Trans-(±)-TTPG-B Attenuates Cell Cycle Progression and Inhibits Cell Proliferation on Cholangiocarcinoma Cells.

This research aimed to determine the target protein and molecular mechanism of trans-(±)-kusunokinin ((±)-KU) derivatives (trans-(±)-ARC and trans-(±)-TTPG-B). Molecular docking was used to predict potential synthesized (±)-KU targets among 22 proteins. The (±)-TTPG-B bound HSP90α better than EC44, native (±)-KU and (-)-KU, and (±)-KU and (-)-ARC. In contrast, (-)-ARC bound PI3K more strongly than any other test compound. CSF1R and AKR1B1 were not supposed to be the target of (±)-TTPG-B and (±)-ARC, unlike native (±)-KU. The (±)-TTPG-B bound Tyr139 and Trp162 of HSP90α. Moreover, (-)-ARC bound PI3K via hydrogen bonds and π-π stacking at distinct amino acids, which was different from the other tested compounds. Using half of the IC50 concentration, (±)-TTPG-B, (±)-KU and (±)-ARC enhanced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase after 12 h and 24 h on KKU-M213 (CCA) cells. The (±)-TTPG-B showed a stronger inhibitory effect than (±)-ARC and (±)-KU on HSP90α, PI3K, HSP90ß, c-Myc, AKT, MEK1, CyclinB1, CyclinD1, and CDK1 for 24 and 48 h after treatment with the same concentration (0.015 µM). Thus, trans-(±)-TTPG-B, a newly synthesized compound, has pharmacological potential for development as a target therapy for CCA treatment.

Trans-(±)-Kusunokinin Binding to AKR1B1 Inhibits Oxidative Stress and Proteins Involved in Migration in Aggressive Breast Cancer.

Synthetic trans-(±)-kusunokinin ((±)KU), a potential anticancer substance, was revealed to have an inhibitory effect on breast cancer. According to the computational modeling prediction, AKR1B1, an oxidative stress and cancer migration protein, could be a target protein of trans-(-)-kusunokinin. In this study, we determined the binding of (±)KU and AKR1B1 on triple-negative breast and non-serous ovarian cancers. We found that (±)KU exhibited a cytotoxic effect that was significantly stronger than zopolrestat (ZP) and epalrestat (EP) (known AKR1B1 inhibitors) on breast and ovarian cancer cells. (±)KU inhibited aldose reductase activity that was stronger than trans-(-)-arctiin ((-)AR) but weaker than ZP and EP. Interestingly, (±)KU stabilized AKR1B1 on SKOV3 and Hs578T cells after being heated at 60 and 75 °C, respectively. (±)KU decreased malondialdehyde (MDA), an oxidative stress marker, on Hs578T cells in a dose-dependent manner and the suppression was stronger than EP. Furthermore, (±)KU downregulated AKR1B1 and its downstream proteins, including PKC-δ, NF-κB, AKT, Nrf2, COX2, Twist2 and N-cadherin and up-regulated E-cadherin. (±)KU showed an inhibitory effect on AKR1B1 and its downstream proteins, similar to siRNA-AKR1B1. Interestingly, the combination of siRNA-AKR1B1 with EP or (±)KU showed a greater effect on the suppression of AKR1B1, N-cadherin, E-cadherin and NF-κB than single treatments. Taken together, we concluded that (±)KU-bound AKR1B1 leads to the attenuation of cellular oxidative stress, as well as the aggressiveness of breast cancer cell migration.

Anticancer Activity of (±)-Kusunokinin Derivatives towards Cholangiocarcinoma Cells.

This study aimed to investigate the cytotoxicity and anticancer activity of (±)-kusunokinin derivatives ((±)-TTPG-A and (±)-TTPG-B). The cytotoxicity effect was performed on human cancer cells, including breast cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, colon and ovarian cancer-cells, compared with normal cells, using the MTT assay. Cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis were detected using flow-cytometry analysis. We found that (±)-TTPG-B exhibited the strongest cytotoxicity on aggressive breast-cancer (MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-231) and cholangiocarcinoma (KKU-M213), with an IC50 value of 0.43 ± 0.01, 1.83 ± 0.04 and 0.01 ± 0.001 µM, respectively. Interestingly, (±)-TTPG-A and (±)-TTPG-B exhibited less toxicity than (±)-kusunokinin (9.75 ± 0.39 µM) on L-929 cells (normal fibroblasts). Moreover, (±)-TTPG-A predominated the ell-cycle arrest at the S phase, while (±)-TTPG-B caused cell arrest at the G0/G1 phase, in the same way as (±)-kusunokinin in KKU-M213 cells. Both (±)-TTPG-A and (±)-TTPG-B induced apoptosis and multi-caspase activity more than (±)-kusunokinin. Taken together, we conclude that (±)-TTPG-A and (±)-TTPG-B have a strong anticancer effect on cholangiocarcinoma. Moreover, (±)-TTPG-B could be a potential candidate compound for breast cancer and cholangiocarcinoma in the future.

