Are Chest Radiographs or Ultrasound More Accurate in Predicting a Pneumothorax or Need for a Thoracostomy Tube in Trauma Patients?

BACKGROUND: Historically, chest radiographs (CXR) have been used to quickly diagnose pneumothorax (PTX) and hemothorax in trauma patients. Over the last 2 decades, chest ultrasound (CUS) as part of Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST) has also become accepted as a modality for the early diagnosis of PTX in trauma patients. METHODS: We queried our institution's trauma databases for all trauma team activations from 2021 for patients with eFAST results. Demographics, injury variables, and the following were collected: initial eFAST CUS, CXR, computed tomography (CT) scan, and thoracostomy tube procedure notes. We then compared PTX detection rates on initial CXR and CUS to those on thoracic CT scans. RESULTS: 580 patients were included in the analysis after excluding patients without a chest CT scan within 2 hours of arrival. Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma was 68.4% sensitive and 87.5% specific for detecting a moderate-to-large PTX on chest CT, while CXR was 23.5% sensitive and 86.3% specific. Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma was 69.8% sensitive for predicting the need for tube thoracostomy, while CXR was 40.0% sensitive. DISCUSSION: At our institution, eFAST CUS was superior to CXR for diagnosing the presence of a PTX and predicting the need for a thoracostomy tube. However, neither test is accurate enough to diagnose a PTX nor predict if the patient will require a thoracostomy tube. Based on the specificity of both tests, a negative CXR or eFAST means there is a high probability that the patient does not have a PTX and will not need a chest tube.

Closed Collaborative Surgical Intensive Care Unit Modeling and Its Association With Trauma Patient Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The optimization of intensive care unit (ICU) care impacts clinical outcomes and resource utilization. In 2017, our surgical ICU (SICU) adopted a "closed-collaborative" model. The aim of this study is to compare patient outcomes in the closed-collaborative model versus the previous open model in a cohort of trauma surgical patients admitted to our adult level 1 trauma center. METHODS: A retrospective review of trauma patients in the SICU from August 1, 2015 to July 31, 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into those admitted prior to August 1, 2017 (the "open" cohort) and those admitted after August 1, 2017 (the "closed-collaborative" cohort). Demographic variables and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Trauma severity was assessed using injury severity score (ISS). RESULTS: We identified 1669 patients (O: 895; C: 774). While no differences in demographics were observed, the closed-collaborative cohort had a higher overall ISS (O: 21.5 ± 12.14; C: 25.10 ± 2.72; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in the incidence of strokes (O: 1.90%; C: 2.58%, P = 0.3435), pulmonary embolism (O: 0.78%; C: 0.65%; P = 0.7427), sepsis (O: 5.25%; C: 7.49%; P = 0.0599), median ICU charges (O: $7784.50; C: $8986.53; P = 0.5286), mortality (O: 11.40%; C: 13.18%; P = 0.2678), or ICU length of stay (LOS) (O: 4.85 ± 6.23; C: 4.37 ± 4.94; P = 0.0795). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the closed-collaborative cohort had similar clinical outcomes despite having a sicker cohort of patients. We hypothesize that the closed-collaborative ICU model was able to maintain equivalent outcomes due to the dedicated multidisciplinary critical care team caring for these patients. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal model of ICU care for trauma patients.

Prophylactic Antibiotics in Patients with Traumatic Pneumocephalus or Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak.

INTRODUCTION: Pneumocephalus and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are uncommon after trauma, but they expose the sterile CSF to environmental pathogens and create theoretical risk of central nervous system infection (CNSI). Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly given to these patients, but there is a paucity of evidence to guide this practice. We aim to quantify the incidences of these entities and analyze the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing CNSIs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using our institutional trauma registry. All patients admitted from January 2014 to July 2020 with traumatic pneumocephalus (TP) or basilar skull fracture with CSF leak (BSF-CSF) were included. ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were used to identify CNSIs. CNSI rates among defined prophylactic antibiotic regimens, no antibiotics, and other antibiotic regimens were evaluated. ANOVA was used to analyze differences between the groups. RESULTS: 365 patients met inclusion criteria: 360 with TP; 5 with BSF-CSF. 1.1% (4/365) of patients developed CNSI, all with isolated traumatic pneumocephalus. 1.4% of patients (1/72) without antibiotics; 1.2% (3/249) receiving IV antibiotics outside of a defined regimen; and 1.1% (1/88) on a designated prophylactic regimen developed CNSIs. ANOVA indicated the incidence of CNSI was not significantly different among patients who received antibiotics or not, regardless of the regimen (p-value 0.958). CONCLUSION: TP and BSF-CSF are rare diagnoses among trauma patients. The rate of CNSI is marginal and antibiotics do not appear to confer a protective advantage. A larger trial is needed to elucidate the true effect of antibiotics on preventing CNSIs in patients with these uncommon diagnoses.

Preoperative nutritional counselling in patients undergoing oesophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal cancer are at high risk of malnutrition due to pathology and neoadjuvent therapy. This study sought to determine if oesophageal cancer patients undergoing oesophagectomy achieve superior clinical outcomes when preoperative nutritional counselling is performed. METHODS: Oesophageal cancer patients undergoing oesophagectomy were retrospectively divided into cohorts based on those who received (n = 48) and did not receive (n = 58) preoperative nutritional counselling. We compared weight loss, length of stay, 30-day readmission related to nutrition or feeding tube problems, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Per cent weight loss was less in patients who received preoperative nutritional counselling. There was a trend toward decreased mean length of stay and there were fewer readmissions for feeding tube-related complications in patients who received counselling. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional counselling before surgery may lead to decreased weight loss and reduced readmissions for feeding tube-related complications in patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing oesophagectomy.

Anatomy Scholars Program for Medical Students Entering a Surgical Residency.

A near-peer teaching experience for upper-level medical students could help prepare them for surgical residency by providing specific education opportunities and exposure to the field of surgery. Five medical students were selected to be near-peer teachers (NPTs) in gross anatomy, and then they reflected on their experiences. The NPTs spent the majority of effort in a teaching role, and reported improved NTS, anatomy knowledge, and dissection skills. MS1s and faculty also reported on the value of the ASP. Further development and evaluation of the ASP may be an excellent opportunity for future surgeons.