Helical plating - a novel technique to increase stiffness in defect fractures.

Single-plate fixation bridging bone defects provokes nonunion and risks plate-fatigue failure due to under- dimensioned implants. Adding a helical plate to bridge the fracture increases stiffness and balances load sharing. This study compares the stiffness and plate surface strain of different constructs in a transverse contact and gap femoral shaft fracture model. Eight groups of six synthetic femora each were formed: intact femora; intact femora with lateral locking plate; contact and gap transverse shaft osteotomies each with lateral locking plate, lateral locking plate and helical locking plate, and long proximal femoral nail. Constructs underwent non-destructive quasi-static axial and torsional loading. Plate surface strain evaluation was performed under 200 N axial loading. Constructs with both lateral and helical plates demonstrated similar axial and torsional stiffness- independent of the contact or gap situations - being significantly higher compared to lateral plating (p < 0.01). Torsional stiffness of the constructs, with both lateral and helical plates in the gap situation, was significantly higher compared to this situation stabilised by a nail (p < 0.01). Plate surface strain dropped from 0.3 % in the gap situation with a lateral plate to < 0.1 % in this situation with both a lateral and a helical plate. Additional helical plating increases axial and torsional construct stiffness in synthetic bone and seems to provide well-balanced load sharing. Its use should be considered in very demanding situations for gap or defect fractures, where single-plate osteosynthesis provides inadequate stiffness for fracture healing and induces nonunion.

[Special reduction instruments]. / Spezielle Repositionsinstrumente.

Special and specialized instruments help perform reduction more effectively and in a tissue-preserving manner. In addition to other articles, the application and advantages of the following instruments are presented: colinear reduction forceps, cerclage, cerclage passer, distal radius reduction clamp, modular external fixator, extension table, distraction frame, joystick, manipulators, distractor and assistance of reduction with elastic nails.

How to Choose between the Implant Materials Steel and Titanium in Orthopedic Trauma Surgery: Part 2 - Biological Aspects.

BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF STEEL AND TITANIUM AS IMPLANT MATERIAL IN ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA SURGERY The following case from the ICUC database, where a titanium plate was implanted into a flourishing infection, represents the clinical experience leading to preferring titanium over steel. (Fig. 1) (6). Current opinions regarding biological aspects of implant function. The "street" opinions regarding the biological aspects of the use of steel versus titanium as a surgical trauma implant material differ widely. Statements of opinion leaders range from "I do not see any difference in the biological behavior between steel and titanium in clinical application" to "I successfully use titanium implants in infected areas in a situation where steel would act as foreign body "sustaining" infection." Furthermore, some comments imply that clinical proof for the superiority of titanium in human application is lacking. The following tries to clarify the issues addressing the different aspects more through a practical clinical approach than a purely scientific one, this includes simplifications. Today's overall biocompatibility of implant materials is acceptable but: As the vast majority of secondary surgeries are elective procedures this allows the selection of implant materials with optimal infection resistance. The different biological reactions of stainless steel and titanium are important for this segment of clinical pathologies. Biological tole - rance (18) depends on the toxicity and on the amount of soluble implant material released. Release, diffusion and washout through blood circulation determine the local concentration of the corrosion products. Alloying components of steel, especially nickel and chromium, are less than optimal in respect to tissue tolerance and allergenicity. Titanium as a pure metal provides excellent biological tolerance (3, 4, 16). Better strength was obtained by titanium alloys like TiAl6V4. The latter found limited application as surgical implants. It contains Vanadium (9). Today's high strength titanium alloys contain well tolerated alloying components1 like Zr, Nb, Mo and Ta (ISO 5832-14) (7, 15). The corrosion rate of surgical implants is kept low by the passive layer formed when immerged in body fluids (13, 14). The passive layer may be locally destroyed, for instance, by mechanical fretting or by local corrosion conditions like in pitting; it is renewed by an electrochemical corrosion process which releases alloying components like Ni and Cr (Fig. 2) (10). The amount of soluble component may vary markedly depending on the local electrochemical conditions (see below).

The Potential of the ICUC® Documentation Concept to Improve Trauma Surgery.