Effects of trans-(±)-kusunokinin on chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells.

Ovarian cancer ranks eighth in cancer incidence and mortality among women worldwide. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is commonly used for patients with ovarian cancer. However, the clinical efficacy of cisplatin is limited due to the occurrence of adverse side effects and development of cancer chemoresistance during treatment. Trans-(±)-kusunokinin has been previously reported to inhibit cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis in various cancer cell types, including breast, colon and cholangiocarcinoma. However, the potential effects of (±)-kusunokinin on ovarian cancer remains unknown. In the present study, chemosensitive ovarian cancer cell line A2780 and chemoresistant ovarian cancer cell lines A2780cis, SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3 were treated with trans-(±)-kusunokinin to investigate its potential effects. MTT, colony formation, apoptosis and multi-caspase assays were used to determine cytotoxicity, the ability of single cells to form colonies, induction of apoptosis and multi-caspase activity, respectively. Moreover, western blot analysis was performed to determine the proteins level of topoisomerase II, cyclin D1, CDK1, Bax and p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA). The results demonstrated that trans-(±)-kusunokinin exhibited the strongest cytotoxicity against A2780cis cells with an IC50 value of 3.4 µM whilst also reducing the colony formation of A2780 and A2780cis cells. Trans-(±)-kusunokinin also induced the cells to undergo apoptosis and increased multi-caspase activity in A2780 and A2780cis cells. This compound significantly downregulated topoisomerase II, cyclin D1 and CDK1 expression, but upregulated Bax and PUMA expression in both A2780 and A2780cis cells. In conclusion, trans-(±)-kusunokinin suppressed ovarian cancer cells through the inhibition of colony formation, cell proliferation and the induction of apoptosis. This pure compound could be a potential targeted therapy for ovarian cancer treatment in the future. However, studies in an animal model and clinical trial need to be performed to support the efficacy and safety of this new treatment.

Trans-(-)-Kusunokinin: A Potential Anticancer Lignan Compound against HER2 in Breast Cancer Cell Lines?

Trans-(-)-kusunokinin, an anticancer compound, binds CSF1R with low affinity in breast cancer cells. Therefore, finding an additional possible target of trans-(-)-kusunokinin remains of importance for further development. Here, a computational study was completed followed by indirect proof of specific target proteins using small interfering RNA (siRNA). Ten proteins in breast cancer were selected for molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation. A preferred active form in racemic trans-(±)-kusunokinin was trans-(-)-kusunokinin, which had stronger binding energy on HER2 trans-(+)-kusunokinin; however, it was weaker than the designed HER inhibitors (03Q and neratinib). Predictively, trans-(-)-kusunokinin bound HER2 similarly to a reversible HER2 inhibitor. We then verified the action of (±)-kusunokinin compared with neratinibon breast cancer cells (MCF-7). (±)-Kusunokinin exhibited less cytotoxicity on normal L-929 and MCF-7 than neratinib. (±)-Kusunokinin and neratinib had stronger inhibited cell proliferation than siRNA-HER2. Moreover, (±)-kusunokinin decreased Ras, ERK, CyclinB1, CyclinD and CDK1. Meanwhile, neratinib downregulated HER, MEK1, ERK, c-Myc, CyclinB1, CyclinD and CDK1. Knocking down HER2 downregulated only HER2. siRNA-HER2 combination with (±)-kusunokinin suppressed HER2, c-Myc, CyclinB1, CyclinD and CDK1. On the other hand, siRNA-HER2 combination with neratinib increased HER2, MEK1, ERK, c-Myc, CyclinB1, CyclinD and CDK1 to normal levels. We conclude that trans-(±)-kusunokinin may bind HER2 with low affinity and had a different action from neratinib.

