CASE REPORT OF ABIOTROPHIA DEFECTIVA ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER REPEATED INJECTIONS OF DEXAMETHASONE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT (OZURDEX).

PURPOSE: To present a case of endophthalmitis caused by Abiotrophia defectiva after repeated injections of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex), in a patient already on systemic immunosuppressive therapy, and discuss the management of this challenging situation. METHODS: Case report and review of literature. RESULTS: A 70-year-old female patient with history of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis presented for urgent evaluation due to left eye vision loss and mild discomfort 12 days after receiving her seventh dexamethasone implant injection. Ocular history was pertinent for recurrent macular edema resulting from a remote branch vein occlusion. Twelve days after her last injection, visual acuity decreased from 20/30 to counting fingers at 5 feet. Slit-lamp examination showed anterior chamber cell without fibrinoid membranes or hypopyon. Within hours, the patient's clinical appearance progressed. A vitreous tap followed by intravitreal injection of vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and ceftazidime (2.25 mg/0.1 mL) was performed. The culture from the vitreous sample revealed heavy growth of A. defectiva. Owing to limited improvement, patient was taken to the operating room, and the presence of a full-thickness scleral defect at the site of most recent dexamethasone implant injection was confirmed. Vitrectomy with removal of implant, closure of all sclerotomies, including nonhealing full-thickness scleral defect, and repeated intravitreal antibiotic injection were performed. At the 3-month follow-up, no inflammation was observed, but visual acuity remained poor. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant-associated endophthalmitis in the setting of systemic immunosuppression is a rare and challenging situation. Both local and systemic immunosuppression may delay wound healing, predisposing to wound leakage and consequent endophthalmitis. Despite repeated intravitreal antimicrobial injection and vitrectomy with implant removal, A. defectiva endophthalmitis carried a poor visual outcome.

Efficacy of Ranibizumab in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Nonperfusion in RIDE and RISE.

PURPOSE: To determine whether there are baseline characteristics that distinguish patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) with coexisting macular nonperfusion (MNP) at baseline and assess these patients' potential to achieve favorable visual acuity (VA), anatomic, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) outcomes over 24 months. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of RIDE/RISE, 2 phase 3, parallel, randomized, multicenter, double-masked trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00473382; NCT00473330). PARTICIPANTS: Study eyes with best-corrected VA (BCVA)/fluorescein angiogram (FA) data at baseline. METHODS: To measure MNP, the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid was overlaid on FAs of the macula. The MNP area was calculated by estimating the percentage of capillary loss in the central, inner, and outer subfields and converting into disc areas (DAs) using a software algorithm. Summary statistics and P values, respectively, were provided for all outcomes and comparisons of interest. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline characteristics; MNP area, BCVA, and central subfield thickness (CST) at months 12 and 24; and incidence of study eyes with ≥2-step DR improvement at months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24. RESULTS: Baseline MNP was detected in 28.2%, 25.8%, and 26.3% of study eyes in the ranibizumab 0.3 mg (n = 213), ranibizumab 0.5 mg (n = 225), and sham (n = 228) arms, respectively. At baseline, patients with MNP were younger and had shorter diabetes duration, worse vision, increased CST, and worse DR severity (P values < 0.01 vs. those without MNP). In the ranibizumab 0.3 mg arm, eyes with baseline MNP had lower mean baseline BCVA (53.4 vs. 57.2 ETDRS letters for those without baseline MNP; P = 0.05), but mean BCVA gain at month 24 was comparable (+15.6 vs. +13.4 ETDRS letters, respectively; P = 0.2). Eyes with baseline MNP had increased CST at baseline, but experienced a greater decrease in CST by month 24. The proportion of eyes with ≥2-step DR improvement was greater for eyes with versus without baseline MNP in each ranibizumab arm. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having worse vision/increased CST versus those without baseline MNP, eyes with concurrent DME and baseline MNP entering RIDE/RISE experienced robust VA and anatomic improvement with ranibizumab and therefore should not be excluded from therapy.

Treatment of vitamin A deficiency retinopathy with sublingual vitamin A palmitate.

PURPOSE: To report treatment of vitamin A deficiency retinopathy with sublingual vitamin A drops. METHODS: Case report with review of the literature. RESULTS: A 69-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of small bowel resection presented with progressive symptoms of bilateral nyctalopia and decreased visual acuity. Ophthalmic examination revealed bilateral conjunctival xerosis and fine white granular deposits in the midperipheral retina suggestive of vitamin A deficiency. Full-field electroretinogram (ERG), multifocal ERG (mfERG), and two-color dark adaptometry revealed significant impairment of rod and cone photoreceptor function. Kinetic perimetry demonstrated depressed macular sensitivity with constriction of the finer isopters. After 5 months of treatment with sublingual vitamin A drops, the patient's vision, ERG, mfERG, dark adaptometry, and perimetry normalized. A review of the literature summarizing the electrophysiologic testing in vitamin A deficiency is also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights novel observations on the effects of sublingual vitamin A supplementation for acquired vitamin A deficiency retinopathy. Sublingual vitamin A may represent a viable and efficacious treatment modality for vitamin A deficiency.

SEROUS NEUROSENSORY RETINAL DETACHMENT ASSOCIATED WITH ATYPICAL COGAN SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT.

PURPOSE: To present a case of a 71-year-old woman with possible focal choroiditis and secondary serous neurosensory retinal detachment associated with atypical Cogan syndrome. METHODS: Retrospective case report. RESULTS: On initial evaluation, the patient had decreased vision with photopsias and distortion in the affected eye. Her history revealed 3 years of preexisting neurosensory hearing loss and corneal scarring in the affected eye. Examination findings were significant for unilateral interstitial keratitis and focal macular neurosensory retinal detachment. Fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography demonstrated focal macular leakage and staining. Treatment with intravitreal and periocular steroid injections resulted in complete resolution of the subretinal fluid and visual improvement. CONCLUSION: Posterior segment manifestations associated with Cogan syndrome are exceedingly rare. This is the first known case of a serous neurosensory retinal detachment from suspected choroidal inflammation associated with Cogan syndrome. Prompt recognition and treatment with corticosteroids may result in anatomical and functional visual improvement, as in this case.

Prospective Retinal and Optic Nerve Vitrectomy Evaluation (PROVE) study: twelve-month findings.

PURPOSE: To report 1-year outcomes of the Prospective Retinal and Optic Nerve Vitrectomy Evaluation study. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty eyes of 40 participants undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole (MH), or vitreous opacities. METHODS: Enrolled participants underwent baseline evaluation of the study (surgical) and fellow (control) eyes by a masked fellowship-trained glaucoma specialist; evaluation included intraocular pressure (IOP; Goldmann applanation and Tono-Pen), central corneal thickness, gonioscopy, and cup-to-disc ratio measurement. Baseline testing included bilateral color fundus and optic disc photography, fundus autofluorescence, automated perimetry, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macula and optic nerve. Evaluations were repeated at 3 months and 1 year after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness. Secondary outcomes included changes in macular thickness and IOP. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 40 patients completed 1 year of follow-up. Mean visual acuity (VA) improved in study eyes from baseline (P = 0.003) but remained worse than fellow eyes (P<0.001). Study eyes had thinner inferior pRNFL thickness (114±16.8 µm) compared with fellow eyes (123±14.7 µm; P = 0.004). Mean IOP difference between study eyes and fellow eyes increased from baseline to 1 year. At 1 year, MH study eyes had higher mean IOP (16.0±3.7 mmHg) compared with fellow eyes (14.8±3.4 mmHg; P = 0.08). Mean IOP for pseudophakic study eyes increased from 14.5±3.2 mmHg at baseline to 16.0±2.8 mmHg at 1 year (P = 0.04). Central subfield thickness (CST) and cube volume decreased in study eyes at 1 year but remained greater than that of fellow eyes (P<0.05). Reduction in CST from baseline correlated with degree of VA improvement (P<0.05). Mean deviation (MD) improved in ERM study eyes at 1 year when compared with baseline (-2.2 vs. -4.0; P = 0.02) but remained worse than fellow eyes (-1.2; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: One year after vitrectomy, VA, CST, and MD improved in study eyes but not to the level of fellow eyes. Inferior pRNFL thickness decreased in study eyes. Reduction in CST from baseline correlated with degree of VA improvement. Pseudophakic study eyes demonstrated increased IOP when compared with baseline.

Prospective Retinal and Optic Nerve Vitrectomy Evaluation (PROVE) study: findings at 3 months.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to report the 3-month findings of the Prospective Retinal and Optic Nerve Vitrectomy Evaluation (PROVE) study. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 40 participants undergoing vitrectomy were enrolled. Participants underwent baseline evaluation of the study (surgical) and fellow (control) eye that included: intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, gonioscopy, cup-to-disc ratio measurement, color fundus and optic disc photography, automated perimetry, and optical coherence tomography of the macula and optic nerve. Evaluation was repeated at 3 months. Main outcome measures were changes in macula and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and intraocular pressure. RESULTS: All participants completed follow-up. Mean cup-to-disc ratio of study and fellow eyes at baseline was 0.43 ± 0.2 and 0.46 ± 0.2, respectively, and 13% of participants had undiagnosed narrow angles. There was no significant change in intraocular pressure, cup-to-disc ratio, or pattern standard deviation in study eyes compared with baseline or fellow eyes at 3 months. Vision improved in all study eyes at 3 months compared with baseline (P = 0.013), but remained significantly worse than fellow eyes (P < 0.001). Central subfield and temporal peripapillary RNFL thickness were significantly greater in eyes with epiretinal membrane (P < 0.05), and resolution after surgery correlated with visual improvement (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The 3-month results do not indicate any increased risk for open-angle glaucoma but suggest that a relatively high percentage of eyes may be at risk of angle closure glaucoma. Temporal RNFL thickness and central subfield were increased in eyes with epiretinal membrane, and resolution correlated with degree of visual recovery.