Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
Public Health Rep ; 126(2): 176-85, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21387947

RESUMO

In September 2008, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sponsored a meeting of public health and infection-control professionals to address the implementation of surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs)-particularly those related to health care-associated infections. The group discussed the role of health departments and defined goals for future surveillance activities. Participants identified the following main points: (1) surveillance should guide prevention and infection-control activities, (2) an MDRO surveillance system should be adaptable and not organism specific, (3) new systems should utilize and link existing systems, and (4) automated electronic laboratory reporting will be an important component of surveillance but will take time to develop. Current MDRO reporting mandates and surveillance methods vary across states and localities. Health departments that have not already done so should be proactive in determining what type of system, if any, will fit their needs.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Órgãos Estatais de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento em Saúde/organização & administração , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Notificação de Doenças/métodos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Estados Unidos
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 23(11): 985-9, 2004 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15545851

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States in the 1990s, the incidence of reported pertussis in adults, adolescents and infants increased; infants younger than 1 year of age had the highest reported incidence. METHODS: In 4 states with Enhanced Pertussis Surveillance, we examined the epidemiology of reported pertussis cases to determine the source of pertussis among infants. A source was defined as a person with an acute cough illness who had contact with the case-infant 7-20 days before the infant's onset of cough. RESULTS: The average annual pertussis incidence per 100,000 infants younger than 1 year of age varied by state: 22.9 in Georgia; 42.1 in Illinois; 93.0 in Minnesota; and 35.8 in Massachusetts. Family members of 616 (80%) of 774 reported case-infants were interviewed; a source was identified for 264 (43%) of the 616 case-infants. Among the 264 case-infants, mothers were the source for 84 (32%) and another family member was the source for 113 (43%). Of the 219 source-persons with known age, 38 (17%) were age 0-4 years, 16 (7%) were age 5-9 years, 43 (20%) were age 10-19 years, 45 (21%) were age 20-29 years and 77 (35%) were age > or =30 years. CONCLUSIONS: The variation in reported pertussis incidence in the 4 states might have resulted from differences in awareness of pertussis among health care providers, diagnostic capacity and case classification. Among case-infants with an identifiable source, family members (at any age) were the main source of pertussis. Understanding the source of pertussis transmission to infants may provide new approaches to prevent pertussis in the most vulnerable infants.


Assuntos
Notificação de Doenças , Surtos de Doenças , Coqueluche/diagnóstico , Coqueluche/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Portador Sadio , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacina contra Coqueluche/administração & dosagem , Medição de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 9(7): 781-7, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12890317

RESUMO

The Emerging Infections Programs (EIPs), a population-based network involving 10 state health departments and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, complement and support local, regional, and national surveillance and research efforts. EIPs depend on collaboration between public health agencies and clinical and academic institutions to perform active, population-based surveillance for infectious diseases; conduct applied epidemiologic and laboratory research; implement and evaluate pilot prevention and intervention projects; and provide capacity for flexible public health response. Recent EIP work has included monitoring the impact of a new conjugate vaccine on the epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease, providing the evidence base used to derive new recommendations to prevent neonatal group B streptococcal disease, measuring the impact of foodborne diseases in the United States, and developing a systematic, integrated laboratory and epidemiologic method for syndrome-based surveillance.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/prevenção & controle , Vigilância da População , Administração em Saúde Pública , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/epidemiologia , Estado Terminal , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinas Conjugadas/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...