Short-term effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective study.

AIM: To compare effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors on individualized HbA1c targets and extra-glycaemic endpoints among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective study on patients aged 70-80 years with HbA1c above individualized target and starting dapagliflozin or DPP-4 inhibitors in 2015-2017. The primary outcome was the proportion reaching individualized HbA1c targets. Confounding by indication was addressed by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), multivariable adjustment (MVA), or propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Patients initiating dapagliflozin (n = 445) differed from those initiating DPP-4i (n = 977) and balance between groups was achieved with IPTW or PSM. The median follow-up was 7.5 months and baseline HbA1c was 8.3%. A smaller proportion of patients initiating dapagliflozin attained individualized HbA1c target as compared to those initiating DPP-4 inhibitors (RR 0.73, p < 0.0001). IPTW, MVA, and PSM yielded similar results. Between-group difference in the primary outcome was observed among patients with lower eGFR or longer disease duration. Dapagliflozin allowed greater reductions in body weight and blood pressure than DPP-4 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with T2D initiating dapagliflozin had a lower probability of achieving individualized HbA1c targets than those initiating DPP-4 inhibitors but displayed better improvements in extra-glycaemic endpoints.

LEADER 5: prevalence and cardiometabolic impact of obesity in cardiovascular high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: baseline global data from the LEADER trial.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data on obesity are needed, particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and high cardiovascular (CV) risk. We used the baseline data of liraglutide effect and action in diabetes: evaluation of CV outcome results-A long term Evaluation (LEADER) (a clinical trial to assess the CV safety of liraglutide) to investigate: (i) prevalence of overweight and obesity; (ii) relationship of the major cardiometabolic risk factors with anthropometric measures of adiposity [body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC)]; and (iii) cardiometabolic treatment intensity in relation to BMI and WC. METHODS: LEADER enrolled two distinct populations of high-risk patients with T2DM in 32 countries: (1) aged ≥50 years with prior CV disease; (2) aged ≥60 years with one or more CV risk factors. Associations of metabolic variables, demographic variables and treatment intensity with anthropometric measurements (BMI and WC) were explored using regression models (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01179048). RESULTS: Mean BMI was 32.5 ± 6.3 kg/m(2) and only 9.1 % had BMI <25 kg/m(2). The prevalence of healthy WC was also extremely low (6.4 % according to International Joint Interim Statement for the Harmonization of the Metabolic Syndrome criteria). Obesity was associated with being younger, female, previous smoker, Caucasian, American, with shorter diabetes duration, uncontrolled blood pressure (BP), antihypertensive agents, insulin plus oral antihyperglycaemic treatment, higher levels of triglycerides and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obesity are prevalent in high CV risk patients with T2DM. BMI and WC are related to the major cardiometabolic risk factors. Furthermore, treatment intensity, such as insulin, statins or oral antihypertensive drugs, is higher in those who are overweight or obese; while BP and lipid control in these patients are remarkably suboptimal. LEADER confers a unique opportunity to explore the longitudinal effect of weight on CV risk factors and hard endpoints.

Frequency of cancer events with saxagliptin in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial.

The Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (SAVOR)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 53 trial randomized trial of 16,492 patients (placebo, n = 8212; saxagliptin, n = 8280) treated and followed for a median of 2.1 years afforded an opportunity to explore whether there was any association with cancer reported as a serious adverse event. At least one cancer event was reported by 688 patients (4.1%): 362 (4.3%) and 326 (3.8%) in the placebo and saxagliptin arms, respectively (p = 0.13). There were 59 (0.6%) deaths adjudicated as malignancy deaths with placebo and 53 (0.6%) with saxagliptin. Stratification by gender, age, race and ethnicity, diabetes duration, baseline glycated haemoglobin and pharmacotherapy did not show any clinically meaningful differences between the two study arms. The overall number of cancer events and malignancy-associated mortality rates were generally balanced between the placebo and saxagliptin groups, suggesting a null relationship with saxagliptin use over the median follow-up of 2.1 years. Multivariable modelling showed that male gender, dyslipidaemia and current smoking were independent predictors of cancer. These randomized data with adequate numbers of cancer cases are reassuring but limited, by the short follow-up in a trial not designed to test this hypothesis.

Achieving the composite endpoint of glycated haemoglobin <7.0%, no weight gain and no hypoglycaemia in the once-weekly dulaglutide AWARD programme.

