Exploring software navigation tools for liver tumour angiography: a scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Liver cancer presents a growing global health concern, necessitating advanced approaches for intervention. This review investigates the use and effectiveness of software navigation in interventional radiology for liver tumour procedures. METHODS: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, a scoping review was conducted of the literature published between 2013 and 2023 sourcing articles through MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL and Embase. Eligible studies focused on liver cancer, utilised cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and employed software for intervention. Twenty-one articles were deemed eligible for data extraction and analysis. RESULTS: Categorised by type, software applications yielded diverse benefits. Feeder detection software significantly enhanced vessel identification, reducing non-target embolisation by up to 43%. Motion correction software demonstrated a 20% enhancement in image quality, effectively mitigating breathing-induced motion artefacts. Liver perfusion software facilitated efficient tumour targeting while simultaneously reducing the occurrence of side effects. Needle guide software enabled precise radiofrequency ablation needle placement. Additionally, these software applications provided detailed anatomical simulations. Overall, software integration resulted in shorter procedures, reduced radiation exposure and decreased contrast media usage. CONCLUSION: This scoping review highlights the innovative yet relatively underexplored role of software navigation for liver tumour procedures. The integration of software applications not only enhances procedural efficiency but also bolsters operator confidence, and contributes to improved patient outcomes. Despite the current lack of uniformity and standardisation, these software-driven advancements hold significant promise for transforming liver tumour interventions. To realise these benefits, further research is needed to explore the clinical impact and optimal utilisation of software navigation tools in interventional radiology.

Assessing radiologists' and radiographers' perceptions on artificial intelligence integration: opportunities and challenges.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate radiologists' and radiographers' opinions and perspectives on artificial intelligence (AI) and its integration into the radiology department. Additionally, we investigated the most common challenges and barriers that radiologists and radiographers face when learning about AI. METHODS: A nationwide, online descriptive cross-sectional survey was distributed to radiologists and radiographers working in hospitals and medical centres from May 29, 2023 to July 30, 2023. The questionnaire examined the participants' opinions, feelings, and predictions regarding AI and its applications in the radiology department. Descriptive statistics were used to report the participants' demographics and responses. Five-points Likert-scale data were reported using divergent stacked bar graphs to highlight any central tendencies. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 258 participants, revealing a positive attitude towards implementing AI. Both radiologists and radiographers predicted breast imaging would be the subspecialty most impacted by the AI revolution. MRI, mammography, and CT were identified as the primary modalities with significant importance in the field of AI application. The major barrier encountered by radiologists and radiographers when learning about AI was the lack of mentorship, guidance, and support from experts. CONCLUSION: Participants demonstrated a positive attitude towards learning about AI and implementing it in the radiology practice. However, radiologists and radiographers encounter several barriers when learning about AI, such as the absence of experienced professionals support and direction. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Radiologists and radiographers reported several barriers to AI learning, with the most significant being the lack of mentorship and guidance from experts, followed by the lack of funding and investment in new technologies.

RRIMS: Radiation Risk In Mammography Screening - model evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: The Radiation Risk In Mammography Screening (RRIMS) model was introduced as a novel tool to help females accurately calculate their lifetime mean glandular dose (MGD) and estimate their population-level risk of radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality. METHODS: The model's accuracy was evaluated by comparing the received MGD of 317 women who had undergone a total of 733 visits across one to four rounds of screening. This was achieved by comparing the RRIMS predicted dose values with the same examination dose calculated manually by hand. Qualitative and quantitative statistical analyses were performed to assess the percentage difference (% diff) or agreement between the two values. RESULTS: Qualitative statistical analysis using the Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a statistically significant bias for the % diff between the manually calculated and RRIMS predicted dose values, where the mean (bias) was -2.02% with an upper and lower limit of agreement of 40.24% and -44.27%, respectively. Quantitative statistical analysis revealed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 3,1) of 0.64 (p-value < 0.001) and a Kendall's W of 0.83 (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results indicate a statistically significant and reasonably good level of agreement between the manually calculated vs RRIMS predicted dose values. This work was focused on one of the major mammography equipment manufacturers that is Hologic, however there is potential for a multivendor applicability study of this model with future iterations. This will further improve upon this innovative dose and risk prediction tool that can empower healthcare professionals when making informed decisions and enhance patient care. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This paper assesses the precision of the dose and risk model that our team has previously established. The results bring us one step closer to providing females and clinicians with a useful tool that can help explain and contextualise the benefits and risks associated with screening mammography.

