Validity of remote live stream video evaluation of the North Star Ambulatory Assessment in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Conducting functional assessments remotely can help alleviate the burden of in-person assessment on patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and their caregivers. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether scores from remote functional assessment of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy correspond to in-person scores on the same functional assessments. Remote live stream versus in-person scores on the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (including time [seconds] to complete the 10-meter walk/run and time to rise from the floor [supine to stand]) were assessed using statistical analyses, including intraclass correlation coefficient, and Pearson, Spearman, and Bland-Altman analyses. The remote and in-clinic assessments had to occur within 2 weeks of one another to be considered for this analysis. This analysis included patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, aged 4 to 7 years. Participants in this analysis received delandistrogene moxeparvovec (as part of SRP-9001-101 [Study 101; NCT03375164] or SRP-9001-102 [Study 102; NCT03769116]) or were randomized to receive placebo (in Part 1 of Study 102). This study evaluates score reproducibility between live stream remote scoring versus in-person functional assessments as determined by intraclass correlation coefficient, and Pearson, Spearman, and Bland-Altman analyses. The results showed that scores from remote functional assessment of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy strongly correlated with those obtained in person. These findings demonstrate congruence between live stream remote and in-person functional assessment and suggest that remote assessment has the potential to reduce the burden on a family by supplementing in-clinic visits.

Feasibility and utility of in-home body weight support harness system use in young children treated for spinal muscular atrophy: A single-arm prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: This single-arm prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and utility of in-home body weight support harness system (BWSS) use in children treated for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). METHODS: Individuals with 2 or 3 copies of SMN2 who received pharmacotherapeutic treatment, had head control, and weight <50lbs were enrolled. Families were provided a BWSS and documented use. Motor outcome assessments were completed at baseline, month 3 and month 6. Families provided feedback in an end of study survey. RESULTS: All 32 participants (2.9 (SD 1.9) yrs), improved or remained stable on all outcomes. Average reported frequency of use was 4.1(2.3) hrs/week. Controlling for other covariates, frequency of use explained over 70% of the variability in change scores. Family feedback was overwhelmingly positive. CONCLUSION: Use of in-home BWSS is a safe, feasible and useful option to increase exercise dosage after treatment in SMA and may help optimize motor abilities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study registered with: Clinicaltrials.gov Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05715749.

Increase in Full-Length Dystrophin by Exon Skipping in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Patients with Single Exon Duplications: An Open-label Study.

Single exon duplications account for disease in a minority of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. Exon skipping in these patients has the potential to be highly therapeutic through restoration of full-length dystrophin expression. We conducted a 48-week open label study of casimersen and golodirsen in 3 subjects with an exon 45 or 53 duplication. Two subjects (aged 18 and 23 years) were non-ambulatory at baseline. Upper limb, pulmonary, and cardiac function appeared stable in the 2 subjects in whom they could be evaluated. Dystrophin expression increased from 0.94 % ±0.59% (mean±SD) of normal to 5.1% ±2.9% by western blot. Percent dystrophin positive fibers also rose from 14% ±17% at baseline to 50% ±42% . Our results provide initial evidence that the use of exon-skipping drugs may increase dystrophin levels in patients with single-exon duplications.

Gene therapy with bidridistrogene xeboparvovec for limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2E/R4: phase 1/2 trial results.

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy 2E/R4 is caused by mutations in the ß-sarcoglycan (SGCB) gene, leading to SGCB deficiency and consequent muscle loss. We developed a gene therapy approach based on functional replacement of the deficient SCB protein. Here we report interim results from a first-in-human, open-label, nonrandomized, phase 1/2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of bidridistrogene xeboparvovec, an adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy containing a codon-optimized, full-length human SGCB transgene. Patients aged 4-15 years with confirmed SGCB mutations at both alleles received one intravenous infusion of either 1.85 × 1013 vector genome copies kg-1 (Cohort 1, n = 3) or 7.41 × 1013 vector gene copies kg-1 (Cohort 2, n = 3). Primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoint was change in SGCB expression in skeletal muscle from baseline to Day 60. We report interim Year 2 results (trial ongoing). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were vomiting (four of six patients) and gamma-glutamyl transferase increase (three of six patients). Serious adverse events resolved with standard therapies. Robust SGCB expression was observed: Day 60 mean (s.d.) percentage of normal expression 36.2% (2.7%) in Cohort 1 and 62.1% (8.7%) in Cohort 2. Post hoc exploratory analysis showed preliminary motor improvements using the North Star Assessment for Limb-girdle Type Muscular Dystrophies maintained through Year 2. The 2-year safety and efficacy of bidridistrogene xeboparvovec support clinical development advancement. Further studies are necessary to confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of this gene therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03652259 .