Conventional documentation of surgical procedures using only pre- and postoperative X-ray images and possibly a few intra-operative pictures does not allow secondary analysis of the technical performance in detail. In particular, the quality of the handling of tissues and surgical tools cannot be judged «post hoc¼, i.e. after the end of the surgical procedure. The invasiveness of the surgical act cannot yet be quantified. Surrogate invasiveness indices have therefore been developed. Furthermore, conventional documentation does not allow evaluation of the proper use of the C-arm both technically and with regard to fluoroscopy time. Documentation that follows the ICUC® documentation concept includes all fluoroscopy shots and images covering all key portions of the entire surgical procedure by multiple still images or videos. In certain cases, such documentation can help to explain post-operative courses that might be difficult to understand based only on X-rays and written operation reports. Finally, the data included in ICUC® documentation are a valuable source for knowledge extraction. In addition, time saving is conceivable if operation reports can include images of the key stages of the procedure with a few additional comments dictated during the surgery. Key words: trauma surgery, ICUC® documentation concept.

How to Choose between the Implant Materials Steel and Titanium in Orthopedic Trauma Surgery: Part 1 - Mechanical Aspects.

When choosing between metal implants of different materials the surgeon mainly needs to balance the pros and cons of steel and titanium. Economic constraints often do not permit both to be kept in stock and it is necessary to decide beforehand which to choose. The arguments for the use of the "preferred metal" vary. The present paper elucidates the practical aspects based on the complex scientific background that has identified the differences between the two metals in their mechanical, electrochemical, biological and application behavior. The data presented here are intended to help the surgeon when he is confronted with different and often complex clinical situations and problems. The following is an overview of different aspects to help with selection of the proper material for the clinical application. The first part concerns mechanical aspects the second part the biological aspects. Both aspects are discussed with the practical application in mind. Nonmetallic implant materials have seen an increasing interest in the recent past. Plastic materials needed improvement to achieve good strength and avoid creep with loss of e.g. compression and minimizing leakage of chemicals.

Evolution of AO Fracture Treatment Part 1: the Internal Fixator.

Surgical fracture treatment has undergone an extensive evolution in the past decades. In the early days achieving solid healing in anatomically reduced position was the primary and nearly exclusive goal of fracture treatment. Since mainly Lambotte, Danis and Müller in Europe the focus of surgical fracture treatment shifted to achieving early recovery of the function of the injured limb with safe healing. Considering the shortcomings of the early fracture treatment helps understanding the evolution of surgical fracture treatment. The evolution of the biomechanical and biological principles of AO plate fixation are discussed as a model.

Balancing Success and Risk in Orthopedic Trauma Surgery: The Ridge-Walking between Sound Accepting "Good" and Risky Striving for "Better".

Immediate post-operative rating of surgical performance can be a valuable source of learning when trying to analyze the reasons for the difference between "work as planned" and "work as done". There are many reasons for the difference, but they can only be found if complete documentation of the surgical steps allows retrospective scrutiny. Documentation like ICUC1 provides this opportunity for scrutiny and may allow better understanding of some unexpected post-operative evolutions.

Biomechanical and biological aspects of defect treatment in fractures using helical plates.

