeks (range, immediately postoperatively to up to 1 year). Of the 62 studies, 37 (59.7%) included an expected timeline for either return to play or return to full activity, most commonly at 6 months (range, 4 months to 1 year). Overall, 13 studies (21.0%) included either objective or subjective criteria to determine return to activity within their rehabilitation protocol. CONCLUSION: There is significant heterogeneity for postoperative rehabilitation guidelines and the return-to-play protocol after OCA of the knee in the literature, as nearly half of the included studies reported use of concomitant procedures. However, current protocols appear to be predominantly time-based without objective criteria or functional assessment. Therefore, the authors recommend the development of objective criteria for patient rehabilitation and return-to-play protocols after OCA of the knee.

The Utility of Continuous Passive Motion After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.

BACKGROUND: The application of continuous passive motion (CPM) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) was popularized in the 1990s, but advancements in the understanding of ACLR rehabilitation have made the application of CPM controversial. Many sports medicine fellowship-trained surgeons report using CPM machines postoperatively. PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of CPM use for recovery after ACLR with respect to knee range of motion (ROM), knee swelling, postoperative pain, and postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane, Cumulative Index of Nursing, and Allied Health Literature databases were searched from inception to January 1, 2020, for studies with evidence levels 1 to 3 on the use of CPM for ACLR rehabilitation. Included studies were those that comparatively evaluated postoperative outcomes after ACLR between at least 2 groups of patients, with 1 having received CPM rehabilitation and the other not having received CPM. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies from 1989 to 2019 met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 808 patients who underwent ACLR. There was no evidence of CPM improving knee stability, final postoperative ROM, or subjective pain scores. Additionally, CPM did not lead to decreased muscle atrophy or improved International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Regarding pain medication intake during postoperative hospitalization, 2 studies found that the CPM group used less pain medication, 1 study found the CPM group used more pain medication, and 1 study found that there was no difference between the 2 groups. Complications varied widely, with 2 of 12 studies reporting complications that required a return to the operating room. CONCLUSION: A clinical benefit of postoperative CPM use after ACLR was not identified in this review. While our systematic review identified a number of studies that suggest CPM use may be associated with lower usage of pain medication in hospitalized patients, this cannot be confirmed without further investigation with standardized CPM protocols and larger sample sizes. Routine CPM use after ACLR was not supported by this systematic review.

The Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing to the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to monitor functional outcomes for clinical and research purposes; unfortunately, many PROMs include redundant, burdensome questions for patients. The use of predictive models to implement computerized adaptive testing (CAT) offer a potential solution to reduce question burden in outcomes research. PURPOSE: To validate the usage of an appropriate CAT system to improve the efficiency of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Validation was based on electronically collected patient responses from 2 separate orthopaedic sports medicine clinics. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, meniscal lesions, ligamentous injuries, and chondral defects. The CAT system was previously developed through analysis of an electronic knee PROM database that did not contain any of these cases. RESULTS: A total of 2173 patient responses (1229 patients) were collected. The CAT model was able to reduce the question burden by a mean of 9.33 questions (45.1%). Higher CAT-predicted scores correlated strongly with higher actual scores (r = 0.99; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). The mean difference between the CAT-predicted score and the actual PROM score was 0.48 of a point on a scale of 0 to 100. CONCLUSION: The use of CAT systems, in conjunction with electronic PROMs, can accurately predict outcome scores for IKDC PROMs, while dramatically decreasing the number of questionnaire items needed for any given patient. By decreasing questionnaire burden, clinicians and researchers can potentially increase patient participation and follow-up in both clinical assessments and research trials.