Successful Fracture Healing for Femoral Neck Nonunion with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fractures in the young patient require prompt anatomic reduction and stabilization to preserve the vascular supply to the femoral head and minimize future need for arthroplasty. Secondary to unique biomechanical and vascular considerations, these injuries are prone to nonunion. CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old male with a chronic femoral neck fracture nonunion who experienced successful fracture healing and symptom resolution following Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) administration. DISCUSSION: Femoral neck nonunion in young patients is a challenging problem with treatment strategies aimed at improving the biological and biomechanical fracture environment. While the use of both vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafting has shown promising results, they have high complication rates and substantial donor site morbidity. BMAC has demonstrated multiple uses throughout orthopedic surgery and may result in an improved fracture healing environment with minimal patient morbidity. CONCLUSION: The success of the BMAC procedure for this patient is promising and may be considered in similar patients, with or without revision internal fixation methods.

Analysis of Patients' Online Reviews of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Physician rating websites (PRWs) are an increasingly popular interface between patient and surgeon. Despite the growing popularity of PRWs, little guidance exists for orthopaedic surgeons regarding online reviews. We analyzed online ratings and comments to provide a better understanding of patients' values and expectations so that surgeons can tailor their practice accordingly to enhance their clinical care and online reputation. METHODS: Three common PRWs (Vitals, HealthGrades, and RateMDs) were queried from January 1, 2006, to May 18, 2020. Publicly available ratings, both quantitative (1 to 5 stars) and qualitative (free text comments), were collected. Comments were qualitatively tabulated as having positive or negative assessments for categories including outcome, personality, staff, surgical skill, visit time, bedside manner, wait time, diagnosis, knowledge, treatment, and advanced practice providers and analyzed using chi square goodness of fit. Quantitative comparisons of star ratings were made across surgeon years in practice, sex, practice setting, and PRW and compared using chi square independence testing. RESULTS: In total, 81% of patient comments were found to have a positive assessment. Comments regarding outcome (P < 0.001), staff (P = 0.001), surgical skill (P < 0.001), or knowledge (P = 0.001) were more likely to be positive. Reviews regarding bedside manner (P < 0.001), wait time (P < 0.001), diagnosis (P < 0.001), treatment (P < 0.001), or advanced practice providers (P < 0.001) were more likely to be negative. Surgeon sex was not associated with a difference in quantitative ratings (P = 0.131), unlike practice setting (P < 0.001) and PRW (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: PRWs are a growing interface between surgeon and patient with a considerable effect on surgeon marketability. This study reveals a statistical association between certain patient-centered medical practices and positive patient reviews. This emphasizes the importance of ensuring that high standards are maintained throughout a physician's practice of maintaining a constant awareness of the fundamentals for effective patient care and of taking care to curate a physician's online presence.

Is Opioid-Limiting Legislation Effective for Hand Surgery Patients?

BACKGROUND: The Rhode Island State Legislature passed the Uniform Controlled Substances Act in 2016 to limit opioid prescriptions. We aimed to objectively evaluate its effect on opioid prescribing for hand surgery patients and also identify risk factors for prolonged opioid use. METHODS: A 6-month period (January-June 2016) prior to passage of the law was compared with a period following its implementation (July-December 2017). Thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty and distal radius fracture fixation were classified as "major surgery" and carpal tunnel and trigger finger release as "minor surgery." Prescription Drug Monitoring Database was used to review controlled substances filled during the study periods. RESULTS: A total of 1380 patients met our inclusion criteria, with 644 prelaw and 736 postlaw patients. Patients undergoing "major surgery" saw a significant decrease in the number of pills issued in the first postoperative prescription (41.1 vs 21.0) and a corresponding decrease in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (318.6 vs 159.2 MMEs) after implementation. A 30% decrease in MMEs was also seen in those undergoing "major surgery" in the first 30 days postoperatively (544.7 vs 381.7 MMEs). Risk factors for prolonged opioid use included male sex and preoperative opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: In Rhode Island, opioid-limiting legislation resulted in a significant decrease in the number of pills and MMEs of the initial prescription and a 30% decrease in total MMEs in the 30-day postoperative period after "major hand surgery." Additional research is needed to explore the association between legislation and clinical outcomes.

