Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Primary Care: Indications, Risks, and Outcomes.

The Psychiatric Consultation Service at Massachusetts General Hospital sees medical and surgical inpatients with comorbid psychiatric symptoms and conditions. During their twice-weekly rounds, Dr Stern and other members of the Consultation Service discuss diagnosis and management of hospitalized patients with complex medical or surgical problems who also demonstrate psychiatric symptoms or conditions. These discussions have given rise to rounds reports that will prove useful for clinicians practicing at the interface of medicine and psychiatry.Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2024;26(2):23f03614. Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

Telemedicine-Based Cognitive Examinations During COVID-19 and Beyond: Perspective of the Massachusetts General Hospital Behavioral Neurology & Neuropsychiatry Group.

Telehealth and telemedicine have encountered explosive growth since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in increased access to care for patients located far from medical centers and clinics. Subspecialty clinicians in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry (BNNP) have implemented the use of telemedicine platforms to perform cognitive examinations that were previously office based. In this perspective article, BNNP clinicians at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) describe their experience performing cognitive examinations via telemedicine. The article reviews the goals, prerequisites, advantages, and potential limitations of performing a video- or telephone-based telemedicine cognitive examination. The article shares the approaches used by MGH BNNP clinicians to examine cognitive and behavioral areas, such as orientation, attention and executive functions, language, verbal learning and memory, visual learning and memory, visuospatial function, praxis, and abstract abilities, as well as to survey for neuropsychiatric symptoms and assess activities of daily living. Limitations of telemedicine-based cognitive examinations include limited access to and familiarity with telecommunication technologies on the patient side, limitations of the technology itself on the clinician side, and the limited psychometric validation of virtual assessments. Therefore, an in-person examination with a BNNP clinician or a formal in-person neuropsychological examination with a neuropsychologist may be recommended. Overall, this article emphasizes the use of standardized cognitive and behavioral assessment instruments that are either in the public domain or, if copyrighted, are nonproprietary and do not require a fee to be used by the practicing BNNP clinician.

Extension of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depression in non-responders: Results of a naturalistic study.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) shows efficacy in the treatment of major depressive disorder using a standard course of 20-36 treatment sessions. However, research efforts are being made to improve overall response and remission rates. Evidence from open-label extension studies of randomized control trials suggests that extending the rTMS treatment course beyond 36 treatments may improve outcomes, however, little has been published on the benefit of extended TMS treatment courses in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective naturalistic observational study, we studied response rates on continuation of rTMS following failure of the first round of 36 treatments. METHODS: From 142 patients who received conventional rTMS and 29 who underwent theta-burst stimulation (TBS) at Massachusetts General Hospital TMS clinical service, 28 non-responders (23 to rTMS and 5 to TBS) opted to continue their treatment beyond session 36. The treatment protocol allowed personalization in target, TMS protocol, as well as number of pulses and sessions as clinically indicated. Sustained response and remission using Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-items (HAMD-17) was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The average number of overall treatment sessions was 70.54 ± 16.73 for the sample. Overall, there was a 53.57% response rate and a 32.14% remission rate. Response and remission rates rose as the number of sessions increased and there did not appear to be a plateau in response over time. CONCLUSION: Our results support the idea that subpopulation of TMS patients are late responders. Continuation of TMS up to 72 treatments among those patients who do not meet response criteria by session 36 may improve overall response rates. While the number of subjects and study design limit generalization, given the fact that these patients were medication refractory and had failed initial course of TMS, the result of this study is encouraging.

Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Descriptive Clinical Study.

OBJECTIVE: The investigators aimed to describe the clinical experience of a single center reporting on neuropsychiatric findings among patients experiencing persistent symptoms as part of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) infection. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively (between February 2020 and May 2021) from a cohort (N=100) within a COVID-19 survivors study of patients with persistent symptoms enrolled after a short inpatient stay or who had been outpatients never hospitalized. Patients without confirmatory positive PCR or antibody diagnostic test results were grouped separately as presumptive cases (N=13). RESULTS: Of the 87 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2, 63 (72.4%) were female, and 65 (74.7%) were White. The mean age was 49.2 years (SD=14.9). The most prevalent symptoms after COVID-19 infection were fatigue, "brain fog," headache, anxiety, and sleep issues. Attention and executive function were frequently impaired. The mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 26.0 (SD=2.8). Concentration and attention as well as memory issues were both significantly correlated with the complaint of brain fog. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 vary in frequency and duration with relation to premorbid history and that these conditions affect functional domains and patients' ability to return to work. Longitudinal research with larger cohorts is needed to characterize PASC and to optimize care, especially for vulnerable populations.

When real life conditions do not follow textbook diagnosis: A diagnostic challenge from a neuropsychiatric clinic.