The clinical case of figure 1 through figure 11 shows a series of impressive failures of plate fixation. The plates were repeatedly applied bridging a comminuted bone segment in a heavy patient. The biomechanical analysis elaborates why this happened and proposes an unconventional procedure to prevent this failure with a minimally invasive procedure. A plate bridging an open gap or a defect in a long bone diaphysis is exposed to full functional load. According to clinical observations such plate application often fails even without external load such as weight bearing. The plate risks to break through fatigue when exposed during a long time to cyclic loading. This type of failure has been observed even with broad plates as well in femoral as in tibiae. The first option to avoid such failure consists in protecting the plate by installing load sharing between plate and either bone or an additional implant. This reduces the load carried by the plate to a safe level. Load sharing with bone may be installed at surgery by establishing solid mechanical bridge between the two main fragments of the fractured bone. The optimal load sharing relies on a solid compressed contact between the main fragments. It can be established because the bone is able to take a large load which results in optimal protection of the plate. In the case of an extended comminuted bone segment it may be very difficult, traumatizing and inefficient to reconstruct the bone. In the present case it was impossible to establish load sharing through the bone. The second option protecting the plate is provided by callus bridging of the gap or defect. The formation of a solid callus bridge takes time but the fatigue failure of the plate also takes time. Therefore, the callus bridge may prevent a late fatigue failure. The surgeon may select one of several options: - Replacing the lack of bone support using a second plate which immediately alleviates plate loading. The drawback of application of a second conventional plate is the extent of surgical trauma at the critical site of healing. - Shingling and/or applying an autologous cancellous bone graft: This procedure provides initially no relevant load sharing but will do so after a couple of weeks. The mechanical coupling of the comparably soft graft and the main fracture fragments presents little problems. Applying a cortical bone graft: Such a graft does provide initial only small load sharing and does a less good job inducing callus than a cancellous graft. Furthermore, the coupling by callus between a somewhat rigid bone graft and the mobile main fracture fragments requires a solid maintained contact. If the cortical graft is fixed using implants with small contact area to the graft such as screws or cerclage loops, the local stress may be critical and the graft may break. When the cortical graft is fixed with cerclage wires the procedure must take into account the limited strength of the individual cerclage. Therefore multiple and well-spaced cerclages are required and may lead to success especially if an intramedullary component of the implant contributes to protection (6). The degree of unloading depends apparently on the stiffness of the material of the protecting splint. Though, more important is the effect of the dimensions of the splint. While titanium as a material is about 50% less stiff than steel, the thickness of the implant changes the stiffness with the third power. That is doubling the thickness results in eightfold increased stiffness. When considering the unloading by application of a second plate the leverage of the second plate plays an important role. The larger the distance between the axis of bending and the second implant the larger the protecting effect. The helical plate (2, 3, 7) as introduced by A.A.D. Fernandez offers biological and mechanical advantages. It can be applied without touching the fracture site maintaining the critical biology intact and provides mechanically efficient unloading. Its application is fairly simple: The helical plate is modified conventional long and small plate that is twisted between its ends about 90 degrees. The twist is applied using "bending irons" (4, 5, 8) whereby the force required is small and the exact degree of twist is not critical. Therefore the twist is applicable operating bending irons by hand. Assuming a situation where a plate bridging a defect or non-union has failed the broken plate is replaced by a similar implant: At the distal end of the bone fracture and opposite to the surgical approach a small incision allows to slide in the helical plate in such a way that proximally the plate ends on the same side of the limb as the replaced plate. Ideally the two plate ends meet and the application of the helical plate does not ask for an additional surgical exposure at this location. Otherwise a small minimally invasive exposure is required. The helical plate is then fixed to the main bone fragments using a couple of locked screws. The following case demonstrates the use and efficiency of the helical plate saving a situation where multiple attempts using conventional plates had failed. The successful final treatment of this case was performed by A. A. D. Fernandez.

Quantification of surgical trauma: comparison of conventional and minimally invasive surgical techniques for pertrochanteric fracture surgery based on markers of inflammation (interleukins).