Parenthood Among Orthopedic Surgery Residents: Assessment of Resident and Program Director Perceptions on Training.

Orthopedic residency training overlaps with common childbearing ages. The purpose of this study was to describe factors affecting male and female residents' family-planning decisions and attitudes of program directors (PDs) toward parenthood during residency. In 2018, using an anonymous survey model, residents and PDs in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopedic surgery programs were asked about their perceptions of parenthood on training, the availability of family-oriented services at their programs, and the effect of residency culture and policies on their decision to have children. This survey occurred in 2018. Three hundred forty-nine (76.2%) of 458 resident respondents were male and 109 (23.8%) were female. Two hundred four (49.9%) of 409 residents were unsure of their program's parental leave policy. Male residents reported taking an average of 0.8 weeks (95% CI, 0.0-4.0 weeks) of parental leave and females an average of 4.6 weeks (95% CI, 2.0-6.5 weeks) (P<.001). Female residents were more likely to report delaying having children during residency (56.73% vs 38.71%, P=.001) and were more likely to cite reputational concerns (57.63% vs 0.76%, P<.001) and effects on career opportunities (42.37% vs 7.57%, P<.001) as reasons for delaying parenthood. The most commonly cited negative effect of parenthood on residency training by PDs was reduction in off-duty educational time (15 of 29, 51.72%). Twenty-four (80%) of 30 PDs believe that training may need to be extended based on amount of maternity/paternity leave time taken off. Although parenthood during orthopedic training is common, both male and female residents reported delaying parenthood because of residency-related factors. Improved clarification of leave policies and establishment of clear guidelines for parenthood in residency may improve resident wellness. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):98-104.].

Modifying the RAPT Score to Reflect Discharge Destination in Current Practice.

BACKGROUND: The Risk Assessment Prediction Tool (RAPT) is a validated 6-question survey designed to predict primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients' discharge disposition. It is scored from 1 to 12 with patients stratified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups. Given recent advancements in rapid-discharge protocols and increasing utilization of home services, the RAPT score may require modified scoring cutoffs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing primary TJA at a single academic center over 14 months was performed. The RAPT score was implemented during the sixth month. Patients undergoing revision TJA, complex TJA, and TJA after resection of malignancy were excluded. Outcomes before and after RAPT implementation were analyzed with additional subanalysis investigating of post-RAPT data. RESULTS: A total of 1264 patients (624 Pre-RAPT and 640 Post-RAPT) were evaluated. The post-RAPT group (245 total hip arthroplasty and 395 total knee arthroplasty) experienced significant decreases in mean hospital length of stay (2.22 days pre-RAPT to 1.82 days post-RAPT, P < .001) and the proportion of patients discharged to facility (21.8% pre-RAPT to 15.2% post-RAPT, P = .002). The modified system demonstrated the highest overall predictive accuracy at 92% and was found to be predictive of hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION: Owing to the recent trends favoring in-home services over rehab facility after discharge, previously published RAPT scoring cutoffs are inaccurate for modern practice. Using mRAPT cutoffs maximizes the number of patients for whom a discharge prediction can be made, while maintaining excellent predictive accuracy.

Larger Initial Opioid Prescriptions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty Are Associated with Greater Risk of Prolonged Use.

