[Portal vein embolization prior to major hepatectomy: A multidisciplinary approach for advanced liver tumors in Chile]. / Embolización portal previo a hepatectomía mayor: Experiencia multidisciplinaria en tumores hepáticos avanzados en Chile.

BACKGROUND: One of the main limitations to achieving a complete tumor resection in patients with technically resectable liver tumors is the presence of a small future liver remnant (FLR). Portal vein embolization (PVE) allows hypertrophy of the non-embolized lobe, reducing the risk of postoperative liver failure. AIM: To describe the experience of portal embolization prior to hepatectomy and its effectiveness in converting advanced unresectable liver tumors into resectable tumors. METHODS: Non-concurrent cohort study. All patients who underwent PVE before hepatectomy between 2016 and 2020 in our center were included. Demographic and diagnostic variables, pre and post-PVE volumes, perioperative variables, and global and disease-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. Median age 66 (54-72) years and 57.9% (n= 11) were women. Bilateral metastases were present in 78.9% (n= 15). Sixteen patients (84.2%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. One patient (5.3%) had a complication after PVE. The median time between embolization and volumetry was 5.3 weeks (4.7-7.1). Median FLR before and after PVE were 19.8% (16.2-27.7) and 30% (25.2-40.5), respectively. The median percentage of hypertrophy was 48% (40.4-76.5). Fifteen patients (78.9%) underwent hepatectomy. Significant complications occurred in 26.6% (n= 4); among them, three patients (20%) presented postoperative liver failure. CONCLUSIONS: PVE is safe and effective in promoting FLR hypertrophy in the presence of chemotherapy, allowing patients with advanced liver tumors to undergo surgery with curative intent.

Risk factors for readmission after a cholecystectomy: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors associated with 30-day hospital readmissions after a cholecystectomy. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study, with data obtained from UC-Christus from Santiago, Chile. All patients who underwent a cholecystectomy between January 2015 and December 2019 were included in the study. We identified all patients readmitted after a cholecystectomy and compared them with a randomized control group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 4866 cholecystectomies performed between 2015 and 2019, 79 patients presented 30-day hospital readmission after the surgical procedure (1.6%). We identified as risk factors for readmission in the univariate analysis the presence of a solid tumor at the moment of cholecystectomy (OR = 7.58), high pre-operative direct bilirubin (OR = 2.52), high pre-operative alkaline phosphatase (OR = 3.25), emergency admission (OR = 2.04), choledocholithiasis on admission (OR = 4.34), additional surgical procedure during the cholecystectomy (OR = 4.12), and post-operative complications. In the multivariate analysis, the performance of an additional surgical procedure during cholecystectomy was statistically significant (OR = 4.24). CONCLUSION: Performing an additional surgical procedure during cholecystectomy was identified as a risk factor associated with 30-day hospital readmission.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los factores de riesgo asociados al reingreso hospitalario en los primeros 30 días post colecistectomía. MÉTODOS: Estudio de casos-controles con datos obtenidos del Hospital Clínico de la UC-Christus, Santiago, Chile. Se ­incluyeron las colecistectomías realizadas entre los años 2015-2019. Se consideraron como casos aquellos pacientes que reingresaron en los 30 primeros días posterior a una colecistectomía. Se realizó un análisis univariado y multivariado de diferentes posibles factores de riesgo. RESULTADOS: De un total de 4866 colecistectomías, 79 pacientes presentaron reingreso hospitalario. Los resultados estadísticamente significativos en el análisis univariado fueron; tumor sólido al momento de la colecistectomía (OR = 7.58) bilirrubina directa preoperatoria alterada (OR = 2.52), fosfatasa alcalina preoperatoria alterada (OR = 3.25), ingreso de urgencia (OR = 2.04), coledocolitiasis al ingreso (OR = 4.34) realización de otros procedimientos (OR = 4.12) y complicaciones postoperatorias. En el análisis multivariado sólo la realización de otro procedimiento durante la colecistectomía fue estadísticamente significativa (OR = 4.24). CONCLUSIÓN: La realización de otros procedimientos durante la colecistectomía es un factor de riesgo de reingreso hospitalario en los 30 días posteriores a la colecistectomía.