BACKGROUND: Fixation of pertrochanteric fracture is undoubtedly an additional trauma after the fracture itself. In elderly patients, it might have an important impact on the whole organism. In the literature we find various techniques to perform this type of surgery. Up to now, there are no parameters validated for quantification of the invasiveness of a surgical procedure; it is therefore still not demonstrated that any method is less invasive than any other. In an effort to find a way to quantify the invasiveness of a surgical procedure, inflammatory markers were collected in patients undergoing fixation of trochanteric fracture with gliding hip screw [dynamic hip screw (DHS)] using either a conventional (DHS conv) or minimally invasive (DHS MIO) technique. METHOD: Two groups of patients were investigated prospectively; 36 of them were treated with conventional DHS technique and 32 with minimally invasive technique. Mean age was 84.7 ± 7.20 and 82.78 ± 7.71 years, respectively. Fracture type was classified according to the AO classification. Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α were measured 1 h before and 1 h after surgery. Student's t test, chi-square test, and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Preoperative levels of interleukins showed no significant differences between the two groups. In contrast, the postoperative blood level of IL-6 in patients operated with DHS conv technique (78.41 ± 67.04 pg/ml) was on average higher than in patients operated by DHS MIO technique (39.02 ± 37.36 pg/ml), the mean difference being 39.39 pg/ml [95 % confidence interval (CI) 12.65-66.13 pg/ml; p = 0.0045]. Multivariate logistic regression (backward method with limit of significance 0.05) confirmed that patients operated by conventional technique were significantly more likely to have increased IL-6 after surgery than those operated by MIO technique. IL-8 was measured in only 36 patients (20 for DHS conv, 16 for DHS MIO). No significant differences were found between the two groups; however, there was a drastic decrease postoperatively (p < 0.0001) regardless of the type of surgery performed. IL-10 and TNF-α were tested in all subjects, but did not show significant differences between the two groups. Average length of incision was significantly different (4.61 cm, 95 % CI 3.50-5.71 cm; p < 0.001) between the two groups, being 11.65 ± 2.64 cm for DHS conv and 7.05 ± 1.77 cm for DHS MIO. Similarly, average units of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused [performed for hemoglobin (Hb) <9 g/dl and/or hematocrit (HCT) <27 %] was higher (2.22 ± 0.99) in the DHS conv group compared with the DHS MIO group (1.09 ± 1.20), with average difference of 1.13 (95 % CI 0.59-1.66; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This attempt to quantify the invasiveness of internal fixation for trochanteric fracture comparing two techniques (DHS conv versus DHS MIO) based on inflammatory markers (IL-6) has given encouraging results. Measurement of systemic inflammatory response to local tissue damage caused by osteosynthesis using IL-6 as marker seems to confirm the lower invasiveness of MIO techniques. These results for trauma cases seem in line with those published for hip prosthesis. Ongoing further studies analyzing the effect of nailing will confirm or invalidate these preliminary results.

[Stabilization of inter- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures with the PFNΑ®]. / Stabilisierung sub- und pertrochantärer Femurfrakturen mit dem PFNΑ®.

OBJECTIVE: Intramedullary nail system fixation of inter- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures allows early weight-bearing, especially in osteoporotic bone. Restoration of anatomical shape and early return to function of the injured leg. INDICATIONS: All inter- and subtrochanteric fractures of AO type 31-A without limitation. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Open physes and unsuitable femoral shaft anatomy (increased anterior bow of femoral shaft or malunion after femoral fracture). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: If possible closed, otherwise open fracture reduction on a fracture table and unreamed intramedullary nailing. Fixation of the fracture by insertion of a helical blade via a guide wire in the head-neck fragment of the femur. Option of static or dynamic locking at the femoral diaphysis. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Early mobilization immediately the day after surgery with full weight-bearing and use of assistive device, as tolerated. Thrombosis prophylaxis for 6 weeks with fondaparinux, rivaroxaban or a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), alternatively oral anticoagulation. RESULTS: Between April 2004 and June 2005, the AO multicenter study at 11 European trauma centers included 313 patients (mean age 80.6 years, 77% women, 23% men) with 315 unstable trochanteric fractures treated with a Peroximal Femoral Nail Antirotation® (PFNΑ®) device for consecutive follow-up [24]. In 82%, the fractures were 31-A2, while in 18% the fractures were 31-A3. Average operation time for A2 fractures was 56 min and 66 min for A3 fractures. Average duration of hospital stay in the trauma center was 12 days. Surgical reduction and fracture fixation that permitted full weight-bearing immediately after operation was achieved in 72% of cases. Of 165 complications, 46 were surgery-related with unplanned revision surgery in 28 cases (including 7 femur fractures and 4 acetabular penetrations). Follow-up for more than 1 year was possible in 56% of patients. After 1 year, 89% of the fractures were consolidated. The highest complication rate was found in fractures type 31-A2.3 and in patients older than 90 years. The recorded number of implant-related complications (14.6%) is comparable to the results of other intramedullary and extramedullary implants.

Impact of a multifunctional image-guided therapy suite on emergency multiple trauma care.

