Comparison of Medial Parapatellar and Transpatellar Tendon Approach in Intramedullary Interlocking Nailing for Tibial Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis.

Introduction Tibial fractures are one of the most common traumatic fractures, particularly in automobile accidents. Percutaneous reduction with conventional reduction forceps and un reamed intramedullary nailing, transpatellar, and medial parapatellar tendon approaches are all used, but tibial intramedullary nails are still primarily inserted through a transpatellar tendon splitting or medial parapatellar tendon approach. Objective The aim and objectives of this study are to assess the mean pain score after nailing for a tibial fracture using a medial parapatellar versus a transpatellar tendon method retrospectively in order to enhance operational planning. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study that took place in a UK level 1 trauma center. Data from 60 patients were included between February 2019 and February 2020. An equal number of patients were selected for both approaches to maintain accuracy. The advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol was used to handle all of the patients in both groups in order to rule out any other injuries or fractures, after which they were scheduled for surgery after stabilization. They were subsequently evaluated during a three-month follow-up in an outdoor clinic, where they were given a pain score using the visual analogue score (VAS) while moving their knee joints. The mean pain score was differentiated by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), injury side, and injury type. Results Patients were divided into groups based on their ages. Patients in the transpatellar tendon group were 32.83±5.13 years old, whereas those in the medial parapatellar tendon group were 31.4 ±5.42 years old. The gender distribution of the patients revealed that the majority of the patients in both groups were male. In both groups, the left side was the most usually affected. The difference between the two groups' mean pain scores at three months was substantially lower in the medial parapatellar approach (p=0.005). Conclusion For patients having intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures, the medial parapatellar route is associated with a lower mean pain score than the transpatellar route. As a result, we may use this method in these individuals regularly.

Ankle syndesmotic injury: Tightrope vs screw fixation, A clinical academic survey.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study is to find out the treatment of choice for ankle fractures involving syndesmotic injury based on level of experience of orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: A survey was undertaken to analyse the management used for ankle fractures with syndesmotic injuries AO 44c in a 35-year-old patient. Surgeons attending an orthopaedic course were invited to take part in a survey sorted into groups: junior surgeons middle grades, and experienced. Pictures of an x ray were shown to the participants and treatment options were asked. RESULTS: 100 surgeons from 20 nations took part in the event. Juniors made up 39%, registrars made up 38%, and experienced doctors were 29%. Screws, were reported by 93% for syndesmosis fixation. 66% of surgeons who used screws for syndesmosis fixation favoured a single screw over two screws.3-4 cortices were virtually evenly divided in choice, with 54% preferring three and 46% preferring four cortices. Only 22% of the time did they utilise a washer with their screws. With 52% of patients, the most typical time for permitting them to weight bear was 4-6 weeks after surgery. At 1-2 months postoperatively, 34% preferred to remove the screw, and at 2-3 months postoperatively, 29% preferred to remove the screw. CONCLUSION: Data show that the majority of junior level doctors handle their patients according to AO principles. The majority prefer one 3.5 mm screw positioned between 2 and 4 cm above the ankle joint, with three cortices being somewhat preferred. Despite the lack of data to support one procedure, the majority of people remove their screws within 1-3 months.

Is spinal tuberculosis changing with changing time?

INTRODUCTION: Spinal tuberculosis is a chronic destructive disease with long-term morbidity. Patients are usually young especially from a poor socioeconomic background. Destruction of the intervertebral disk space and the adjacent vertebral bodies is the characteristic lesion. The dorsal spine is the most affected region with multi-level noncontiguous involvement being detected more frequently. Patients usually present with chronic back pain associated with spinal tenderness, paraplegia, spinal deformities, as well as with constitutional symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging has proved to be more sensitive and specific for its diagnosis, but availability and affordability of this investigation remain a problem in developing countries. Anti-tuberculous drug therapy has revolutionized the treatment of this debilitating disease. Surgery is still required in selected cases especially with evolving neurological deficit, progressive deformity, intractable pain and lack of response to drug therapy. With early diagnosis and effective treatment, prognosis is generally good.Materials/Methods: After getting permission from the clinical governance department, We collected the retrospective data of 305 patients with diagnosed spinal tuberculosis, who underwent surgical intervention. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in incidence among males and females. Housewives were the most affected. Lower dorsal spinal was the commonest site involved but our study didn't confirm the incidence of multi-level disease process. Anterior decompression along with Cage fixation was most frequently performed procedure. CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of highly effective antituberculous drugs, advanced surgical procedure, the spinal tuberculosis still maintains its demographic profile. There has been no change in characteristics of spinal presentation of this chronic debilitating disease. Patients continue to suffer the same way as they were suffering decades ago.