A Preliminary Investigation of Social Network Analysis Applied to Dairy Cow Behavior in Automatic Milking System Environments.

We have applied social network analysis (SNA) to data on voluntary cow movement through a sort gate in an automatic milking system to identify pairs of cows that repeatedly passed through a sort gate in close succession (affinity pairs). The SNA was applied to social groups defined by four pens on a dairy farm, each served by an automatic milking system (AMS). Each pen was equipped with an automatic sorting gate that identified when cows voluntarily moved from the resting area to either milking or feeding areas. The aim of this study was two-fold: to determine if SNA could identify affinity pairs and to determine if milk production was affected when affinity pairs where broken. Cow traffic and milking performance data from a commercial guided-flow AMS dairy farm were used. Average number of milked cows was 214 ± 34, distributed in four AMS over 1 year. The SNA was able to identify clear affinity pairs and showed when these pairings were formed and broken as cows entered and left the social group (pen). The trend in all four pens was toward higher-than-expected milk production during periods of affinity. Moreover, we found that when affinities were broken (separation of cow pairs) the day-to-day variability in milk production was three times higher than for cows in an affinity pair. The results of this exploratory study suggest that SNA could be potentially used as a tool to reduce milk yield variation and better understand the social dynamics of dairy cows supporting management and welfare decisions.

Cyclic pressure applied to cows' teats by teatcup liners can be determined simply and noninvasively.

Liner overpressure is a quantitative variable indicating the extent to which the vacuum difference across the liner during phase d (the liner compression phase) of milking machine pulsation exceeds the vacuum difference that would be just sufficient to stop milk flow from the teat. Previously defined methods of determining liner overpressure have required modifications to the milking machine, complex instrumentation, or both. Our method of measuring derived overpressure (OP) offers relatively simple instrumentation and realistic milking machine characteristics. We determined derived OP by measuring the duration of milk flow within a pulsation cycle, and then comparing that duration with the shape of the pulsation curve to deduce the pulsation chamber vacuum level corresponding to that duration. Derived OP by our method yielded measurements of OP that differed by less than 2.0 kPa from those determined by the most practical previous method, for 2 trial liners. Derived OP can serve as a method for comparing and evaluating liners, and the method we developed may also be applied to automatic control of the milking process.

Potential for Electrified Vehicles to Contribute to U.S. Petroleum and Climate Goals and Implications for Advanced Biofuels.

To examine the national fuel and emissions impacts from increasingly electrified light-duty transportation, we reconstructed the vehicle technology portfolios from two national vehicle studies. Using these vehicle portfolios, we normalized assumptions and examined sensitivity around the rates of electrified vehicle penetration, travel demand growth, and electricity decarbonization. We further examined the impact of substituting low-carbon advanced cellulosic biofuels in place of petroleum. Twenty-seven scenarios were benchmarked against a 50% petroleum-reduction target and an 80% GHG-reduction target. We found that with high rates of electrification (40% of miles traveled) the petroleum-reduction benchmark could be satisfied, even with high travel demand growth. The same highly electrified scenarios, however, could not satisfy 80% GHG-reduction targets, even assuming 80% decarbonized electricity and no growth in travel demand. Regardless of precise consumer vehicle preferences, emissions are a function of the total reliance on electricity versus liquid fuels and the corresponding greenhouse gas intensities of both. We found that at a relatively high rate of electrification (40% of miles and 26% by fuel), an 80% GHG reduction could only be achieved with significant quantities of low-carbon liquid fuel in cases with low or moderate travel demand growth.

Stray voltage and milk quality: a review.

If animal contact voltage reaches sufficient levels, animals coming into contact with grounded devices may receive a mild electric shock that can cause a behavioral response. At voltage levels that are just perceptible to the animal, behaviors indicative of perception (eg, flinches) may result with little change in normal routines. At higher exposure levels, avoidance behaviors may result. The direct effect of animal contact with electrical current can range from: • Mild behavioral reactions indicative of sensation, to • Involuntary muscle contraction, or twitching, to • Intense behavioral responses indicative of pain. The indirect effects of these behaviors can vary considerably depending on the specifics of the contact location, level of current flow, body pathway, frequency of occurrence, and many other factors related to the daily activities of animals. There are several common situations of concern in animal environments: • Animals avoiding certain exposure locations, which may result in: X Reduced water intake if exposure is required for animals to access watering devices, X Reduced feed intake if exposure is required for animals to accesses feeding devices or locations. • Difficulty of moving or handling animals in areas of voltage/current exposure• The physiologic implications of the release of stress hormones produced by contact with painful stimuli. The severity of response will depend on the amount of electrical current (measured in milliamps) flowing through the animal's body, the pathway it takes through the body, and the sensitivity of the individual animal. The results of the combined current dose-response experiments, voltage exposure response experiments, and measurements of body and contact resistances is consistent with the lowest (worst case) cow + contact resistance as low as 500 as estimated by Lefcourt that may occur in some unusual situations on farms (firm application of the muzzle to a wet metallic watering device and hoof contact on a clean, wet, contoured metallic plate on the floor). These studies on responses of dairy cows to electrical exposure agree well with each other and with predictions from neuroelectric theory and practice. There is a high degree of repeatability across studies in which exposures and responses have been appropriately quantified. For confirmation, a potential of 2 to 4 V (60 Hz, rms) must be measured between 2 points that an animal might contact (or animal contact measurement), and some animals should exhibit signs of avoidance behavior. The animal contact voltage measurement with an appropriate shunt resistor value provides the only reliable indication of exposure levels. Voltage readings at cow contact points should be made with a 500- or 1000- resistor across the 2 measuring leads to the cow contact points in addition to open circuit measurements. The only studies that have documented adverse effects of voltage and current on cows had both sufficient current applied to cause aversion and forced exposures (ie, animals could not eat or drink without being exposed to voltage and current) and all of the indirect responses (reduced water or intake and milk production) were behaviorally mediated. It is typical for voltage levels to vary considerably at different locations on a farm. Decreased water and/or feed intake or undesired behaviors result only if current levels are sufficient to produce aversion at locations that are critical to daily animal activity, such as feeders, waterers, and milking areas. If an aversive current occurs only a few times per day, it is not likely to have an adverse effect on cow behavior. The more often an aversive voltage occurs in areas critical to cows' normal feeding, drinking, or resting, the more likely it is to affect cows. A number of studies have been done to investigate potential detrimental physiologic responses that may result from animals' exposure to voltage and current. The literature review presented here summarizes 46 research trials on groups of cows exposed to know levels of voltage and/or current. Many of these were part of the same experiment but exposed cows at different levels of voltage or current. None of these trials or experiments (some using aggressive exposure of cows to mastitis organisms) showed a significant effect of voltage/current exposure on SCC or the incidence of mastitis. Many of these studies showed behavioral modification and some showed minor changes in milk yield, milk composition, or stress hormones (especially cortisol). These studies have shown that increased concentrations of the stress hormone cortisol do not occur at levels below behavioral response levels and only become apparent in some, but not all, cows at substantially higher voltage/current exposures than the threshold required for behavioral modification. This body of research indicates that while exposure to stray voltage at levels of 2 V to 4 V may be a mild stressor to dairy cows, it does not contribute to increased SCC or incidence of mastitis or reduced milk yield.