An assessment of the relationship between body mass index and minor complications in percutaneous gastrostomy tubes.

Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine if patients with obesity have different postoperative outcomes than their peers. Material and Methods: A single-center retrospective review of all fluoroscopically-guided percutaneous gastrostomy tube, with 183 patients and 90 patients in the BAG and dilator groups, respectively. Patients were stratified, based on body mass index (BMI) percentile and for age. Demographic information and data on medical comorbidities and post-operative complications were collected. All analyses were conducted using Chi-square or Kruskal-Wallis testing. Results: The median BMI was 26.6 kg/m2 with a standard deviation of 7.7. 106 (38.8%) patients were classified in the normal BMI category, 57 (20.9%) were overweight, and 50 (28.3%) were classified as obese. No major complications were reported in either group. 106 patients (38.8%) reported minor complications. The most common complication observed across both groups was procedural pain, with a higher incidence in the balloon group compared to the dilator group (17.5% vs. 12.2%). Dislodgement emerged as the second most common complication, occurring more frequently in the balloon group (12%) compared to the dilator group (6.7%). When considering weight categories, the overall rate of minor complications was highest among underweight patients (57.6%, P = 0.124). Both underweight and normal BMI patients showed a significantly higher incidence of tube dislodgement compared to other BMI categories (27.2% and 9.4%, respectively, P = 0.015). In a multivariable logistic regression, age was associated with an increased risk of minor complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, F [1.01, 1.05], P = 0.002). BAG had a greater OR for minor complication rate compared to dilator-assisted gastrostomy, although the difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval [0.69, 2.06]). Conclusion: Few studies have identified the relationship between BMI and complications related to gastrostomy tube placement. Our study highlights the importance of individualized care for patients across different BMI classes to minimize complications and improve patient outcomes.

Radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube in neurological disease: A retrospective study.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of balloon and non-balloon (or dilator) gastrostomy devices in radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) for patients with neurological disease. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 152 patients was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from July 2017 to September 2020. 104 and 48 patients were included in the balloon and non-balloon groups, respectively. The frequency of complications per specific neurological indication as well as the breakdown of the different complications pertaining to each indication was recorded for analysis. The recovery time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, peak radiation, and pain management dosages for each procedure were all reviewed to evaluate for statistical differences between the balloon and non-balloon groups. An adjusted model odds ratio (OR) was conducted to evaluate how each of the variables (type of gastrostomy tube, body mass index [BMI], age, and gender) affected the frequency of complications within our cohort. Results: This study included 152 patients, with an average age of 65.17 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 12.66) and an average BMI of 26.97 (IQR = 7.19). The majority of patients were male (71.1%). The most common indication for the procedure was stroke (24.3%), followed by post-intubation dysphagia (16.4%) and intracranial hemorrhage (11.8%). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and altered mental status had a similar prevalence at 9.9%. The overall complication rate was 33.8%, overall mortality rate 3.3%, 30-day mortality rate of 2.6%, and no other major complications according to CIRSE criteria. Notably, patients with neurodegenerative disorders exhibited comparable rates of minor complications: 33.3% in ALS (5/15 patients), 50% in myasthenia gravis (1/2 patients), and 100% in muscular dystrophy (1/1 patient). The study compared two groups: the balloon group (104 patients) and the dilator group (48 patients). The balloon group received significantly lower preoperative sedation in the form of fentanyl (Avg = 4.46 min vs. 6.54 min, P = 0.287). The balloon group had shorter fluoroscopy time, lower radiation exposure dose, and shorter operating time compared to the dilator group, though not statistically significant. In the logistic regression model, there was no statistical difference in complication rates between the dilator and balloon groups. BMI, age, and gender did not significantly affect minor complication rates. Conclusion: RIG tube insertions may serve as a valuable, alternative approach in providing enteral support in patients with neurological disease.

Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial forceps are commonly used for complex IVC filter removal and after initial attempts at IVC filter retrieval with a snare have failed. Currently, there are no clear guidelines to help distinguish cases where primary removal should be attempted with standard snare technique or whether attempts at removal should directly be started with forceps. This study is aimed to identify clinical and imaging predictors of snare failure which necessitate conversion to endobronchial forceps. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 543 patients who underwent IVC filter retrievals were performed at three large quaternary care centers from Jan 2015 to Jan 2022. Patient demographics and IVC filter characteristics on cross-sectional images (degree of tilt, hook embedment, and strut penetration, etc.) were reviewed. Binary multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of IVC filter retrieval where snare retrieval would fail. RESULTS: Thirty seven percent of the patients (n = 203) necessitated utilization of endobronchial forceps. IVC filter hook embedment (OR:4.55; 95%CI: 1.74-11.87; p = 0.002) and strut penetration (OR: 56.46; 95% CI 20.2-157.7; p = 0.001) were predictors of snare failure. In contrast, total dwell time, BMI, and degree of filter tilt were not associated with snare failure. Intraprocedural conversion from snare to endobronchial forceps was significantly associated with increased contrast volume, radiation dose, and total procedure times (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IVC filter hook embedment and strut penetration were predictors of snare retrieval failure. Intraprocedural conversion from snare to endobronchial forceps increased contrast volume, radiation dose, and total procedure time. When either hook embedment or strut penetration is present on pre-procedural cross-sectional images, IVC filter retrieval should be initiated using endobronchial forceps. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, large multicenter retrospective cohort.

