Benchmarking blood culture quality in the emergency department: Contamination, single sets and positivity.

OBJECTIVE: To benchmark blood culture (BC) quality in an Australian ED, explore groups at risk of suboptimal BC collection, and identify potential areas for improvement. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was undertaken to benchmark quality of BCs in a tertiary adult ED in terms of number of BC sets per patient and proportion of patients with false positive (contaminated) BC results. RESULTS: A single BC set was taken for 55% of patients, with lower acuity patients being more likely to have a single BC set taken. BC false positives occurred in 3.4% of presentations, with higher frequency in some critically unwell patient groups. The true positive BC rate was 10.9%, with pathogens most frequently isolated in older patients, those with a haematological condition or genitourinary source, and those admitted to inpatient wards. Hospital length of stay did not differ between patients with negative and patients with false positive BCs. CONCLUSIONS: BC quality standards in the ED such as false positive rate <3% and single culture rate <20% are required to facilitate benchmarking and prospective quality improvement. The sensitivity and specificity of this common and critical test can be improved. Patient subgroups associated with poor-quality BC collection can be identified and should be a focus of future work.

Changing culture: An intervention to improve blood culture quality in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Blood cultures (BCs) remain a key investigation in ED patients at risk of bacteraemia. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a multi-modal, nursing-led intervention to improve the quality of BCs in the ED, in terms of single culture, underfilling and contamination rates. METHOD: The present study was conducted in the ED of a large urban tertiary referral hospital. The study included four phases: pre-intervention, intervention, post-intervention and sustainability periods. A multi-modal intervention to improve BC quality consisting small group education, posters, brief educational videos, social media presence, quality feedback, small group/individual mentoring and availability of BC collection kits was designed and delivered by two senior ED nurses over 7 weeks. Study data comprised rates of single, underfilled and contaminated cultures in each of three 18-week periods: pre-intervention (baseline), post-intervention and sustainability. RESULTS: Over the study period 4908 BC sets were collected during 2347 episodes of care in the ED. Single culture sets reduced from 56.2% in the pre-intervention period to 22.8% post-intervention (P < 0.01) and 18.8% in the sustainability period (P < 0.01). Underfilled bottle rates were also significantly reduced (aerobic 52.8% pre-intervention to 19.2% post-intervention, 18.8% sustainability, anaerobic 46.8% pre-intervention to 23.3% post-intervention, 23.8% sustainability). Skin contaminants were grown from 3.7% of BC sets in the pre-intervention period, improving to 1.5% in the post-intervention period (P < 0.001) and 2.1% in the sustainability period (P = 0.03). Total volume of blood cultured was significantly associated with diagnosis of bacteraemia. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in BC quality are possible with nursing-based interventions in the ED.

The effectiveness of interventions to reduce peripheral blood culture contamination in acute care: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures are an integral part of the diagnosis of bacteremia in unwell patients. The treatment of bacteremia involves the rapid and accurate identification of the causative agent grown from the blood cultures collected. Contamination of blood cultures with non-pathogenic microbes such as skin commensals causes false positive results and subsequent unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions. While guidelines for blood culture quality recommend no more than 2-3% contamination rate, rates up to 12% are reported in the literature. There have been a number of methods proposed to reduce the contamination of blood cultures, including educational interventions, changing of skin cleansing preparations and introduction of blood culture collection packs in acute care settings. This protocol outlines methods to identify and evaluate interventions to reduce blood culture contamination in the acute care setting. METHODS: The reviewers will conduct a systematic search of literature in CINHAL, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central register of controlled trials. Unpublished works will be identified in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Articles will be assessed for relevance based on their title and abstract. Remaining relevant citations will have their full text retrieved and assessed against eligibility criteria. All studies that meet the eligibility criteria will have their methodological quality appraised. Assessments for relevance and methodological quality will be conducted independently by two reviewers. If appropriate, data will be analysed using the Mantel-Haenszel method under a random effects model. Heterogeneity of the studies will be assessed using the I 2 and chi-squared statistic. Meta-analysis will be attempted if the data is suitable. DISCUSSION: This review will identify and summarise the interventions previously described in the literature aimed at reducing peripherally collected blood culture contamination rates in acute care. These findings have the potential to lead to multifaceted interventions based on previous evidence to reduce blood culture contamination in the acute setting. Reductions in the proportion of contaminated blood cultures have the potential to save money, unrequired treatment (particularly antimicrobials) and hospital bed days. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: In accordance with guidelines outlined in the PRISMA-P methodology, this protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on December 8, 2017, and last updated on January 4, 2018 (registration number CRD42017081650).