Optimizing Fluid Resuscitation and Preventing Fluid Overload in Patients with Septic Shock.

Intravenous fluid administration remains an important component in the care of patients with septic shock. A common error in the treatment of septic shock is the use of excessive fluid in an effort to overcome both hypovolemia and vasoplegia. While fluids are necessary to help correct the intravascular depletion, vasopressors should be concomitantly administered to address vasoplegia. Excessive fluid administration is associated with worse outcomes in septic shock, so great care should be taken when deciding how much fluid to give these vulnerable patients. Simple or strict "recipes" which mandate an exact amount of fluid to administer, even when weight based, are not associated with better outcomes and therefore should be avoided. Determining the correct amount of fluid requires the clinician to repeatedly assess and consider multiple variables, including the fluid deficit, organ dysfunction, tolerance of additional fluid, and overall trajectory of the shock state. Dynamic indices, often involving the interaction between the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, appear to be superior to traditional static indices such as central venous pressure for assessing fluid responsiveness. Point-of-care ultrasound offers the bedside clinician a multitude of applications which are useful in determining fluid administration in septic shock. In summary, prevention of fluid overload in septic shock patients is extremely important, and requires the careful attention of the entire critical care team.

Extubating trauma patients in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients often require endotracheal intubation for urgent or emergent airway protection or to allow expeditious imaging when they cannot cooperate with the needed evaluation. These patients may occasionally be extubated in the emergency department (ED) when the trauma workup is negative for consequential injuries and eventually discharged from the ED. The timing and safety of discharging these patients is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the adverse outcomes and evaluate the safety of extubating trauma patients who are clinically well following evaluation in the ED. METHODS: Records of trauma patients who were intubated and then extubated in the ED at a single level 1 trauma referral center during the 4-year study period (Jan 2014 - Dec 2017) were retrospectively abstracted. The primary outcome was the incidence of a post-extubation complication, including desaturation, emesis, aspiration, need for sedative administration, or unplanned reintubation. Additional outcome measures included final disposition, duration of observation following extubation, ED length of stay and return to the hospital within 72 h. RESULTS: There were 59 eligible patients identified over the study period, of whom 95% presented following blunt trauma. One patient (1.7%; 95% confidence interval 0-9) required unplanned reintubation and developed aspiration pneumonia following re-extubation. Forty-two (71%) of the patients were discharged from the ED following extubation and a period of post-extubation observation with a mean of 5.8 h (0.6-16.7 h). None of the patients who were discharged returned to the ED within 72 h with complications related to extubation (0%; 95% confidence interval 0-6%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting to the ED with possible acute traumatic injuries who are intubated and then extubated after trauma evaluation and resolution of the indication for intubation appear to have a low incidence of complication or return visit when discharged from the ED after a brief period of observation. Specific extubation and discharge criteria should be developed to ensure the safety of this practice. Further validation is required in the form of larger and prospective studies.

A Rare Cause of Septic Shock in the Emergency Department in an Intellectually-Disabled Child.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis in older children is often associated with the presence of developmental abnormalities and cerebral palsy. While relatively uncommon, surgical abdomen in these patients is associated with a high rate of mortality. Few reports have been described of sepsis caused by isolated cecal necrosis. CASE REPORT: We report a 13-year-old child with cerebral palsy and global developmental delay who presented to the emergency department with acute worsening abdominal distention that the mother attributed to chronic constipation. Clinical evaluation revealed that she was in severe septic shock and needed immediate stabilization after which she underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Operative findings revealed cecal necrosis that necessitated an ileocecectomy. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Children with intellectual disabilities presenting with sepsis to the emergency department can be particularly challenging given the communication barriers and the time-sensitive nature of the condition. When evaluating these patients, a thorough history and examination are often the only tools that assist in the early identification of the infectious source, leading to improved clinical outcomes.© 2019 Elsevier Inc.

Open versus closed lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the management of chronic anal fissures: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic anal fissure is a benign disorder that is associated with considerable discomfort. Surgical treatment in the form of lateral sphincterotomy has long been regarded as the gold standard of treatment. This study compared the open and closed techniques of lateral sphincterotomy in terms of their postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A prospective, randomized comparative study was conducted between October 2010 and August 2012. A total of 136 patients were randomly assigned to each of two groups. Patients were followed up postoperatively for more than 1 year to assess any complications. The outcomes were compared among the two groups using the Chi-square test and Student t test. RESULTS: The mean age at presentation was 40.13 years. The male to female ratio was 1.47:1. The typical presentation was painful defecation. Fissures were most often located in the posterior midline and associated with a sentinel pile. Delayed postoperative healing was found in 4.4% of the group of patients undergoing open lateral sphincterotomy. The mean pain score and duration of hospital stay were lower with the closed technique. CONCLUSION: Closed lateral internal sphincterotomy is the treatment of choice for chronic fissures as it is effective, safe, less expensive, and associated with a lower rate of complications than the open sphincterotomy technique.

A comparative analysis on various techniques of incisional hernia repair-experience from a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India.

This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India over a period of 7 years and included 90 patients with incisional hernia (n = 90; 76 females and 14 males), operated over 2 years (January 2004 to December 2005), and followed-up for 5 years postoperatively (2005-2009). As per the surgical unit preference, patients underwent different methods of hernia repair-onlay mesh repair (n = 45, 50 %), underlay mesh repair (n = 18, 20 %), and anatomical repair (i.e., without mesh) (n = 27, 30 %). Parameters studied included seroma formation, wound infection, postoperative pain, and hernia recurrence. Although the first two parameters were statistically not significant, postoperative pain was found to be more in patients who underwent an underlay repair. A significant difference in the hernia recurrence rate was observed between mesh repair and anatomical repair groups. Hence, we conclude that all incisional hernias should be repaired with a mesh (meshplasty).

Accuracy of clinical examination of breast lumps in detecting malignancy: a retrospective study.

Clinical examination is a simple method to detect breast lumps and their nature as it is inexpensive and non-invasive and if found to be accurate, might be of great value as a diagnostic tool. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of clinical examination and its contribution towards the diagnosis of a palpable breast lump. The study was record based and conducted at a University Medical College Hospital and a tertiary referral centre of South India. Patient files of those women who presented with a breast lump between January to December 2011 were studied. A total of 120 patients were obtained following necessary exclusions. The accuracy of clinical assessment at an outpatient facility was determined by comparing the physician's diagnosis with the final histopathological diagnosis. The inter-observer agreement (kappa) for diagnosing a breast lump was 81 % (95 % Confidence Interval = 71 % to 92 %) indicating a good agreement between clinical and pathological diagnoses. McNemar test also indicated a high degree of concordance between the two diagnoses (4.17 % discordance). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of clinical breast examination in comparison to histopathology were 95, 88, 87, and 95 % respectively, with an overall accuracy of 90.8 %. 11 lumps were wrongly diagnosed at the time of clinical examination. Clinical examination of breast lumps was found to have a high sensitivity (94.5 %) and specificity (87.7 %) and can be used as the diagnostic tool to identify the nature of the lump, however, its value in diagnosing breast malignancy remains contributory due to the possibility that malignant lumps could be overlooked and present as advanced cancer at a later stage. Histopathology is recommended in all cases unless clinical examination is supported with strong evidence of benignity based on repeated breast imaging via ultrasound or mammogram (>35 yrs).