We present the case of a 61-year-old retired catholic priest, who was adopted at a very young age, with psychiatric history of anxiety and depression presenting for evaluation of at least 4 year memory loss and word finding difficulties. Over the preceding couple of years his cognitive functions had rapidly declined. As a result, he became dependent on his elderly parents for most of his instrumental activities of daily living including administration of medication, financial management, and driving. He continues to be independent in his personal care. His presentation offered diagnostic challenges due to the interplay of anxiety and cognitive disorders involving both memory and language domains. In addition, he resisted to repeat formal neuropsychological evaluation. At the bedside, his poor effort on testing was often blamed on his severe anxiety confounding the clinical picture. Lack of knowledge of his family history and his childhood development, and unclear premorbid functioning complicated the diagnostic formulation. A differential diagnosis ranging from possible functional cognitive disorder to neurodevelopmental disorder and neurodegenerative disorders will be discussed.

Telemedicine in Behavioral Neurology-Neuropsychiatry: Opportunities and Challenges Catalyzed by COVID-19.

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has profoundly impacted the well-being of society and the practice of medicine across health care systems worldwide. As with many other subspecialties, the clinical paradigm in behavioral neurology and neuropsychiatry (BN-NP) was transformed abruptly, transitioning to real-time telemedicine for the assessment and management of the vast majorities of patient populations served by our subspecialty. In this commentary, we outline themes from the BN-NP perspective that reflect the emerging lessons we learned using telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Positive developments include the ability to extend consultations and management to patients in our high-demand field, maintenance of continuity of care, enhanced ecological validity, greater access to a variety of well-reimbursed telemedicine options (telephone and video) that help bridge the digital divide, and educational and research opportunities. Challenges include the need to adapt the mental state examination to the telemedicine environment, the ability to perform detailed motor neurologic examinations in patients where motor features are important diagnostic considerations, appreciating nonverbal cues, managing acute safety and behavioral concerns in less controlled environments, and navigating intervention-based (neuromodulation) clinics requiring in-person contact. We hope that our reflections help to catalyze discussions that should take place within the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, the American Neuropsychiatric Association, and allied organizations regarding how to optimize real-time telemedicine practices for our subspecialty now and into the future.

COVID-19 and telepsychiatry: Early outpatient experiences and implications for the future.

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically transformed the U.S. healthcare landscape. Within psychiatry, a sudden relaxing of insurance and regulatory barriers during the month of March 2020 enabled clinicians practicing in a wide range of settings to quickly adopt virtual care in order to provide critical ongoing mental health supports to both existing and new patients struggling with the pandemic's impact. In this article, we briefly review the extensive literature supporting the effectiveness of telepsychiatry relative to in-person mental health care, and describe how payment and regulatory challenges were the primary barriers preventing more widespread adoption of this treatment modality prior to COVID-19. We then review key changes that were implemented at the federal, state, professional, and insurance levels over a one-month period that helped usher in an unprecedented transformation in psychiatric care delivery, from mostly in-person to mostly virtual. Early quality improvement data regarding virtual visit volumes and clinical insights from our outpatient psychiatry department located within a large, urban, tertiary care academic medical center reflect both the opportunities and challenges of virtual care for patients and providers. Notable benefits have included robust clinical volumes despite social distancing mandates, reduced logistical barrieres to care for many patients, and decreased no-show rates. Finally, we provide clinical suggestions for optimizing telepsychiatry based on our experience, make a call for advocacy to continue the reduced insurance and regulatory restrictions affecting telepsychiatry even once this public health crisis has passed, and pose research questions that can help guide optimal utilization of telepsychiatry as mainstay or adjunct of outpatient psychiatric treatment now and in the future.

Traumatic brain injury and methamphetamine: A double-hit neurological insult.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the world. TBI causes permanent physical, cognitive, social, and functional impairments. Substance use and intoxication are established risk factors for TBI. Data are emerging that also suggest that brain injury might be a risk factor for substance use. Methamphetamine (METH), a highly addictive psychostimulant, has not been thoroughly investigated in the context of TBI exposure. The interplay between the two has been of interest as their pathophysiology intertwines on many levels. However, the knowledge concerning the association between TBI-METH and the impact of chronic METH use on short and long-term TBI outcomes is equivocal at best. In this review of the literature, we postulate that, when combined, these two conditions synergize to result in more significant neuronal damage. As such, chronic exposure to METH before brain trauma may accentuate the pathophysiological signs of injury, worsening TBI outcomes. Similarly, individuals with a history of TBI would be more vulnerable to METH misuse and harmful effects. We, therefore, review the most recent preclinical and clinical data tackling the significant overlap in the pathophysiology of TBI and METH at three levels: the structural level, the biochemical level, and the cellular level. We also highlight some controversial results of studies investigating the outcomes of the interaction between TBI and METH.

Biomarker identification in psychiatric disorders: from neuroscience to clinical practice.