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg with active comparators and placebo with regard to a composite endpoint of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), weight and hypoglycaemia, using post hoc analyses. METHODS: A logistic regression analysis was performed on the intention-to-treat population, using data from the last observation carried forward, and the composite endpoint of HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol), no weight gain (≤0 kg) and no hypoglycaemia (glucose <3.0 mmol/l or severe hypoglycaemia) after 26 weeks for each trial in the AWARD programme separately. RESULTS: At 26 weeks, within each study, 37-58% of patients on dulaglutide 1.5 mg, 27-49% of patients on dulaglutide 0.75 mg, and 9-61% of patients on active comparators achieved the composite endpoint. Significantly more patients reached the composite endpoint with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than with metformin, sitagliptin, exenatide twice daily or insulin glargine: odds ratio (OR) 1.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0, 2.2; p < 0.05], OR 4.5 (95% CI 3.0, 6.6; p < 0.001), OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.8, 3.7; p < 0.001) and OR 7.4 (95% CI 4.4, 12.6; p < 0.001), respectively, with no difference between dulaglutide 1.5 mg and liraglutide 1.8 mg. In addition, significantly more patients reached the composite endpoint with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than with sitagliptin or insulin glargine: OR 3.3 (95% CI 2.2, 4.8; p < 0.001) and OR 4.5 (95% CI 2.7, 7.8; p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dulaglutide is an effective treatment option, resulting in a similar or greater proportion of patients reaching the HbA1c target of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol), without weight gain or hypoglycaemia compared with active comparators.

Impact of treatment with saxagliptin on glycaemic stability and ß-cell function in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 study.

AIMS: To study the effects of saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on glycaemic stability and ß-cell function in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial. METHODS: We randomized 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to saxagliptin or placebo, added to current antidiabetic medications, and followed them for a median of 2.1 years. Glycaemic instability was defined by: (i) a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) increase of ≥ 0.5% post-randomization; (ii) the initiation of new antidiabetic medications for ≥ 3 months; or (iii) an increase in dose of oral antidiabetic medication or ≥ 25% increase in insulin dose for ≥ 3 months. ß-cell function was assessed according to fasting homeostatic model 2 assessment of ß-cell function (HOMA-2ß) values at baseline and at year 2 in patients not treated with insulin. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, participants treated with saxagliptin had a reduction in the development of glycaemic instability (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.74; p < 0.0001). In participants treated with saxagliptin compared with placebo, the occurrence of an HbA1c increase of ≥ 0.5% was reduced by 35.2%; initiation of insulin was decreased by 31.7% and the increases in doses of an oral antidiabetic drug or insulin were reduced by 19.5 and 23.5%, respectively (all p < 0.0001). At 2 years, HOMA-2ß values decreased by 4.9% in participants treated with placebo, compared with an increase of 1.1% in those treated with saxagliptin (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Saxagliptin improved glycaemia and prevented the reduction in HOMA-2ß values. Saxagliptin may reduce the usual decline in ß-cell function in T2D, thereby slowing diabetes progression.

The Barmer study: impact of standardized warming of the injection site to enhance insulin absorption and reduce prandial insulin requirements and hypoglycemia in obese patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this prospective controlled study was to investigate the impact of standardized injection-site warming on prandial rapid acting insulin dose and glycemic control when studied under real-world conditions. METHODS: All 145 participating patients (51 female, 94 male, 13 type 1 and 132 type 2 patients, age: 61.6 ± 8.4 yrs, HbA1c: 7.19 ± 0.50%) were treated with intensive insulin glargine and short-acting insulin analog therapy. After a 4 week treatment optimization run-in period, patients were randomized to continue therapy for three months without (control) or with a local injection-site warming device (InsuPad * ). Observation parameters included HbA1c, insulin dose, frequency of hypoglycemia, body weight and adverse events. RESULTS: HbA1c improved in both arms until study end (control group: 6.3 ± 0.5%; injection-site warming device: 6.3 ± 0.5%; both p < 0.001 vs. baseline). To achieve this good control, patients in the control group needed to increase the daily prandial insulin dose by 8.1% (from 66 ± 31 U to 71 ± 38 U, p < 0.05) with stable basal insulin requirements. Patients who used the injection-site warming device required less prandial insulin (70 ± 43 U to 55 ± 34 U; -19%, p < 0.001) and slightly more basal insulin (+3.9%). Total daily insulin dose increased in the control group (+3.7%) and decreased with warming device use (-8.6%, p < 0.001). The number of hypoglycemic events (<63 mg/dL) during the observation period was higher in the control group (6.2 ± 9.9/patient vs. injection-site warming device: 3.3 ± 4.8/patient, p < 0.05). Main study limitations can be seen in the open label design reliability of the collected dose information and the very obese patient cohort. CONCLUSION: When treating obese patients to target with insulin therapy, use of an injection-site warming device for 3 months resulted in a lower frequency of hypoglycemic events and a reduction in prandial insulin analog requirements. If these results are confirmed in other patient populations, an injection-site warming device may be useful in achieving treatment targets with a safer and more efficient basal bolus therapy in insulin-treated patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

