Reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection with a dedicated CLABSI prevention registered nurse role.

BACKGROUND: Following a 200% increase in the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) standardized infection ratio in a private teaching hospital between 2019 and 2020, a program with the utilization of a CLABSI Prevention Registered Nurse was implemented to reduce CLABSIs through a variety of focused prevention efforts and education. METHODS: The CLABSI P-RN project consisted of a dedicated team of RNs that performed interventions that included an audit of all central lines daily, real-time education and remediation, bi-weekly educational handouts, and assistance with 2-person dressing changes. Audit data were utilized to identify trends in gaps in compliance with the CLABSI bundle (ie, daily bathing, dressing integrity). The CLABSI rate/1,000 central line days were tracked in preintervention, intervention, and postintervention time periods. RESULTS: During the intervention, the CLABSI rate decreased from 1.4 during the preintervention time period, to 0.4 during the intervention time period (P-value .04). Additionally, daily bathing compliance improved from 84.3% during the preintervention time period, to 90.8% during the intervention time period (P-value .004). DISCUSSION: The implementation of the CLABSI P-RN was beneficial in reducing CLABSIs. CONCLUSIONS: An expert-trained role dedicated to central line management reduces CLABSI occurrences, reduces health care costs, and improves patient outcomes.

Optimizing the Relationship Between Perioperative Personnel and Infection Preventionists to Reduce Surgical Site Infections.

Prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) is a critical aspect of ensuring positive patient outcomes. One of the challenges of SSI prevention is the communication barrier between perioperative staff members and infection preventionists (IPs), which may lead to frontline staff members who are primarily responsible for infection prevention being unaware of pertinent hospital SSI data. To overcome this challenge, IPs and perioperative staff members should develop a partnership that facilitates the sharing of feedback on SSI case review data and effective key performance indicators. A partnership also can help engage perioperative staff members in quality improvement efforts and increase collaboration with IPs. Perioperative leaders should identify effective methods to improve data transparency, SSI case reviews, audit and feedback programs, and education for perioperative team members. A strong perioperative-IP partnership and increased sharing of data in accessible formats may improve engagement and interest in SSI prevention.

Addressing an increase in surgical site infections during the COVID-19 pandemic-Identifying opportunities during a chaotic time.

BACKGROUND: Health care systems saw increases in device-associated infections and decreases in surgical site infections (SSI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, following an increase in SSIs, an acute care hospital assessed the risk and preventative factors of SSIs among patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study on surgeries performed between January 2020 and September 2021 analyzed associations of SSI with risk and preventive factors utilizing χ2, t-tests, and odds ratios. A secondary analysis was utilized to determine the association of case urgency and prevention practice performance. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the administration of correct perioperative antibiotic selection between SSI (78.1%) and non-SSI (86.2%) along with 2.9 greater odds of developing an SSI with incorrect perioperative antibiotics. Patients who had urgent cases were significantly less likely than elective to receive preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate wipes (81.6%, 61.5%, respectively), correct antibiotic selection and timing (93.2%, 70.8%, respectively) and chlorhexidine and alcohol skin preparation (81.6%, 67.5%, respectively). DISCUSSION: Disruption of perioperative workflow during the COVID-19 pandemic likely resulted in an increase in SSI. Numerous opportunities were identified for focused prevention efforts. CONCLUSIONS: The next steps include implementing strategies to improve SSI prevention and establish a culture that can withstand workflow disruptions to maintain a safe environment during significant changes.

Recommendations for change in infection prevention programs and practice.

Fifty years of evolution in infection prevention and control programs have involved significant accomplishments related to clinical practices, methodologies, and technology. However, regulatory mandates, and resource and research limitations, coupled with emerging infection threats such as the COVID-19 pandemic, present considerable challenges for infection preventionists. This article provides guidance and recommendations in 14 key areas. These interventions should be considered for implementation by United States health care facilities in the near future.