BACKGROUND: The ongoing U.S. opioid epidemic threatens quality of life and poses substantial economic and safety burdens to opioid abusers and their communities, physicians, and health-care systems. Public health experts have argued that prescription opioids are implicated in this epidemic; however, opioid dosing following surgical procedures remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between initial opioid prescribing following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the risk and quantity of long-term opioid use. METHODS: Patients undergoing THA or TKA from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2016, were identified. Preoperative 30-day opioid and benzodiazepine exposures were evaluated using the Rhode Island Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) in the postoperative inpatient stay, initial outpatient opioid prescription, and prescriptions filled from 31 to 90 days (prolonged use) and 91 to 150 days (chronic use) following the surgical procedure were calculated. Regression analyses evaluated the association between the initial postoperative opioid dosing and prolonged or chronic use, controlling for demographic characteristics, procedure, preoperative opioid and benzodiazepine exposures, anesthesia type, and use of a peripheral nerve block. RESULTS: A total of 507 patients (198 who underwent a THA and 309 who underwent a TKA) were identified. Increased inpatient opioid dosing (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 per 1 standard deviation increase in inpatient opioid MMEs; p = 0.001) and increased dosing in the first outpatient prescription (OR, 1.26 per 1 standard deviation increase in initial outpatient prescription MMEs; p = 0.049) were each independently associated with an increased risk of prolonged opioid use. Additionally, increased inpatient dosing postoperatively was strongly associated with a greater risk of chronic use (OR, 1.77 per 1 standard deviation increase in inpatient MMEs; p < 0.001). Among the 30% (151 of 507) of patients requiring prolonged postoperative opioids, each 1-MME increase in the initial outpatient prescription dose was associated with a 0.997-MME increase in quantity filled during the prolonged period (p < 0.001). Among the 14% (73 of 507) of patients requiring chronic opioids, every 1-MME increase in the initial outpatient dose was associated with a 1.678-MME increase in chronic opioid dosing (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Increased opioid dosing in the early postoperative period following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is associated with an increased risk of extended opioid use. A dose-dependent relationship between initial outpatient dosing and greater future quantities consumed by those with prolonged usage and those with chronic usage was noted. This study suggests that providers should attempt to minimize inpatient and early outpatient opioid utilization following TJA. Multimodal pain management strategies may be employed to assist in achieving adequate pain control while minimizing opioid utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Suture Stabilization of Open Physeal Fractures of the Great Toe Distal Phalanx (Seymour Fracture).

BACKGROUND: Open physeal fractures of the distal phalanx of the hallux are analogous to Seymour fractures of the hand. When missed, these injuries can result in long-term sequelae including infection, pain, nail deformity, and physeal arrest. Nevertheless, there is a paucity in the literature regarding optimal surgical treatment for these challenging injuries. We present a novel technique and case series for suture-only stabilization of Seymour fractures of the great toe. METHODS: Billing records were used to identify all children aged 18 years or younger who underwent operative treatment open distal phalanx fracture of the hallux with an associated nail bed injury. Electronic medical records and plain imaging were reviewed to identify mechanism of injury, surgical technique, results, complications, and follow-up. RESULTS: Five boys with a mean age of 10.3 years (range, 5 to 13 y) met inclusion criteria. Forty percent (2/5) of injuries were missed by the initial treating providers. Only 2 patients presented to our institution primarily; 60% (3/5) patients were transferred from other facilities. The mechanism of injury was variable but generally involved "stubbing" the toe. The mean time from injury to surgical treatment was 2.6 days (range, 0 to 6 d). Median follow-up was 2 months (range, 1 to 96 mo). No patient complications (including infection) or reoperations were reported. On follow-up imaging, no physeal bars were evident on patients treated with suture-only technique. CONCLUSIONS: Seymour fracture of the hallux are uncommon, and there is frequently a delay in both presentation and diagnosis. Providers should have increased suspicion for these injuries when a physeal fracture of the great toe is associated with bleeding or nail bed injury. Currently, no consensus exists for treatment of these injuries. Suture-only stabilization represents a simple, reliable alternative to pin fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective case series.

Concussion: Mechanisms of Injury and Trends from 1997 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: There is limited long-term epidemiological data focused on concussions in the United States. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was queried from 1997 to 2019 for concussion diagnoses. National incidence rates, stratified by age and sex, were estimated. Injury mechanisms were ranked. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2019, there was a 3-fold increase in the diagnosis of concussion from 82,103 (95% CI 77,650-86,555) in 1997 to 261,722 (95% CI 212,156-311,288) in 2019 (p<0.001). Fall-related head-injury mechanisms were most common in very young (<5 year old) and older (>65 year old) patients. Sports-related injuries were most common in those age 5-24 years old. CONCLUSIONS: It remains unclear if the observed two-decade rise in reported concussions represents a true increase in incidence or is indicative of improvements in early detection, diagnosis, and treatment during this time period. Common injury mechanisms described highlight the need for improved age-specific safety recommendations.