Long-term safety and functional outcomes of delandistrogene moxeparvovec gene therapy in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A phase 1/2a nonrandomized trial.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Delandistrogene moxeparvovec is indicated in the United States for the treatment of ambulatory pediatric patients aged 4 through 5 years with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with a confirmed mutation in the DMD gene. Long-term delandistrogene moxeparvovec microdystrophin protein (a shortened dystrophin that retains key functional domains of the wild-type protein) expression may positively alter disease progression in patients with DMD. We evaluated long-term safety and functional outcomes of delandistrogene moxeparvovec in patients with DMD. METHODS: An open-label, phase 1/2a, nonrandomized controlled trial (Study 101; NCT03375164) enrolled ambulatory males, ≥4 to <8 years old, with DMD. Patients received a single intravenous infusion (2.0 × 1014 vg/kg by supercoiled quantitative polymerase chain reaction) of delandistrogene moxeparvovec and prednisone (1 mg/kg/day) 1 day before to 30 days after treatment. The primary endpoint was safety. Functional outcomes were change from baseline in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) and timed function tests. RESULTS: Four patients (mean age, 5.1 years) were enrolled. There were 18 treatment-related adverse events; all occurred within 70 days posttreatment and resolved. Mean NSAA total score increased from 20.5 to 27.5, baseline to year 4, with a mean (standard deviation) change of +7.0 (2.9). Post hoc analysis demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 9-point difference in NSAA score, relative to a propensity-score-weighted external control cohort (least-squares mean [standard error] = 9.4 [3.4]; P = .0125). DISCUSSION: Gene transfer therapy with delandistrogene moxeparvovec treatment is well tolerated, with a favorable safety profile. Functional improvements are sustained through 4 years, suggesting delandistrogene moxeparvovec may positively alter disease progression.

Expression of SRP-9001 dystrophin and stabilization of motor function up to 2 years post-treatment with delandistrogene moxeparvovec gene therapy in individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Introduction: Delandistrogene moxeparvovec (SRP-9001) is an investigational gene transfer therapy designed for targeted expression of SRP-9001 dystrophin protein, a shortened dystrophin retaining key functional domains of the wild-type protein. Methods: This Phase 2, double-blind, two-part (48 weeks per part) crossover study (SRP-9001-102 [Study 102]; NCT03769116) evaluated delandistrogene moxeparvovec in patients, aged ≥4 to <8 years with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Primary endpoints (Part 1) were change from baseline (CFBL) in SRP-9001 dystrophin expression (Week 12), by Western blot, and in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) score (Week 48). Safety assessments included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Patients were randomized and stratified by age to placebo (n = 21) or delandistrogene moxeparvovec (n = 20) and crossed over for Part 2. Results: SRP-9001 dystrophin expression was achieved in all patients: mean CFBL to Week 12 was 23.82% and 39.64% normal in Parts 1 and 2, respectively. In Part 1, CFBL to Week 48 in NSAA score (least-squares mean, LSM [standard error]) was +1.7 (0.6) with treatment versus +0.9 (0.6) for placebo; p = 0.37. Disparity in baseline motor function between groups likely confounded these results. In 4- to 5-year-olds with matched baseline motor function, CFBL to Week 48 in NSAA scores was significantly different (+2.5 points; p = 0.0172), but not significantly different in 6-to-7-year-olds with imbalanced baseline motor function (-0.7 points; p = 0.5384). For patients treated with delandistrogene moxeparvovec in Part 2, CFBL to Week 48 in NSAA score was +1.3 (2.7), whereas for those treated in Part 1, NSAA scores were maintained. As all patients in Part 2 were exposed to treatment, results were compared with a propensity-score-weighted external control (EC) cohort. The LSM difference in NSAA score between the Part 2 treated group and EC cohort was statistically significant (+2.0 points; p = 0.0009). The most common TRAEs were vomiting, decreased appetite, and nausea. Most occurred within the first 90 days and all resolved. Discussion: Results indicate robust expression of SRP-9001 dystrophin and overall stabilization in NSAA up to 2 years post-treatment. Differences in NSAA between groups in Part 1 were not significant for the overall population, likely because cohorts were stratified only by age, and other critical prognostic factors were not well matched at baseline.

