A multicentre evaluation and expert recommendations of use of the newly developed BioFire Joint Infection polymerase chain reaction panel.

Septic arthritis is a serious condition with significant morbidity and mortality, routinely diagnosed using culture. The FDA has recently approved the rapid molecular BioFire® Joint Infection Panel (BJIP) for synovial fluid. We aimed to evaluate the BJIP compared to culture and its potential use in patient management. A multicentre retrospective evaluation of BJIP was conducted in the UK and Ireland. Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated between the BJIP and routine culture. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion addressing the optimal or potential case use of the assay practice was facilitated. Three hundred ninety-nine surplus synovial fluid samples (~ 70% from native joints) from eight centres were processed using BJIP in addition to routine culture. An increased yield of positive results was detected using BJIP compared to routine culture (98 vs 83), giving an overall PPA of 91.6% and overall NPA of 93% for the BJIP compared to culture results. The BJIP detected resistant markers and additional organisms that could influence antibiotic choices including Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Kingella kingae. The MDT agreed that the assay could be used, in addition to standard methods, in adult and children patients with specialist advice use based on local needs. Rapid results from BJIP were assessed as having potential clinical impact on patient management. Organisms not included in the panel may be clinically significant and may limit the value of this test for PJI.

Delayed Tuberculosis Treatment and Cost of Care in a Low-Incidence Country.

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) elimination requires high-quality, timely care. In countries with a low incidence of TB, such as Ireland, delayed diagnosis is common. This evaluation aimed to determine the factors that predict patient-related and health care provider-related delays in TB management and to establish how TB care cost is affected by care delays. Methods: Health care records of patients with signs and symptoms of TB evaluated by a tertiary service in Ireland between July 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were reviewed to measure and determine predictors of patient-related delays, health care provider-related delays, and the cost of TB care. Outcomes were compared against benchmarks derived from the literature. Results: Thirty-seven patients were diagnosed with TB, and 51% (19/37) had pulmonary TB (PTB). The median patient-related delay was 60 days among those with PTB, greater than the benchmark derived from the literature (38 days). The median health care provider-related delay among patients with PTB was 16 days and, although similar to the benchmark (median, 22 days; minimum, 11 days; maximum, 36 days), could be improved. The health care provider-related delay among patients with EPTB was 66 days, greater than the benchmark (42 days). The cost of care was €8298 and, while similar to that reported in the literature (median, €9319; minimum, €6486; maximum, €14 750), could be improved. Patient-related delays among those with PTB predicted care costs. Conclusions: Patient-related and health care provider-related delays in TB diagnosis in Ireland must be reduced. Initiatives to do so should be resourced.