Patients Who Undergo Primary Lumbar Spine Fusion After Recent but Not Remote Total Hip Arthroplasty Are at Increased Risk for Complications, Revision Surgery, and Prolonged Opioid Use.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a recent history of total hip arthroplasty (THA) on primary lumbar spine fusion (LSF) for concurrent hip and spine disease. METHODS: A total of 98,242 patient records from the PearlDiver Database were evaluated and divided into 3 cohorts: 1) patients with a history of LSF alone, 2) patients with a history of LSF for newly diagnosed lumbar disease after having a remote THA> 2 years previously, and 3) patients with a history of LSF after having recent THA <2 years before LSF who initially presented with concurrent hip and lumbar spine disease and underwent THA before LSF. Postoperative outcomes were assessed with multivariable logistic regression to determine the effect of THA on outcomes after LSF with respect to postoperative complications, LSF revision rates, and opioid use. RESULTS: Patients who had LSF after a recent THA had increased risk of deep venous thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.39; P = 0.0191), neurologic complications (aOR, 1.81; P = 0.0459), prolonged opioid use (aOR, 1.22; P = 0.0032), and revision LSF (12.8%; P = 0.0004 vs. 9.9%; OR, 1.41; P < 0.0001; hazard ratio, 1.69; P < 0.0001). Patients who underwent LSF after a remote history of THA had no significant difference in DVT (4.2% vs. 2.6%, aOR, 1.31; P = 0.2190), neurologic complications (1.0% vs. 0.5%, aOR, 2.02; P = 0.1220), revision surgery (9.6% vs. 9.9%, aOR, 1.06; P = 0.7197), or prolonged opioid use (36.5% vs. 24.4%, aOR, 1.17; P = 0.1120). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo LSF with a history of THA may be at increased risk of postoperative complications, revision LSF, and prolonged opioid use if their THA was performed for concurrent hip-spine disease in the recent past (<2 years).

Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty: An Evaluation of Gender and Racial Diversity Compared with Other Specialties.

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has adopted the strategic goal of evolving its culture and governance to become more strategic, innovative, and diverse. Given the charge to increase diversity, a focus on assessing and increasing diversity at the faculty level may help this cause. However, an analysis of gender and racial diversity among orthopaedic faculty has not been performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate faculty appointments for underrepresented minority (URM) and female orthopaedic surgeons. We also aim to draw comparisons between orthopaedic surgery and other specialties. METHODS: Data on gender, race, and faculty rank (clinical instructor, assistant professor, associate professor, and professor) of academic faculty for 18 specialties from 1997 to 2017 were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Faculty Roster. Assistant professors were designated as junior faculty, whereas associate professor and professor were considered senior faculty. URMs were defined using the AAMC definition-groups having lower representation than in the general population. Regression analysis was used to evaluate and compare the change over time and to compare the change across different specialties. RESULTS: Over the 20-year study period, the number of female faculty increased (8.8% pts) but represents a lower proportion than other specialties (13.9% pts) (p = 0.029). Female orthopaedic senior faculty grew slower (7.3% pts) than other specialties (14.7% pts) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the growth of URM faculty positions (2.0% pts) compared with all other specialties (2.4% pts) (p = 0.165). The proportion of orthopaedic URM senior faculty increased less (0.5% pts) than other specialties (2.5% pts) (p < 0.001), whereas more orthopaedic URM junior faculty were added than other specialties (2.2% pts) (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Although orthopaedic surgery has increased the representation of female and URM faculty members, it continues to lag behind other specialties. In addition, fewer female and URM orthopaedic faculty members obtained senior faculty status than other specialties. To address the differences seen in faculty diversity, a concerted effort should be made to recruit and promote more diverse faculty, given similar qualifications and capabilities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV.

