Clinical Features and Treatment Response to Topical Steroids in Ethnic and Racial Minority Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

INTRODUCTION: Differences in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) presentation and outcomes by ethnicity or race remain understudied. We aimed to determine whether EoE patients of Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity or non-White race have differences in presentation at diagnosis or response to topical corticosteroid (tCS) treatment. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included subjects of any age with a new diagnosis of EoE and documentation of ethnicity or race. For those who had treatment with tCS and follow-up endoscopy/biopsy, we assessed histologic response (<15 eosinophils/hpf), global symptom response, and endoscopic response. Hispanic EoE patients were compared with non-Hispanics at baseline and before and after treatment. The same analyses were repeated for White vs non-Whites. RESULTS: Of 1,026 EoE patients with ethnicity data, just 23 (2%) were Hispanic. Most clinical features at presentation were similar to non-Hispanic EoE patients but histologic response to tCS was numerically lower (38% vs 57%). Non-White EoE patients (13%) were younger at diagnosis and had less insurance, lower zip code-level income, shorter symptom duration, more vomiting, less dysphagia and food impaction, fewer typical endoscopic features, and less dilation. Of 475 patients with race data treated with tCS, non-Whites had a significantly lower histologic response rate (41% vs 59%; P = 0.01), and odds of histologic response remained lower after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence intervals: 0.19-0.87). DISCUSSION: Few EoE patients at our center were Hispanic, and they had similar clinical presentations as non-Hispanics. The non-White EoE group was larger, and presentation was less dysphagia-specific. Non-White patients were also less than half as likely to respond to tCS.

Eosinophilic esophagitis patients with multiple atopic conditions: Clinical characteristics and treatment response to topical steroids.

BACKGROUND: Patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) typically have concomitant atopic conditions, but whether there are differences in presentation or treatment response by the number of atopic diseases is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with EoE having multiple atopic conditions have differences in presentation or response to topical corticosteroid (TCS) treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults and children with newly diagnosed EoE. The total number of atopic comorbidities (allergic rhinitis, asthma, eczema, food allergy) was calculated. Patients with at least 2 atopic conditions other than allergic rhinitis were defined as having multiple atopic conditions and their baseline characteristics were compared with those with less than 2 atopic conditions. Histologic, symptom, and endoscopic responses to TCS treatment were also compared with bivariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of the 1020 patients with EoE having atopic disease information, 235 (23%) had 1 atopic comorbidity, 211 (21%) had 2, 113 (11%) had 3, and 34 (3%) had 4. At baseline, the 180 (18%) patients with 2 or more atopic diseases were younger and had more vomiting, less abdominal pain, more exudates and edema on endoscopy, and higher peak eosinophil counts. Among those treated with TCS, there was a trend toward better global symptom response in patients with less than 2 atopic conditions, but there was no difference in histologic or endoscopic response compared with those with 2 or more atopic conditions. CONCLUSION: There were differences in the initial presentation of EoE between those with and without multiple atopic conditions, but there were no major differences in histologic treatment response to corticosteroids by atopic status.

Association between eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal dysmotility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence about the association between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and esophageal motility disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate esophageal manometry findings in EoE. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. All articles from 1990 to 2021 with EoE patients who underwent esophageal manometry were eligible. We also included pertinent abstracts from national conferences from 2015 to 2020. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of specific Chicago 3 Classification (CCv3) diagnoses in EoE, as well as broader categories of non-relaxing lower esophageal sphincter, and major and minor peristaltic disorders. When multiple studies reported a specific outcome, we performed random effects meta-analysis to obtain pooled prevalence of each outcome. To reduce heterogeneity, we restricted meta-analysis to high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies only. KEY RESULTS: Of 763 publications identified, 27 original studies met criteria for inclusion, encompassing 706 EoE patients; 14 studies (425 patients) had HRM and underwent meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of any motility abnormality was 53% (95% CI: 43%-63%), largely comprised of minor motility disorders such as ineffective esophageal motility and fragmented peristalsis. Major motility disorders, classified by CCv3, were less common in EoE, with pooled prevalence of 2% (0%-7%), 10% (5%-16%), and 1% (0%-3%), for achalasia, esophagogastric-junction outflow obstruction, and hypercontractile disorders, respectively. CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: Non-specific motility disorders were common in patients with EoE, but major motility disorders were rare. Further studies are needed to determine the relationship between eosinophilic infiltration and the clinical relevance of abnormal esophageal motility findings in this population.