Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of TAR-200 in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Who Refused or Were Unfit for Curative-intent Therapy: A Phase 1 Study.

PURPOSE: Half of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer worldwide may not receive curative-intent therapy. Elderly or frail patients are most affected by this unmet need. TAR-200 is a novel, intravesical drug delivery system that provides sustained, local release of gemcitabine into the bladder over a 21-day dosing cycle. The phase 1 TAR-200-103 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of TAR-200 in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who either refused or were unfit for curative-intent therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had cT2-cT3bN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. TAR-200 was inserted for 4 consecutive 21-day cycles over 84 days. The primary end points were safety and tolerability at 84 days. Secondary end points included rates of clinical complete response and partial response as determined by cystoscopy, biopsy, and imaging; duration of response; and overall survival. RESULTS: Median age of the 35 enrolled patients was 84 years, and most were male (24/35, 68.6%). Treatment-emergent adverse events related to TAR-200 occurred in 15 patients. Two patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events leading to removal of TAR-200. At 3 months, complete response and partial response rates were 31.4% (11/35) and 8.6% (3/35), respectively, yielding an overall response rate of 40.0% (14/35; 95% CI 23.9-57.9). Median overall survival and duration of response were 27.3 months (95% CI 10.1-not estimable) and 14 months (95% CI 10.6-22.7), respectively. Progression-free rate at 12 months was 70.5%. CONCLUSIONS: TAR-200 was generally safe, well tolerated, and had beneficial preliminary efficacy in this elderly and frail cohort with limited treatment options.

The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine intravesical drug delivery system (TAR-200) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: a phase I trial.

OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy (RC) are underutilized standards of care for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) due to high patient burden from systemic toxicities and postoperative complications, respectively. TAR-200 is a novel intravesical drug delivery system developed to release gemcitabine into the bladder urine continuously, resulting in distribution of drug into stromal layers of the bladder. The primary aim of the TAR-200-101 study was to evaluate the safety of TAR-200 in patients with MIBC prior to RC (NCT02722538). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This phase I, open-label study was conducted across 6 US and European sites. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed T2a-T3b N0-N1 M0 urothelial cancer and had refusal or were ineligible to receive cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Two arms were enrolled serially. Patients in Arm 1 had residual tumor >3 cm after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT); those in Arm 2 had undergone maximal TURBT (residual tumor <3 cm). Patients received two 7-day cycles of intravesical gemcitabine delivery via TAR-200 before undergoing RC. Primary outcome was safety; secondary outcomes were tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy. RESULTS: Of 23 patients in the intention-to-treat population (11 in Arm 1, 12 in Arm 2), 20 completed both dosing cycles of TAR-200. No patients were classified as intolerant to TAR-200. Ten patients (4 in Arm 1, 6 in Arm 2) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common TAR-200-related TEAEs were pollakiuria (n = 3) and urinary incontinence (n = 2). All TEAEs prior to RC were grade ≤2; 1 patient in Arm 2 experienced a grade 3 non-treatment-related TEAE. Plasma gemcitabine levels were undetectable. In Arm 1, those with residual tumor, 4 of 10 patients exhibited pathologic downstaging; 1 experienced a complete response (CR) and 3 a partial response (PR). In Arm 2, those undergoing maximal TURBT, 6 of 10 patients exhibited downstaging; 3 experienced a CR and 3 a PR. CONCLUSION: Controlled intravesical gemcitabine release via TAR-200 was safe and well tolerated in patients with MIBC.

ENERGIZE: a Phase III study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or with nivolumab with/without linrodostat mesylate for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In cisplatin-eligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy improves overall survival. Tumor PD-L1 expression increases in MIBC after NAC, suggesting potential synergy in combining PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors with NAC. IDO1 is overexpressed in bladder cancer and is associated with poor outcomes. Linrodostat mesylate (BMS-986205) - a selective, potent, oral IDO1 inhibitor - combined with nivolumab has demonstrated safety and preliminary evidence of clinical activity in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Here, we discuss the rationale and trial design of the ENERGIZE, a Phase III trial investigating the efficacy of NAC in combination with nivolumab with or without linrodostat followed by postsurgery nivolumab or nivolumab with linrodostat in cisplatin-eligible patients with MIBC. Clinical trial registration number: NCT03661320.