[Myositis Ossificans Traumatica in the Craniocervical Junction: A Case Report and Review of Literature]. / Myositis ossificans traumatica im kraniozervikalen Übergang ­ Fallbericht und Literaturübersicht.

Background Myosits ossificans (MO) is a rare but important differential diagnosis for a heterotrophic bony tumor in the muscles. It is often misdiagnosed as a malignant tumor. With a previous trauma the diagnosis is myositis ossificans traumatic (MOT). In most cases, it is benign and predominantly seen in the big muscles. But there can be malignant etiologies too. Case Description We report a rare case of MO in the muscle of the craniocervical junction. This 37-year-old woman had a riding accident years ago. Because of persisting pain and cervical dysfunction, we did a total resection. Clinical Implications MOT is a benign tumor that can be treated conservative in most cases. In case of persistent pain or neurological deficits, and especially for securing diagnosis, surgical resection is recommended.

Return to Sports After Cervical Total Disc Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Total disc replacement (TDR) is typically indicated in young patients with a cervical soft disc herniation. There are few data on the activity level of patients after cervical TDR, in particular from young patients who are expected to have a high activity level with frequent exercising. The expectation is that returning to active sports after cervical TDR is not restricted. METHODS: Fifty patients were treated with a monosegmental cervical TDR at our department between May 2006 and March 2012. Clinical status and radiographic parameters were evaluated preoperatively and during follow-up. In addition, information was gathered regarding neck disability index, pain, a questionnaire concerning athletic aspects, and a modified Tegner activity score. The study design was a prospective case series. RESULTS: All patients were treated with the Prestige artificial cervical disc for a single-level soft disc herniation with radiculopathy. The average age was 40 years, and the mean follow-up period was 53 months (range, 26-96). The median neck disability index during follow-up was 5, and median visual analog scale for pain was 2. Two professional athletes, 20 semiprofessionals, 24 hobby athletes, and 5 patients with a very low activity level were treated. The median time to resumption of sporting activity was 4 weeks after surgery. All professionals and semiprofessionals recovered to their previous activity level. All of the 20 hobby athletes recovered to resume their sport participation. The modified Tegner preoperative score was 4 and the postoperative score was 3.5 (P = 0.806). CONCLUSIONS: We found that cervical TDR did not prohibit sporting activities. All patients recovered and were able to take part in their previous activities at an appropriate intensity level.

