Real-World Management Strategies of Anticoagulated Atrial Fibrillation Patients After a Clinically Significant Bleeding Episode.

BACKGROUND: Systemic anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) carries inherent bleeding risks, and determining whether and when to resume anticoagulation after significant bleeding is a common dilemma. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of AF patients discharged after a bleeding event, document real-life thromboembolic prevention strategy (TPS), and analyse their associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of anticoagulated AF patients admitted for bleeding from 2017 to 2019. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included, with a mean age of 78.6 years. Four discharge groups were defined: 75 patients (53.5%) had optimal anticoagulation (OA), 37 (26.4%) had a suboptimal antithrombotic regimen (SAR; low-dose direct oral anticoagulants without dose-reduction criteria or antiplatelet therapy), 10 (7.1%) were referred for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), and 18 (12.9%) left without any TPS. All-cause mortality at 2 years was high (28.6%) but not statistically different between groups (P = 0.71). Patients discharged with a TPS (OA/SAR/LAAO referral) were more likely to be readmitted for bleeding at 2 years (34% vs 0%; P = 0.002), and those discharged without a TPS had higher rates of stroke (16.6% vs 1.4%; P = 0.003). SAR yielded readmission rates for bleeding similar to resumption of OA (27% vs 34.7%; P = 0.41) but was associated with high rates of death or readmission at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: This real-life cohort reveals that clinicians frequently downgrade or discontinue long-term thromboembolic protection after a bleeding event despite current guideline recommendations to the contrary, and downgrading resulted in bleeding risk similar to OA.

Clinical assessment of AF pattern is poorly correlated with AF burden and post ablation outcomes: A CIRCA-DOSE sub-study.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary guidelines recommend that atrial fibrillation (AF) be classified into paroxysmal and persistent AF based on clinical assessment, with these categorizations forming the basis of therapeutic recommendations. While pragmatic, clinical assessment may introduce misclassification errors, which may impact treatment decisions. We sought to determine the relationship between AF classification, baseline AF burden, and post-ablation arrhythmia outcomes. DESIGN: The current study is a sub-analysis of a prospective, parallel-group, multicenter, single-blinded randomized clinical trial. All 346 patients enrolled in CIRCA-DOSE received an implantable cardiac monitor a median of 72 days prior to ablation. AF was classified as low burden paroxysmal, high burden paroxysmal, or persistent based on clinical assessment prior to device implantation. Prior to ablation patients were re-classified using the same definitions based on device monitoring data. Correlation between classifications, AF burden, and post-ablation arrhythmia outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: There was poor agreement between clinical and device-based AF classification (Cohen's kappa: 0.192). AF classification derived from pre-ablation continuous monitoring reflected baseline and post-ablation AF burden with greater accuracy and with less overlap between the AF classes (P < 0.01 for all categorical comparisons). Patients objectively classified as "Low Burden" paroxysmal by continuous monitoring data had significantly greater freedom from recurrent AF/AT/AFL compared to those classified as "High Burden" paroxysmal (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57 for AF/AT/AFL recurrence) or persistent AF (HR 0.19 for AF/AT/AFL recurrence). CONCLUSIONS: Classification of AF pattern based on pre-ablation continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring better predicted AF burden and freedom from recurrent AF post ablation. Despite the use of standardized definitions, classification of AF based on clinical assessment did not predict baseline AF burden, post ablation AF burden, or freedom from recurrent AF post ablation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT01913522.

Prognostic Value of Noninducibility on Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: A VANISH Substudy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the predictive value of noninducibility on long-term outcomes. BACKGROUND: The traditional endpoint for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is noninducibility of VT by programmed stimulation; however, the definition of inducibility remains variable and its prognostic value limited by nonstandardized periprocedural antiarrhythmic drug therapy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming in prior observational studies. The VANISH trial randomized patients with prior myocardial infarction and VT to ablation (with an endpoint of noninducibility of VT ≥300 ms after ablation) versus antiarrhythmic drug escalation. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the VANISH study randomized to catheter ablation were included. The relationship between post-ablation inducibility and the primary composite endpoint (death, VT storm >30 days, or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock >30 days) was assessed using a time-to-event analysis, adjusting for other clinical and procedural characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients from the ablation arm were included in the primary analysis, of which 51 were noninducible post-ablation compared with 78 who had inducible VT or in whom inducibility testing was not performed. There were no significant baseline characteristic or procedural differences except for increased implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks before randomization in the noninducible group. In multivariate analysis, inducibility significantly increased the risk of death, appropriate shock, or VT storm after 30 days (HR: 1.87; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Inducibility of any VT post-ablation was associated with an increased risk of the composite endpoint in the VANISH trial. A randomized trial is required to confirm whether more aggressive ablation targeting faster induced VTs (<300 ms) can improve outcomes.

