The relationship between body mass index and perceived control over labor.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with an increased body mass index (BMI) (≥ 30 kg/m2) experience higher rates of perinatal mental health disorders than individuals with BMI < 30. Personal experience of decreased control over labor has been associated with the development postpartum mood and anxiety disorders. However, no studies have investigated the association between BMI and experience of control over labor. This study aimed to assess perceived control over labor and compare patients with BMI ≥ 30 to those with BMI < 30. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of postpartum patients who delivered at term (37-41 weeks gestation). Postpartum, participants completed the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS), a validated tool to assess perceived control over labor/birth. Demographic, maternal health history and obstetric/neonatal outcomes were abstracted from the patient chart. Bivariate analyses were performed between those with BMI < 30 and those with BMI ≥ 30 using Fisher's exact test. Continuous LAS scores were compared between patients with BMI < 30 and BMI ≥ 30 using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Higher LAS scores indicate higher perceived control over labor. Multivariable linear regression was then performed to account for confounding factors identified a priori. RESULTS: There was no difference in LAS between those with BMI ≥ 30 and BMI < 30. When stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) class of BMI, those with BMI ≥ 40 had a significantly lower LAS scores than those with BMI < 30 (147 vs. 163, p = 0.02), however, this finding was no longer significant after controlling for length of labor and cesarean birth. CONCLUSION: Only participants with the highest BMI experienced decreased control over labor, and this finding was no longer significant after controlling for mode of delivery and length of labor. Further research into the experience of birthing people with BMI ≥ 30 is critical to understand the increased risk of perinatal mood disorders among this population.

Body Mass Index and Perceived Labor Control: Could weight stigma explain differences in birth experience?

Background: Individuals with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 30 kg/m2 experience weight stigma when interacting with the healthcare system. There is limited data on how weight stigma impacts patient's experience of obstetric care. This study aims to assess perceived control over the birth process and compare patients with BMI ≥ 30 to those with BMI < 30. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of term patients. Postpartum, participants completed the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS), a validated tool to assess perceived control over labor/birth. Continuous LAS scores were compared between patients with BMI < 30 and BMI ≥ 30. Results: There was no difference in LAS between those with BMI ≥ 30 and BMI < 30. When stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) class of BMI, those with BMI ≥ 40 had a significantly lower LAS scores than those with BMI < 30 (147 vs. 163, p = 0.02), however, this finding was no longer significant after controlling for length of labor and cesarean birth. Conclusion: Only participants with the highest BMI experienced decreased control over labor, and this finding was no longer significant after controlling for mode of delivery and length of labor. Further research is necessary into how weight stigma influences birthing people's experience.

Survey of young women with breast cancer to identify rates of fertility preservation (FP) discussion and barriers to FP care.

PURPOSE: To identify the proportion of reproductive age women with breast cancer that engaged in a fertility preservation discussion and reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) consultation. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey recruited women 18-42 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2016 by phone or email and asked them to complete an online survey. Demographic characteristics, barriers to FP, utilization of FP consultation, and FP procedures (oocyte and embryo cryopreservation) were analyzed. RESULTS: A majority of women (64%) did not have FP discussed by any provider. Older women and those who were parents at the time of diagnosis were less likely to engage in a FP discussion. However, there were no significant differences in partner status or cancer stage between women with or without FP discussions. Of the women who desired future children prior to the cancer diagnosis, 93% received chemotherapy; however, only 34% of these women had a consultation with an REI. The most common reasons for declining FP consultation were already having their desired number of children (41%), financial barriers (14%), and concern about delaying cancer treatment and cancer recurrence (12%). Forty percent of women who desired future children and met with an REI pursued FP procedures. CONCLUSION: Younger women were more likely to receive FP counseling. FP consultations and procedures were low even in women who desired future fertility, with the predominant barriers being cost, fears concerning a delay in cancer treatment, and future cancer recurrence.

Unplanned Operative Delivery is Associated with Decreased Perception of Control over Labor.