BACKGROUND: The multifunctional image-guided therapy suite (MIGTS), a combined diagnostic and operating theatre, is currently the subject of considerable interest. This study investigated the effect of instituting a MIGTS on the emergency treatment of multiply injured patients. METHODS: This prospective controlled intervention study (MIGTS versus conventional treatment) included consecutive multiply injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score of 16 or more) admitted between February 2003 and April 2005 to a university hospital. Main outcome measures were time to computed tomography (CT) and number of in-hospital transfers. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were enrolled, 87 in the MIGTS and 81 in the control group. On average, CT was started at least 13 min sooner in the MIGTS group (P < 0.001), and these patients underwent fewer within-hospital transfers before arrival in the intensive care unit (median 2 versus 4 for controls; odds ratio -2.92, P < 0.001). Team members indicated increased satisfaction with the quality of the MIGTS procedure over the course of the study (P = 0.009). Thirty-day mortality rate (17 per cent for MIGTS versus 22 per cent for controls; P = 0.420) and long-term outcome did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a MIGTS in the emergency treatment of multiple trauma significantly accelerated the procedure and reduced the number of in-hospital transports. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT0072213 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Positioning accuracy in a registration-free CT-based navigation system.

In order to maintain overall navigation accuracy established by a calibration procedure in our CT-based registration-free navigation system, the CT scanner has to repeatedly generate identical volume images of a target at the same coordinates. We tested the positioning accuracy of the prototype of an advanced workplace for image-guided surgery (AWIGS) which features an operating table capable of direct patient transfer into a CT scanner. Volume images (N = 154) of a specialized phantom were analysed for translational shifting after various table translations. Variables included added weight and phantom position on the table. The navigation system's calibration accuracy was determined (bias 2.1 mm, precision +/- 0.7 mm, N = 12). In repeated use, a bias of 3.0 mm and a precision of +/- 0.9 mm (N = 10) were maintainable. Instances of translational image shifting were related to the table-to-CT scanner docking mechanism. A distance scaling error when altering the table's height was detected. Initial prototype problems visible in our study causing systematic errors were resolved by repeated system calibrations between interventions. We conclude that the accuracy achieved is sufficient for a wide range of clinical applications in surgery and interventional radiology.

Medical technology integration: CT, angiography, imaging-capable OR-table, navigation and robotics in a multifunctional sterile suite.

Technology integration is an enabling technological prerequisite to achieve a major breakthrough in sophisticated intra-operative imaging, navigation and robotics in minimally invasive and/or emergency diagnosis and therapy. Without a high degree of integration and reliability comparable to that achieved in the aircraft industry image guidance in its different facets will not ultimately succeed. As of today technology integration in the field of image-guidance is close to nonexistent. Technology integration requires inter-departmental integration of human and financial resources and of medical processes in a dialectic way. This expanded techno-socio-economic integration has profound consequences for the administration and working conditions in hospitals. At the university hospital of Basel, Switzerland, a multimodality multifunction sterile suite was put into operation after a substantial pre-run. We report the lessons learned during our venture into the world of medical technology integration and describe new possibilities for similar integration projects in the future.

[Quality management of interdisciplinary treatment of polytrauma. Possibilities and limits of retrospective routine data collection]. / Qualitätssicherung interdisziplinärer Polytraumaversorgung. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen retrospektiver Standarderfassung.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of interdisciplinary multiple trauma management using routinely taken data. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all multiple traumatized patients [Injury Severity Score (ISS)>15] in a university hospital (n=172; time period 01.01.1997-31.12.1999) was carried out concerning epidemiological and clinical variables and hospital outcome (p<0.05). RESULTS: The overall mortality was 22% [n=38; expected Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) mortality 29%]. Significant parameters for worse outcome in univariate analysis were age>74 years, hypotension, decreasing hemoglobin level and prothrombin time, decreased Glasgow Coma Scale and the number of erythrocyte or plasma concentrates received in the initial period of treatment. The comparison of our results with the data of the German Association for Trauma Surgery registry demonstrated comparable results with respect to management sequence and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In the quality management of multiple trauma patients retrospective analysis of routinely registered parameters can be a reliable and practical alternative to time-consuming prospective studies when based on prognostic relevant data. Such a procedure allows a preliminary critical comparison with other centers.

A less invasive anterior intrapelvic approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures and pelvic ring injuries.