Resecciones Hepáticas Laparoscópicas por Hepatocarcinoma: Resultados Perioperatorios y Oncológicos / Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world. Surgery is the treatment of choice in stages 0 and A in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification. A minimally invasive technique in this scenario has the advantage of reducing postoperative pain, blood loss, and hospital stay. We present our experience and outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection in HCC. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive analysis from all patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection for HCC in our center between August 2006 and December 2020. RESULTS: Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC was performed in 20 patients. The median age was 70 years, and the male gender was 75%. Sixteen patients had chronic liver disease, and 87.5% were Child A. The most common liver resection was the non-anatomical (45%). 30-day morbidity was 15%, without the need for reintervention. We had no 30-day mortality and postoperative liver failure. Negative margins were achieved in 90% of patients. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 25 and 40.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic liver resection for the treatment of HCC in our series is safe, with no 30-day mortality, low incidence of complications, no postoperative liver failure, and suitable medium- and long-term oncological results

Liver resection for hepatolithiasis: A multicenter experience in Latin America.

BACKGROUND: Hepatolithiasis is a prevalent disease in Asia but rare in Western countries. An increasing number of cases have been reported in Latin America. Liver resection has been proposed as a definitive treatment for complete stone clearance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of liver resection for the treatment of hepatolithiasis in 2 large hepatobiliary reference centers from South America. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis from patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent liver resection between November 1986 and December 2018, in 2 Latin-American centers in Chile and Brazil. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients underwent liver resection for hepatolithiasis (72 in Chile, 77 in Brazil). The mean age was 49 years and most patients were female (62.4%). Hepatolithiasis was localized in the left lobe (61.7%), right lobe (24.2%), and bilateral lobe (14.1%). Bilateral lithiasis was associated with higher incidence of preoperative and postoperative cholangitis (81% vs 46.9% and 28.6% vs 6.1%) and need for hepaticojejunostomy (52.4%). In total, 38.9% of patients underwent major hepatectomy and 14.1% were laparoscopic. The postoperative stone clearance was 100%. The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 30.9% and 0.7%, respectively. Cholangiocarcinoma was seen in 2 specimens, and no postoperative malignancy were seen after a median follow-up of 38 months. Fourteen patients (9.4%) had intrahepatic stones recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection is an effective and definitive treatment for patients with hepatolithiasis. Bilateral hepatolithiasis was associated with perioperative cholangitis, the need for hepaticojejunostomy, and recurrent disease. Resection presents a high rate of biliary tree stone clearance and excellent long-term results, with low recurrence rates and low risk of malignancy.

[Outcomes of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience]. / Resecciones Hepáticas Laparoscópicas por Hepatocarcinoma: Resultados Perioperatorios y Oncológicos.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world. Surgery is the treatment of choice in stages 0 and A in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification. A minimally invasive technique in this scenario has the advantage of reducing postoperative pain, blood loss, and hospital stay. We present our experience and outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection in HCC. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive analysis from all patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection for HCC in our center between August 2006 and December 2020. RESULTS: Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC was performed in 20 patients. The median age was 70 years, and the male gender was 75%. Sixteen patients had chronic liver disease, and 87.5% were Child A. The most common liver resection was the non-anatomical (45%). 30-day morbidity was 15%, without the need for reintervention. We had no 30-day mortality and postoperative liver failure. Negative margins were achieved in 90% of patients. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 25 and 40.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic liver resection for the treatment of HCC in our series is safe, with no 30-day mortality, low incidence of complications, no postoperative liver failure, and suitable medium- and long-term oncological results.

Right Lobe Liver Donation After Bariatric Surgery. A Case Series of 4 Living Donors.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of obesity and need for bariatric surgery as well as the expanding use of living donors for liver transplantation means that potential donors could present with this surgical history. We present 4 cases of liver donors with previous bariatric surgery in our living donor liver transplant program. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis of patients with a bariatric surgery history who underwent right hepatectomy in our living donor liver transplant program is presented. RESULTS: Case 1: A 53-year-old man with body mass index (BMI) of 33 who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Pretransplant BMI was 21.5. Case 2: A 46-year-old woman with a BMI maximum of 40.8 who underwent LSG and required conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Pretransplant BMI was 35.1. Case 3: A 53-year-old woman with a BMI maximum of 31.6 who underwent LSG. Pretransplant BMI was 24.2. Case 4: A 38-year-old man with a BMI maximum of 41.5 who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 6 years before the hepatectomy. Pretransplant BMI was 29.4. No complications were observed. Average operative time was 367.5 minutes, with a hospital stay of 5.8 days and 100% graft survival to date. DISCUSSION: Utilization of selected donors with previous bariatric surgery appears to be a safe option and increases the donor pool.

