Biomechanical Assessment of Hip Capsular Repair and Reconstruction Procedures Using a 6 Degrees of Freedom Robotic System.

BACKGROUND: Although acetabular labral repair has been biomechanically validated to improve stability, capsular management of the hip remains a topic of growing interest and controversy. PURPOSE: To biomechanically evaluate the effects of several arthroscopically relevant conditions of the capsule through a robotic, sequential sectioning study. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten human cadaveric unilateral hip specimens (mean age, 51.3 years [range, 38-65 years]) from full pelvises were used to test range of motion (ROM) for the intact capsule and for multiple capsular conditions including portal incisions, interportal capsulotomy, interportal capsulotomy repair, T-capsulotomy, T-capsulotomy repair, a large capsular defect, and capsular reconstruction. Hips were biomechanically tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system to assess ROM with applied 5-N·m internal, external, abduction, and adduction rotation torques throughout hip flexion and extension. RESULTS: All capsulotomy procedures (portals, interportal capsulotomy, and T-capsulotomy) created increases in external, internal, adduction, and abduction rotations compared with the intact state throughout the full tested ROM (-10° to 90° of flexion). Reconstruction significantly reduced rotation compared with the large capsular defect state for external rotation at 15° (difference, 1.4°) and 90° (difference, 1.3°) of flexion; internal rotation at -10° (difference, 0.4°), 60° (difference, 0.9°), and 90° (difference, 1.4°) of flexion; abduction rotation at -10° (difference, 0.5°), 15° (difference, 1.1°), 30° (difference, 1.2°), 60° (difference, 0.9°), and 90° (difference, 1.0°) of flexion; and adduction rotation at 0° (difference, 0.7°), 15° (difference, 0.8°), 30° (difference, 0.3°), and 90° (difference, 0.6°) of flexion. Repair of T-capsulotomy resulted in significant reductions in rotation compared with the T-capsulotomy condition for abduction rotation at -10° (difference, 0.3°), 15° (difference, 0.9°), 30° (difference, 1.3°), 60° (difference, 1.7°), and 90° (difference, 1.5°) of flexion and for internal rotation at -10° (difference, 0.9°), 60° (difference, 1.5°), and 90° (difference, 2.6°) of flexion. Similarly, repair of interportal capsulotomy resulted in significant reductions in abduction (difference, 0.9°) and internal (difference, 1.4°) rotations compared with interportal capsulotomy at 90° of flexion. In most cases, however, after the repair procedures, ROM was still increased in comparison with the intact state. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that common hip arthroscopic capsulotomy procedures can result in increases in external, internal, abduction, and adduction rotations throughout a full range (-10° to 90°) of hip flexion. However, capsular repair and reconstruction succeeded in partially reducing the increased rotational ROM caused by common capsulotomy procedures. Thus, consideration should be allotted toward capsular repair or reconstruction in cases with an increased risk of residual instability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although complete restoration of joint stability may not be fully achieved at time zero, capsular repair and reconstruction may lead to improved patient outcomes by bringing hip rotational movements nearer to normal values in the immediate postoperative period, especially in cases in which extensive capsulotomy is performed.

Quantitative Anatomic Analysis of the Native Ligamentum Teres.

BACKGROUND: While recent studies have addressed the biomechanical function of the ligamentum teres and provided descriptions of ligamentum teres reconstruction techniques, its detailed quantitative anatomy remains relatively undocumented. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding the number and morphology of the acetabular attachments of the ligamentum teres. PURPOSE: To provide a clinically relevant quantitative anatomic description of the native human ligamentum teres. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Ten human cadaveric hemipelvises, complete with femurs (mean age, 59.6 years; range, 47-65 years), were dissected free of all extra-articular soft tissues to isolate the ligamentum teres and its attachments. A coordinate measuring device was used to quantify the attachment areas and their relationships to pertinent open and arthroscopic landmarks on both the acetabulum and the femur. The clock face reference system was utilized to describe acetabular anatomy, and all anatomic relationships were described using the mean and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: There were 6 distinct attachments to the acetabulum and 1 to the femur. The areas of the acetabular and femoral attachment footprints of the ligamentum teres were 434 mm2 (95% CI, 320-549 mm2) and 84 mm2 (95% CI, 65-104 mm2), respectively. The 6 acetabular clock face locations were as follows: anterior attachment, 4:53 o'clock (95% CI, 4:45-5:02); posterior attachment, 6:33 o'clock (95% CI, 6:23-6:43); ischial attachment, 8:07 o'clock (95% CI, 7:47-8:26); iliac attachment, 1:49 o'clock (95% CI, 1:04-2:34); and a smaller pubic attachment that was located at 3:50 o'clock (95% CI, 3:41-4:00). The ischial attachment possessed the largest cross-sectional attachment area (127.3 mm2; 95% CI, 103.0-151.7 mm2) of all the acetabular attachments of the ligamentum teres. CONCLUSION: The most important finding of this study was that the human ligamentum teres had 6 distinct points of attachment on the acetabulum (transverse, anterior, and posterior margins of the acetabular notch and cotyloid fossa attachments: ilium, ischium, and pubis) and 1 on the femur. On the acetabulum, the anterior attachment was substantially larger than the posterior attachment and was located at a mean clock face position of 4:53 o'clock. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These quantitative descriptions of the ligamentum teres can be used by clinicians to arthroscopically identify the attachments of the ligamentum teres, guiding arthroscopic surgical interventions designed to address ligamentum teres pathology.