Anti-Proliferative Effects of Compound A and Its Effect in Combination with Cisplatin in Cholangiocarcinoma Cells.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a fatal cancer with high resistance to anticancer drugs.  The development of new drugs or compounds to be used alone or in combination with currently available chemotherapeutic agents to improve the treatment of CCA is needed. Compound A (CpdA), which is a small plant-derived glucocorticoid receptor modulator, strongly inhibited the growth and survival of several cancers.  However, the effect of CpdA on cholangiocarcinoma has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CpdA on CCA. METHODS: Cytotoxicity of CpdA was tested in primary cells including peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), fibroblasts, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), as well as on CCA cell lines (KKU-100, KKU-055, and KKU-213) was examined. Cell cycle distribution and IL-6 expression was assessed by flow cytometry and real-time polymerase chain reaction, respectively.  The effect of combination CpdA and cisplatin was evaluated by cell viability assay. RESULTS: CpdA significantly inhibited cell cycle at G1 phase in CCA cell lines, and reduced IL-6 mRNA expression.  However, combination CpdA and cisplatin did not enhance the inhibitory effect. TGFßR-II expression was increased in CCA cells after the combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the potential of CpdA for CCA treatment. However, combination treatment with CpdA and cisplatin increased CCA cell survival. The molecular mechanism is likely attributable to promotes cell survival via the TGFßR-II signaling pathway. The combination of CpdA with other anticancer drugs for CCA treatment should be further examined.

(-)-Kusunokinin inhibits breast cancer in N-nitrosomethylurea-induced mammary tumor rats.

Natural and synthetic (-)-kusunokinin inhibited breast cancer, colon cancer and cholangiocarcinoma cells at the G2/M phase and induced apoptosis. However, there is no report on the action and adverse effects of (-)-kusunokinin in animal models. In this study, we investigated the cytotoxic effect of (-)-kusunokinin from Piper nigrum on cancer cells. NMU-induced rat mammary tumors, an ER positive breast cancer model, were treated with (-)-kusunokinin. Proteins of interest related to cell cycle, angiogenesis, migration and signaling proteins were detected in tumor tissues. Results showed that (-)-kusunokinin exhibited strong cytotoxicity against breast, colon and lung cancer cells and caused low toxicity against normal fibroblast cells. For in vivo study, 7.0 mg/kg and 14.0 mg/kg of (-)-kusunokinin reduced tumor growth without side effects on body weight, internal organs and bone marrow. Combination of (-)-kusunokinin with a low effective dose of doxorubicin significantly inhibited tumor growth and provoked cell death in cancer tissues. Mechanistically, 14.0 mg/kg of (-)-kusunokinin decreased cell proliferation (c-Src, PI3K, Akt, p-Erk1/2 and c-Myc), cell cycle (E2f-1, cyclin B1 and CDK1), and metastasis (E-cadherin, MMP-2 and MMP-9) proteins in tumor tissues, which supports its anticancer effect. We further confirmed the antimigration effect of (-)-kusunokinin; the results show that this compound inhibited breast cancer cell (MCF-7) migration in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, the results suggest that 14 mg/kg of (-)-kusunokinin inhibited tumors through the reduction of signaling proteins and their downstream molecules. Therefore, (-)-kusunokinin becomes an intriguing candidate for cancer treatment as it provides a strong potency in cancer inhibition.

Inhibition of CSF1R and AKT by (±)-kusunokinin hinders breast cancer cell proliferation.