Complications of Thoracolumbar Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a challenging problem for spine surgeons given the high risk of complications, both medical and surgical. Surgeons should have a high index of suspicion for medical complications, including cardiac, pulmonary, thromboembolic, genitourinary and gastrointestinal, renal, cognitive and psychiatric, and skin conditions, in the perioperative period and have a low threshold for involving specialists. Surgical complications, including neurologic injuries, vascular injuries, proximal junctional kyphosis, durotomy, and pseudarthrosis and rod fracture, can be devastating for the patient and costly to the health-care system. Mortality rates have been reported to be between 1.0% and 3.5% following ASD surgery. With the increasing rate of ASD surgery, surgeons should properly counsel patients about these risks and have a high index of suspicion for complications in the perioperative period.

Assessment of Patient Outcomes and Proximal Junctional Failure Rate of Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Undergoing Caudal Extension of Previous Spinal Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: This case series examined patients undergoing caudal extension of prior fusion without alteration of the prior upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) to assess patient outcomes and rates of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK)/proximal junctional failure (PJF). METHODS: Patients eligible for 2-year minimum follow-up undergoing caudal extension of prior fusion with unchanged UIVs were identified. These patients were evaluated for PJK/PJF, and patient reported outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 40 patients were included. Mean follow-up duration was 2.2 ± 0.3 years. Patients in this cohort had poor preoperative sagittal alignment (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] 26.7°, T1 pelvic angle [TPA] 29.0°, sagittal vertical axis [SVA] 93.4 mm) and achieved substantial sagittal correction (ΔSVA -62.2 mm, ΔPI-LL -19.8°, ΔTPA -11.1°) after caudal extension surgery. At final follow-up, there was a 0% rate of PJF among patients undergoing caudal extension of previous fusion without creation of a new UIV, but 27.5% of patients experienced PJK. Patients experienced significant improvement in both the Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society-22r total score at 2 years postoperatively (P < 0.05). In total, 7.5% (n = 3) of patients underwent further revision, at an average of 1.1 ± 0.54 years after the surgery with unaltered UIV. All 3 of these patients underwent revision for rod fracture with no revisions for PJK/PJF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing caudal extension of previous fusions for sagittal alignment correction have high rates of clinical success, low revision surgery rates, and very low rates of PJF. Minimizing repetitive tissue trauma at the UIV may result in decreased PJF risk because the PJF rate in this cohort of patients with unaltered UIV is below historical PJF rates of patients undergoing sagittal balance correction.