Quality of life with ablation or medical therapy for ventricular arrhythmias: A substudy of VANISH.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: We compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients randomized to escalated therapy and those randomized to ablation for ventricular tachycardia in the VANISH trial. METHODS: HRQoL was assessed among VANISH patients at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Four validated instruments were used: the SF-36, the implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) Concerns questionnaire (ICDC), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D). Linear mixed-effects modeling was used for repeated measures with SF-36, HADS, ICDC, and EQ-5D as dependent variables. In a second model, treatment was subdivided by amiodarone use prior to enrollment. RESULTS: HRQoL did not differ significantly between those randomized to ablation or escalated therapy. On subgroup analysis, improvement in SF-36 measures was seen at 6 months in the ablation group for social functioning (63.5-69.3, P = 0.03) and energy/fatigue (43.0-47.9, P = 0.01). ICDC measures showed a reduction in ICD concern in the ablation group at 6 months (10.4-8.7, P = 0.01) and a reduction in ICD concern in the escalated therapy group at 6 months (10.9-9.4, P = 0.04). EQ-5D measures showed a significant improvement in overall health in ablation patients at 6 months (63.4-67.3, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Patients in the VANISH study randomized to ablation did not have a significant change in quality of life outcomes compared to those randomized to escalated therapy. Some subgroup findings were significant, as those randomized to ablation showed persistent improvement in SF-36 energy/fatigue and ICD concern, and transient improvement in SF-36 social functioning and EQ-5D overall health.

Effect of Baseline Antiarrhythmic Drug on Outcomes With Ablation in Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia: A VANISH Substudy (Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischemic Heart Disease).

BACKGROUND: The VANISH trial (Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischemic Heart Disease) compared the effectiveness of escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy to catheter ablation in patients with prior myocardial infarction, an implanted defibrillator, and ventricular tachycardia (VT). The effectiveness of these interventions in patients on sotalol versus amiodarone was compared. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analysis was conducted based on whether patients had recurrent VT, despite amiodarone (amio-refractory) or nonamiodarone drugs (sotalol-refractory). Outcomes included death, VT storm, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock, and any ventricular arrhythmia. At baseline, 169 (65.2%) were amio-refractory, and 90 (34.7%) were sotalol-refractory (1 patient on procainamide rather than sotalol). Amio-refractory patients had more renal insufficiency (23.7% versus 10%; P=0.0008), worse New York Heart Association class (82.3% II/III versus 65.5%; P=0.0003), and lower ejection fraction (29±9.7% versus 35.2±11%; P<0.0001). Within the amio-refractory group, ablation resulted in reduction of any ventricular arrhythmia compared with escalated drug therapy (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.9), P=0.020). Sotalol-refractory patients had trends toward higher mortality and VT storm with ablation, with no effect on implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. Within the escalated drug therapy arm, amio-refractory patients had a higher rate of the composite outcome (hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.29; P=0.0144) and a trend to higher mortality (hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-6.22; P=0.07), whereas mortality was not different between amio- and sotalol-refractory patients within the ablation treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with amio-refractory VT have a higher rate of ventricular arrhythmia and mortality than those with sotalol-refractory VT and derive greater benefit of catheter ablation than for patients with sotalol-refractory VT who are switched to amiodarone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00905853.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent ventricular tachycardia among survivors of myocardial infarction with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is frequent despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The most effective approach to management of this problem is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an ICD who had ventricular tachycardia despite the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either catheter ablation (ablation group) with continuation of baseline antiarrhythmic medications or escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy (escalated-therapy group). In the escalated-therapy group, amiodarone was initiated if another agent had been used previously. The dose of amiodarone was increased if it had been less than 300 mg per day or mexiletine was added if the dose was already at least 300 mg per day. The primary outcome was a composite of death, three or more documented episodes of ventricular tachycardia within 24 hours (ventricular tachycardia storm), or appropriate ICD shock. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients who were enrolled, 132 were assigned to the ablation group and 127 to the escalated-therapy group. During a mean (±SD) of 27.9±17.1 months of follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in 59.1% of patients in the ablation group and 68.5% of those in the escalated-therapy group (hazard ratio in the ablation group, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.98; P=0.04). There was no significant between-group difference in mortality. There were two cardiac perforations and three cases of major bleeding in the ablation group and two deaths from pulmonary toxic effects and one from hepatic dysfunction in the escalated-therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an ICD who had ventricular tachycardia despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy, there was a significantly lower rate of the composite primary outcome of death, ventricular tachycardia storm, or appropriate ICD shock among patients undergoing catheter ablation than among those receiving an escalation in antiarrhythmic drug therapy. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; VANISH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00905853.).

Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Intracardiac Echocardiographic Guidance From the Left Atrium.

BACKGROUND: Most commonly, left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion procedures are performed using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance and general anaesthesia. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) offers potential advantages over TEE, however, ICE-guided LAA occlusion experience is limited and has been typically performed from a right-sided location where LAA visualization might be suboptimal. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous LAA occlusion using ICE guidance performed from the left atrium. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with atrial fibrillation, significant risk for stroke, and long-term contraindication to anticoagulation underwent LAA closure with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, MN) with mild sedation and ICE guidance. The ICE catheter was introduced in the left atrium through a second transseptal puncture. Patients underwent preprocedural TEE to rule out thrombus and 3-month follow-up TEE to assess occlusion grade. Patient characteristics, procedural data, effectiveness of ICE imaging, quality of occlusion, and complications were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 36 of 37 patients (97%). Closure was complete or near complete (grade ≥3 according to ICE and angiography) in all cases where the device was released. In all cases, ICE imaging yielded good LAA and surrounding structure visualization and adequate procedural guidance. Three major procedural or in-hospital complications occurred. Median length of stay was 1 day. Follow-up TEE documented the absence of any residual peri-device leak in all but 1 (29 of 30) case. CONCLUSION: Initial experience suggests LAA occlusion with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug using ICE guidance from the left atrium is feasible, reproducible, and safe.

Atrial tachycardias adjacent to the phrenic nerve: recognition, potential problems, and solutions.

BACKGROUND: Ablation of atrial tachycardias (AT) arising from the crista terminalis region (CT) can be complicated by phrenic nerve (PN) injury. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to describe epicardial protection techniques to prevent PN injury from endocardial ablation of AT. METHODS: Ablation was attempted in 4 patients with focal AT arising from the CT in whom conventional endocardial ablation was limited by PN proximity identified by capture during pacing. RESULTS: Four women ages 20, 28, 30, and 31 years with structurally normal hearts presented with symptomatic ATs failing medical therapy. In the first patient, endocardial cryoablation was performed during superior vena cava (SVC) PN pacing. After acute success, AT recurred. Open surgical ablation was then performed, but AT was noninducible under anesthesia, and an anatomic ablation was performed. AT was abolished, but sinus node dysfunction required pacemaker implantation. In the subsequent 3 patients with AT adjacent to the right PN, protection of the PN was attempted by inserting a peripheral angioplasty balloon (2 patients) or steerable ablation catheter and sheath into the epicardial space between the PN and atrium. Endocardial radiofrequency ablation was successful in all 3 patients without PN injury. CONCLUSION: Epicardial protection of the PN allowing for safe endocardial ablation of CT ATs is a feasible method of managing these challenging cases and seems to be preferable to surgery.

Catheter ablation for scar-related ventricular tachycardias.

Patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) are subject to frequent arrhythmia recurrences; antiarrhythmic drug therapy has been disappointing due to poor efficacy and side effects. Patients receiving multiple implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks because of VT have impaired quality of life. The role of catheter ablation in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias has been increasing in the last 2 decades. As more knowledge is gained about the mechanisms of VT, the potential for doing ablation has increased. Now, multiple VTs and unstable VTs can be targeted by ablation strategies. Also, electroanatomic mapping systems have made substrate mapping feasible. The purpose of this article is to review the selection and preparation of patients who require catheter ablation for scar-related VT, the different mapping techniques, and the ablation strategies employed. An overview of the pathophysiology of scar-related VT and the variety of heart diseases that are related to scar-related VT is provided.

Steam pops during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: feasibility of impedance monitoring for prevention.