An In Vitro Robotic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament, Part 2: Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated that an extra-articular lateral knee structure, most recently referred to as the anterolateral ligament (ALL), contributes to overall rotational stability of the knee. However, the effect of anatomic ALL reconstruction (ALLR) in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has not been biomechanically investigated or validated. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical function of anatomic ALLR in the setting of a combined ACL and ALL injury. More specifically, this investigation focused on the effect of ALLR on resultant rotatory stability when performed in combination with concomitant ACLR. It was hypothesized that ALLR would significantly reduce internal rotation and axial plane translation laxity during a simulated pivot-shift test compared with isolated ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were evaluated with a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system. Knee kinematics were evaluated with simulated clinical examinations including a simulated pivot-shift test consisting of coupled 10-N·m valgus and 5-N·m internal rotation torques, a 5-N·m internal rotation torque, and an 88-N anterior tibial load. Kinematic differences between ACLR with an intact ALL, ACLR with ALLR, and ACLR with a deficient ALL were compared with the intact state. Single-bundle ACLR tunnels and ALLR tunnels were placed anatomically according to previous quantitative anatomic attachment descriptions. RESULTS: Combined anatomic ALLR and ACLR significantly improved the rotatory stability of the knee compared with isolated ACLR in the face of a concurrent ALL deficiency. During a simulated pivot-shift test, ALLR significantly reduced internal rotation and axial plane tibial translation when compared with ACLR with an ALL deficiency. Isolated ACLR for the treatment of a combined ACL and ALL injury was not able to restore stability of the knee, resulting in a significant increase in residual internal rotation laxity. ALLR did not affect anterior tibial translation; no significant differences were observed between the varying ALL conditions with ACLR except between ACLR with an intact ALL and ACLR with a deficient ALL at 0° of flexion. CONCLUSION: In the face of a combined ACL and ALL deficiency, concurrent ACLR and ALLR significantly improved the rotatory stability of the knee compared with solely reconstructing the ACL. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Significant increases in residual internal rotation and laxity during the pivot-shift test may exist in both acute and chronic settings of an ACL deficiency and in patients treated with isolated ACLR for a combined ACL and ALL deficiency. For this subset of patients, surgical treatment of the ALL, in addition to ACLR, should be considered to restore knee stability.

An In Vitro Robotic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament, Part 1: Secondary Role of the Anterolateral Ligament in the Setting of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

BACKGROUND: Recent investigations have described the structural and functional behavior of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee through pull-apart and isolated sectioning studies. However, the secondary stabilizing role of the ALL in the setting of a complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear has not been fully defined for common simulated clinical examinations, such as the pivot-shift, anterior drawer, and internal rotation tests. HYPOTHESIS: Combined sectioning of the ALL and ACL would lead to increased internal rotation and increased axial plane translation during a pivot-shift test when compared with isolated sectioning of the ACL. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were subjected to a simulated pivot-shift test with coupled 10-N·m valgus and 5-N·m internal rotation torques from 0° to 60° of knee flexion and a 5-N·m internal rotation torque and an 88-N anterior tibial load, both from 0° to 120° of knee flexion via a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system. Kinematic changes were measured and compared with the intact state for isolated sectioning of the ACL and combined sectioning of the ACL and ALL. RESULTS: Combined sectioning of the ACL and ALL resulted in a significant increase in axial plane tibial translation during a simulated pivot shift at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 60° of knee flexion and a significant increase in internal rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, 90°, 105°, and 120° when compared with the intact and ACL-deficient states. Based on the model results, ALL sectioning resulted in an additional 2.1 mm (95% CI, 1.4-2.9 mm; P < .001) of axial plane translation during the pivot shift when compared with ACL-only sectioning, when pooling evidence over all flexion angles. Likewise, when subjected to IR torque, the ACL+ALL-deficient state resulted in an additional 3.2° of internal rotation (95% CI, 2.4°-4.1°; P < .001) versus the intact state, and the additional sectioning of the ALL increased internal rotation by 2.7° (95% CI, 1.8°-3.6°; P < .001) versus the ACL-deficient state. CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirm the ALL as an important lateral knee structure that provides rotatory stability to the knee. Specifically, the ALL was a significant secondary stabilizer throughout flexion during an applied internal rotation torque and simulated pivot-shift test in the context of an ACL-deficient knee. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Residual internal rotation and a positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction may be attributed to ALL injury. For these patients, surgical treatment of an ALL tear may be considered.