Has a Prescription-limiting Law in Rhode Island Helped to Reduce Opioid Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: In the United States, since 2016, at least 28 of 50 state legislatures have passed laws regarding mandatory prescribing limits for opioid medications. One of the earliest state laws (which was passed in Rhode Island in 2016) restricted the maximum morphine milligram equivalents provided in the first postoperative prescription for patients defined as opioid-naïve to 30 morphine milligram equivalents per day, 150 total morphine milligram equivalents, or 20 total doses. While such regulations are increasingly common in the United States, their effects on opioid use after total joint arthroplasty are unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are legislative limitations to opioid prescriptions in Rhode Island associated with decreased opioid use in the immediate (first outpatient prescription postoperatively), 30-day, and 90-day periods after THA and TKA? (2) Is this law associated with similar changes in postoperative opioid use among patients who are opioid-naïve and those who are opioid-tolerant preoperatively? METHODS: Patients undergoing primary THA or TKA between January 1, 2016 and June 28, 2016 (before the law was passed on June 28, 2016) were retrospectively compared with patients undergoing surgery between June 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 (after the law's implementation on April 17, 2017). The lapse between the pre-law and post-law periods was designed to avoid confounding from potential voluntary practice changes by physicians after the law was passed but before its mandatory implementation. Demographic and surgical details were extracted from a large multi-specialty orthopaedic group's surgical billing database using Current Procedural Terminology codes 27130 and 27447. Any patients undergoing revision procedures, same-day bilateral arthroplasties, or a second primary THA or TKA in the 3-month followup period were excluded. Secondary data were confirmed by reviewing individual electronic medical records in the associated hospital system which included three major hospital sites. We evaluated 1125 patients. In accordance with the state's department of health guidelines, patients were defined as opioid-tolerant if they had filled any prescription for an opioid medication in the 30-day preoperative period. Data on age, gender, and the proportion of patients who were defined as opioid tolerant preoperatively were collected and found to be no different between the pre-law and post-law groups. The state's prescription drug monitoring program database was used to collect data on prescriptions for all controlled substances filled between 30 days preoperatively and 90 days postoperatively. The primary outcomes were the mean morphine milligram equivalents of the initial outpatient postoperative opioid prescription after discharge and the mean cumulative morphine milligram equivalents at the 30- and 90-day postoperative intervals. Secondary analyses included subgroup analyses by procedure and by preoperative opioid tolerance. RESULTS: After the law was implemented, the first opioid prescriptions were smaller for patients who were opioid-naïve (mean 156 ± 106 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 451 ± 296 before, mean difference 294 morphine milligram equivalents; p < 0.001) and those who were opioid-tolerant (263 ± 265 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 534 ± 427 before, mean difference 271 morphine milligram equivalents; p < 0.001); however, for cumulative prescriptions in the first 30 days postoperatively, this was only true among patients who were previously opioid-naïve (501 ± 416 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 796 ± 597 before, mean difference 295 morphine milligram equivalents; p < 0.001). Those who were opioid-tolerant did not have a decrease in the cumulative number of 30-day morphine milligram equivalents (1288 ± 1632 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 1398 ± 1274 before, mean difference 110 morphine milligram equivalents; p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: The prescription-limiting law was associated with a decline in cumulative opioid prescriptions at 30 days postoperatively filled by patients who were opioid-naïve before total joint arthroplasty. This may substantially impact public health, and these policies should be considered an important tool for healthcare providers, communities, and policymakers who wish to combat the current opioid epidemic. However, given the lack of a discernible effect on cumulative opioids filled from 30 to 90 days postoperatively, further investigations are needed to evaluate more effective policies to prevent prolonged opioid use after total joint arthroplasty, particularly in patients who are opioid-tolerant preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Opioid-limiting legislation associated with decreased 30-day opioid utilization following anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Since 2016, 35 of 50 US states have passed opioid-limiting laws. The impact on postoperative opioid prescribing and secondary outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of opioid-limiting regulations on postoperative opioid prescriptions, emergency department (ED) visits, unplanned readmissions, and reoperations following elective ACDF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of prospectively-collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred and eleven patients (101 pre-law, 110 post-law) undergoing primary elective 1-3 level ACDF during specified pre-law (December 1st, 2015-June 30th, 2016) and post-law (June 1st, 2017-December 31st, 2017) study periods were evaluated. METHODS: Demographic, medical, surgical, clinical, and pharmacological data was collected from all patients. Total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) filled was compared at 30-day postoperative intervals, before and after stratification by preoperative opioid-tolerance. Thirty- and 90-day ED visit, readmission, and reoperation rates were calculated. Independent predictors of increased 30-day and chronic (>90 day) opioid utilization were evaluated. RESULTS: Demographic, medical, and surgical factors were similar pre-law versus post-law (all p>.05). Post-law, ACDF patients received fewer opioids in their first postoperative prescription (26.65 vs. 62.08 pills, p<.001; 202.23 vs. 549.18 MMEs, p<.001) and in their first 30 postoperative days (cumulative 30-day MMEs 444.14 vs. 877.87, p<.001). Furthermore, post-law reductions in cumulative 30-day MMEs were seen among both opioid-naïve (363.54 vs. 632.20 MMEs, p<.001) and opioid-tolerant (730.08 vs. 1,122.90 MMEs, p=.022) patient populations. Increased 30-day opioid utilization was associated with surgery in the pre-law period, preoperative opioid exposure, preoperative benzodiazepine exposure, and number of levels fused (all p<.05). Chronic (>90 day) opioid requirements were associated with preoperative opioid exposure (odds ratio 4.42, p<.001) but not with pre/post-law status (p>.05). Pre- and post-law patients were similar in terms of 30- or 90-day ED visits, unplanned readmissions, and reoperations (all p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of mandatory opioid prescribing limits effectively decreased 30-day postoperative opioid utilization following ACDF without a rebound increase in prescription refills, ED visits, unplanned hospital readmissions, or reoperations for pain.