Kusunokinin, a lignan compound, inhibits cancer cell proliferation and induces apoptosis; however, the role of kusunokinin is not fully understood. Here, we aimed to identify a target protein of (-)-kusunokinin and determine the protein levels of its downstream molecules. We found that (-)-kusunokinin bound 5 possible target proteins, including CSF1R, MMP-12, HSP90-α, CyclinB1 and MEK1 with ΔGbind less than -10.40 kcal/mol. MD simulation indicated (-)-kusunokinin and pexidartinib (P31, a specific CSF1R binding compound) shared some extents of functional similarity in which (-)-kusunokinin bound CSF1R at the juxtamembrane (JM) region with aromatic amino acids similar to pexidartinib using π-π interaction, as well as hydrogen bond. Both P31 and (-)-kusunokinin moved into the same CSF1R region and W7 was a mutual key residue. However, the P31 binding site differed from the (-)-kusunokinin binding site. For in vitro study, the synthetic (±)-kusunokinin exhibited stronger cytotoxicity than picropodophyllotoxin, silibinin and etoposide on MCF-7 cells and represented less toxicity than picropodophyllotoxin and doxorubicin on L-929 and MCF-12A cells. Knocking down CSF1R using a specific siRNA combination with (±)-kusunokinin demonstrated levels of cell proliferation proteins slightly higher than siRNA-CSF1R treatment. However, siRNA-CSF1R combination with P31 represented the number of cell viability and cell proliferation proteins, like in the control groups (Lipofectamine and siRNA-Luciferase). Moreover, (±)-kusunokinin suppressed CSF1R and its downstream proteins, including AKT, CyclinD1 and CDK1. Meanwhile, both P31 and siRNA-CSF1R dramatically suppressed CSF1R, MEK1, AKT, ERK, CyclinB1, CyclinD1 and CDK1. Our overall results indicate that the mechanism of (±)-kusunokinin differed fairly from P31. We have concluded that (±)-kusunokinin inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation partially through the binding and suppression of CSF1R, which consequently affected AKT and its downstream molecules.

Anticancer activity of synthetic (±)-kusunokinin and its derivative (±)-bursehernin on human cancer cell lines.

Kusunokinin is a potent lignan compound with a several biological properties including antitrypanosomal and anticancer. In this study, (±)-kusunokinin and its derivative, (±)-bursehernin, were synthesized and investigated for their anticancer activities on cell viability, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer cell lines including breast cancer (MCF-7, MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-231), colon cancer (HT-29) and cholangiocarcinoma (KKU-K100, KKU-M213 and KKU-M055) cells. The result showed that (±)-kusunokinin and (±)-bursehernin represented the strongest growth inhibition against breast cancer (MCF-7) and cholangiocarcinoma (KKU-M213) cells with the IC50 values of 4.30 ±â€¯0.65 µM and 3.70 ±â€¯0.79 µM, respectively, both of which were lower than IC50 of normal fibroblast cells (L929). Etoposide was used as a positive control since this chemotherapeutic drug is in the lignan group same as (±)-kusunokinin. Surprisingly, etoposide showed less cytotoxicity than (±)-kusunokinin and its derivative on MCF-7, HT-29, KKU-M213 and KKU-K100. Moreover, (±)-bursehernin induced cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase, meanwhile (±)-kusunokinin tended to increased cell population at G2/M phase but did not show the significant difference compared with non-treated cells. Interestingly, protein levels related to cell proliferation pathway (topoisomerase II, STAT3, cyclin D1, and p21) were significantly decreased at 72 h. Both compounds induced apoptotic cell in time-dependent manner as confirmed by MultiCaspase assay. In conclusion, synthetic compound, (±)-kusunokinin and (±)-bursehernin, showed anticancer effects via the reduction of cell proliferation proteins and induction of apoptosis.

Inhibition of dengue virus production and cytokine/chemokine expression by ribavirin and compound A.

Dengue virus (DENV) infection is a worldwide public health problem with an increasing magnitude. The severity of disease in the patients with DENV infection correlates with high viral load and massive cytokine production - the condition referred to as "cytokine storm". Thus, concurrent inhibition of DENV and cytokine production should be more effective for treatment of DENV infection. In this study, we investigated the effects of the antiviral agent - ribavirin (RV), and the anti-inflammatory compound - compound A (CpdA), individually or in combination, on DENV production and cytokine/chemokine transcription in human lung epithelial carcinoma (A549) cells infected with DENV. Initially, the cells infected with DENV serotype 2 (DENV2) was studied. The results showed that treatment of DENV-infected cells with RV could significantly reduce both DENV production and cytokine (IL-6 and TNF-α) and chemokine (IP-10 and RANTES) transcription while treatment of DENV-infected cells with CpdA could significantly reduce cytokine (IL-6 and TNF-α) and chemokine (RANTES) transcription. Combined RV and CpdA treatment of the infected cells showed greater reduction of DENV production and cytokine/chemokine transcription. Similar results of this combined treatment were observed for infection with any one of the four DENV (DENV1, 2, 3, and 4) serotypes. These results indicate that combination of the antiviral agent and the anti-inflammatory compound offers a greater efficiency in reduction of DENV and cytokine/chemokine production, providing a new therapeutic approach for DENV infection.