The use of radiomics in magnetic resonance imaging for the pre-treatment characterisation of breast cancers: A scoping review.

Radiomics is an emerging field that aims to extract and analyse a comprehensive set of quantitative features from medical images. This scoping review is focused on MRI-based radiomic features for the molecular profiling of breast tumours and the implications of this work for predicting patient outcomes. A thorough systematic literature search and outcome extraction were performed to identify relevant studies published in MEDLINE/PubMed (National Centre for Biotechnology Information), EMBASE and Scopus from 2015 onwards. The following information was retrieved from each article: study purpose, study design, extracted radiomic features, machine learning technique(s), sample size/characteristics, statistical result(s) and implications on patient outcomes. Based on the study purpose, four key themes were identified in the included 63 studies: tumour subtype classification (n = 35), pathologically complete response (pCR) prediction (n = 15), lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection (n = 7) and recurrence rate prediction (n = 6). In all four themes, reported accuracies widely varied among the studies, for example, area under receiver characteristics curve (AUC) for detecting LNM ranged from 0.72 to 0.91 and the AUC for predicting pCR ranged from 0.71 to 0.99. In all four themes, combining radiomic features with clinical data improved the predictive models. Preliminary results of this study showed radiomics potential to characterise the whole tumour heterogeneity, with clear implications for individual-targeted treatment. However, radiomics is still in the pre-clinical phase, currently with an insufficient number of large multicentre studies and those existing studies are often limited by insufficient methodological transparency and standardised workflow. Consequently, the clinical translation of existing studies is currently limited.

Investigating the impact of cognitive biases in radiologists' image interpretation: A scoping review.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Image interpretation is a fundamental aspect of radiology. The treatment and management of patients relies on accurate and timely imaging diagnosis. However, errors in radiological reports can negatively impact on patient health outcomes. These misdiagnoses can be caused by several different errors, but cognitive biases account for 74 % of all image interpretation errors. There are many biases that can impact on a radiologist's perception and cognitive processes. Several recent narrative reviews have discussed these cognitive biases and have offered possible strategies to mitigate their effects. However, these strategies remain untested. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review is to evaluate the current knowledge on the extent that cognitive biases impact on medical image interpretation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Scopus and Medline Databases were searched using relevant keywords to identify papers published between 2012 and 2022. A subsequent hand search of the narrative reviews was also performed. All studies collected were screened and assessed against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-four publications were included and categorised into five main themes: satisfaction of search, availability bias, hindsight bias, framing bias and other biases. From these studies, there were mixed results regarding the impact of cognitive biases, highlighting the need for further investigation in this area. Moreover, the limited and untested debiasing methods offered by a minority of the publications and narrative reviews also suggests the need for further research. The potential of role of artificial intelligence is also highlighted to further assist radiologists in identifying and mitigating these cognitive biases. CONCLUSION: Cognitive biases can impact radiologists' image interpretation, however the effectiveness of debiasing strategies remain largely untested.

Assessing the knowledge of CT radiographers regarding how CT parameters affect patient dose and image quality.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the current knowledge of CT radiographers regarding the optimization of CT parameters and their consequential effects on both patient dose and image quality. METHOD: A nationwide, cross sectional study was conducted from the 2nd of January 2023 to 1st of March 2023 to evaluate CT radiographers' knowledge in managing CT parameters in Jordan. Recruitment involved convenience sampling where radiographers were invited to participate and complete the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to report the normalized knowledge scores. Student's t-test and ANOVA were used to investigate and compare the outcomes between different subgroups. A forward stepwise linear regression was used to investigate the influence of a number of technologist related factors on the knowledge score. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-seven radiographers participated in the study, with a mean knowledge score of 69.0%. Participants with an academic master's degree had a significantly higher score of 72.1% compared to the ones with a diploma degree, with a score of 66.8% (p = 0.026). No statistically significant difference was found between radiographers that received additional training and the ones that did not. Furthermore, when investigating the effects of academic education, working sector, additional training and years of experience, only education had a statistically significant impact on the knowledge score. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that radiographers have an overall good understanding of CT parameters, with academic education having a significant influence on their performance.