Risk of Revision Shoulder Surgery, Complications, and Prolonged Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy Who Have Previously Undergone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative complications, rates of revision, and opioid use of those who undergo shoulder arthroscopy with and without previous anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: The PearlDiver database from 2007 to 2017 was used to query all patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy as determined by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT). Patients were then separated among those who had a previous instance of ACDF and those who did not as filtered by CPT. Postoperative complications within 30 days, readmission rates, opioid use, and revision procedures were assessed for each cohort using a mix of International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Revision Clinical Modification codes, CPT, as well as generic drug codes. RESULTS: A total of 91,029 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were identified, of whom 1,267 (1.4%) had a history of ACDF. Compared with patients without previous ACDF, patients with a history of ACDF had significantly greater respiratory complication rates (1.3% vs 0.5%: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.30-3.59, P = .003), 30-day complication rates (3.7% vs 2.2%: aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-1.99, P = .011), 1-year revision rates (15.2% vs 7.7%: aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.71-2.33, P < .0001), and greater opioid use at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that patients who undergo shoulder arthroscopy with a history of ACDF are twice as likely to undergo revision arthroscopy within 2 years of surgery and are at an increased risk of complications within 30 days postoperatively as well as prolonged opioid use compared with those without a history of ACDF. With these findings, both spine and shoulder surgeons should aim to be more aware of surgical history, especially of the cervical spine, to better counsel patients' clinical course and expected outcomes following shoulder arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Opioid-Limiting Legislation Associated With Reduced Postoperative Prescribing After Surgery for Traumatic Orthopaedic Injuries.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate opioid-prescribing patterns after surgery for orthopaedic trauma before and after implementation of opioid-limiting mandates in one state. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred fifty-three patients (297 pre-law and 456 post-law) undergoing isolated fixation for 6 common fracture patterns during specified pre-law (January 1, 2016-June 28, 2016) and post-law (June 01, 2017-December 31, 2017) study periods. Polytrauma patients were excluded. INTERVENTION: Implementation of statewide legislation establishing strict limits on initial opioid prescriptions [150 total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), 30 MMEs per day, or 20 total doses]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Initial opioid prescription dose, cumulative MMEs filled by 30 and 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Pre-law and post-law patient groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, opioid tolerance, recent benzodiazepine use, or open versus closed fracture pattern (P > 0.05). The post-law cohort received significantly less opioids (363.4 vs. 173.6 MMEs, P < 0.001) in the first postoperative prescription. Furthermore, the post-law group received significantly less cumulative MMEs in the first 30 postoperative days (677.4 vs. 481.7 MMEs, P < 0.001); This included both opioid-naïve (633.7 vs. 478.1 MMEs, P < 0.001) and opioid-tolerant patients (1659.2 vs. 880.0 MMEs, P = 0.048). No significant difference in opioid utilization between pre- and post-law groups was noted after postoperative day 30. Independent risk factors for prolonged (>30 days) postoperative opioid use included male gender (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.9, P < 0.001) and preoperative opioid use (odds ratio 5.1, 95% confidence interval 2.4-10.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-limiting legislation is associated with a statistically and clinically significant reduction in initial and 30-day opioid prescriptions after surgery for orthopaedic trauma. Preoperative opioid use and male gender are independently associated with prolonged postoperative opioid use in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Opioid-Limiting Regulation: Effect on Patients Undergoing Knee and Shoulder Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect prescription-limiting legislation passed in Rhode Island has had on opioids prescribed following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery at various time points, up to 90 days postoperatively. METHODS: All patients undergoing the 3 most common arthroscopic procedures at our institution (anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, partial meniscectomy, and rotator cuff repair) were included. Patients were selected from 2 6-month study periods (prepassage and postimplementation of the law). The state's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program database was queried for controlled substances filled in the perioperative period (from 30 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively). Multiple logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of chronic (>30 days) opioid use. RESULTS: The morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed in the initial postoperative script decreased from 319.04 (∼43 5-mg oxycodone tablets) in the prepassage to 152.45 MMEs (∼20 5-mg oxycodone tablets) in the postimplementation group (P < .001). The total MMEs filled in the first 30 days decreased from 520.93 to 299.94 MMEs (∼70 to ∼40 5-mg oxycodone tablets) (P < .001). MMEs filled between 30 and 90 days fell by 22.5% for all patients in this study; however, this change was not statistically significant (P = .263). Preoperative opioid use (odds ratio, 10.85; P < .001) and preoperative benzodiazepine use (odds ratio, 2.13; P = .005) predicted chronic opioid use postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: State opioid-limiting legislation reduced cumulative MMEs following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery in the first 30 days. Further research assessing the impact of this legislation on postoperative pain control, patient satisfaction, and functional outcomes following surgery is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Upper-thoracic versus lower-thoracic upper instrumented vertebra in adult spinal deformity patients undergoing fusion to the pelvis: surgical decision-making and patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Optimal patient selection for upper-thoracic (UT) versus lower-thoracic (LT) fusion during adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction is challenging. Radiographic and clinical outcomes following UT versus LT fusion remain incompletely understood. The purposes of this study were: 1) to evaluate demographic, radiographic, and surgical characteristics associated with choice of UT versus LT fusion endpoint; and 2) to evaluate differences in radiographic, clinical, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes following UT versus LT fusion for ASD. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter ASD database was performed. Patients with ASD who underwent fusion from the sacrum/ilium to the LT (T9-L1) or UT (T1-6) spine were compared for demographic, radiographic, and surgical characteristics. Outcomes including proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), reoperation, rod fracture, pseudarthrosis, overall complications, 2-year change in alignment parameters, and 2-year HRQOL metrics (Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index, Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index) were compared after controlling for confounding factors via multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred three patients (169 LT, 134 UT) were evaluated. Independent predictors of UT fusion included greater thoracic kyphosis (odds ratio [OR] 0.97 per degree, p = 0.0098), greater coronal Cobb angle (OR 1.06 per degree, p < 0.0001), and performance of a 3-column osteotomy (3-CO; OR 2.39, p = 0.0351). While associated with longer operative times (ratio 1.13, p < 0.0001) and greater estimated blood loss (ratio 1.31, p = 0.0018), UT fusions resulted in greater sagittal vertical axis improvement (-59.5 vs -41.0 mm, p = 0.0035) and lower PJK rates (OR 0.49, p = 0.0457). No significant differences in postoperative HRQOL measures, reoperation, or overall complication rates were detected between groups (all p > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Greater deformity and need for 3-CO increased the likelihood of UT fusion. Despite longer operative times and greater blood loss, UT fusions resulted in better sagittal correction and lower 2-year PJK rates following surgery for ASD. While continued surveillance is necessary, this information may inform patient counseling and surgical decision-making.