The importance of short-term off-target effects in estimating the long-term renal and cardiovascular protection of angiotensin receptor blockers.

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have multiple effects that may contribute to their efficacy on renal/cardiovascular outcomes. We developed and validated a risk score that incorporated short-term changes in multiple risk markers to predict the ARB effect on renal/cardiovascular outcomes. The score was used to predict renal/cardiovascular risk at baseline and at month 6 in the ARB treatment arm of the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM (noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial. The net risk difference at these time points indicated the estimated long-term renal/cardiovascular treatment effect. Predicted relative risk reductions (RRRs) based on multiple markers were close to observed RRRs for renal (RRR(predicted): 30.1% vs. RRR(observed): 21.8%; P = 0.44) and cardiovascular outcomes (RRR(predicted): 9.4% vs. RRR(observed): 9.2%; P = 0.98), in addition to being markedly more accurate than predicted RRRs based on changes in single markers. The score was validated in an independent ARB trial. Predictions of long-term renal/cardiovascular ARB effects are more accurate when considering short-term changes in multiple risk markers, challenging the use of single markers to establish drug efficacy.

Baseline characteristics of the patient population in the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in patients with diabetes mellitus (SAVOR)-TIMI 53 trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: SAVOR-TIMI 53 was designed to study the effects of the DPP-4 inhibitor saxagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in high risk type 2 diabetes patients with diverse levels of diabetes control and background anti-diabetic drugs. The goal of this article is to describe the baseline characteristics of this hypothesis driven study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 496 diabetic patients from North America (31.9%), Western Europe (26.0%), Eastern Europe (17.3%), Latin America (16.4%) and Asia (8.3%), with either established cardiovascular disease (78.3%) or with ≥two additional cardiovascular risk factors (21.7%) were randomised to saxagliptin or placebo. Biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance were taken at baseline and 2 years later in order to correlate saxagliptin effect on cardiovascular outcome to its effect on inflammation and insulin resistance. RESULTS: Mean [+/-standard deviation (SD)] age was 65.0 (+/-8.6) years, 66.9% were male, body mass index was 31.2 kg/m² (+/-5.6), mean diabetes duration was 11.9 years (+/-8.9) and the mean HbA1c 8.0% (+/-1.4%). HbA1c < 7% was most prevalent among North Americans (30.8%) and least among Asians (15.1%), whereas HbA1c > 9% was 30.7% in Latin America 27.0% in Asia and 15.1% in North America. Diabetic retinopathy was reported in 12.3% of patients, nephropathy in 17.7% and amputation in 2.5%. Diabetic treatments categories were as follows: no medication (5.4%), 1 oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) (25.0%), ≥2 OAD (27.7%) and/or insulin (40.9%). The prevalence of micro-albuminuria was twice as high among insulin users compared with users of ≥2 OAD. Baseline statin use (78.3% overall) varied by region. CONCLUSION: The SAVOR-TIMI 53 patient population, with differing background diabetes control and anti-diabetic treatment, provides global representation of diabetic patients with established cardiovascular disease or at high risk for cardiovascular disease and is well-positioned to determine the effect of saxagliptin on cardiovascular events.

Basal state hyperinsulinemia in healthy normoglycemic adults heralds dysglycemia after more than two decades of follow up.