A comparison of balloon-assisted versus dilator in percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement.

Objectives: This study assesses the safety and efficacy of balloon-assisted gastrostomy (BAG) compared to conventional techniques using dilators. Material and Methods: A single-center retrospective review of all fluoroscopically-guided percutaneous gastrostomy tube insertions from July 2017 to September 2020 was performed. Two hundred and seventy-three patients were included in this study, with 183 patients and 90 patients in the BAG and dilator groups, respectively. Fluoroscopy time, peak radiation dose, pain management, days to interventional radiology (IR) reconsultation, and post-operative complications (major and minor) for each procedure were reviewed to evaluate for statistical differences. Results: There were shorter fluoroscopy times (5.13 min vs. 7.05 min, P = 0.059) and a significantly lower radiation use (Avg = 102.13 mGy vs. 146.98 mGy, P < 0.05) in the BAG group. The BAG group required significantly lower operating time (41 min vs. 48 min, P < 0.01) and received lower pain management (fentanyl 75 mcg and midazolam 1.5 mg, P < 0.001). The mean days to IR reconsultation for the BAG group was greater (29 days vs. 26 days, P = 0.38). The overall rate of minor complications (grades 1 and 2, according to the CIRSE classification system) was higher in the dilator group (39% vs. 35% in BAG group, P = 0.53). No major complications were reported in either group. Conclusion: BAG is a safe and efficient technique for percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement. BAG patients required significantly lesser radiation, OR time, post-operative pain management, and recorded lower postoperative complications compared to their counterparts in gastrostomies utilizing dilators.

The Role of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Massive Pulmonary Embolism in a Patient With Unilateral Lung Transplant and Atrial Septal Defect.

PURPOSE: The risk of thromboembolic disease is high in patients with lung transplantation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality with single healthy transplanted lung. We present a case involving successful endovascular management of life-threatening acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) in a patient with single lung transplant and atrial septal defect (ASD). CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old man with a history of interstitial lung disease status post single left orthotopic lung transplant in 2012 presented with acute massive PE and clot burden in the pulmonary arteries of the transplanted left lung. Severe right heart dysfunction, hemodynamic instability, and requirement for vasopressors persisted post systemic thrombolytic therapy. As a result, the patient underwent successful endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with immediate improvement in oxygen saturation and hemodynamic status. The procedure was performed without adverse outcomes or paradoxical embolization despite the presence of ASD. The right heart dysfunction resolved, the patient was extubated the next day, and was discharged to home 2 days post procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy was safely used to treat acute massive PE in a single transplanted lung in the presence of ASD. CLINICAL IMPACT: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy could be safely utilized to treat patients with lung transplant and acute massive or submassive pulmonary embolism. However, safely of mechanical thrombectomy should be determined in case-based scenarios and based on time interval from transplantation to when the thrombectomy is required.

Assessment of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training for Clinical Educators in Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.

Integrating point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to enhance diagnostic availability in resource-limited regions in Africa has become a main initiative for global health services in recent years. In this article, we present lessons learned from introducing POCUS as part of the Global Health Service Partnership (GHSP), a collaboration started in 2012 between the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the Peace Corps and Seed Global Health to provide health care work force education and training in resource-limited countries. A cross-sectional survey of GHSP clinical educators trained to use POCUS and provided with hand-held ultrasound during their 1-y deployment during the period 2013-2017. The survey consisted of 35 questions on the adequacy of the training program and how useful POCUS was to their overall clinical and educational mission. Clinical educators engaged in a series of ultrasound educational initiatives including pre-departure training, bedside training in the host institutions, online educational modules, educational feedback on transmitted images and training of local counterparts. In this study 63 GHSP clinical educators who participated in the POCUS trainings were identified, and 49 were included at the study (78% response rate). They were assigned to academic institutions in Tanzania (n = 24), Malawi (n = 21) and Uganda (n = 18). More than 75% reported use of POCUS in clinical diagnoses and 50% in determining treatment, and 18% reported procedural application of ultrasound in their practice. The top indications for POCUS were cardiac exams, second- and third-trimester obstetric exams, lung and pleura, liver and spleen and gynecology/first-trimester obstetrics. The largest perceived barriers were lack of ultrasound knowledge by the clinical educators, lack of time, equipment security, difficulty accessing the Internet and equipment problems. We concluded that our multiphase POCUS training program has increased the utility, acceptability and usage of POCUS in resource-limited settings.