Background: Unplanned operative delivery is associated with postpartum depression (PPD), but the mechanism is unknown. We aimed to assess the sense of control over labor for those who had unplanned delivery (unplanned cesarean or operative vaginal delivery: uCD/OVD) versus spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD). Methods: Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey study of term patients admitted for delivery at a tertiary center. After delivery, patients completed the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS), a validated tool to assess perceived control over labor and birth. Demographics, obstetric and neonatal outcomes and LAS scores were compared between patients who underwent uCD/OVD versus SVD. Multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship between uCD/OVD and LAS score controlling for confounders that differed in the bivariate analysis. Results: Of the 149 patients, 50 (33.6%) underwent uCD/OVD. There were no differences in maternal age, race/ethnicity, insurance status or education level between those who had uCD/OVD versus SVD. Patients who had uCD/OVD had higher median body mass index (BMI) than those who had SVD (33.2 vs 30.1 kg/m2, p = 0.03). There were no differences in rate of medical or psychiatric morbidity between groups. Additionally, there were no differences in reason for admission, however those who had uCD/OVD had significantly longer times to delivery than those who underwent SVD (22 vs 14 hrs, p < 0.01). Gestational age at delivery was also significantly higher for those who underwent uCD/OVD compared to SVD (40.2 vs 39.6 wks, p = 0.02). For the primary outcome, LAS scores were lower for those who underwent uCD/OVD compared to SVD (146 vs. 164, p < 0.01). This remained significant even after controlling for length of labor, BMI and gestational age at delivery (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Even after accounting for length of labor, uCD/OVD is associated with a reduction in perceived control over labor, which may mediate the known increased risk of PPD. Further qualitative research is needed to examine how to better support patients' wellbeing after uCD/OVD.

The Association of Perceived Labor Agentry and Depression and/or Anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancies complicated by perinatal mood disorders or a history of mental health disorder are at increased risk for complications including postpartum depression/anxiety. Patients' perceived control over childbirth is known to be an important factor for development of postpartum depression/anxiety. It is unclear whether women with preexisting and/or current depression and/or anxiety have different perceptions of control during childbirth compared with those without these comorbidities. This study aimed to evaluate the association between a current and/or prior diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety and scores on the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS), a validated tool evaluating patient's experience of control over their labor and delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study of nulliparous patients admitted at term to a single center. Participants completed the LAS after delivery. A trained researcher performed detailed chart reviews for all participants. Participants were identified as having a current or historical diagnosis of depression/anxiety by self-report confirmed by chart review. Scores on the LAS were compared between those with versus without a diagnosis of depression/anxiety prior to admission for delivery. RESULTS: A total of 73 (44.8%) of the 149 participants held a current and/or prior diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety. Baseline demographics were similar between those with and without depression/anxiety. Mean scores on the LAS (range: 91-201) were significantly lower for those with depression/anxiety than those without a prior diagnosis (150.0 vs. 160.5, p < 0.01). Even after controlling for mode of delivery, admission indication, anesthesia, and Foley balloon usage, participants with anxiety and depression had scores that were on average 10.4 points lower on the LAS (95% confidence interval: -19.25, -1.62). CONCLUSION: Participants with a current and/or prior diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety scored lower on the LAS as compared with those without psychiatric diagnoses. Patients with psychiatric diagnoses may benefit from increased education and support during childbirth. KEY POINTS: · Control over childbirth is an important factor in the development of postpartum depression/anxiety.. · Patients with a prior or current diagnosis of anxiety and depression have lower labor agentry scores.. · These differences remained significant even when controlling for confounders such as delivery mode..

Dispositional Optimism, Mode of Delivery, and Perceived Labor Control among Recently Delivered Parturients.

OBJECTIVE: Dispositional optimism (DO) is an understudied transdiagnostic resilience factor among peripartum individuals. Low DO is associated with increased fear and pain in labor and increased rates of emergent cesarean delivery, but it is unknown whether DO is associated with perceived control over the labor process. STUDY DESIGN: This a planned secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort of term parturients (n = 164) who were recruited in July and August 2021 during their delivery hospitalization at a single, tertiary medical center. Participants completed a baseline demographic survey prior to delivery and then completed evaluations of DO (Revised Life-Orientation Test [LOT-R]) and control over the labor process (Labor Agentry Scale [LAS]) during their postpartum hospitalization. DO was dichotomized into low and high by score of ≤14 or >14 on LOT-R, respectively, and labor agentry scores were compared between groups. Maternal demographics, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics were compared by DO status. Multivariable regression was performed, adjusting for known confounders (induction, labor analgesia, and mode of delivery). RESULTS: Demographic, pregnancy, and neonatal characteristics were similar between those with low compared with high DO. People with low DO had significantly higher rates of cesarean section (44 vs. 24%, p = 0.02) and overall had lower LAS scores (139.4 vs. 159.4, p < 0.001), indicating that they felt less control over their labor process than those with high DO. In the multivariable regression, those with low DO had higher odds of a low LAS score after controlling for induction, labor analgesia, and mode of delivery (adjusted odds ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.20-1.39). CONCLUSION: People with low DO had significantly lower perceived control over their labor, even after controlling for differences in mode of delivery. Interventions to alter DO may be an innovative way to improve birth experience and its associated perinatal mental health morbidities. KEY POINTS: · It is unknown if there is an association between DO and perceived labor control.. · People with low DO had higher rates of cesarean delivery and lower perceived labor control.. · Altering DO may be a novel mechanism for improving birth experience..

Risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome among high-risk early-term and full-term deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: To identify whether risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) differ between early-term and full-term births. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a large NIH-funded retrospective cohort study including patients who delivered at a tertiary-care obstetric hospital between January 2002 and March 2013 with comorbid diabetes, hypertensive disorders, and/or fetal growth restriction (FGR). Pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia and multifetal gestations were excluded. Maternal characteristics, delivery information, and neonatal information were abstracted by trained clinicians blinded to the comorbidity leading to study inclusion. In this secondary analysis of the infant health outcomes of pregnancies with one or more of the qualifying conditions, risk factors for RDS among neonates born early term (37w0d-38w6d gestation) were compared to risk factors for RDS among full-term neonates (39w0d-40w6d). RESULTS: Among 10,532 singleton newborns, there were 99 cases of early-term RDS (0.94%) and 95 cases of full-term RDS (0.90%). Maternal demographics were similar between those with and without RDS in both groups. Among early-term infants, lower gestational age, presence of meconium, non-spontaneous labor, and cesarean delivery were positively associated with RDS, whereas hypertensive disorders, diabetes, FGR, and many other comorbid delivery conditions were not. The strongest risk factor for RDS among early-term infants was delivery via cesarean (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.31, 3.01). Among full-term neonates, cesarean delivery was also positively associated with RDS, although presence of meconium, chorioamnionitis, and endometritis were all stronger risk factors with RRs >2.0. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of high-risk term deliveries, maternal demographics and comorbidities were found not to be associated with increased risk for RDS, but novel risk factors for RDS after 37 weeks' gestation - chorioamnionitis and endometritis - were identified. A focus on preventing infectious comorbidities may help reduce incidence of RDS at full-term.Key PointsRDS risk factors vary by gestational age.Novel risk factors for RDS at full-term identified.Intrauterine inflammation associated with RDS at term.

Association of admission unit and birth satisfaction during induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE: As induction of labor (IOL) becomes more common, hospitals must adjust to accommodate longer length of stays on labor and delivery. An alternative to reduce the length of time spent on labor and delivery during an IOL is to perform cervical ripening on an antepartum unit. However, this may affect patient satisfaction and knowledge about the birthing process. This study aimed to evaluate whether cervical ripening conducted in an antepartum unit, rather than on a labor and delivery unit, was associated with changes in patient satisfaction with birth experience and baseline knowledge about IOL. Additionally, the study aimed to understand how patients would prefer to receive education on the IOL process. METHODS: This prospective observational study recruited English and Spanish-speaking patients at or after 39 weeks and 0 days gestation who were admitted for IOL. Consenting patients completed a preliminary survey containing sociodemographic and obstetric information as well as a previously validated survey on IOL knowledge on admission. Within 48 h of delivery, patients completed a follow-up survey including a validated birth satisfaction survey, the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised, and questions eliciting their preferred IOL education method. Data analyses compared patients who were admitted to antepartum for IOL to those admitted directly to labor and delivery. Multivariate analyses adjusted for sociodemographic and obstetric differences between the two groups. The primary outcomes were scores on the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised and on a test examining IOL knowledge. Secondary outcomes included preferred method of IOL education, obstetric outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 277 eligible patients were approached from October 2020 to March 2021. Of the 216 (78%) that consented, 159 (74%) completed the follow-up survey and were subsequently included in this analysis. Individuals admitted directly to antepartum (n = 122) more commonly self-identified as Latina, Latin American, or Hispanic (27.9% vs. 8.1%, p = .01) and were nulliparous (68.0% vs. 21.6%, p < .001) compared to participants admitted to labor and delivery for IOL (n = 37). Patients admitted to labor and delivery were more likely to undergo elective induction (29.7% vs. 9.8%, p = .006). Admission unit was not associated with differences in birth satisfaction scores or obstetric or neonatal outcomes. However, after controlling for potential confounders, patients admitted to the antepartum unit correctly answered a greater percentage of questions assessing IOL knowledge compared to patients admitted to labor and delivery (73.9% vs. 62.3%, adjusted mean difference (aMD) 12.6 [95% CI 7.2, 18.0]). Patients in both groups indicated preference for reviewing an induction checklist with a provider during prenatal care (59.1%) or using a technology-based intervention (37.1%) over attending in-person classes (3.1%) to learn more about IOL. CONCLUSION: Unit of admission for IOL is not associated with satisfaction with birth experience but is associated with patient knowledge of IOL. This suggests that IOL may be initiated in less acute units than labor and delivery without altering birth experience and may potentially allow for increased patient knowledge. Additionally, IOL checklists or technology-based education may help to further increase patient knowledge about IOL.