Sacral neuromodulation in patients with refractory overactive bladder symptoms after failed Botulinum toxin therapy: Results in a large cohort of patients.

AIMS: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) and Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injections are well-known third-line treatment options in patients with refractory overactive bladder (OAB). Our aim is to evaluate the success rate of SNM in patients who received prior therapy with BoNT-A injections. METHODS: All patients with OAB symptoms referred for SNM between 2006 and 2019 were included. History taking and 3-day voiding diaries assessed the complaints and suitability for SNM. The success rate of SNM in patients who received prior BoNT-A was compared with BoNT-A naive patients. Success was defined as an improvement of 50% or greater in voiding diary parameters. Satisfaction was registered at their most recent visit. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients underwent SNM test stimulation, of which 75 (16 male/57 female) received prior BoNT-A and 188 (46 male/142 female) were BoNT-A naive. Success rate for SNM in BoNT-A naive patients was 72.9% and in BoNT-A patients 66.7% (p = 0.316). Success rate after ≤2 BoNT-A injections was 68.5%, compared to 61.1% after ≥3 injections (p > 0.05). Success rate in patients perceiving lack of efficacy of BoNT-A was 67.4% (p > 0.05), subjected to temporary CISC was 73.7% (p > 0.05) and with temporary effect of BoNT-A was 50% (p > 0.05). In 86% of BoNT-A patients the system was still activated and used to their satisfaction at their last follow-up visit (mean FU, 40.70 months). CONCLUSION: SNM in patients with refractory OAB who failed prior BoNT-A is an excellent approach. The number of injections nor reason of BoNT-A discontinuation have predictive value for success with SNM.

First-in-human implantation of a mid-field powered neurostimulator at the sacral nerve: Results from an acute study.

INTRODUCTION: Commercially approved implantable systems for sacral neuromodulation require the implantation of a multipolar lead subcutaneously connected to an implantable pulse generator (IPG). Eliminating the need for an IPG would eliminate the need for tunneling of the lead, reduce procedure time, infection risk, and the need for IPG replacement. The objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of implanting the AHLeveeS System in the S3 Foramen to stimulate the S3 sacral nerve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A first-in-human, prospective, single center, nonrandomized, acute feasibility clinical investigation at the Maastricht University Medical Center+. Patients with refractory overactive bladder underwent acute implantation of the AHLeveeS neurostimulator before the InterStim procedure. Outcome measurements included motor responses, procedural time and a scoring of the difficulty of the implant and explant procedure. Retrospectively, qualitative responses to the stimulation protocol were assessed by video motion analyses. Only descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: During the stimulation a motor response to stimulation was seen in four of the five subjects. In all implantations the AHLeveeS was correctly placed. The median time for complete procedure was 24 minutes. The implant and explant procedures were successfully performed and no device or procedure related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this acute first-in-human study demonstrate the feasibility of implantation and acute stimulation of the sacral nerve with this mid-field powered system. Future clinical studies will focus on safety and efficacy of a chronically implanted device.