BACKGROUND: In a preliminary report, we found an association between hyperinsulinemia in the basal (fasting) state and the development of diabetes. OBJECTIVES: The current analysis further explored the long term link between basal hyperinsulinemia and conversion to dysglycemia. METHODS: This is a prospective study with up to 24 years of follow-up of 515 normoglycemic individuals (mean age at follow up = 70.3 ± 7.0; range 58-94) of an Israeli cohort. Fasting glucose and insulin were measured, and dysglycemia was defined as fasting glucose > 100 mg/dL. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up period, almost half had progressed to dysglycemia. Male sex and elevated baseline levels of basal insulin, body mass index, blood glucose and blood pressure each favoured progression to dysglycemia over the subsequent two decades. A multivariate logistic regression model identified basal hyperinsulinemia as the strongest predictor for progression to dysglycemia (odds ratio = 1.79; 95% confidence interval 1.12-2.88), while controlling for ethnicity, blood pressure, fasting glucose, male sex, body mass index and age. CONCLUSIONS: Basal hyperinsulinemia in normoglycemic adults constitutes an independent risk factor for metabolic deterioration to dysglycemia over adulthood, and may help to identify apparently healthy subjects at increased risk for diabetes.

Benefits of a simple glycaemic protocol in an orthopaedic surgery ward: a randomized prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus are common in patients hospitalized in the orthopaedic surgery ward. However, glycaemic control obtained during hospitalization is often suboptimal. No method for achieving adequate glycaemic control in this population has been validated in an in-hospital setting. INTERVENTION: An intervention including an intensive subcutaneous insulin protocol in the orthopaedic department. METHODS: All diabetic patients admitted to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery were prospectively randomized during a 6-month period. One group (n = 30) received standard care with sliding scale insulin and the other group (n = 35) received the intervention protocol. During the intervention period, the staff was briefed on the importance of glucose monitoring and control. An intensive multiple-injection protocol consisting of four daily regular/neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin injections was initiated in diabetic patients. The programme was followed up by a consulting diabetologist. RESULTS: Mean blood glucose levels throughout the hospitalization were 161.48 ± 3.8 mg/dL in the intervention group versus 175.29 ± 2.3 mg/dL in the control group (p < 0.0005). Hospitalization was shorter by 2 days in the intervention group (p < 0.05). The number of severe hyperglycaemic events (blood glucose level above 400 mg%) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in the number of hypoglycaemic events. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested four-step intervention regimen improved glycaemic control of hospitalized patients in the orthopaedic department and simplified the 'in-house' treatment of the diabetic patient. Hospital stays were reduced on average by two days (p < 0.05).

Practical guidance on intensification of insulin therapy with BIAsp 30: a consensus statement.

BACKGROUND: Basal insulin and premix insulin are commonly prescribed first-line insulin therapies for patients failing to maintain glycaemic control on oral therapy. When control on these insulins starts to drift, premix analogues, such as biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30), are a simple and effective tool for intensification as they can be injected up to three-times daily (TID). However, at present, international recommendations for intensification of insulin therapy using premix analogues are limited and specific guidance on dosing is not available for many scenarios. METHODS: In October 2008, an international expert panel met to review the current guidelines for insulin intensification with BIAsp 30 in patients with type 2 diabetes, with the aim of developing practical guidance for general and specialist practitioners. RESULTS: Simple treatment algorithms have been developed for (i) patients on basal insulin (human or analogue) once daily or twice daily (BID) who need intensification to BIAsp 30 BID, and (ii) patients on BIAsp 30 once daily or BID who can be intensified to BIAsp 30 BID or TID. As well as these algorithms, specific guidance has been provided on dose transfer (from basal insulin to BIAsp 30), dose split (when intensifying from once daily to BID), and combination oral therapies. In addition, a guide to dose titration is included. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines presented here should enable general or specialist practitioners to use BIAsp 30 to intensify the insulin therapy of patients failing on basal insulin or BIAsp 30 once or twice daily.