Innovative Partnership Between Intensive Care Unit Nurses and Therapists to Care for Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: When patients with COVID-19 began presenting to hospitals in early 2020, medical professionals were unprepared to handle the severity of disease and the number of severely ill patients. LOCAL PROBLEM: In response to critical needs of patients with COVID-19 and the threat of nurse burnout, a special operations team comprising physical and occupational therapists was convened to (1) provide help to intensive care unit nurses, (2) help therapists be productive, and (3) use therapists' specialties for critical patients. METHODS: Two therapists teamed up each shift to work with every critical patient with COVID-19, performing numerous nursing and therapy activities. Activity frequency was documented by the therapists daily, and duration was estimated and data were summarized by nursing leadership. RESULTS: During the 9-week program, 35 critical patients with COVID-19 were included in the special operations program. During the program, the teams performed 10 activities, including prone positioning, turning, and mobilization, 1937 times with the patients with COVID-19. The partnership saved between 5 and 40 minutes of intensive care nurse time per activity, which resulted in a total of 677.2 hours of nursing time saved. DISCUSSION: Implementation of the special operations program had a positive impact on patients, nurses, and therapists. Patients benefited both clinically and socially from additional time with special operations teams. Nurses benefited from having help caring for critical patients, and therapists benefited from increased productivity during redeployment. CONCLUSION: Deployment of nonnursing clinical staff could be an effective strategy to leverage available resources while maintaining clinical standards of care and reducing nursing burden during a pandemic or crisis surge.

Challenges and opportunities in recruiting, hiring and training infection preventionists across facility settings.

BACKGROUND: Recruitment of skilled professionals for the infection preventionist (IP) role is an ongoing priority for organizations. The objective of this study was to understand differences in recruitment, hiring and training by facility setting and discuss targeted strategies for diverse organizations. METHODS: A survey study investigated recruitment, hiring and training practices for IPs and stratified by facility location (multi-location health system (MLHS), urban, suburban and rural), specifically pertaining to job description requirements, background of candidates interviewed and hired and training programs. RESULTS: A Master's in Public Health degree was significantly more frequently listed on MLHS and urban facility job descriptions (37.3%, 43.7%, respectively) than suburban (27.4%) and rural facility job descriptions (17.2%)(P < .01). Respondents from MLHS (41.3%), urban facilities (47.0%), suburban facilities (41.7%) were more likely to interview public health professionals than rural facilities (20.3%, P = .003). Respondents from MLHS, (73.3%), urban (68.4%), and suburban (62.2%) facilities were significantly more likely to use local Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology chapter for training compared to rural facilities (32.4%)(P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results identified differences in facility setting with recruitment, hiring and training practices. Optimizing recruitment and training best practices will result in a large and well trained IP workforce and patient safety.

Infection preventionist retention and professional development strategies: Insights from a national survey.

This brief report explores why Infection Preventionists (IPs) leave their positions and strategies implemented to retain and professionally develop IPs. National survey data of over 500 APIC members found turnover is due to personal reasons, professional advancement opportunities and work-life balance challenges. In addition, IPs are retiring in great numbers. The creation of career pathways and providing an environment that supports work-life balance are novel strategies that could retain and professionally develop IPs.

Recruitment and hiring practices in United States infection prevention and control departments: Results of a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Infection prevention is a profession that requires highly specified skills and clinical experience. Infection Preventionists (IPs) direct interventions that protect patients from health care-associated infections across clinical and community settings. To enhance the hiring and recruitment of diverse IPs, it is key to understand current recruitment and hiring practices METHODS: A national on-line survey was performed with members of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) who participate in the recruitment and hiring of IPs in their organization. Descriptive statistics were calculated for respondent and organizational demographics, IP recruitment strategies and hiring practices. RESULTS: In the fall of 2019, 522 APIC members from 101 of 113 APIC chapters (89% chapter response rate) participated in the survey. A vacant IP position was reported by 25% (n = 126) of respondents. Recent IP hires were primarily nurses (70%; n = 346) recruited from outside the organization (54%; n = 270). Online job-boards (eg, Indeed and Monster) and internal organizational job postings were the most frequently used recruitment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide a summary of practices for IP recruitment and hiring that can inform local and national initiatives to increase the number and professional diversity of IPs.