Early Morbidity and Mortality in 50 Very Elderly Patients After Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion for Traumatic Odontoid Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic odontoid fractures (tOFs) in the very elderly are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The best treatment strategy (conservative vs. surgery) is still unclear. METHODS: Between April 2008 and April 2014, fifty (17 male, 33 female) patients (mean age 87.2 ± 4.4 years; range: 80-99) were included in this retrospective cohort study. All patients underwent posterior fusion surgery for tOF. Early outcome, morbidity and mortality, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, comorbidities, and perioperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 5.8 ± 3.9 (range: 0-13), and the mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3 ± 0.5 (range: 2-4). Surgery was delayed in 48% of patients. Thirty percent of patients had preoperative complications (72.4% severe), of which a leading cause was dysphagia with subsequent pneumonia, and 18% required preoperative assessment or improvement of health status. Surgery-related complications were experienced in 14% with no neurovascular lesion. Postoperative medical complications occurred in 52% of patients (67.3% severe). Major complications were mostly respiratory/pulmonary (66.7%), of which postoperative pneumonia (36.4%) was leading. Twenty-four percent of patients were ICU monitored. Mean length of ICU stay was 9 ± 6.6 days (1-20). Mean length of hospital stay was 15 ± 8.6 days (4-56). There was no in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality was 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior fusion for tOF in patients 80 years or older seems to be a feasible treatment option in these high-risk patients. Despite a high incidence of severe comorbidities and perioperative complications, outcome was satisfactory. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Our research was a retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized study. OBJECTIVE: To compare occupational radiation exposure to the surgeon, as well as the patient, during posterior lumbar spine instrumentation in 10 navigated cases (navigated) versus 11 cases using the freehand technique (non-navigated). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of navigation increases the accuracy of posterior lumbar instrumentation.A further speculated benefit of navigation is the reduction of radiation exposure of the surgeon. However, this has so far not been evaluated in such comparative manner. METHODS: Radiation exposure to the surgeon was measured by digital dosimeters placed at the level of the eye, chest, and dominant forearm. Radiation exposure was measured from the time of positioning of the patient to the end of the procedure both for navigated (intraoperative 3-dimensional [3D] fluoroscopy-based) and non-navigated (2-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided) freehand posterior lumbar spine instrumentations. A 3D fluoroscopic scan was routinely performed at the end of the procedure for all patients. RESULTS: Patients were distributed evenly in the 2 groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, and the number of operated levels. The accumulated radiation dose for the surgeon was significantly higher in the non-navigated group; up to 9.96 times. The radiation dose for the patient was higher with the freehand technique, 1884.8 cGy·cm (non-navigated) versus 887 cGy·cm (navigated), without reaching a statistically significant level. CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure to the surgeon during pedicle screw placement with the freehand technique is up to 9.96 times greater than with the use of navigation. In the latter group, the only radiation exposure comes from the preoperative-level control and positioning of the 3D C-arm before 3D fluoroscopic acquisition. Furthermore, neuronavigation also reduces the cumulative dose for the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Accuracy of robot-assisted placement of lumbar and sacral pedicle screws: a prospective randomized comparison to conventional freehand screw implantation.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective randomized controlled study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of robot-assisted (RO) implantation of lumbar/sacral pedicle screws in comparison with the freehand (FH) conventional technique. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SpineAssist is a miniature robot for the implantation of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral pedicle screws. The system, studied in cadaver and cohort studies, revealed a high accuracy, so far. A direct comparison of the robot assistance with the FH technique is missing. METHODS: Patients requiring mono- or bisegmental lumbar or lumbosacral stabilization were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to FH or RO pedicle screw implantation. Instrumentation was performed using fluoroscopic guidance (FH) or robot assistance. The primary end point screw position was assessed by a postoperative computed tomography, and screw position was classified (A: no cortical violation; B: cortical breach <2 mm; C: ≥2 mm to <4 mm; D: ≥4 mm to <6 mm; E: ≥6 mm). Secondary end points as radiation exposure, duration of surgery/planning, and hospital stay were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 298 pedicle screws were implanted in 60 patients (FH, 152; RO, 146). Ninety-three percent had good positions (A or B) in FH, and 85% in RO. Preparation time in the operating room (OR), overall OR time, and intraoperative radiation time were not different for both groups. Surgical time for screw placement was significantly shorter for FH (84 minutes) than for RO (95 minutes). Ten RO screws required an intraoperative conversion to the FH. One FH screw needed a secondary revision. CONCLUSION: In this study, the accuracy of the conventional FH technique was superior to the RO technique. Most malpositioned screws of the RO group showed a lateral deviation. Attachment of the robot to the spine seems a vulnerable aspect potentially leading to screw malposition as well as slipping of the implantation cannula at the screw entrance point.

Posterior C1-2 fusion with C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws: accuracy of screw position, alignment and patient outcome.

BACKGROUND: Transarticular screw fixation is seen as the "gold standard" in instrumented fusion of C1 and C2. However, drawbacks are the necessity of a reduction before instrumentation and a risk of vertebral artery injury. Therefore, C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws are an alternative. The present study assessed the feasibility of C1-2 stabilization with C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws and evaluated quality of life. METHOD: All data of 35 consecutive patients treated from May 2006 to September 2009 were collected. Patients had C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws. RESULTS: Twenty patients were operated on for traumatic instabilities, six for neoplastic instabilities, five for infectious instabilities and two each for degenerative and congenital instabilities. Sixty-six of 70 C1 screws had an ideal position, while four were placed suboptimal without the need for revision. Twelve of 68 C2 screws were not ideal but acceptable; one screw needed a surgical revision. There was one non-surgery related case of neurological deterioration after multilevel instrumentation. No vascular injuries occurred. Realignment was correct in all patients. After a median follow-up of 12 months, patients showed a reduction of pain, disability and improvements in EQ-5D items. SF36 data compared with a normative population and a historical cohort showed lower levels of function in all domains. CONCLUSION: C1-C2 instrumented fusion with lateral mass and isthmic screws is a safe procedure. Sufficient screw position and alignment was possible in all cases. Therefore, at our institution transarticular screws were abandoned in favor of C1 lateral mass and C2 isthmic screws.

