RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Controlled trials have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and BRCA1 or BRCA2 alterations (BRCAalt). However, the reported efficacy of PARPi for alterations in other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes is less consistent. We sought to evaluate the routine practice effectiveness of PARPi between and within these groups. DESIGN: Patient-level data from a deidentified nationwide (USA-based) cancer clinico-genomic database between January 2011 and September 2023 were extracted. Patients with mCRPC and comprehensive genomic profiling by liquid biopsy [circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)] or tissue (tumor) biopsy and who received single-agent PARPi were included and grouped by BRCAalt, ATMalt, other HRR, or no HRR. We further subcategorized BRCAalt into homozygous loss (BRCAloss) and all other deleterious BRCAalt (otherBRCAalt). RESULTS: A total of 445 patients met inclusion criteria: 214 with tumor and 231 with ctDNA. BRCAalt had more favorable outcomes to PARPi compared with ATM, other HRR, and no HRR groups. Within the BRCAalt subgroup, compared with other BRCAalt, BRCAloss had a more favorable time to next treatment (median 9 versus 19.4 months, P = 0.005), time to treatment discontinuation (median 8 versus 14 months, P = 0.006), and routine practice overall survival (median 14.7 versus 19.4 months, P = 0.016). Tumor BRCAloss prevalence (3.1%) was similar to ctDNA prevalence in liquid biopsy specimens with high tumor fraction (>20%). BRCAloss was not detected in orthogonal germline testing. CONCLUSIONS: PARPi routine practice effectiveness between groups mirrors prospective trials. Within the BRCAalt group, BRCAloss had the best outcomes. Unless the ctDNA tumor fraction is very high, somatic tissue testing (archival or metastatic) should be prioritized to identify patients who may benefit most from PARPi. When tissue testing is not clinically feasible, sufficient ctDNA tumor fraction levels for detection are enriched at clinical timepoints associated with tumor progression.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that progresses on androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) may continue to be driven by AR signaling. BMS-986365 is an orally administered ligand-directed degrader targeting the AR via a first-in-class dual mechanism of AR degradation and antagonism. CC-94676-PCA-001 (NCT04428788) is a phase 1 multicenter study of BMS-986365 in patients with progressive mCRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who progressed on androgen deprivation therapy, ≥ 1 ARPI, and taxane chemotherapy (unless declined/ineligible) were enrolled. The study included dose escalation (Part A) and expansion (Part B) of BMS-986365 up to 900 mg twice daily (BID). Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and to define maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Key secondary endpoints included decline in prostate-specific antigen ≥50% (PSA50) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). RESULTS: Parts A and B enrolled 27 and 68 patients, respectively. In Part B, the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2-11). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were asymptomatic prolonged corrected QT interval (47%) and bradycardia (34%). Part A MTD was not reached and RP2D selection is ongoing. Across Part B three highest doses (400-900 mg BID, n = 60), PSA50 was 32% (n = 19), including 50% (n = 10/20) at 900 mg; median rPFS (95% CI) was 6.3 months (5.3-12.6), including 8.3 months (3.8-16.6) at 900 mg; and rPFS was longer in patients without versus with prior chemotherapy: 16.5 months (5.5-not evaluable) versus 5.5 months (2.7-8.3), respectively. Efficacy was observed in patients with AR ligand binding domain (LBD) WT or with AR LBD mutations. CONCLUSIONS: BMS-986365 was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile, and demonstrated activity in heavily pretreated patients with potentially higher benefit in chemotherapy-naïve patients. These data show BMS-986365's potential to overcome resistance to current ARPIs, regardless of AR LBD mutation status.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Genomic analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly incorporated into the clinical management of patients with advanced cancer. Beyond tumor profiling, ctDNA analysis also can enable calculation of circulating tumor fraction (TF), which has previously been found to be prognostic. While most prognostic models in metastatic cancer are tumor type specific and require significant patient-level data, quantification of TF in ctDNA has the potential to serve as a pragmatic, tumor-agnostic prognostic tool. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study utilized a cohort of patients in a nationwide de-identified clinico-genomic database with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), metastatic breast cancer (mBC), advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing liquid biopsy testing as part of routine care. TF was calculated based on single-nucleotide polymorphism aneuploidy across the genome. Clinical, disease, laboratory, and treatment data were captured from the electronic health record. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by TF level while controlling for relevant covariables. RESULTS: A total of 1725 patients were included: 198 mCRPC, 402 mBC, 902 aNSCLC, and 223 mCRC. TF ≥10% was highly correlated with OS in univariable analyses for all cancer types: mCRPC [hazard ratio (HR) 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.04-5.34, P < 0.001], mBC (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.71-3.37, P < 0.001), aNSCLC (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.34-2.1, P < 0.001), and mCRC (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.39-3.2, P < 0.001). Multivariable assessments of TF had similar point estimates and CIs, suggesting a consistent and independent association with survival. Exploratory analysis showed that TF remained consistently prognostic across a wide range of cutpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma ctDNA TF is a pragmatic, independent prognostic biomarker across four advanced cancers with potential to guide clinical conversations around expected treatment outcomes. With further prospective validation, ctDNA TF could be incorporated into care paradigms to enable precision escalation and de-escalation of cancer therapy based on patient-level tumor biology.