Validation of a six degree-of-freedom robotic system for hip in vitro biomechanical testing.

Currently, there exists a need for a more thorough understanding of native hip joint kinematics to improve the understanding of pathological conditions, injury mechanisms, and surgical interventions. A biomechanical testing system able to accomplish multiple degree-of-freedom (DOF) movements is required to study the complex articulation of the hip joint. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the repeatability and comparative accuracy of a 6 DOF robotic system as a testing platform for range of motion in vitro hip biomechanical analysis. Intact human cadaveric pelvises, complete with full femurs, were prepared, and a coordinate measuring machine collected measurements of pertinent femoral and pelvic bony landmarks used to define the anatomic hip axes. Passive flexion/extension path and simulated clinical exam kinematics were recorded using a 6 DOF robotic system. The results of this study demonstrate that the 6 DOF robotic system was able to identify hip passive paths in a highly repeatable manner (median RMS error of <0.1mm and <0.4°), and the robotically simulated clinical exams were consistent and repeatable (rotational RMS error ≤0.8°) in determining hip ranges of motion. Thus, a 6 DOF robotic system is a valuable and effective tool for range of motion in vitro hip biomechanical analysis.

Radiographic Identification of the Deltoid Ligament Complex of the Medial Ankle.

BACKGROUND: An injury to the deltoid ligament complex of the ankle can require surgical intervention in cases of chronic instability. There is an absence of data describing medial ankle ligament anatomy on standard radiographic views. PURPOSE: To quantitatively describe the anatomic origins and insertions of the individual ligamentous bands of the superficial and deep deltoid on standard lateral and mortise radiographic views with reference to osseous landmarks and anatomic axes. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve nonpaired, fresh-frozen cadaveric foot and ankle specimens were utilized. Specimens were dissected free of all overlying soft tissue to identify individual ligamentous bands of the superficial and deep deltoid ligaments and to isolate their distinct origins and insertions. Footprint centers were identified on standard lateral and mortise radiographs by 2-mm stainless steel spheres embedded at the level of the cortical bone. Distances to osseous landmarks were measured independently by 2 blinded reviewers to calculate mean distances and evaluate reliability and repeatability measures using intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Varying subsets of the 4 superficial deltoid bands including the tibionavicular (12/12), tibiospring (12/12), tibiocalcaneal (9/12), and superficial posterior tibiotalar (9/12) ligaments were found across specimens. On the lateral view, the tibionavicular ligament was the most anterior and attached 7.6 ± 1.9 mm superior and anterior to the inferior tip of the medial malleolus. The tibiospring ligament attached 12.1 ± 2.2 mm superior and anterior to the inferior tip of the medial malleolus and attached to the spring ligament, which coursed from its origin 12.3 ± 1.6 mm anterior and slightly inferior to the posterior point of the sustentaculum tali to its insertion on the navicular tuberosity. The tibiocalcaneal ligament and superficial posterior tibiotalar ligament were found posteriorly in the majority of specimens. Two constituents of the deep deltoid, including the deep anterior tibiotalar (11/12) and deep posterior tibiotalar (12/12) ligaments, were found in the majority of specimens. The deep posterior was larger and coursed from the tibia, 8.1 ± 2.2 mm posterior and superior to the inferior tip of the medial malleolus, to its attachment on the talus, 15.5 ± 2.4 mm superior and anterior to the posterior inferior point of the talus on the lateral view. CONCLUSION: Quantitative radiographic relationships describing the anatomic origins and insertions of the individual superficial and deep deltoid constituents were defined with excellent reliability and reproducibility. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Radiographic parameters will augment current anatomic data by assisting with preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative assessment. These radiographic guidelines will facilitate the development of novel anatomic reconstructions and allow surgeons to plan the locations of reconstruction tunnels.

Intramedullary Tibial Nailing Reduces the Attachment Area and Ultimate Load of the Anterior Medial Meniscal Root: A Potential Explanation for Anterior Knee Pain in Female Patients and Smaller Patients.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the treatment of choice among orthopaedic surgeons for tibial shaft fractures. However, because of the close proximity of the nail's insertion site to the anterior medial (AM) meniscal root on the tibial plateau, there is increased risk of iatrogenic injury to the meniscal root during nailing. PURPOSE: To quantify the area of the AM meniscal root footprint damaged by IM tibial reaming and determine its subsequent effects on the ultimate failure load in female versus male knees. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve matched pairs (6 male and 6 female pairs; average age, 50.2 years) of human cadaveric knees were randomly assigned to native and reamed groups. In the reamed group, knees were reamed within the "safe zone" according to current guidelines for IM tibial nail insertion (3 mm lateral to the center of the tibial tubercle and adjacent to the anterior margin of the tibial plateau). The attachment areas and ultimate failure load were quantified and compared with paired knees in the native group. RESULTS: Intra-articular reaming within the "safe zone" for IM tibial nail insertion did not significantly decrease the AM root attachment area or ultimate failure load in male specimens, as only 2 of the 6 knees were damaged by reaming. In contrast, all 6 of the AM roots in the female knees were damaged by reaming, and on average, reaming decreased the female AM root attachment area by 19% and significantly decreased ultimate failure load by 37% (P = .028). There was a strong negative correlation (R(2) = 0.77) between reamed tunnel-AM root overlap area and medial-lateral width in female but not in male knees. CONCLUSION: Standard reaming for an IM tibial nail induced significant damage to the AM meniscal root in smaller, female specimens, whereas larger, male specimens were not affected. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings may suggest that improvements in current guidelines and surgical techniques are warranted to prevent iatrogenic injury to the AM meniscal root during intramedullary reaming for tibial shaft fractures in females and in smaller patients.