Patients with psychiatric disorders exhibit several neurobehavioral and neuropsychological alterations compared to healthy controls. However, signature endpoints of these behavioral manifestations have not yet been translated into clinical tests for diagnosis and follow-up measures. Recently, neuroproteomic approaches have been utilized to identify unique signature markers indicative of these disorders. Development of reliable biomarkers has the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis, classification, and monitoring of clinical responses in psychiatric diseases. However, the lack of biological gold standards, the evolving nosology of psychiatric disorders, and the complexity of the nervous system are among the major challenges that have hindered efforts to develop reliable biomarkers in the field of neuropsychiatry and drug abuse. While biomarkers currently have a limited role in the area of neuropsychiatry, several promising biomarkers have been proposed in conditions such as dementia, schizophrenia, depression, suicide, and addiction. One of the primary objectives of this review is to discuss the role of proteomics in the development of biomarkers specific to neuropsychiatry. We discuss and evaluate currently available biomarkers as well as those that are under research for clinical use in the future.

Systems biology, bioinformatics, and biomarkers in neuropsychiatry.

Although neuropsychiatric (NP) disorders are among the top causes of disability worldwide with enormous financial costs, they can still be viewed as part of the most complex disorders that are of unknown etiology and incomprehensible pathophysiology. The complexity of NP disorders arises from their etiologic heterogeneity and the concurrent influence of environmental and genetic factors. In addition, the absence of rigid boundaries between the normal and diseased state, the remarkable overlap of symptoms among conditions, the high inter-individual and inter-population variations, and the absence of discriminative molecular and/or imaging biomarkers for these diseases makes difficult an accurate diagnosis. Along with the complexity of NP disorders, the practice of psychiatry suffers from a "top-down" method that relied on symptom checklists. Although checklist diagnoses cost less in terms of time and money, they are less accurate than a comprehensive assessment. Thus, reliable and objective diagnostic tools such as biomarkers are needed that can detect and discriminate among NP disorders. The real promise in understanding the pathophysiology of NP disorders lies in bringing back psychiatry to its biological basis in a systemic approach which is needed given the NP disorders' complexity to understand their normal functioning and response to perturbation. This approach is implemented in the systems biology discipline that enables the discovery of disease-specific NP biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutics. Systems biology involves the use of sophisticated computer software "omics"-based discovery tools and advanced performance computational techniques in order to understand the behavior of biological systems and identify diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers specific for NP disorders together with new targets of therapeutics. In this review, we try to shed light on the need of systems biology, bioinformatics, and biomarkers in neuropsychiatry, and illustrate how the knowledge gained through these methodologies can be translated into clinical use providing clinicians with improved ability to diagnose, manage, and treat NP patients.

Qualitative versus quantitative methods in psychiatric research.

Qualitative studies are gaining their credibility after a period of being misinterpreted as "not being quantitative." Qualitative method is a broad umbrella term for research methodologies that describe and explain individuals' experiences, behaviors, interactions, and social contexts. In-depth interview, focus groups, and participant observation are among the qualitative methods of inquiry commonly used in psychiatry. Researchers measure the frequency of occurring events using quantitative methods; however, qualitative methods provide a broader understanding and a more thorough reasoning behind the event. Hence, it is considered to be of special importance in psychiatry. Besides hypothesis generation in earlier phases of the research, qualitative methods can be employed in questionnaire design, diagnostic criteria establishment, feasibility studies, as well as studies of attitude and beliefs. Animal models are another area that qualitative methods can be employed, especially when naturalistic observation of animal behavior is important. However, since qualitative results can be researcher's own view, they need to be statistically confirmed, quantitative methods. The tendency to combine both qualitative and quantitative methods as complementary methods has emerged over recent years. By applying both methods of research, scientists can take advantage of interpretative characteristics of qualitative methods as well as experimental dimensions of quantitative methods.

Leveraging biomarker platforms and systems biology for rehabilomics and biologics effectiveness research.

Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major health problem, with approximately 2 million incidents occurring annually in the United States, no therapeutic agents to treat TBI have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration despite several clinical trials. It is estimated that 3.5 million Americans now have a lifelong condition that might be termed "chronic traumatic brain injury disease.'' Some health care providers categorize TBI as an "event" for which patients require brief periods of rehabilitation with no further treatment. On the contrary, TBI should be seen as a chronic disease process that fits the World Health Organization definition as being a non-reversible pathologic condition requiring special rehabilitation training. Among the major obstacles that contribute to this type of misconception is the absence of brain injury-specific diagnostic biomarker(s) that can indicate and monitor the long-term health status of patients with TBI after use of conventional therapeutics and a rehabilitation process. It is of interest that recent advances in genomics, proteomics, and systems biology have enabled us to use these high throughput-based approaches in developing biomarkers and therapeutic targets in the area of TBI. One aim of this article is to provide an overview that evaluates the current status of TBI biomarker discovery using neuroproteomics/systems biology techniques, along with their clinical utilization. In addition, we discuss the need for strengthening the role of biomarker-based neuroproteomics/systems biology and its potential utility in the field of rehabilitation, which would lead to the establishment of rehabilomics studies, where biomarkers would indicate and predict the long-term efficacy and health status of patients with chronic TBI conditions.