Implementation of colon surgical site infection prevention bundle-The successes and challenges.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundles have proven successful in decreasing infections. Surgeon and nurse engagement and endorsement are essential for success. The objective of this quality improvement project was to develop, implement and sustain a colon SSI prevention bundle and determine which bundle components are most strongly associated with prevention of SSI. METHODS: The bundle was developed and implemented in a 525 bed Level I trauma hospital and included pre-, intra- and postoperative components. Bundle adherence and SSI rate were continually tracked and communicated to surgeons and nursing staff throughout project. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the components associated with lowest SSI rates. RESULTS: There were 280 elective and urgent/emergent colon surgeries between October 2015 and March 2018. Over 60% had preoperative components, 76.5% had intraoperative components and 55.6% had postoperative bundle components with a nonsignificant decreasing trend in SSI rate of -0.5 SSI/100 procedures per quarter. The multivariate analysis suggested that use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% alcohol skin prep, use of wound protector and change of gloves for fascial closure were associated with fewer SSI. DISCUSSION: The implementation of a colon SSI prevention bundle in a Level I trauma hospital with pre-, intra- and postoperative components was described. Future directions include focusing implementation efforts on bundle components that significantly prevent SSI to improve adherence.

Prepping for Prevention: An Intervention to Optimize Skin Antisepsis and Peri-Operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis.

Background: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend bathing prior to surgery, surgical skin antisepsis, peri-operative antibiotic administration, normothermia throughout the procedure, serum glucose concentration <200 mg/dL throughout the procedure, and hyperoxygenation in the immediate post-operative period to prevent surgical site infection (SSI). We developed interventions to standardize skin antisepsis and peri-operative antibiotic administration at our institution. Methods: This is a cross-sectional evaluation of surgical skin antisepsis and antibiotic administration before and after a series of interventions designed to standardize the processes. Results: One hundred twenty-four surgical skin antisepsis opportunities were observed; significant improvement was seen in hand hygiene prior to performing skin antisepsis (compliance changing from 1% to 48%; p < 0.001), sleeves being worn during skin antisepsis (1% versus 67%; p < 0.001), use of the correct cleansing time (47% versus 85%; p < 0.001), allowance for adequate drying time (67% versus 87%; p = 0.02), and use of a cleansing motion from the incision to the periphery (78% versus 95%; p = 0.004). Pre-operative antibiotic order placement, correct antibiotic selection, and optimal antibiotic dose were evaluated in 466 surgical procedures. Significant improvement was seen in both peri-operative order placement (59% versus 70%; p = 0.02) and correct antibiotic selection (52% versus 95%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: An intervention to standardize skin antisepsis and to encourage early ordering of peri-operative antibiotics was successful.

Implementation of cleaning and evaluation process for mobile patient equipment using adenosine triphosphate.

We implemented a cleaning process for mobile patient equipment (MPE) and determined its success using adenosine trisphosphate (ATP) monitoring and data feedback. Following education for staff and ATP data feedback, the data suggest that the MPE cleaning program we implemented was successful.

The effect of eye images and a social norms message on healthcare provider hand hygiene adherence.

BACKGROUND: Depictions of eye images and messages encouraging compliance with social norms have successfully motivated behavioral change in a variety of experimental and applied settings. We studied the effect of these 2 visual cues on hand hygiene adherence in a cohort of hospital-based healthcare providers participating in an electronic monitoring and feedback program. METHODS: Prospective, quasi-experimental study utilizing an interrupted time-series design. Intervention placards depicting an image of eyes, a social norms message, or a control placard were placed near soap and alcohol-based hand-rub dispensers on 2 hospital units. Placards were alternated every 10 days. Hand hygiene opportunities and adherence rates were assessed electronically via the CenTrak Hand Hygiene Compliance Solution. RESULTS: A total of 166 nurses and certified nursing assistants (74 on a medical-surgical unit and 92 on a progressive care unit) were monitored electronically over the 4-month study period. In total, 184,172 electronic observations were collected (110,903 on a medical-surgical unit and 73,269 on a progressive care unit). The median daily number of electronic observations was 1,471 (interquartile range, 1,337-1,584). The preintervention baseline hand hygiene adherence rate was 70%. No statistically significant increase in hand hygiene adherence was observed as a result of either intervention. CONCLUSION: Displaying eye images or a social norms message in the hospital environment did not result in measurable improvements in HH adherence in a cohort of healthcare providers participating in an electronic monitoring and feedback program.