Effects of early breastfeeding on neonatal glucose levels of term infants born to women with gestational diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Infants born to diabetic women are at higher risk for hypoglycaemia related to hyperinsulinism in response to maternal hyperglycaemia during pregnancy. As such, recommendations to prevent neonatal hypoglycaemia include infant feeding in the early postpartum period. The present study aimed to examine the effect of early breastfeeding and type of nutrition used for the first feed (human milk or formula) on glucose levels in infants born to women with gestational diabetes. METHODS: The prospective pilot study of 84 infants born to gestational diabetic women examined the glycaemic levels of infants who were breastfed in the delivery room compared to glycaemic levels of those who were not. The study also compared the glycaemic levels of infants who breastfed with those who received formula for their first feed. RESULTS: Infants who were breastfed in the delivery room had a significantly lower rate of borderline hypoglycaemia than those who were not breastfed in the early postpartum period (10% versus 28%; Fisher's exact test., P = 0.05,). Likewise, infants breastfed in the delivery room had significantly higher mean blood glucose level compared to infants who were not breastfed in the delivery room (3.17 versus 2.86 mmol L(-1), P = 0.03). Additionally, breastfed infants had a significantly higher mean blood glucose level compared to those who were formula fed for their first feed (3.20 versus 2.68 mmol L(-1), P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Early breastfeeding may facilitate glycaemic stability in infants born to women with gestational diabetes.

Diabetes and radiocontrast media increase endothelin converting enzyme-1 in the kidney.

Plasma endothelin-1 levels rise in diabetes and after exposure to contrast media suggesting a role in progressive diabetic and acute radiocontrast nephropathies. Here we studied individual and combined effects of streptozotocin-induced diabetes and contrast media on renal endothelin converting enzyme-1 levels in the rat. In vivo, medullary (but not cortical) endothelin converting enzyme protein gradually increased 4 to 5-fold following the induction of diabetes or after the administration of contrast media but rose 15-fold when diabetic rats were given contrast media. Changes in mRNA expression paralleled those of the protein. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that increased tubular and endothelial cell endothelin converting enzyme-1 were most pronounced in the medulla. In vitro, endothelin-1 levels increased 3-fold following incubation of endothelial cells with media high in glucose or with contrast and 4-fold with their combination. Endothelin converting enzyme-1 protein and mRNA expression changed in a similar pattern while prepro endothelin-1 mRNA increased with each insult but not in an additive way. Our study shows that diabetes and contrast media up-regulate renal medullary endothelin converting enzyme-1 expression and synthesis.

Assessing the levels of immunoglobulins in the saliva of diabetic individuals with periodontitis using checkerboard immunodetection.

BACKGROUND: Current methods for determining salivary antibodies are cumbersome for large-scale screenings. OBJECTIVES: To test checkerboard immunodetection for monitoring salivary antibodies and to profile them in diabetic individuals with periodontitis. METHODS: Salivary anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis, anti-Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and total IgA levels of 10 individuals were compared using checkerboard immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Close correlation between both methods was found in anti-P. gingivalis IgA and total IgA, but not in anti-A. actinomycetemcomitans IgA, because of high background levels in ELISA. Thereafter, checkerboard immunodetection was used to compare salivary antibodies of 20 adult type II diabetic with 32 non-diabetic individuals with (n=22) or without (n=10) periodontitis. Patients with periodontitis (regardless of their diabetic condition) expressed increased levels of total IgA in both whole and parotid saliva, but reduced levels of anti-A. actinomycetemcomitans IgA in whole saliva. Consequently, the proportion of anti-A. actinomycetemcomitans IgA in the total IgA was lower in saliva of patients with periodontitis compared with healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Checkerboard immunodetection was reliable and economical for screening saliva samples for multiple antibody reactions. Our results support previous reports which suggested that patients with periodontitis are able to secrete high levels of salivary Ig, but are hampered in targeting their salivary response toward A. actinomycetemcomitans.

Treatment of microalbuminuria in hypertensive subjects with elevated cardiovascular risk: results of the IMPROVE trial.

Microalbuminuria independently predicts increased cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients, especially in those with concomitant diabetes or established cardiovascular disease. Drugs that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system reduce microalbuminuria regardless of diabetic status. The Irbesartan in the Management of PROteinuric patients at high risk for Vascular Events was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled paralleled group study in which hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria and increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to 20 weeks treatment with ramipril plus irbesartan or to ramipril plus placebo. Patients discontinued or tapered previous antihypertensive therapy during a 14-day placebo lead-in period. Change in albumin excretion rate from baseline to week 20 was the primary end point. Adjusted week 20 baseline geometric ratios for ramipril plus irbesartan and ramipril plus placebo were not significantly different. Although differences in blood pressure reductions were observed between the two treatments, these changes did not affect microalbuminuria. More patients on dual therapy achieved target blood pressure goals at week 20 than with monotherapy. The incidence of adverse effects and treatment-related adverse effects was similar in both groups. Our results suggest that patients with cardiovascular risk and relatively low albumin excretion rates in early-stage disease may only require monotherapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blocking agents.