Successful Treatment of Morel-Lavallée Lesion of the Back With Transcutaneous Transmyofascial Bolstered Progressive Tension Suturing.

The authors describe their experience in successfully treating an isolated Morel-Lavallée lesion of the lumbar spine after delayed presentation. In addition to thorough irrigation, debridement, and pseudo-capsulectomy, surgical management included transcutaneous transmyofascial bolstering with a progressive tension suturing technique to close the cavity over drains in a "quilting" fashion. This was followed by 6 days of incisional wound vacuum treatment and 13 days of drainage through 2 Jackson-Pratt drains. At 6-month follow-up, the patient noted resolution of pain and return to baseline level of functioning. No evidence of recurrence was noted. The Morel-Lavallée lesion of the low back represents a difficult soft tissue injury to treat with substantial risk of complications and recurrence. Diagnosing and treating physicians should be familiar with common injury mechanisms and clinical presentations, as well as a variety of nonoperative and operative treatment options. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):e399-e401.].

Proximal junctional failure prevention in adult spinal deformity surgery utilizing interlaminar fixation constructs.

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common complication following fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity. PJK and proximal junctional failure (PJF) may lead to pain, neurological injury, reoperation, and increased healthcare costs. Efforts to prevent PJK and PJF have aimed to preserve or reconstruct the posterior spinal tension band and/or modifying instrumentation to allow for more gradual transitions in stiffness at the cranial end of long spinal constructs. We describe placement of an interlaminar fixation construct at the upper instrumented vertebra which may decrease PJK/PJF severity, and is placed with little additional operative time and minimal posterior soft tissue trauma.