BACKGROUND: Steam pops are a risk of irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) and may cause cardiac perforation. Data to guide radiofrequency (RF) energy titration to avoid steam pops are limited. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the frequency and consequence of audible pops and to determine the feasibility of using the magnitude of impedance change to predict pops. METHODS: We reviewed consecutive endocardial open-irrigated RFA for ventricular tachycardia (VT) with continuously recorded ablation data in 142 patients with structural heart disease. Steam pops were defined as an audible pop associated with a sudden spike in impedance. Ablation lesions before or after pops served as controls. RESULTS: From a total of 4,107 ablation lesions, 62 (1.5%) steam pops occurred in 42 procedures in 38 patients. Perforation with tamponade occurred with 1 of 62 (2%) pops. Applications with pops had a greater impedance decrease (22 +/- 7 Omega vs. 18 +/- 8 Omega, P = .001) and a higher maximum power (45 +/- 5 W vs. 43 +/- 6 W, P = .011), but did not differ in maximum catheter tip temperature (40 degrees C +/- 4 degrees C vs. 40 degrees C +/- 4 degrees C, P = .180) from applications without pops. Eighty percent of pops occurred after impedance decreased by at least 18 Omega. CONCLUSION: During VT ablation with open irrigation, audible pops are infrequent and do not usually cause perforation. Limiting RF power to achieve an impedance decrease of <18 Omega is a feasible method of reducing the likelihood of a pop when perforation risk is of concern.

Transcoronary ethanol ventricular tachycardia ablation in the modern electrophysiology era.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be unsuccessful when critical portions of the circuit cannot be interrupted with either endocardial or epicardial radiofrequency application. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate whether transcoronary ethanol ablation (TCEA) can be used as a therapy for patients with VT who have failed medications and radiofrequency ablation in the modern era. METHODS: Nine patients (7 men, 55 +/- 9 years old, left ventricular ejection fraction 23% +/- 8%, 2.2 +/- 0.8 failed VT ablations) with at least 1 unsuccessful attempt at radiofrequency catheter ablation for symptomatic VT at our institution between 2000 and May 2007 underwent TCEA. The majority of patients had an ischemic cardiomyopathy (67%), and all patients had VT due to scar-related reentry. In the 7 patients with VT involving a septal scar, a septal perforator artery was a suitable target in 5 patients, whereas in the remaining patients, a distal branch of the circumflex and the conus branch of the right coronary artery were targeted. In the 2 patients in whom VT involved an inferior scar, a branch of the posterior descending artery was targeted. RESULTS: Acute success was obtained in 56% of patients (89% for clinical targeted VT). During a mean follow-up of 29 +/- 23 months, 3 deaths occurred and 67% of the patients were free of recurrence. CONCLUSION: TCEA may represent an option in patients with refractory VT in whom radiofrequency ablation fails, especially in cases of septal scar in which failure is thought to be caused by inability to provide adequate lesion depth.

Ventricular tachycardia ablation: evolution of patients and procedures over 8 years.

BACKGROUND: Evolving management of coronary artery disease, heart failure, and the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators impacts the characteristics of patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). We investigated the substrate, procedure, and outcome evolution of all patients referred for VT ablation during the past 8 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1999 to 2006, 493 consecutive patients (358 male, 57+/-16 years) underwent 623 VT ablations: 131 had no structural heart disease (SHD), 213 had ischemic cardiomyopathies (ICMP), and 149 had nonischemic cardiomyopathies (NICMP). Although the main substrate is ICMP, the proportion of NICMP has increased from 27% to 35% (P=0.06) from 1999-2002 to the 2003-2006. The procedure abolished or modified inducible VTs in > or =75% of patients in all groups, but abolition of all monomorphic VTs was achieved in 125 (83%) patients without SHD, 180 (65%) with ICMP, and 99 (51%) with NICMP (P<0.0001). During a mean follow-up of 3.3+/-2.4 years, no deaths occurred in patients without SHD, but 75 patients (35%) with ICMP and 26 patients (17%) with NICMP died after a median of 13 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that age, ejection fraction, and need for preprocedural mechanical hemodynamic support predicted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The substrate causing VT in patients requiring ablation is evolving and determines the long-term outcome. In the setting of a normal heart, VT ablation is associated with a low risk of subsequent mortality, with no deaths occurring during a mean follow-up of >3 years. In contrast, in patients with SHD and recurrent VT, VT ablation can be helpful to suppress drug refractory VT, but long-term mortality remains significant.