Distal humerus internal fixation: a biomechanical comparison of 90° and parallel constructs.

The optimal plating configuration for open reduction and internal fixation of complex distal humerus fractures is controversial. We evaluated cyclic fatigue performance and biomechanical stiffness in a cadaveric model of distal humerus fractures: precontoured nonlocking parallel plates versus a 90° nonlocking construct. A paired design was used, and 8 matched pairs of cadaveric arms were evaluated for bone density and plated. An osteotomy gap was created to simulate comminution, and constructs were randomized to anteroposterior, mediolateral, and torsional stiffness testing. Finally, 350 N was applied cyclically until deformation was permanent, Although there was a trend toward more stiffness of the parallel construct in anteroposterior, mediolateral, and torsional testing, it was not significant (P>.05). Likewise, there was no significant difference in number of cycles to failure (P>.05). Given these results, we suggest that it is reasonable to use a 90° construct or a parallel construct for internal fixation of distal humerus fractures. However, our findings are consistent with a trend in the biomechanical literature supporting use of a parallel construct.

Airway compromise secondary to upper cervical spine injury.

BACKGROUND: Airway compromise secondary to isolated injury at the atlas (C1) and axis (C2) without an associated spinal cord injury is a rare, but recognized phenomenon that results in significant morbidity and mortality. No previous study in the literature has reported the incidence of this potentially lethal complication of these relatively common fractures. METHODS: The medical records for 625 consecutive patients who presented to a Level I trauma center with C1 and C2 fractures during the years from 1996 to 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to identify adult patients with isolated fractures and no other injuries. All patients that developed significant airway compromise were identified and correlations were made with the patient's demographic features, clinical presentation, and radiologic findings, to determine potential risk factors. RESULTS: During the 10 years studied, 343 patients with isolated C1 and C2 fractures were identified. Of these, 17 patients developed significant airway compromise. This represents a 4.9% incidence of this potentially life-threatening complication. Older age and male gender were found to be risk factors with a statistically significant association (p value <0.05). The majority of patients also exhibited prevertebral swelling, the presence of significant degenerative changes, and significant fracture displacement. Twelve patients required intubation and admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). There were four deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 5% of patients with isolated C1 and C2 fractures developed airway compromise. All patients with these injuries should be assessed for the risk of developing this complication and some will require close monitoring to detect this problem at an early stage.

Knee immobilization for pain control after a hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This study will attempt to evaluate the efficacy of knee immobilization on patient pain levels after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: There is no difference in visual analog scale pain scores 2 days after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between patients who wear a knee immobilizer and those who do not wear a knee immobilizer. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 40 years who met study inclusion criteria were eligible. Patients meeting intraoperative inclusion criteria were randomized (immobilizer or no immobilizer) after wound closure. The immobilizer used was a soft, unhinged brace with Velcro straps. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative protocols were standardized. The primary outcome was patient self-assessed pain using a 0-to-100-mm visual analog scale at day 2 after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain and analgesic use in the first 14 days after surgery, complications, and range of motion (approximately 3 weeks postoperatively). A sample size estimate was calculated and resulted in the need for 44 patients per group. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were enrolled; 88 patients were randomized, and 14 were excluded intraoperatively. There was no difference in mean visual analog scale pain scores at 2 days after surgery between immobilized and nonimmobilized patients (32.6 and 35.2, respectively; P = .59; difference, -2.6; 95% confidence interval, -12.2 to 6.9). There were no differences between groups in medication consumed, range of motion, or complications. Pain and analgesic use were the same for both groups at 7 and 14 days postoperatively. CONCLUSION: No differences in pain or any of the secondary outcomes were detected between immobilized and nonimmobilized patients at any point during the first 14 days after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.