Assessing the implementation of COVID-19 structured reporting templates for chest radiography: a scoping review.

Objective: One of the common modalities used in imaging COVID-19 positive patients is chest radiography (CXR), and serves as a valuable imaging method to diagnose and monitor a patients' condition. Structured reporting templates are regularly used for the assessment of COVID-19 CXRs and are supported by international radiological societies. This review has investigated the use of structured templates for reporting COVID-19 CXRs. Methods: A scoping review was conducted on literature published between 2020 and 2022 using Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and manual searches. An essential criterion for the inclusion of the articles was the use of reporting methods employing either a structured quantitative or qualitative reporting method. Thematic analyses of both reporting designs were then undertaken to evaluate utility and implementation. Results: Fifty articles were found with the quantitative reporting method used in 47 articles whilst 3 articles were found employing a qualitative design. Two quantitative reporting tools (Brixia and RALE) were used in 33 studies, with other studies using variations of these methods. Brixia and RALE both use a posteroanterior or supine CXR divided into sections, Brixia with six and RALE with four sections. Each section is scaled numerically depending on the level of infection. The qualitative templates relied on selecting the best descriptor of the presence of COVID-19 radiological appearances. Grey literature from 10 international professional radiology societies were also included in this review. The majority of the radiology societies recommend a qualitative template for reporting COVID-19 CXRs. Conclusion: Most studies employed quantitative reporting methods which contrasted with the structured qualitative reporting template advocated by most radiological societies. The reasons for this are not entirely clear. There is also a lack of research literature on both the implementation of the templates or comparing both template types, indicating that the use of structured radiology reporting types may be an underdeveloped clinical strategy and research methodology. Advances in knowledge: This scoping review is unique in that it has undertaken an examination of the utility of the quantitative and qualitative structured reporting templates for COVID-19 CXRs. Moreover, through this review, the material examined has allowed a comparison of both instruments, clearly showing the favoured style of structured reporting by clinicians. At the time of the database interrogation, there were no studies found had undertaken such examinations of both reporting instruments. Moreover, due to the enduring influence of COVID-19 on global health, this scoping review is timely in examining the most innovative structured reporting tools that could be used in the reporting of COVID-19 CXRs. This report could assist clinicians in decision-making regarding templated COVID-19 reports.

Using Radiomics-Based Machine Learning to Create Targeted Test Sets to Improve Specific Mammography Reader Cohort Performance: A Feasibility Study.

Mammography interpretation is challenging with high error rates. This study aims to reduce the errors in mammography reading by mapping diagnostic errors against global mammographic characteristics using a radiomics-based machine learning approach. A total of 36 radiologists from cohort A (n = 20) and cohort B (n = 16) read 60 high-density mammographic cases. Radiomic features were extracted from three regions of interest (ROIs), and random forest models were trained to predict diagnostic errors for each cohort. Performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC. The impact of ROI placement and normalization on prediction was investigated. Our approach successfully predicted both the false positive and false negative errors of both cohorts but did not consistently predict location errors. The errors produced by radiologists from cohort B were less predictable compared to those in cohort A. The performance of the models did not show significant improvement after feature normalization, despite the mammograms being produced by different vendors. Our novel radiomics-based machine learning pipeline focusing on global radiomic features could predict false positive and false negative errors. The proposed method can be used to develop group-tailored mammographic educational strategies to help improve future mammography reader performance.

Reliability of radiologists' first impression when interpreting a screening mammogram.