Validation of the North Star Assessment for Limb-Girdle Type Muscular Dystrophies.

OBJECTIVE: The North Star Assessment for limb-girdle type muscular dystrophies (NSAD), a clinician-reported outcome measure (ClinRO) of motor performance, was initially developed and validated for use in dysferlinopathy, an autosomal recessive form of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD R2/2B). Recent developments in treatments for limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMD) have highlighted the urgent need for disease-specific ClinROs. The purpose of this study was to understand the ability of the NSAD to quantify motor function across the broad spectrum of LGMD phenotypes. METHODS: Assessments of 130 individuals with LGMD evaluated by the physical therapy teams at Nationwide Children's Hospital and the John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre were included in the analysis. NSAD, 100-m timed test (100MTT), and Performance of Upper Limb 2.0 assessment data were collected. Psychometric analysis with Rasch measurement methods was used to examine the NSAD for suitability and robustness by determining the extent to which the observed data "fit" with predictions of those ratings from the Rasch model. The NSAD score was correlated with the 100MTT and Performance of Upper Limb 2.0 assessment scores for external construct validity. RESULTS: The NSAD demonstrated a good spread of items covering a continuum of abilities across both individuals who had LGMD and were ambulatory and individuals who had LGMD and were weaker and nonambulatory. Items fit well with the construct measured, validating a summed total score. The NSAD had excellent interrater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.986, 95% CI = 0.981-0.991] and was highly correlated with the 100MTT walk/run velocity (Spearman rho correlation coefficient of rs(134) = .92). CONCLUSION: Although LGMD subtypes may differ in age of onset, rate of progression, and patterns of muscle weakness, the overall impact of progressive muscle weakness on motor function is similar. The NSAD is a reliable and valid ClinRO of motor performance for individuals with LGMD and is suitable for use in clinical practice and research settings. IMPACT: Recent developments in potential pharmacological treatments for LGMD have highlighted the urgent need for disease-specific outcome measures. Validated and meaningful outcome measures are necessary to capture disease presentation, to inform expected rates of progression, and as endpoints for measuring the response to interventions in clinical trials. The NSAD, a scale of motor performance for both individuals who have LGMD and are ambulatory and those who are nonambulatory, is suitable for use in clinical and research settings.

Comparison of strength testing modalities in dysferlinopathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Dysferlinopathy demonstrates heterogeneity in muscle weakness between patients, which can progress at different rates over time. Changing muscle strength due to disease progression or from an investigational product is associated with changing functional ability. The purpose of this study was to compare three methods of strength testing used in the Clinical Outcome Study (COS) for dysferlinopathy to understand which method and which muscle groups were most sensitive to change over time. METHODS: Patients were evaluated at each study visit using functional scales, manual muscle testing, and handheld dynamometry (HHD) at all 15 sites. A fixed-frame system (Fixed) was used at a subset of seven sites. Screening and baseline visits were evaluated for reliability. Data over a 1-year period were analyzed to determine sensitivity to change among strength modalities and individual muscle groups. RESULTS: HHD and Fixed captured significant change across 1 year in summed muscle strength score of four muscle groups (P < .01). Strength summed scores were significantly correlated with functional scales (rho = 0.68-0.92, P < .001). Individual muscle groups, however, showed high levels of variability between visits. DISCUSSION: Although both HHD and Fixed demonstrate change over 12 months, HHD is a less expensive option that provides data on a continuous scale and may be easier to implement. Due to variability in strength measures, researchers should carefully consider use of strength testing as an outcome and may wish to select functional measures with less variability as clinical trial endpoints.

Remote Delivery of Motor Function Assessment and Training for Clinical Trials in Neuromuscular Disease: A Response to the COVID-19 Global Pandemic.