Emerging Updates on the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Review of the Current Literature.

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is recognized as an essential stabilizer of the knee. However, the complexity of the ligament has generated controversy about its definitive role and the recommended treatment after injury. A proper understanding of the functional role of the PCL is necessary to minimize residual instability, osteoarthritic progression, and failure of additional concomitant ligament graft reconstructions or meniscal repairs after treatment. Recent anatomic and biomechanical studies have elucidated the surgically relevant quantitative anatomy and confirmed the codominant role of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the PCL. Although nonoperative treatment has historically been the initial treatment of choice for isolated PCL injury, possibly biased by the historically poorer objective outcomes postoperatively compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, surgical intervention has been increasingly used for isolated and combined PCL injuries. Recent studies have more clearly elucidated the biomechanical and clinical effects after PCL tears and resultant treatments. This article presents a thorough review of updates on the clinically relevant anatomy, epidemiology, biomechanical function, diagnosis, and current treatments for the PCL, with an emphasis on the emerging clinical and biomechanical evidence regarding each of the treatment choices for PCL reconstruction surgery. It is recommended that future outcomes studies use PCL stress radiographs to determine objective outcomes and that evidence level 1 and 2 studies be performed to assess outcomes between transtibial and tibial inlay reconstructions and also between single- and double-bundle PCL reconstructions.

Tensile properties of the human acetabular labrum and hip labral reconstruction grafts.

BACKGROUND: In cases where the acetabular labrum is severely damaged and irreparable, labral reconstructions are becoming an increasingly preferred means of preserving the fluid seal effect of the labrum. However, the graft that most closely replicates the biomechanical properties of the native labrum remains undetermined. PURPOSE: To characterize the tensile properties and geometry of the labrum, as well as iliotibial band, semitendinosus, gracilis, and anterior tibialis grafts. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Five graft groups--(1) acetabular labrum, (2) iliotibial band, (3) semitendinosus, (4) gracilis, and (5) anterior tibialis--with 8 specimens per group were tested. Grafts were tested using a materials testing system in response to a stepwise sinusoidal cyclic loading protocol. Uniaxial tensile loads were initially applied from 20 to 50 N for 100 cycles at 0.5 Hz, followed by incremental increases of 50 N in the upper force every 100 cycles until failure or successful completion of 100 cycles at 300 N. This protocol was designed to be representative of progressive loading experienced during rehabilitation. Cyclic displacement was recorded after 100 (50 N), 200 (100 N), 300 (150 N), 400 (200 N), 500 (250 N), and 600 (300 N) cycles. RESULTS: The mean elongation (95% CI) after 100 cycles from 20 to 50 N was similar for all groups: acetabular labrum, 0.68 mm (0.57-0.78 mm); iliotibial band, 0.68 mm (0.47-0.89 mm); semitendinosus, 0.68 mm (0.51-0.84 mm); gracilis, 0.62 mm (0.46-0.79 mm); and anterior tibialis, 0.66 mm (0.58-0.73 mm). After 100 cycles from 20 to 300 N (600 cycles total), the mean elongation of the labrum was 4.53 mm (3.71-5.35 mm), and the mean elongations of the iliotibial band, semitendinosus, gracilis, and anterior tibialis were 4.65 mm (3.23-6.07 mm), 4.41 mm (3.45-5.36 mm), 5.12 mm (3.09-7.16 mm), and 5.33 mm (4.40-6.25 mm), respectively. CONCLUSION: All tested grafts and the acetabular labrum exhibited similar cyclic elongation behavior in response to simulated physiologic forces. In addition, differences in variability in both elongation and geometry existed for all graft types. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All tested grafts can be considered viable acetabular labrum reconstruction graft options.

Consequences of tibial tunnel reaming on the meniscal roots during cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model, Part 2: The posterior cruciate ligament.