Trasplante hepático por metástasis hepáticas irresecables de cáncer colorrectal: revisión de la literatura / Liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: A review

In Chile, colorectal cancer ranks third in incidence and fifth in mortality. Half of these patients have liver metastases at the diagnosis, and only 30% of them are resectable. Despite the development of many complex hepatobiliary procedures to achieve the total resection of metastases, the long-term survival with these techniques is not good. Liver transplantation is an alternative to treat unresectable liver metastasis from colorectal cancer with a good outcome. Several prognostic scores allow the selection of patients with good tumor biology. These patients have better overall and disease-free survival after liver transplantation. The use of immunosuppressive treatment doesn't increase recurrence, and even the pattern of tumor growth is slower in liver transplant recipients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence in this topic and to highlight the need for a formal protocol for liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases, using living donors or marginal grafts to avoid competition with the rest of the national waiting list.

[Liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: A review]. / Trasplante hepático por metástasis hepáticas irresecables de cáncer colorrectal: revisión de la literatura.

In Chile, colorectal cancer ranks third in incidence and fifth in mortality. Half of these patients have liver metastases at the diagnosis, and only 30% of them are resectable. Despite the development of many complex hepatobiliary procedures to achieve the total resection of metastases, the long-term survival with these techniques is not good. Liver transplantation is an alternative to treat unresectable liver metastasis from colorectal cancer with a good outcome. Several prognostic scores allow the selection of patients with good tumor biology. These patients have better overall and disease-free survival after liver transplantation. The use of immunosuppressive treatment doesn't increase recurrence, and even the pattern of tumor growth is slower in liver transplant recipients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence in this topic and to highlight the need for a formal protocol for liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases, using living donors or marginal grafts to avoid competition with the rest of the national waiting list.

Immediate antiinflammatory effects of inhaled budesonide in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with asthma, single doses of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (ICS) have been reported to have antiinflammatory actions that can be detected several hours after drug administration. However, the onset and duration of the effect have not been investigated. We therefore measured airway blood flow ([Formula: see text]aw) as an index of airway inflammation to determine the time course and dose dependence of the antiinflammatory action of an ICS in 20 patients with moderate asthma receiving regular ICS treatment. METHODS: [Formula: see text]aw and spirometry were measured before and serially for 360 minutes after a single inhaled dose of 360 µg, 720 µg, and 1,440 µg budesonide or placebo as well as after four repetitive 720-µg budesonide doses given 30 minutes apart. RESULTS: Baseline mean [Formula: see text]aw was increased and FEV1 was decreased without significant differences among the 5 treatment days. After budesonide inhalation, there was a transient, dose-dependent decrease in mean [Formula: see text]aw from 12 to 21%, with significant differences from baseline at 60 and 90 minutes for the 720-µg and 1,440-µg doses (P < 0.05). Thirty minutes after four repetitive budesonide administrations, mean [Formula: see text]aw was 28% below baseline (P < 0.05) and remained 11% below baseline after 270 minutes. There was no change in mean FEV1 after any of the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with moderate asthma who use ICS regularly, inhaled budesonide caused a transient dose-dependent vasoconstriction in the airway, thereby reversing one manifestation of airway inflammation. These results suggest that a pure controller medication can have immediate beneficial effects not paralleled by changes in airflow. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01219738).

