Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 71(3): 515-28, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25659490

RESUMO

In the European Union animal testing has been eliminated for cosmetic ingredients while the US Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel may request data from animal studies. The use of read-across and predictive toxicology provides a path for filling data gaps without additional animal testing. The PEG cocamines are tertiary amines with an alkyl group derived from coconut fatty acids and two PEG chains of varying length. Toxicology data gaps for the PEG cocamines can be addressed by read-across based on structure-activity relationship using the framework described by Wu et al. (2010) for identifying suitable structural analogs. Data for structural analogs supports the conclusion that the PEG cocamines are non-genotoxic and not expected to exhibit systemic or developmental/reproductive toxicity with use in cosmetics. Due to lack of reliable dermal sensitization data for suitable analogs, this endpoint was addressed using predictive software (TIMES SS) as a first step (Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry). The prediction for PEG cocamines was the same as that for PEGs, which have been concluded to not present a significant concern for dermal sensitization. This evaluation for PEG cocamines demonstrates the utility of read-across and predictive toxicology tools to assess the safety of cosmetic ingredients.


Assuntos
Aminas/toxicidade , Simulação por Computador , Cosméticos/toxicidade , Irritantes/toxicidade , Modelos Teóricos , Polietilenoglicóis/toxicidade , Testes de Toxicidade/métodos , Aminas/química , Animais , Cosméticos/química , Dermatite de Contato/etiologia , Olho/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Irritantes/química , Camundongos , Estrutura Molecular , Testes de Mutagenicidade , Polietilenoglicóis/química , Medição de Risco , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Irritação da Pele , Software , Relação Estrutura-Atividade
2.
J Pharm Sci ; 97(3): 1325-8, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17694544

RESUMO

A single-center, single-sequence, two-period crossover study was performed to compare the systemic exposure to salicylic acid (SA) following facial application of a 30% SA cosmetic skin peel formulation applied for 5 min and an oral dose of 650 mg aspirin in nine healthy male and female subjects. The mean (SD) maximum SA concentration (Cmax) was 0.81 (0.32) microg/mL and 56.4 (14.2) microg/mL. The AUC-based safety margin ratio was 50:1. A depot effect was observed during topical application of the skin peel solution as the absorption of SA continued beyond the 5-min application period. Plasma SA Cmax values were achieved from 1.4 to 3.5 h after topical application and from 0.5 to 1.5 h after oral aspirin. The plasma concentrations in the present study (30%; 5 min) were similar to that of a low concentration (2%) applied in a leave-on product to the same body surface area. In conclusion, our results suggest that the use of this SA facial peel should not pose any significant systemic health risks.


Assuntos
Ácido Salicílico/farmacocinética , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Disponibilidade Biológica , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ácido Salicílico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Salicílico/sangue , Ácido Salicílico/farmacologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA