A Large Case-series of Successful Treatment of Patients Exposed to Mold and Mycotoxin.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to present the results of treatment of 100 chemically sensitive and chronically mold-exposed patients, who continued to be disabled even after decontamination of their houses or work places or they were physically removed from their sources of mold. METHODS: Molds were identified, serum anti-mold immunoglobulin G antibodies were measured, patients were skin-tested, immunologic abnormalities were recorded, and objective neurologic tests were performed in a subset of patients. FINDINGS: Patient sensitivities and exposures were confirmed by measuring serum immunoglobulin G anti-mold antibodies, intradermal skin testing, and trichothecene toxin breakdown products in the urine. Patients were positive (44%-98%) for individual molds. Abnormalities in T and B cells were found in >80% of patients. Respiratory signs were present in 64% of all patients, and physical signs and symptoms of neurologic dysfunction were present in 70%. Objective autonomic nervous system test results were abnormal in almost 100% of patients tested. Objective neuropsychological evaluations were conducted in 46 of the patients who exhibited symptoms of neurologic impairment and showed typical abnormalities in short-term memory, executive function/judgment, concentration, and hand/eye coordination. Patients (N = 100) with documented mold exposure were divided into 3 groups: (1) those who improved easily, with mold avoidance and antigen injections; (2) those who improved after desensitization to their mold antigens plus additional mycotoxin antigens; and (3) those who had their regular mold antigens, additional mycotoxin antigens, along with regimens that included sauna, oxygen therapy, and nutrients. Approximately 85% of all patients cleared completely; 14% had partial improvement, and 1% remained unchanged. IMPLICATIONS: Exposure to molds has been increasingly recognized as a major reason for patients presenting with multiple organ symptoms that could not otherwise be explained. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment could be very successful.

History of chemical sensitivity and diagnosis.

Histories of mold, pollen, dust, food, chemicals, and electromagnetic field (EMF) sensitivities are the major categories of triggers for chemical sensitivity. They are tied together by the coherence phenomenon, where each has its own frequencies and identifiable EMF; therefore, they can be correlated. The diagnosis of chemical sensitivity can be done accurately in a less-polluted, controlled environment, as was done in these studies. The principles of diagnosis and treatment depend on total environmental and total body pollutant loads, masking or adaptation, bipolarity of response, and biochemical individuality, among others. These principles make less-polluted, controlled conditions necessary. The clinician has to use less-polluted water and organic food with individual challenges for testing, including dust, mold, pesticide, natural gas, formaldehyde, particulates, and EMF testing, which needs to be performed in less-polluted copper-screened rooms. The challenge tests for proof of chemical sensitivity include inhaled toxics within a clean booth that is chemical- and particulate-free at ambient doses in parts per million (ppm) or parts per billion (ppb). Individual foods, both organic and commercial (that are contaminated with herbicides and pesticides), are used orally. Water testing and intradermal testing are performed in a less-polluted, controlled environment. These include specific dose injections of molds, dust, and pollen that are preservative-free, individual organic foods, and individual chemicals, i.e. methane, ethane, propane, butane, hexane, formaldehyde, ethanol, car exhaust, jet fuel exhaust, and prosthetic implants (metal plates, pacemakers, mesh, etc.). Normal saline is used as a placebo. EMF testing is performed in a copper-screened room using a frequency generator. In our experience, 80% of the EMF-sensitive patients had chemical sensitivity when studied under less-polluted conditions for particulates, controlled natural gas, pesticides, and chemicals like formaldehyde.

Terpenes and terpenoids in chemical sensitivity.

UNLABELLED: CONTEXT : Terpenes and terpenoids are a diverse class of organic compounds produced by a variety of plants, particularly conifers. Chemically sensitive patients can be targeted by terpenes and terpenoids, resulting in a triggering of symptoms and pathology. Often patients cannot clear their symptoms from exposure to chemicals unless terpenes and terpenoids are avoided and neutralized along with chemical avoidance and treatment. OBJECTIVE: This article evaluates the presence, diagnosis, and treatment of terpenes exposure in chemically sensitive patients. DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-part study was designed to establish the chemically sensitive state of the patients in part 1, followed by a second set of challenges to determine each patient's concurrent sensitivity to terpenes and terpenoids in part 2. In all of the challenges, normal saline was used as a control. A case report illustrates the history of 1 patient and describes the authors' treatment methods. SETTING: The study was developed and conducted at the Environmental Health Center of Dallas (EHC-D) because the environment within the center is 5 times less polluted than the surrounding environments, as determined by quantitative air analysis and particulate counts. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 45 chemically sensitive patients at EHC-D with odor sensitivity to terpenes. The cohort included 18 males and 27 females, aged 24-62 y.Intervention • Patients were deadapted (4 d) and evaluated in a 5-times-less-polluted environment, which was evaluated using air analysis and particulate counts. After deadaptation, the patients were challenged by inhalation in a controlled, less-polluted glass steel booth inside an environmentally controlled room with an ambient air dose of the toxics in the order of parts per billion (PPB) and parts per million (PPM). These toxics included formaldehyde, pesticide, cigarette smoke, ethanol, phenol, chlorine, new sprint, perfume, and placebo. They were also challenged intradermally with extracts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including formaldehyde, orris root, ethanol, phenol, cigarette smoke, chlorine, newsprint, perfume, terpenes, terpenoids, and placebo. OUTCOME MEASURES: Inhaled challenges recorded pulse, blood pressure, peak bronchial flow, and other signs and symptoms 30 min before and at 15-min intervals for 2 h postchallenge. Intradermal challenges recorded wheal size and the provocation of signs and symptoms. RESULTS : Different numbers of patients were tested for each terpenes source because of time-related factors or the cumulative effect of testing, which made patients unable to continue. Of 45 chemically sensitive patients in the study, 43 demonstrated sensitivity to terpenes. CONCLUSIONS: This particular patient group was positive for a number of toxic and nontoxic chemicals provoking their symptoms. This study shows there was a connection between VOCs, other chemicals, and terpenes in chemically sensitive patients in a prospective cohort study. It has also shown the potential for terpenes to exacerbate symptoms of chemical sensitivity. Further research on this topic is recommended.

Predicting co-morbidities in chemically sensitive individuals from exhaled breath analysis.

The exhaled breath of more than four hundred patients who presented at the Environmental Health Center - Dallas with chemical sensitivity conditions were analyzed for the relative abundance of their breath chemical composition by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds. All presenting patients had no fewer than four and as many as eight co-morbid conditions. Surprisingly, almost all the exhaled breath analyses showed the presence of a preponderance of lipophilic aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons. The hydrophilic compounds present were almost entirely of natural origin, i.e. expected metabolites of foods. The lipophile, primarily C3 to C16 hydrocarbons and believed to have come from inhalation of polluted air, were, in all cases, present at concentrations far below those known to be toxic to humans, but caused sensitivity and signs of chemical overload. The co-morbid health effects observed are believed to be caused by the sequential absorption of lipophilic and hydrophilic chemicals; an initial absorption and retention of lipophile followed by a subsequent absorption of hydrophilic species facilitated by the retained lipophile to produce chemical mixtures that are toxic at very low levels. It is hypothesized that co-morbid conditions in chemically sensitive individuals can be predicted from analysis of their exhaled breath.

The treatment of patients with mycotoxin-induced disease.

Twenty-eight incapacitated individuals (average 43 years old, 7 males, 21 females, range 12-70) exposed to molds and mycotoxins were studied and treated with a protocol of cleaning up or changing their environment to be mold free. Injections of the optimum dose of antigens were given as part of the treatment protocol as was oral and intravenous (i.v.) antioxidants; heat depuration (sauna); physical therapy with massage and exercise under environmentally controlled conditions; oxygen therapy at 4-8 L/min for 2 hours with a special wood-grade cellophane reservoir and a glass oxygen container. Many patients were sensitive to plastics; therefore, exposures to these were kept to a minimum. Autogenous lymphocytic factor was given as an immune modulator. Of 28 patients, 27 did well and returned to work. One patient improved but did not return to work during the period of study.

Effects of toxic exposure to molds and mycotoxins in building-related illnesses.

The authors studied 100 patients who had been exposed to toxic molds in their homes. The predominant molds identified were Alternaria, Cladosporium, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Stachybotrys, Curvularia, Basidiomycetes, Myxomycetes, smuts, Epicoccus, Fusarium, Bipolaris, and Rhizopus. A variety of tests were performed on all, or on subgroups of, these patients. Sensitivities and exposures were confirmed in all patients by intradermal skin testing for individual molds (44-98% positive), and by measurement of serum antibodies. Abnormalities in T and B cells, and subsets, were found in more than 80% of the patients. The findings of trichothecene toxin and breakdown products in the urine, serum antibodies to molds, and positive intradermal skin tests confirmed mycotoxin exposure. Respiratory signs (e.g., rhinorrhea, sinus tenderness, wheezing) were found in 64% of all patients, and physical signs and symptoms of neurological dysfunction (e.g., inability to stand on the toes or to walk a straight line with eyes closed, as well as short-term memory loss) were identified in 70% of all patients. Objective abnormal autonomic nervous system tests were positive in all 100 patients tested. Brain scans, conducted using triple-head single photon emission computed tomography, were abnormal in 26 (86%) of 30 (subgroup of the 100) patients tested. Objective neuropsychological evaluations of 46 of the patients who exhibited symptoms of neurological impairment showed typical abnormalities in short-term memory, executive function/judgment, concentration, and hand/eye coordination.

Use of functional brain imaging in the evaluation of exposure to mycotoxins and toxins encountered in Desert Storm/Desert Shield.

In this retrospective analysis the authors compared brain scintigrams, performed using triple-head single-photon emission computed tomography (tripleSPECT), of subjects who were judged clinically impaired from exposure to toxins during the Desert Storm/Desert Shield military action, and of subjects exposed to mycotoxins, with those of normal controls. The scintigrams for both exposed groups exhibited similar patterns of abnormalities, which were consistent with neurotoxic impairment. The authors conclude that further study is needed to determine whether mycotoxin exposure may be a cause of abnormalities seen in tripleSPECT images.

Food and chemicals as environmental incitants

La susceptibilidad a provocadores ambientales de componentes presentes en el aire, la comida y el agua constituye un problema de salud conocido. Tales sensibilidades y reacciones pueden dar lugar a múltiples síntomas que afectan el músculo liso, las membranas y la sustancia colágena de los sistemas respiratorio, gastrointestinal y genitourinario. Estas reacciones pueden ser confundidas como hipocondriasis, pero son realmente reacciones a contaminantes y químicos presente en el medio ambiente casero y de trabajo del paciente. La realización de historias clínicas detalladas alertarán al médico y la enfermera de la industria, pudidendo establecer su relación, mediante eliminación y confrontamiento del paciente a las sustancias ofensivas mediante la realización de estudios cuidadosos y controlados