BACKGROUND: Recent emphasis has turned to reconstructing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) after injury. However, single-bundle PCL reconstruction of the anterolateral bundle may potentially injure the posterior meniscal roots. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine if posterior meniscal root injuries occurred because of tunnel reaming for single-bundle PCL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that tibial tunnel reaming within the anterolateral bundle footprint during PCL reconstruction would result in clinically significant decreases in posteromedial (PM) root attachment areas and in ultimate failure strength for the PM root. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Testing was performed on 12 matched pairs of human cadaveric knees. For each pair of knees, one knee was left intact, while the contralateral knee was prepared with a tibial tunnel placed 5 mm anterior to the center of the tibial PCL attachment and within the previously described footprint of the anterolateral bundle of the PCL for single-bundle PCL reconstruction. The attachment areas of the posterior meniscal roots were measured with a coordinate measuring device before and after PCL tunnel reaming. The posterior meniscal roots were then pulled to failure with a dynamic tensile testing machine. RESULTS: There was a significant mean decrease in the attachment area of the PM root (%Δ, 28%; 95% CI, 16-40) after PCL tunnel reaming compared with the intact state (P=.005). The mean ultimate failure strength of the native PM root (mean, 440 N; 95% CI, 347-534) was also significantly stronger (mean, 40%; 95% CI, 18-61; P=.005) than that of the PM root after PCL tunnel reaming (mean, 243 N; 95% CI, 176-309). No changes were found for the posterolateral (PL) root after PCL tunnel reaming. CONCLUSION: Tibial tunnel reaming for single-bundle PCL reconstruction in the anterolateral bundle footprint significantly reduced the ultimate failure strength and attachment area of the PM meniscal root. The attachment area and ultimate failure strength of the PL root were unaffected by tunnel reaming. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tibial tunnels reamed in the footprint of the anterolateral bundle during single-bundle PCL reconstruction can cause iatrogenic damage to the PM meniscal root attachment. Thus, tibial tunnels should strive to be reamed in the center of the entire tibial PCL attachment site during PCL reconstruction.

Consequences of tibial tunnel reaming on the meniscal roots during cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model, Part 1: The anterior cruciate ligament.

BACKGROUND: The current standard for treating complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction, which requires reaming a tibial tunnel. Based on recent anatomic and biomechanical studies, this reconstruction tunnel may cause injuries to the anterior meniscal root attachments. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to determine if injuries occurred to the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) meniscal root attachments because of reaming a tibial reconstruction tunnel in the anatomic center of the ACL footprint. It was hypothesized that tibial tunnel reaming for ACL reconstruction would result in significant decreases in the attachment area and in ultimate failure strength for the AL root. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve matched pairs of human cadaveric knees were tested. One knee from each pair remained intact, while the contralateral knee was reamed with a tibial tunnel for an anatomic ACL reconstruction. The attachment areas of the anterior meniscal roots were measured with a coordinate measuring device before and after tunnel reaming. The anterior meniscal roots were then pulled to failure with a dynamic tensile testing machine. RESULTS: There was a significant mean decrease in the attachment area for the AL root (%Δ, 38%; 95% CI, 25-51) after ACL tunnel reaming compared with the intact state (P=.003). The mean ultimate failure strength of the native AL root (mean, 610 N; 95% CI, 470-751) was significantly stronger (P=.015) than that of the AL root with a reamed ACL reconstruction tunnel (mean, 506 N; 95% CI, 353-659). Tunnel reaming did not significantly affect the AM root attachment area or ultimate failure strength. CONCLUSION: Tibial tunnel reaming during anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction significantly decreased the AL meniscal root attachment area and ultimate failure strength. The AM root was not significantly affected by reaming of the ACL reconstruction tunnel. Future studies should investigate the clinical importance of these iatrogenic injuries to the AL root. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The ACL reconstruction tunnels reamed in the center of the ACL tibial footprint caused a significant decrease in the attachment area and ultimate strength of the AL meniscal root attachment. Clinically, repositioning guide pins placed in the lateral aspect of the ACL attachment before tibial tunnel reaming may minimize iatrogenic injuries to the AL meniscal root attachment.

A quantitative analysis of hip capsular thickness.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive quantitative analysis of capsular thickness adjacent to the acetabular rim in clinically relevant locations. METHODS: Dissections were performed and hip capsular measurements were recorded on 13 non-paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric hemi-pelvises using a coordinate measuring device. Measurements were taken for each clock-face position at 0, 5, 10 and 15 mm distances from the labral edge. RESULTS: The capsule was consistently thickest at 2 o'clock for each interval from the labrum with a maximum thickness of 8.3 at 10 mm [95 % CI 6.8, 9.8] and 15 mm [95 % CI 6.8, 9.7]. The capsule was noticeably thinner between 4 and 11 o'clock with a minimum thickness of 4.1 mm [95 % CI 3.3, 4.9] at 10 o'clock at the labral edge. Direct comparison between 0 and 5 mm between 9 and 3 o'clock showed that the hip capsule was significantly thicker at 5 mm from the labrum at 9 o'clock (p = 0.027), 10 o'clock (p = 0.032), 1 o'clock (p = 0.003), 2 o'clock (p = 0.001) and 3 o'clock (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The hip capsule was thickest between the 1 and 2 o'clock positions for all measured distances from the acetabular labrum and reached its maximum thickness at 2 o'clock, which corresponds to the location of the iliofemoral ligament.