BACKGROUND: The ilioinguinal approach by Letournel has fundamentally contributed to the successful treatment of acetabular fractures. Since most of the present complications arise from soft tissue structures in the inguinal part, it would be desirable to avoid the surgical dissection of this region. We have therefore developed a less invasive anterior intrapelvic approach consisting of a suprapubic access combined with the lateral window of the ilioinguinal approach. METHODS: Between January 2000 and October 2002, 14 patients with acetabular fractures and 6 patients with pelvic ring injuries were consecutively operated using our technique. The patients were prospectively followed up clinically and by standard X-rays for 1 year. RESULTS: In 19 patients the technique was successful and only one patient was converted to an ilioinguinal approach due to difficulties in reducing the fracture. Our access allowed good visibility but reduction manoeuvres were sometimes difficult and the development of a new reduction forceps became necessary. Anatomical and satisfactory reduction was achieved in 13 acetabular fractures and 4 pelvic ring injuries. One cutaneous femoris neurapraxy and one superficial infection occurred related to the approach and both resolved with conservative treatment. Clinical outcome at one year was good to excellent in 17 patients (modified Merle d'Aubigné/Postel score). In 3 patients the result was fair to poor for reasons unrelated to the approach. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach permits visualisation of the entire anterior column and pelvic ring without the necessity to dissect the inguinal neurovascular structures. Our preliminary results demonstrate that safe reduction and stable fixation of selected acetabular- and pelvic ring fractures are possible.

[Interdisciplinary emergency room management of trauma patients from the standpoint of coworkers]. / Interdisziplinäres Schockraum-Management unfallchirurgischer Patienten aus der Sicht der Mitarbeitenden.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine whether staff questionnaire evaluation is useful for quality control in the emergency room (ER) setting. METHODS: Consecutive anonymous questionnaires (Likert scale 1-5) were filled out by the involved medical staff in all ER trauma cases in a university hospital from July 2002 to December 2003 (analysis of variance, P<0.05). RESULTS: In 171 ER cases, 844 staff members responded. Main criticisms concerned time management or satisfaction with personal ER training (Likert <4). Consultants rated the quality of their training significantly higher than younger doctors, two thirds of consultants vs one third of residents having passed an Advanced Trauma and Life Support course (P<0.001). Depending on responders' professional specialties and whether the situation concerned multiple trauma (Injury Severity Score >15), a significant systematic difference resulted. CONCLUSION: Our standardized staff questionnaire evaluation was revealed to be a discriminative instrument for quality management of trauma cases in the ER. To confirm these findings, correlation with clinical outcome data and further validation of the method are needed.

Fixation principles in metaphyseal bone--a patent based review.

Osteoporotic changes start in cancellous bone due to the underlying pathophysiology. Consequently, the metaphyses are at a higher risk of "osteoporotic" fracture than the diaphysis. Furthermore, implant purchase to fix these fractures is also affected by the poor bone quality. In general, researchers and developers have worked on three different approaches to address the problem of fractures to osteoporotic bone: adapted anchoring techniques, improved load distribution as well as transfer with angular stable screws, and augmentation techniques using bone substitutes. A patent-based review was performed to evaluate which ideas were utilized to improve fixation in osteoporotic, metaphyseal bone, especially in the proximal femur, and to analyze whether the concept had entered clinical use. Anchoring devices that are either extramedullary or intramedullary have a long clinical history. However, demanding surgical techniques and complications, especially in poor quality bone, are justification that such implants and their corresponding surgical techniques need to be improved upon. Expanding elements have been evaluated in the laboratory. The results are promising and the potential of this approach has yet to be fully exploited in the clinics. Internal fixators with angular stable screws open the door for many new anchorage ideas and have great potential for further optimization of load distribution and transfer. Augmentation techniques may improve anchorage in osteoporotic bone. However, the properties of bone substitute materials will need to be modified and improved upon in order to meet the demanding requirements. If we summarise the development process and the clinical use of implants to date, we have to clearly state that more factors than simply biomechanical advantage will determine the clinical success of a new fixation principle or a new implant. Instead, fracture treatment of patients with osteoporosis really needs an interdisciplinary approach!