Previous studies showed that radiologists can detect the gist of an abnormality in a mammogram based on a half-second image presentation through global processing of screening mammograms. This study investigated the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the radiologists' initial impressions about the abnormality (or "gist signal"). It also examined if a subset of radiologists produced more reliable and accurate gist signals. Thirty-nine radiologists provided their initial impressions on two separate occasions, viewing each mammogram for half a second each time. The intra-class correlation (ICC) values showed poor to moderate intra-reader reliability. Only 13 radiologists had an ICC of 0.6 or above, which is considered the minimum standard for reliability, and only three radiologists had an ICC exceeding 0.7. The median value for the weighted Cohen's Kappa was 0.478 (interquartile range = 0.419-0.555). The Mann-Whitney U-test showed that the "Gist Experts", defined as those who outperformed others, had significantly higher ICC values (p = 0.002) and weighted Cohen's Kappa scores (p = 0.026). However, even for these experts, the intra-radiologist agreements were not strong, as an ICC of at least 0.75 indicates good reliability and the signal from none of the readers reached this level of reliability as determined by ICC values. The inter-reader reliability of the gist signal was poor, with an ICC score of 0.31 (CI = 0.26-0.37). The Fleiss Kappa score of 0.106 (CI = 0.105-0.106), indicating only slight inter-reader agreement, confirms the findings from the ICC analysis. The intra- and inter-reader reliability analysis showed that the radiologists' initial impressions are not reliable signals. In particular, the absence of an abnormal gist does not reliably signal a normal case, so radiologists should keep searching. This highlights the importance of "discovery scanning," or coarse screening to detect potential targets before ending the visual search.

Incidence, mortality, survival, and disease burden of breast cancer in China compared to other developed countries.

Breast cancer was the most diagnosed malignant neoplasm and the second leading cause of cancer mortality among Chinese females in 2020. Increased risk factors and widespread adoption of westernized lifestyles have resulted in an upward trend in the occurrence of breast cancer. Up to date knowledge on the incidence, mortality, survival, and burden of breast cancer is essential for optimized cancer prevention and control. To better understand the status of breast cancer in China, this narrative literature review collected data from multiple sources, including studies obtained from the PubMed database and text references, national annual cancer report, government cancer database, Global Cancer Statistics 2020, and Global Burden of Disease study (2019). This review provides an overview of the incidence, mortality, and survival rates of breast cancer, as well as a summary of disability-adjusted life years associated with breast cancer in China from 1990 to 2019, with comparisons to Japan, South Korea, Australia and the United States.

Comparison of image quality assessments between interventional radiographers and interventional radiologists using digital subtraction angiography.

Purpose: The aim of our study was to compare the image quality assessments of vascular anatomy between interventional radiographers and interventional radiologists using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) runs acquired during an interventional radiology procedure. Approach: Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis was used to assess image quality by comparing two groups of images, where one group consisted of procedures in which radiation dose was optimized (group A, n = 10 ) and one group where dose optimization was not performed (group B, n = 10 ). The radiation dose parameters were optimized based on theoretical and empirical evidence to achieve radiation dose reductions during uterine artery embolization procedures. The two observer groups comprised of interventional radiologists ( n = 4 ) and interventional radiographers ( n = 4 ). Each observer rated the image quality of 20 DSA runs using a five-point rating scale. Results: The VGC analysis produced an area under the VGC curve ( AUC VGC ) of 0.55 for interventional radiographers ( P = 0.61 ) and AUCVGC of 0.52 for interventional radiologists ( P = 0.83 ). The optimization of radiation dose parameters demonstrated a reduction in kerma-area product by 35% ( P = 0.026 , d = 0.5 ) and reference air kerma (Ka, r ) by 43% ( P = 0.042 , d = 0.5 ) between group A and group B. Conclusions: VGC analysis indicated that the image quality assessments of interventional radiographers were comparable with interventional radiologists, where a reduction in radiation dose revealed no effect on both observer groups regarding their image quality assessment of vascular anatomy.

Do Reader Characteristics Affect Diagnostic Efficacy in Screening Mammography? A Systematic Review.

To examine reader characteristics associated with diagnostic efficacy in the interpretation of screening mammograms. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using databases such as Cochrane, Scopus, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed. Search terms were combined with "AND" or "OR" and included: "Radiologist's characteristics AND performance"; "radiologist experience AND screening mammography"; "annual volume read AND diagnostic efficacy"; "screening mammography performance OR diagnostic efficacy". Studies were included if they assessed reader performance in screening mammography interpretation, breast readers, used a reference standard to assess the performance, and were published in the English language. Twenty-eight studies were reviewed. Increasing reader's age was associated with lower false positive rates. No association was found between gender and performance. Half of the studies showed no association between years of reading mammograms and performance. Most studies showed that high reading volume was more likely to be associated with increased sensitivity, cancer detection rates (CDR), lower recall rate, and lower false positive rates. Inconsistent associations were found between fellowship training in breast imaging and reader performance. Specialization in breast imaging was associated with better CDR, sensitivity, and specificity. Limited studies were available to establish the association between performance and factors such as time spent in breast imaging (n = 2), screening focus (n = 1), formal rotation in mammography (n = 1), owner of practice (n = 1), and practice type (n = 1). No individual characteristics is associated with versatility in diagnostic efficacy, albeit reading volume and specialization in breast imaging appear to be associated with with increased sensitivity and CDR without significantly affecting other performance metrics.