Structural properties of the intact proximal hamstring origin and evaluation of varying avulsion repair techniques: an in vitro biomechanical analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although surgical repair has been reported to provide improved outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment in the management of complete proximal hamstring origin avulsions, no intact or avulsion repair biomechanical data exist to support various repair strategies or guide postoperative rehabilitation. PURPOSE: To compare failure load among 4 proximal hamstring tendon conditions: (1) intact, (2) repair with 2 small anchors (2S), (3) repair with 2 large anchors (2L), and (4) repair with 5 small anchors (5S). STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty-four human cadaveric hemipelvises were randomly allocated to 1 of the 4 testing groups. Intact and repaired specimens were subjected to cyclic loading at 1 Hz between 25 N and a progressively increasing maximum load that was incremented by 200 N every 50 cycles, beginning at 200 N and increasing to 1600 N. Displacement, maximum load, stiffness, number of cycles to failure, and mode of failure during cyclic loading were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The intact proximal hamstring tendons failed at the highest cyclic force of all tested groups, yet no significant differences existed between the intact (1405 ± 157 N) and 5S repair (1164 ± 294 N) conditions. Both the 2S and the 2L repair groups failed at a level significantly lower than the intact hamstring (474 ± 145 N [P < .001] and 543 ± 245 N [P < .001], respectively). The maximum load attained by the 5S repairs was significantly greater than the loads attained by the 2S (P = .005) and 2L (P = .013) repairs. CONCLUSION: Repairs using 5 small anchors were similar to the intact tendon and were significantly stronger than repairs using only 2 large or 2 small anchors in the repair of complete avulsions of the proximal hamstring tendons. Additionally, no significant differences in strength were observed when only anchor size differed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This finding supports the clinical investigation of postoperative range of motion rehabilitation protocols that permit full flexion and extension of the hip and knee when a 5-anchor repair construct is used.

Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 2: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic double-bundle reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have suggested that anatomic double-bundle (DB) posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) reduces residual laxity compared with the intact state better than single-bundle PCLR. Although the anterolateral bundle (ALB) and posteromedial bundle (PMB) reportedly act codominantly, few studies have compared commonly used graft fixation angles and the influence that graft fixation angles have on overall graft forces and knee laxity. HYPOTHESIS: Graft fixation angle combinations of 0°/75° (PMB/ALB), 0°/90°, 0°/105°, 15°/75°, 15°/90°, and 15°/105° would significantly reduce knee laxity from the sectioned PCL state while preventing in vitro graft forces from being overloaded between any of the graft fixation angles. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Nine cadaveric knees were evaluated for the kinematics of the intact, PCL-sectioned, and DB PCLR techniques. The DB technique was varied by fixing the PMB and ALB grafts at the following 6 randomly ordered fixation angle combinations: 0°/75° (PMB/ALB), 0°/90°, 0°/105°, 15°/75°, 15°/90°, and 15°/105°. A 6 degrees of freedom robotic testing system subjected each specimen to an applied 134-N posterior tibial load at 0° to 120° of flexion and 5-N·m external, 5-N·m internal, and 10-N·m valgus rotation torques applied at 60°, 75°, 90°, 105°, and 120° of flexion. The ALB and PMB grafts were fixed to load cells that concurrently measured graft forces throughout kinematic testing. t tests compared the kinematics between groups, and 2-factor models assessed the contribution of ALB and PMB grafts after DB PCLR (P < .05). RESULTS: Consistently, DB PCLR significantly reduced posterior translation compared with the sectioned PCL and was comparable with the intact state during applied posterior tibial loads at flexion angles of greater than 90°; a mean residual laxity of 1.5 mm remained compared with the intact state during applied posterior tibial loads. Additionally, fixing the PMB graft at 15° resulted in significantly larger PMB graft forces compared with fixation at 0° during applied posterior loading, internal rotation, external rotation, and valgus rotation. Similarly, fixing the ALB graft at 75° resulted in significantly larger ALB graft forces compared with fixation of the ALB graft at 90° or 105° during all loading conditions. CONCLUSION: Fixation of the PMB graft at 0° to 15° and the ALB graft at 75° to 105° during DB PCLR were successful in significantly reducing knee laxity from the sectioned state. However, fixation of the PMB graft at 15° versus 0° resulted in significantly increased loads through the PMB graft, and fixation of the ALB graft at 75° versus 90° or 105° resulted in significantly increased loads through the ALB graft. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study found that all 6 fixation angle combinations significantly improved knee kinematics compared with the sectioned state at time zero; however, it is recommended that fixation of the PMB graft be performed at 0° because of the significant increases in PMB graft loading that occur with fixation at 15° and that fixation of the ALB graft be performed at 90° or 105° rather than 75° to minimize ALB graft forces, which could lead to graft attenuation or failure over time.

Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 1: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Currently, no consensus exists for the optimal graft fixation angle for anatomic single-bundle (SB) posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (PCLRs). Additionally, direct graft forces have not been measured. Alternative graft fixation angles and the resultant graft forces should be investigated to optimize the stability of SB PCLRs without overconstraining the knee. HYPOTHESIS: Graft fixation angles of 75°, 90°, and 105° for SB PCLR were hypothesized to improve knee stability compared with the sectioned posterior cruciate ligament state with no evidence of knee overconstraint. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were biomechanically evaluated for the intact, sectioned, and SB PCLR states with the anterolateral bundle graft fixed at 75°, 90°, and 105°. A 6 degrees of freedom robotic system assessed knee laxity with a 134-N posterior load applied at 0° to 120° and 5-N·m external, 5-N·m internal, and 10-N·m valgus rotation torques applied at 60° to 120°. By securing the graft to an external load cell, graft forces were measured throughout kinematic testing. RESULTS: No significant kinematic differences were found among the 3 fixation angles. Each fixation angle resulted in significantly less posterior translation than in the sectioned state at all flexion angles (P < .05), with 4.1 mm of average residual laxity during an applied posterior loading. For all graft fixation angles, internal rotation was significantly increased between 60° and 120° of flexion, and external rotation was significantly increased at 90°, 105°, and 120° of flexion compared with the intact state. Graft forces were not significantly different among the 3 fixation angles and remained below reported loads observed during activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: All tested SB PCLR graft fixation angles restored knee laxity to similar levels; however, persistent laxity resulted in significant increases in knee laxity compared with the intact state during posterior tibial loading at all flexion angles, internal rotation at flexion angles ≥60°, and external rotation at ≥75° of flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest that SB PCL graft fixation angles of 75°, 90°, and 105° were comparable in restoring knee kinematics and exposed the graft to similar time-zero loads. However, SB PCLRs did not fully reduce knee laxity to the intact state.

Anatomy of the anterior root attachments of the medial and lateral menisci: a quantitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: While the biomechanical importance of the meniscal roots has been demonstrated, the anatomy of the anterior meniscal roots remains largely unknown. Defining the quantitative anatomy of the anterior meniscal root attachments is essential for developing improved diagnostic and surgical techniques. HYPOTHESIS: The anterior medial (AM) and anterior lateral (AL) meniscal roots could be quantitatively defined relative to open and arthroscopic surgical landmarks. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve nonpaired human cadaveric knees were used (average age, 51.3 years). A coordinate measuring device quantified the anatomic relationships of the AM and AL root attachments to open and arthroscopic surgical landmarks. The tibial attachments of both anterior roots were defined and quantified by categorizing the fibers of the root as either central, dense attachments or peripheral, supplemental attachments. RESULTS: The center of the tibial tuberosity and the medial tibial eminence apex were 27.0 mm lateral and distal and 27.5 mm posterior to the center of the AM root, respectively. The center of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the lateral tibial eminence apex were 5.0 mm posteromedial and 14.4 mm posterolateral to the center of the AL root, respectively. The AM root attachment had a mean area of 110.4 mm(2) (95% CI, 92.2-128.5) with a central attachment of 56.3 mm(2) (95% CI, 46.9-65.8). The AL root attachment had a mean area of 140.7 mm(2) (95% CI, 121.6-159.8) and inserted deeply beneath the ACL in all specimens. The overlap of the ACL on the AL root averaged 88.9 mm(2) (95% CI, 63.3-114.6), comprising 63.2% of the AL root attachment. CONCLUSION: The anterior meniscal roots were identified in relation to pertinent open and arthroscopic landmarks. The extended overlap between the AL root and ACL attachment revealed a more intimate tibial attachment relationship than previously recognized. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Quantitative descriptions of the anterior meniscal roots elucidate the relationship between the root attachments and pertinent surgical landmarks. In addition, the supplemental attachments of both menisci may contribute to native meniscal function, and further investigation is recommended.

Trochlear dysplasia and the role of trochleoplasty.

The diagnosis and treatment of chronic patellar instability caused by trochlear dysplasia can be challenging. A dysplastic trochlea leads to biomechanical and kinematic changes that often require surgical correction when symptomatic. In the past, trochlear dysplasia was classified using the 4-part Dejour classification system. More recently, new classification systems have been proposed. Future studies are needed to investigate long-term outcomes after trochleoplasty.

Structural Properties of the Meniscal Roots.