Treatment of new-onset type 1 diabetes with peptide DiaPep277 is safe and associated with preserved beta-cell function: extension of a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with DiaPep277, a peptide derived from HSP60, has been shown to preserve beta-cell function in non-obese diabetic mouse (NOD) mice and in a trial with newly diagnosed human patients with type 1 diabetes treated over a 10-month period. This article extends the clinical trial observations to a total of 20 months of treatment to determine the safety and the effects of repeated doses of DiaPep277 on endogenous insulin secretion, metabolic control, and exogenous insulin requirements. METHODS: Thirty-five male patients (aged 16-58) with a basal C-peptide greater than 0.1 nmol/L were assigned to periodic treatment with DiaPep277 (1 mg) or placebo for a 12-month treatment and 18-month observation protocol, later extended to an additional year of treatment. Stimulated C-peptide, HbA1c, and an exogenous insulin dose were the clinical endpoints. RESULTS: At 18 months, stimulated C-peptide concentrations had fallen in the placebo group (p = 0.0005) but were maintained in the DiaPep277 group. The need for exogenous insulin was higher in the placebo group than in the DiaPep277 group. Mean HbA1c concentrations were similar in both groups. After extension of the study, patients continuing treatment with DiaPep277 and those switched from placebo to DiaPep277 manifested a trend towards a greater preservation of beta-cell function compared to patients maintained on or switched to placebo. The safety profile of DiaPep277 was similar between the treatment and placebo groups, and no drug-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Periodic treatment of subjects with DiaPep277 over 2 years was safe and associated preservation of endogenous insulin secretion up to 18 months was observed.

Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin (MK-0431) as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycaemic control (HbA(1c) > or =7% and < or =10%) on exercise and diet. METHODS: A total of 521 patients aged 27-76 years with a mean baseline HbA(1c) of 8.1% were randomised in a 1:2:2 ratio to treatment with placebo, sitagliptin 100 mg once daily, or sitagliptin 200 mg once daily, for 18 weeks. The efficacy analysis was based on an all-patients-treated population using an analysis of covariance, excluding data obtained after glycaemic rescue. RESULTS: After 18 weeks, HbA(1c) was significantly reduced with sitagliptin 100 mg and 200 mg compared with placebo (placebo-subtracted HbA(1c) reduction: -0.60% and -0.48%, respectively). Sitagliptin also significantly decreased fasting plasma glucose relative to placebo. Patients with higher baseline HbA(1c) (> or =9%) experienced greater placebo-subtracted HbA(1c) reductions with sitagliptin (-1.20% for 100 mg and -1.04% for 200 mg) than those with HbA(1c) <8% (-0.44% and -0.33%, respectively) or > or =8% to 8.9% (-0.61% and -0.39%, respectively). Homeostasis model assessment beta cell function index and fasting proinsulin:insulin ratio, markers of insulin secretion and beta cell function, were significantly improved with sitagliptin. The incidence of hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal adverse experiences was not significantly different between sitagliptin and placebo. Sitagliptin had a neutral effect on body weight. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Sitagliptin significantly improved glycaemic control and was well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had inadequate glycaemic control on exercise and diet.

Rationale and design of a study to evaluate management of proteinuria in patients at high risk for vascular events: the IMPROVE trial.

Declining kidney function predicts increasing cardiovascular risk in people with hypertension. Microalbuminuria is a marker for cardiovascular risk and declining kidney function. Agents that block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), notably angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), reduce proteinuria and microalbuminuria, lower blood pressure and slow the progression of proteinuric kidney disease. Evidence is accumulating that the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an ARB is the optimal means of RAAS blockade in this setting, slowing the progression of nephropathy independently of blood pressure lowering to a greater degree than can be achieved using maximum approved doses of either agent alone. However, the emerging therapeutic potential of ACE inhibitor/ARB combination therapy in hypertensive kidney disease requires further characterization. The Irbesartan in the Management of PROteinuric patients at high risk for Vascular Events trial aims to determine definitively whether the combination therapy of an ARB, irbesartan and an ACE inhibitor, ramipril, is more effective than ramipril alone in reducing the urinary albumin excretion rate in patients at high cardiovascular risk with hypertension and proteinuria or microalbuminuria.