Panoramic radiographs and dental patients with Down syndrome: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Life expectancy for people with Down syndrome (DS) has increased to 60 years, although poor oral health affects their quality of life. Panoramic radiographs (PRs) are usually well-tolerated by people with DS and can provide valuable diagnostic data for treatment planning and research. Methods A scoping review of peer-reviewed articles published between 1971and 2021 was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews to determine the scope of use of PRs for people with DS. RESULTS: 937 papers were screened, and 52 papers were included and charted into seven categories in this review. A high prevalence of tooth agenesis (TA) and other anomalies were reported in 45% of papers. Severe periodontal disease was considered characteristic of DS in the 1970s-80s and the benefit of time-consuming treatment was questioned. Since 2000 case reports illustrate that improved oral care, orthodontic treatment, and dental implants under local or general anaesthetic can improve the quality of life for people with DS. CONCLUSION: PRs play an important role in the diagnosis of anomalies, periodontal disease, and implant planning for patients with DS. This review highlights the gaps in research of caries, pathology, TMJ, systemic disease indicators, and guidelines for dentists. Systematic PR viewing, with a knowledge of characteristic features of DS, will assist diagnosis of pathology and improve comprehensive dental care treatment planning for children and adults with DS.

COVID-19 and its enduring influence on medical imaging.

Our article comments on the enduring impact of COVID-19 in medical imaging. The emotional impact on COVID-19 is well reported in articles published at JMRS. This editorial covers the qualitative and quantitative structured templates now used for the reporting of chest x-rays on COVID-19.

Teaching evidence-based practice: Case study of an integrated assessment task for diagnostic radiography students.

INTRODUCTION: A core competency for all health care professionals is evidence-based practice (EBP). An understanding of research skills are key to diagnostic radiographers adopting EBP, and should be taught and assessed in curricula leading to eligibility to register and practice. This paper focuses on the design, implementation and initial evaluation of an assessment task in the Diagnostic Radiography (DR) curriculum at an Australian university, which aimed to facilitate students' skills to identify and interpret research methods and output as a foundation for EBP by combining with EBP and DR theoretical content. METHODS: An integrated assessment task was introduced across two units of study, requiring student groups to produce a single literature review incorporating learning objectives from each distinct unit of study. This approach recognised and incorporated themes of student choice, negotiation of group membership, and scholarly writing as inherent components. RESULTS: Student feedback showed that students valued the integration of content knowledge and research principles across two units of study to better reflect their depth and breadth of learning. Students also commented on the value of team or group work in developing their communication and cooperation skills, which are essential skills in the DR workplace. DISCUSSION: A literature review assessment task integrated across two previously separate units of study provided an innovative approach to assessment of EBP in the DR curricula. CONCLUSION: It is anticipated that DR graduates, who are prepared with knowledge and skills in EBP prior to graduation, will become leaders and drive future innovation in EBP.

Factors affecting chiropractor requests for full-length spinal radiography: A scoping review.

Chiropractors often refer their patients for full-length (three- to four-region) radiographs of the spine as part of their clinical assessment, which are frequently completed by radiographers in medical imaging practices. Overuse of spinal radiography by chiropractors has previously been reported and remains a contentious issue. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the issues surrounding the utilisation of full-length spinal radiography by chiropractors and examine the alignment of this practice with current evidence. A search of four databases (AMED, EMBASE, MedLine and Scopus) and a hand search of Google was conducted using keywords. Articles were screened against an inclusion/exclusion criterion for relevance. Themes and findings were extracted from eligible articles, and evidence was synthesised using a narrative approach. In total, 25 articles were identified, five major themes were extracted, and subsequent conclusions drawn by authors were charted to identify confluent findings. This review identified a paucity of literature addressing this issue and an underrepresentation of relevant perspectives from radiographers. Several issues surrounding the use of full-length spinal radiography by chiropractors were identified and examined, including barriers to the adherence of published guidelines for spinal imaging, an absence of a reporting mechanism for the utilisation of spinal radiography in chiropractic and the existence of a spectrum of beliefs amongst chiropractors about the clinical utility and limitations of full-length spinal radiography. Further investigation is required to further understand the scope of this issue and its impacts for radiation protection and patient safety.