Clinical outcome assessments of function or strength, assessed by physical therapists, are commonly used as primary endpoints in clinical trials, natural history studies and within clinics for individuals with neuromuscular disorders. These evaluations not only inform the efficacy of investigational agents in clinical trials, but also importantly track disease trajectory to prospectively advise need for equipment, home and work modifications, and other assistive devices. The COVID-19 pandemic had a global impact on the safety and feasibility of in-person visits and assessments, necessitating rapid development of mitigation strategies to ensure ongoing collection of key clinical trial endpoints and access to expert clinical care despite travel restrictions. Physical therapists who are expert in neuromuscular disorders working across clinics, countries, and clinical trials developed initial guidelines and methods for the suitability and feasibility of performing remote evaluations. A number of Sponsors introduced amendments to their study protocols to enable remote evaluations, supported by live video streaming of the assessment to their local clinical evaluators. Similarly, application of these techniques to clinical telemedicine enabled objective evaluations for use in payer discussions, equipment procurement, and general access to expert physical therapy services. Here we report on our methodology for adapting current practices to remote testing and considerations for remote evaluations.

Validity and Reliability of the Neuromuscular Gross Motor Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Approved treatments in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have resulted in unprecedented gains for many individuals. Use of available outcomes, typically developed for a specific type of SMA, do not cover the range of progression, often resulting in a battery of functional testing being completed at visits. Our objective was to validate the Neuromuscular Gross Motor Outcome (GRO) as a tool to quantify function in SMA across the span of abilities. METHODS: Patients with genetically confirmed SMA completed functional testing at each visit including the Neuromuscular GRO and other appropriate gross motor outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled 91 patients with SMA types 1 to 3 between 8 days and 32.1 years. The GRO utilizes a 0- to 2-point scale with scores in our cohort ranging from 1 to 95 points with no floor or ceiling effect. GRO scores were significantly different across functional categories (P < 0.001) and treatment status (P = 0.01) and correlated to other functional assessments (P ≤ 0.001). All patients were measured using the GRO, whereas traditional outcomes were only appropriate on 36% to 59% of our cohort. CONCLUSION: The Neuromuscular GRO quantifies function across the span of age and abilities included in our cohort, allowing for continuous longitudinal monitoring on one scale to reduce the burden of testing in our heterogeneous clinic population.

Five-Year Extension Results of the Phase 1 START Trial of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Importance: This ongoing study assesses long-term safety and durability of response in infants with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 after dosing with onasemnogene abeparvovec gene replacement therapy. Objective: The primary objective of this ongoing study is to assess safety. The secondary objective is to determine whether developmental milestones achieved in the START phase 1 clinical trial were maintained and new milestones gained. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study is an ongoing, observational, follow-up study for continuous safety monitoring for 15 years in patients from the START phase I study (conducted May 5, 2014, through December 15, 2017) at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. Participants were symptomatic infants with SMA type 1 and 2 copies of SMN2 previously treated with an intravenous dose of onasemnogene abeparvovec (low dose, 6.7 × 1013 vg/kg; or therapeutic dose, 1.1 × 1014 vg/kg) in START. Thirteen of 15 original START patients are included in this analysis; 2 patients' families declined follow-up participation. Data were analyzed from September 21, 2017, to June 11, 2020. Exposures: Median time since dosing of 5.2 (range, 4.6-6.2) years; 5.9 (range, 5.8-6.2) years in the low-dose cohort and 4.8 (range, 4.6-5.6) years in the therapeutic-dose cohort. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Results: At data cutoff on June 11, 2020, 13 patients treated in START were enrolled in this study (median age, 38.9 [range, 25.4-48.0] months; 7 females; low-dose cohort, n = 3; and therapeutic-dose cohort, n = 10). Serious adverse events occurred in 8 patients (62%), none of which resulted in study discontinuation or death. The most frequently reported SAEs were acute respiratory failure (n = 4 [31%]), pneumonia (n = 4 [31%]), dehydration (n = 3 [23%]), respiratory distress (n = 2 [15%]), and bronchiolitis (n = 2 [15%]). All 10 patients in the therapeutic-dose cohort remained alive and without the need for permanent ventilation. Prior to baseline, 4 patients (40%) in the therapeutic-dose cohort required noninvasive ventilatory support, and 6 patients (60%) did not require regular ventilatory support, which did not change in long-term follow-up. All 10 patients treated with the therapeutic dose maintained previously acquired motor milestones. Two patients attained the new milestone of "standing with assistance" without the use of nusinersen. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this ongoing clinical follow-up of patients with SMA type 1 treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec supports the long-term favorable safety profile up to 6 years of age and provides evidence for sustained clinical durability of the therapeutic dose. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03421977.