Factors affecting annual compensation and professional development support for infection preventionists: Implications for recruitment and retention.

BACKGROUND: Factors affecting annual compensation and professional development support have been studied for various healthcare professions. However, there is little understanding of these factors for infection preventionists (IPs). METHODS: Using secondary data from the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology 2015 MegaSurvey, we designed a descriptive, correlational study to describe IP annual compensation and professional development support. We tested for associations between demographic variables and annual compensation and investigated for predictors of higher annual compensation. RESULTS: Median salary for IPs was $75,000. IPs who indicated that their compensation was based on industry benchmarks reported a median salary of $85,000 (P < .001). IPs with advanced degrees reported a median salary of $90,000. IPs with bachelor's degrees or lower reported a median salary of $50,000 (P < .001). IPs with CIC® reported a median salary of $85,000. IPs without CIC® reported a median salary of $65,000 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study can be used to develop recruitment and retention guidelines that lead to a well-educated, well-compensated, and competent IP workforce.

Development of a surgical site infection prediction model in orthopaedic trauma: The Denver Health Model.

BACKGROUND: The CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network's (NHSN) current risk adjustment model for surgical site infections (SSI) following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of long bone fractures is a suboptimal predictor of risk. We hypothesized that by including variables known to be associated with SSI following ORIF, we would develop a model that would increase the accuracy and predictability of SSI risk. METHODS: Patients who underwent ORIF of a long bone between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014 were included in the study (n=1543). Patient risk factors, injury risk factors and perioperative risk factors were considered in the development of this model. We developed a risk prediction model for SSI following ORIF and then applied this to a new dataset of ORIF to determine the expected number of infections. This was compared to the expected number of infections calculated using the NHSN risk adjusted model. RESULTS: The final multivariate model included age (odds ratio: 1.02, p-value<0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.04), lower leg fracture (2.63, 0.004, 1.40-4.93), open fracture (1.87, 0.07, 0.93-3.76), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) (2.09, 0.02, 1.07-4.08) and history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which was the most important predictor of infection (7.20, <0.001, 2.61-19.85). The c-index was 0.74 compared to 0.65 for the NHSN model, indicating that our model more accurate in estimating infection risk. When the developed model was used to predict the number of expected infections on a new dataset from 2015, 36.3 SSI were expected compared to 5.7 calculated by the NHSN model. CONCLUSIONS: The model that was developed uses five easily identifiable risk factors that result in a more accurate prediction of infection at our facility than the currently used model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level III.

Infection prevention workforce: Potential benefits to educational diversity.

BACKGROUND: Nurses have historically occupied the infection preventionist (IP) role. As the knowledge and skills needed to advance the field expand, professionals from public health and the laboratory sciences have become IPs. Our study describes the characteristics of current IPs and assesses for relationships between background, certification, experience, and type of work performed. METHODS: The data were drawn from an existing dataset collected in the conduct of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) MegaSurvey. Descriptive statistics were computed. Associations were calculated using χ2 or Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests. Characteristics of IPs were stratified by work-related activities to allow for comparisons between groups. RESULTS: Of the 13,050 active APIC members, 4,079 participated in the survey (31% response rate). The primary job activity for nurses (97.9%; n = 2,434) was preventing and controlling the transmission of infectious agents or health care-associated infections, for laboratory scientists (97.5%; n = 307) it was the interpretation of surveillance data, and for public health professionals (96.1%; n = 136) it was management and communication: feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Infection control departments would benefit from hiring IPs with diverse education and training to address the expanding roles and responsibilities of IPs. This may facilitate the implementation of novel and innovative processes that will impact patient care.

Hospital-wide chlorhexidine gluconate bed bathing protocol: A cross-sectional study in a single hospital.

The objective of this study was to determine understanding of bed bathing practices over time after the implementation of a standardized bed bathing protocol. An online survey addressing bathing practices was administered preintervention and 6 and 18 months postintervention to all nurses and technicians caring for adult patients. Survey responses suggested that the intervention resulted in sustained understanding of the standardized bed bathing protocol.