Panoramic radiography and patients with disability: a new simple breathing technique to reduce common airspace error.

Patients with intellectual disabilities often fail to follow traditional tongue position instructions for panoramic radiographs resulting in missed pathology or unnecessary further radiation. This simple breathing technique is a new clinical instruction method for panoramic radiography developed to reduce the most common patient position error: patient failure to hold the tongue to the roof of the mouth. The technique is suitable for all patients including young patients and those with intellectual disabilities. The simple breathing technique uses 'tell-show-do' communication methods and does not mention the tongue but utilises the known tongue positions that occur during breathing and swallowing. This simple breathing technique instruction for panoramic radiography uses a demonstration of 'breathe-in, breathe-out, swallow, lips closed and hold still' to reduce the intensity of both the palatoglossal and pharyngeal airspaces on panoramic radiographs. This method, referred in this article as the simple breathing technique, can improve the diagnostic potential of panoramic radiographs and can be used with young children and patients with intellectual disabilities, and this slow breathing technique can help them further relax.

Predictors of radiation dose for uterine artery embolisation are angiography system-dependent.

This study sought to achieve radiation dose reductions for patients receiving uterine artery embolisation (UAE) by evaluating radiation dose measurements for the preceding generation (Allura) and upgraded (Azurion) angiography system. Previous UAE regression models in the literature could not be applied to this centre's practice due to being based on different angiography systems and radiation dose predictor variables. The aims of this study were to establish whether radiation dose is reduced with the upgraded angiography system and to develop a regression model to determine predictors of radiation dose specific to the upgraded angiography system. A comparison between Group I (Allura,n= 95) and Group II (Azurion,n= 95) demonstrated a significant reduction in kerma-area product (KAP) and Ka, r (reference air kerma) by 63% (143.2 Gy cm2vs 52.9 Gy cm2;P< 0.001,d= 0.8) and 67% (0.6 Gy vs 0.2 Gy;P< 0.001,d= 0.8), respectively. The multivariable linear regression (MLR) model identified the UAE radiation dose predictors for KAP on the upgraded angiography system as total fluoroscopy dose, Ka, r, and total uterus volume. The predictive accuracy of the MLR model was assessed using a Bland-Altman plot. The mean difference was 0.39 Gy cm2and the limits of agreement were +28.49 and -27.71 Gy cm2, and thus illustrated no proportional bias. The resultant MLR model was considered system-dependent and validated the upgraded angiography system and its advance capabilities to significantly reduce radiation dose. Interventional radiologist and interventional radiographer familiarisation of the system's features and the implementation of the newly established MLR model would further facilitate dose optimisation for all centres performing UAE procedures using the upgraded angiography system.

A review of screening mammography: The benefits and radiation risks put into perspective.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: In medical imaging a benefit to risk analysis is required when justifying or implementing diagnostic procedures. Screening mammography is no exception and in particular concerns around the use of radiation to help diagnose cancer must be addressed. METHODS: The Medline database and various established reports on breast screening and radiological protection were utilised to explore this review. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The benefit of screening is well argued; the ability to detect and treat breast cancer has led to a 91% 5-year survival rate and 497 deaths prevented from breast cancer amongst 100,000 screened women. Subsequently, screening guidelines by various countries recommend annual, biennial or triennial screening from ages somewhere between 40-74 years. Whilst the literature presents different perspectives on screening younger and older women, the current evidence of benefit for screening women <40 and ≥75 years is currently not strong. The radiation dose and associated risk delivered to each woman for a single examination is dependent upon age, breast density and breast thickness, however the average mean glandular dose is around 2.5-3 mGy, and this would result in 65 induced cancers and 8 deaths per 100,000 women over a screening lifetime from 40-74 years. This results in a ratio of lives saved to deaths from induced cancer of 62:1. CONCLUSION: Therefore, compared to the potential mortality reduction achievable with screening mammography, the risk is small.