Robotic technology in spine surgery: current applications and future developments.

Medical robotics incrementally appears compelling in nowadays surgical work. The research regarding an ideal interaction between physician and computer assistance has reached a first summit with the implementation of commercially available robots (Intuitive Surgical's® da Vinci®). Moreover, neurosurgery--and herein spine surgery--seems an ideal candidate for computer assisted surgery. After the adoption of pure navigational support from brain surgery to spine surgery a meanwhile commercially available miniature robot (Mazor Surgical Technologies' The Spine Assist®) assists in drilling thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws. Pilot studies on efficacy, implementation into neurosurgical operating room work flow proved the accuracy of the system and we shortly outline them. Current applications are promising, and future possible developments seem far beyond imagination. But still, medical robotics is in its infancy. Many of its advantages and disadvantages must be delicately sorted out as the patients safety is of highest priority. Medical robots may achieve a physician's supplement but not substitute.

Pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine with the Cosmic-system: a prospective observation.

OBJECT: The objective of the study was to generate prospective data to assess the clinical results after dynamic stabilization with the Cosmic system (Ulrich Medical). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2006 and December 2007, 103 consecutive patients were treated with Cosmic for painful degenerative segmental instability +/- spinal stenosis. The preoperative workup included radiological (MRI and myelography/CT) and clinical parameters (general/neurological examination, visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), SF-36, Karnofsky (KPS)). At pre-defined intervals (at discharge, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and yearly) the patients were reevaluated (X-ray/flexion/extension, neurological status, VAS, ODI, SF-36, KPS, and patient satisfaction). Data were collected in a prospective observational design. RESULTS: Data collection was completed in 100 of 103 operated patients (mean follow-up, 15 +/- 0.6 months). Dynamic stabilization was performed as first-tier surgery in 43 cases and as second-tier therapy in 60 cases. Additional decompression was performed in 83 cases. Dynamic stabilization led to significant reduction of back pain-related disability (ODI pre-op, 51 +/- 1%; post-op, 21 +/- 1%) and improvement of pain (VAS pre-op, 65 +/- 1; post-op, 21 +/- 2), mental/physical health (norm-based SF-36: mental pre-op, 44; post-op, 48; physical pre-op, 41; post-op, 46), and mobility (KPS pre-op, 70 +/- 1; post-op, 82 +/- 31). Early reoperation was necessary in 12 patients (n = 3 symptomatic misplaced screws, n = 8 CSF pseudocele, rebleeding, or impaired wound healing, n = 1 misjudged instability/stenosis in adjacent segment). Reoperations within the follow-up period were necessary in another 10 patients due to secondary screw loosening (n = 2), persistent stenosis/disk protrusion in an instrumented segment (n = 3), symptomatic degeneration of an adjacent segment (n = 6), or osteoporotic fracture of an adjacent vertebra (n = 1), respectively. Patient satisfaction rate was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic stabilization with Cosmic achieved significant improvement of pain, related disability, mental/physical health, and mobility, respectively, and a high rate of satisfied patients. A reoperation rate of 10% during follow-up seems relatively high at first glance. Comparable data, however, are scarce, and a prospective randomized trial (spondylodesis vs. dynamic stabilization) is warranted based on these results.

Absence of the mutated Trp2 allele but a common polymorphism of the COL9A2 collagen gene is associated with early recurrence after lumbar discectomy in a German population.

Genetic factors seem to play a role in symptomatic lumbar disc disease (LDD). It has been shown previously that a tryptophan mutation of the COL9A2 gene is a major risk factor for LDD in a Finish population. The impact of collagen gene variations on the relapse rate after lumbar discectomy, however, has not been studied so far. Here, we conducted a cross-sectional genotyping study of patients who underwent lumbar discectomy to determine the influence of a COL9A2 mutation on the recurrence rates. Biopsy samples from 288 patients suffering from LDD with and without relapse were analyzed by PCR restriction fragment analysis and direct sequencing. The mutated Trp2 allele was not detected in the patients' samples of the present study. However, nine patients with recurrent LDD, but only two without recurrence were homozygous for the Arg allele. Homozygosity for the Arg allele of Col9A2 seems to be more frequent in the patient group with early recurrence although the differences in the allele frequencies were statistically not significant. In contrast, the Trp2 mutation seems not to be a major susceptibility factor for LDD in a German population.