The Cost of Breast Cancer Surgery - Is the Money Spent Reflected on Health-related Quality of Life?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Different treatment options of breast cancer (BC) are dependent on certain cancer- and patient-related features. The cost of treatment varies among patients. This study describes the cost distribution in the treatment of Finnish patients with BC for two years and relates the costs to important outcomes of modern BC treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of 1,065 patients was measured prospectively at baseline, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months thereafter with a generic (15D) and a disease-specific (EORTC QLQ C-30 BR23) HRQoL-instrument. Clinical data and costs of care were collected from hospital records. Patients were divided into four groups according to the surgical approach: breast-conserving surgery (BCS n=661), mastectomy (n=319), immediate reconstruction (IBR n=51), and delayed reconstruction (DR n=34), and the costs according to the clinic responsible for treatment: oncological-, breast surgery-, and plastic surgery unit. Total costs of care during follow-up are presented groupwise alongside HRQoL results. RESULTS: The mean total cost for BC surgery was 6,015 Euros for BCS, 8,114 euros for mastectomy, 18,217 Euros for IBR, and 19,041 Euros for DR. BCS, IBR, and DR produced good HRQoL. Mastectomy patients had the lowest overall HRQoL and highest cost accumulation at the oncology unit. HRQoL of IBR and DR patients was similar. CONCLUSION: DR produces good HRQoL but generates the highest costs of care. If patients that require reconstruction could be identified earlier and offered IBR instead of mastectomy followed by later DR, the costs of care might be reduced.

Breast Reconstruction-Prospective Follow up on Breast Cancer Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: Analysing the results of breast reconstruction is important both in terms of oncological safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is thought to be prone to complications and heavy for patients with no time to adapt to having cancer. Delayed reconstruction (DR) is an option after primary surgery and oncological treatments, but requires patients to go through two recovery periods after surgery. METHODS: A prospective study of 1065 breast cancer patients with repeated measurement of HRQoL with both generic (15D) and disease specific (EORTC QLQ C-30 BR23) measuring tools included 51 IBR patients and 41 DR patients. These patients' HRQoL and reconstruction methods were studied in more detail alongside with clinical data to determine HRQoL levels for patients with IBR and those with mastectomy and DR during a 24-month follow-up. Measuring points were baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: Most frequent techniques used were abdominal flaps (IBR n = 16, DR n = 14), latissimus dorsi flaps (LD) (IBR n = 19, DR n = 10), implants (IBR n = 12) and fat grafting (DR n = 6). Smaller groups were excluded from group comparisons. Approximately one third of the patients encountered complications. Symptom scores did not differ between reconstruction methods. DR patients had better overall HRQoL at 12 months, but at 24 months the situation had changed in favour of IBR. Both approaches of reconstructive surgery produced good HRQoL with no significant differences between the approaches studied.

Surgery and health-related quality of life - A prospective follow up study on breast cancer patients in Finland.

INTRODUCTION: The influence of different surgical approaches on breast cancer patients' Health-related Quality of life (HRQoL) is an important determinant when making decisions on the choice of treatment. Knowledge on how patients actually perceive different surgical treatments regarding long-term HRQoL is still scarce. MATERIALS & METHODS: 1065 patients with primary breast cancer operated on from 2008 to 2015 at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland were prospectively followed-up for two years. They filled in two HRQoL questionnaires, the EORTC QLQ C30 - BR 23 and the 15D, at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Clinical data on treatments given and the course of recovery were collected from patient records. Patients were divided into four mutually exclusive groups according to surgical method: breast resection (n = 415), oncoplastic resection (n = 248), mastectomy (n = 351) and immediate reconstruction (n = 51). Clinical data were combined with HRQoL scores and analysed as multivariate modelling. RESULTS: All groups experienced initially worsening overall HRQoL after baseline. Oncoplastic resection patients had the best body image and their HRQoL reached the highest level after treatments at 12 months whereas the reconstruction patients reached the highest HRQoL level first at 24 months. Mastectomy patients had the lowest scores throughout the 24-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Extensive surgery, in terms of immediate reconstruction, led to slower HRQoL recovery than oncoplastic techniques. Mastectomy patients are at risk of having the lowest HRQoL scores throughout their recovery after surgery.

Health-related quality of life in different states of breast cancer - comparing different instruments.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of breast cancer has improved significantly during the last few decades increasing the interest in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to compare the HRQoL scores produced by different instruments and to shed light on their validity in various states of breast cancer by studying the association of cancer-related symptoms with HRQoL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study of breast cancer patients treated in the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District from September 2009 to April 2011. A total of 840 patients completed three HRQoL questionnaires: the EQ-5D-3L (including VAS), 15D and EORTC QLQ-30 and a questionnaire concerning sociodemographic factors. Patients were divided into five mutually exclusive groups: primary treatment (n = 118), recovery (6-18 months from diagnosis) (n = 150), remission (>18 months) (n = 382), metastatic disease (n = 176) and palliative care (n = 14). The association of HRQoL with sociodemographic and clinical factors and cancer-related symptoms, screened by the EORTC QLQ-30, was studied by multivariate modeling using stepwise linear regression analysis. RESULTS: HRQoL scores were the best at the time closest to diagnosis and deteriorated with disease progression. The EQ-5D had a pronounced ceiling effect with 40.8% of the respondents scoring 1 (perfect health) compared to 6% for the 15D and 5.6% for VAS. In regression analyses, pain, fatigue and financial difficulties were the most important predictors of lower HRQoL. The 15D showed better discriminatory power and content validity. The EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning deteriorated in advanced states of the disease with physical, social and role functioning being the most affected. Insomnia, fatigue and pain were the most commonly reported symptoms in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Different HRQoL instruments produce notably different HRQoL scores. The EQ-5D has a pronounced ceiling effect. Pain and fatigue are the most common symptoms associated with poor HRQoL in all disease states.

Quality of life of recently treated patients with breast cancer.

AIM: To investigate whether the negative quality of life result of a large randomized exercise intervention study (BREX) was due to considerable spontaneous recovery after adjuvant treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The change in QoL was studied in the control patients of the BREX study (Group 1) and a group of similar follow-up patients that did not participate in any intervention study (Group 2). QoL was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 with the breast cancer module supplement 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: QoL improved in both groups between 6 and 12 months after surgery. The improvement was similar in both groups for global QoL and for most of the QoL sub-scales. CONCLUSION: No evidence was found to support the hypothesis that participation in an exercise intervention per se significantly improves QoL. Spontaneous improvement in QoL began during the first six months after the primary treatments, which might have confounded the results of the intervention of the BREX study.