BACKGROUND: Current surgical techniques for meniscal root repair reattach the most prominent, dense portion of the meniscal root and fail to incorporate recently identified peripheral, supplemental attachment fibers. The contribution of supplemental fibers to the biomechanical properties of native meniscal roots is unknown. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose was to quantify the ultimate failure strengths, stiffness, and attachment areas of the native posterior medial (PM), posterior lateral (PL), anterior medial (AM), and anterior lateral (AL) meniscal roots compared with the most prominent, dense meniscal root attachment after sectioning of supplemental fibers. It was hypothesized that the ultimate failure strength, stiffness, and attachment area of each native root would be significantly higher than those of the respective sectioned root. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve matched pairs of male human cadaveric knees were used. The 4 native meniscal roots were left intact in the native group, whereas the roots in the contralateral knee (sectioned group) were dissected free of all supplemental fibers. A coordinate measuring device quantified the amount of tissue resected in the sectioned group compared with the native group. A dynamic tensile testing machine pulled each root in line with its circumferential fibers. All root attachments were preconditioned from 10 to 50 N at a rate of 0.1 Hz for 10 cycles and subsequently pulled to failure at a rate of 0.5 mm/s. RESULTS: Supplemental fibers composed a significant percentage of the native PM, PL, and AM meniscal root attachment areas. Mean ultimate failure strengths (in newtons) of the native PM, PL, and AM roots were significantly higher than those of the sectioned state, while the ultimate failure strength of the native AL root was indistinguishable from that of the sectioned state. CONCLUSION: Three of the 4 meniscal root attachments (PM, PL, AM) contained supplemental fibers that accounted for a significant percentage of the native root attachment areas, and these fibers significantly contributed to the failure strengths of the native roots. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These supplemental fibers are not routinely reattached during root repair surgery, suggesting that current techniques fail to reattach the biomechanically relevant attachments of native meniscal roots.

Structural Properties of the Native Ligamentum Teres.

BACKGROUND: A majority of studies investigating the role of the ligamentum teres (LT) have focused primarily on anatomical and histological descriptions. To date, however, the structural properties of the LT have yet to be fully elucidated. PURPOSE: To investigate the structural properties of the native LT in a human cadaveric model. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 12 human cadaveric hemipelvises (mean age, 53.6 years; range, 34-63 years) were dissected free of all extra-articular soft tissues to isolate the LT and its acetabular and femoral attachments. A dynamic tensile testing machine distracted each femur in line with the fibers of the LT at a displacement-controlled rate of 0.5 mm/s. The anatomic dimensions, structural properties, and modes of failure were recorded. RESULTS: The LT achieved a mean yield load of 75 N and ultimate failure load of 204 N. The LT had mean lengths of 38.0 and 53.0 mm at its yield and failure points, respectively. The most common (75% of specimens) mechanism of failure was tearing at the fovea capitis. On average, the LT had a linear stiffness of 16 N/mm and elastic modulus of 9.24 MPa. The mean initial length and cross-sectional area were 32 mm and 59 mm(2), respectively. CONCLUSION: The human LT had a mean ultimate failure load of 204 N. Therefore, the results of this investigation, combined with recent biomechanical and outcomes studies, suggest that special consideration should be given to preserving the structural and corresponding biomechanical integrity of the LT during surgical intervention. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The LT may be more important as a static stabilizer of the hip joint than previously recognized. Further studies are recommended to investigate the appropriate indications to perform surgical repair or reconstruction of the LT for preservation of hip stability and function.

Superficial medial collateral ligament anatomic augmented repair versus anatomic reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical analysis.

BACKGROUND: When surgical intervention is required for a grade 3 superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) tear, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical treatment. Anatomic augmented repairs and anatomic reconstructions for treatment of grade 3 sMCL tears have not been biomechanically validated or compared. HYPOTHESIS: Anatomic sMCL augmented repairs and anatomic sMCL reconstruction techniques will reproduce equivalent knee kinematics when compared with the intact state, while creating significant improvements in translational and rotational laxity compared with the sMCL sectioned state. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eighteen match-paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (average age, 52.6 years; range, 40-59 years) were each used to test laxity of an intact sMCL, a deficient sMCL, and either an anatomic augmented repair or an anatomic reconstruction. Knees were biomechanically tested in a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system, which included valgus rotation, internal and external rotation, simulated pivot shift, and coupled anterior drawer with external rotation. RESULTS: Anatomic augmented repairs and anatomic reconstructions had significantly less medial joint gapping than the sectioned state at all tested flexion angles and showed significant reductions in valgus rotation compared with the sectioned state at all flexion angles. No significant differences between the anatomic augmented repair and anatomic reconstruction were found for any test performed. Despite the similar behavior between the 2 reconstruction groups, neither technique was able to reproduce the intact state. CONCLUSION: Anatomic sMCL augmented repairs and anatomic sMCL reconstructions were not significantly different when tested at time zero. Both the anatomic augmented repair and the anatomic reconstruction were able to improve knee stability and provide less than 2 mm of medial joint gapping at 0° and 20° of flexion. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that both an anatomic sMCL augmented repair and an anatomic sMCL reconstruction improve knee kinematics compared with a deficient sMCL and provide equivalent joint stability.