Airway vascular endothelial function in healthy smokers without systemic endothelial dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking can lead to systemic endothelial dysfunction. Since the airway circulation is exposed to a high concentration of cigarette smoke constituents, we reasoned that airway vascular endothelial dysfunction could be present in healthy smokers without systemic endothelial dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare airway and systemic endothelial function and measure markers of systemic inflammation in lung-healthy current smokers. Since endothelial dysfunction in smokers has been related to systemic inflammation, we also investigated its response to an inhaled glucocorticosteroid (ICS). METHODS: Fifteen healthy, current smokers and 17 healthy, lifetime nonsmokers were enrolled. Smokers were randomly assigned to 3-week treatments with inhaled fluticasone propionate or placebo in a crossover design. Vascular endothelial function was assessed in the airway by the airway blood-flow response to inhaled albuterol (ΔQaw) and in the extrapulmonary circulation by brachial arterial flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD). Venous blood was collected for C-reactive protein and IL-6. RESULTS: Baseline parameters did not differ between groups except for ΔQaw, which was greater in nonsmokers (45% ± 12%) than smokers (1% ± 12%) (P = .001). In the smokers, ICS treatment increased Qaw to 41% ± 7% (P < .001), but had no effect on FMD or inflammatory markers. There was an inverse relationship between baseline and ICS-induced changes in ΔQaw. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy smokers with no signs of systemic inflammation or endothelial dysfunction display impaired airway vascular endothelial function, possibly preceding systemic endothelial dysfunction. Airway endothelial function was restored with an ICS, and the response was directly related to the severity of endothelial dysfunction.

Acute effects of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate alone and in combination on airway blood flow in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: The airway contains airway smooth muscle and airway vascular smooth muscle. The acute effects of inhaled long-acting ß(2)-adrenergic agonists (LABAs) alone, or in combination with an inhaled glucocorticoid (ICS), on airway smooth muscle tone in asthma are known; however, to the best of our knowledge, their effect on airway vascular smooth muscle tone has not been investigated previously. The objective of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of a LABA and an ICS alone and in combination on airway blood flow (Qaw) as an index of airway vascular smooth muscle tone in patients with stable asthma. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with moderate asthma inhaled single doses of salmeterol (50 µg), fluticasone propionate (250 µg), salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 µg), or placebo; Qaw was measured before and serially for 240 min after drug administration. RESULTS: Mean Qaw increased after salmeterol and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate, with peaks at 60 min of 34% and 40%, respectively, and returned to baseline by 240 min after inhalation. Fluticasone propionate alone caused a transient decrease in mean Qaw. The maximal changes in Qaw, which occurred at different times, were 60% for salmeterol, 67% for salmeterol/fluticasone propionate, and -19% for fluticasone propionate (P < .05 vs placebo for all). CONCLUSIONS: The LABA salmeterol has an acute vasodilator action on the airway of subjects with stable asthma. The addition of fluticasone propionate, which by itself causes vasoconstriction, does not attenuate the salmeterol-induced vasodilation, suggesting that fluticasone propionate potentiates the vasodilator effect of salmeterol. The vasodilation could be of clinical benefit by promoting the vascular clearance of inflammatory mediators including spasmogens from the airway. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01231230; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Effect of an inhaled glucocorticoid on endothelial function in healthy smokers.

Cigarette smoking is associated with attenuated endothelium-dependent vasodilation (endothelial dysfunction) in the systemic circulation, including the airway circulation. We wished to determine whether an inhaled corticosteroid could restore endothelial function in the airway of lung-healthy current smokers, ex-smokers, and nonsmokers. We measured baseline airway blood flow (Qaw) and Qaw reactivity to inhaled albuterol as an index of endothelium-dependent vasodilation and to sublingual nitroglycerin as an index of endothelium-independent vasodilation in lung-healthy current smokers, ex-smokers, and nonsmokers. Current smokers were then treated with inhaled fluticasone for 3 wk, and all measurements were repeated after fluticasone treatment and after a subsequent 3-wk fluticasone washout period. Baseline mean Qaw and endothelium-independent Qaw reactivity were similar in the three groups. Mean endothelium-dependent Qaw reactivity was 49.5% in nonsmokers, 42.7% in ex-smokers, and 10.8% in current smokers (P < 0.05 vs. nonsmokers). In current smokers, mean baseline Qaw was unchanged after fluticasone treatment, but endothelium-dependent Qaw reactivity significantly increased to 34.9%. Qaw reactivity was again blunted after fluticasone washout. Endothelial dysfunction, as assessed by vascular reactivity, can be corrected with an inhaled corticosteroid in the airway of lung-healthy current smokers. This proof of concept can serve as the basis for future clinical investigations on the effect of glucocorticoids on endothelial function in smokers.