Clinical trials update from the European Society of Cardiology Congress in Vienna, 2007: PROSPECT, EVEREST, ARISE, ALOFT, FINESSE, Prague-8, CARESS in MI and ACUITY.

The Clinical Trials described in this article were presented at the Hotline and Clinical Trial Update Sessions of the European Society of Cardiology Congress held in September 2007 in Vienna, Austria. The sessions chosen for this article represent the scope of interest of Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. The presentations should be considered preliminary, as further analyses could alter the final publication of the results of these studies. PROSPECT evaluated echocardiographic criteria for optimal selection of patients with moderate to severe heart failure who may benefit from cardiac resynchronisation therapy, however concluded that no single echocardiographic measure can be recommended. EVEREST found that tolvaptan, a vasopressin V(2) antagonist, resulted in early weight reduction and improvement of dyspnoea in patients with acute heart failure, but lacked long term improvement. In ARISE, the anti-oxidant succinobucal did not affect the primary outcome in high risk cardiovascular patients, but improved the combination of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, and diabetic control in diabetics. ALOFT showed that the addition of the renin inhibitor aliskiren to an ACE inhibitor or ARB and a beta-blocker leads to favourable effects on neurohormonal actions in heart failure. FINESSE markedly improved coronary patency before PCI with half-dose reteplase/abciximab in STEMI patients, however without significantly improving short-term outcome. The Prague-8 Study evaluated whether routine clopidogrel administered >6 h pre-angiography would be a safe way to achieve therapeutic drug levels in case a follow-up intervention would be considered immediately, but appeared not justified because of bleeding complications. CARESS in MI showed that high risk patients with evolving STEMI who undergo thrombolytic therapy should undergo PCI early after the thrombolysis. Finally, the ACUITY trial found that in moderate or high risk Non ST elevation ACS patients triaged to PCI, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, or medical management, bivalirudin, with or without associated GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, resulted in a marked reduction of bleeding at 30 days whilst preserving the ischemic and mortality benefit at 1 year follow up.

ACE inhibition and endothelial function: main findings of PERFECT, a sub-study of the EUROPA trial.

BACKGROUND: ACE inhibition results in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) through different mechanisms including improvement of endothelial dysfunction. The Perindopril-Function of the Endothelium in Coronary artery disease Trial (PERFECT) evaluated whether long-term administration of perindopril improves endothelial dysfunction. METHODS: PERFECT is a 3-year double blind randomised placebo controlled trial to determine the effect of perindopril 8 mg once daily on brachial artery endothelial function in patients with stable CAD without clinical heart failure. Endothelial function in response to ischaemia was assessed using ultrasound. Primary endpoint was difference in flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) assessed at 36 months. RESULTS: In 20 centers, 333 patients randomly received perindopril or matching placebo. Ischemia-induced FMD was 2.7% (SD 2.6). In the perindopril group FMD went from 2.6% at baseline to 3.3% at 36 months and in the placebo group from 2.8 to 3.0%. Change in FMD after 36 month treatment was 0.55% (95% confidence interval -0.36, 1.47; p = 0.23) higher in perindopril than in placebo group. The rate of change in FMD per 6 months was 0.14% (SE 0.05, p = 0.02) in perindopril and 0.02% (SE 0.05, p = 0.74) in placebo group (0.12% difference in rate of change p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Perindopril resulted in a modest, albeit not statistically significant, improvement in FMD.

Pharmacological modulation of cardiovascular remodeling: a guide to heart failure therapy.

Cardiac remodeling is a complex process, which involves genetic, molecular and cellular changes in cardiomyocytes and the interstitium, leading to progressive structural and functional alterations, including cardiac dilatation, interstitial fibrosis, and a reduction in contractility and relaxation. As cardiac function worsens, ventricular dysfunction, heart failure and end-stage heart disease are the ultimate consequences. Underlying mechanisms include myocardial stretch and neurohormonal and cytokine activation. Consequently, therapies aiming counteracting these mechanisms have proven successful in attenuating or even preventing cardiac remodeling. In particular, ACE inhibition, beta-blockade and aldosterone antagonism have proven to be effective in modulating the process of remodeling and in reducing the occurrence of adverse events in heart failure. Of interest, although several other antagonists of neurohormonal, including endothelin, or of cytokine activation have been shown to effectively modulate remodeling, studies thus far have been negative in terms of event reduction in heart failure. Whereas insight in cardiovascular remodeling has already significantly contributed to existing management strategies in heart failure, further studies in different mechanisms may provide additional therapeutic measures.

The Carvedilol and ACE-Inhibitor Remodelling Mild Heart Failure EvaluatioN trial (CARMEN)--rationale and design.

Inhibition or reversal of ventricular remodelling in heart failure patients is regarded as of prime importance in the treatment of heart failure and in determining long term outcome. Recent studies have demonstrated that the addition of carvedilol to Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and other routine heart failure therapy results in a valuable improvement in the clinical status and life expectancy of mild, moderate and severe heart failure patients. ACE inhibitors have become the cornerstone of heart failure therapy. Also, carvedilol in combination with standard therapy (including ACE inhibitors) has demonstrable beneficial effects on left ventricular remodelling. Each new treatment has to be added, this quickly leads to polypharmacy, which may not be necessary and even unwanted in the individual patient, as the pharmacological profile of carvedilol compares favourably to ACE inhibitors, this suggests that it could challenge ACE inhibitors as first-line treatment for heart failure. The CARMEN trial (Carvedilol and ACE-Inhibitor Remodelling Mild Heart Failure EvaluatioN) was designed to compare the effects of carvedilol alone and of carvedilol plus an ACE inhibitor (enalapril) with the effect of an ACE inhibitor alone on different parameters of left ventricular remodelling as well as morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic mild heart failure, thereby allowing conclusions on whether combination therapy may be replaced by the multiple action adrenergic inhibitor carvedilol in the future.

Hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of continuous infusion of levosimendan in patients with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to define the therapeutic dose range of levosimendan in patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure of ischemic origin. BACKGROUND: Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer for treatment of acute decompensated heart failure. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study included 151 adult patients. Levosimendan was given as a 10-min intravenous bolus of 3, 6, 12, 24 or 36 microg/kg, followed by a 24-h infusion of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 0.6 microg/kg/min, respectively. Dobutamine, for comparative purposes, was given as an open-label infusion (6 microg/kg/min). The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients achieving in each treatment group at least one of the following: 1) a > or =15% increase in stroke volume (SV) at 23 h to 24 h; 2) a > or =25% decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (and > or =4 mm Hg) at 23 h to 24 h; 3) a > or =40% increase in cardiac output (CO) (with change in heart rate [HR] <20%); 4) a > or =50% decrease in PCWP during two consecutive measurements. RESULTS: The response rate to levosimendan ranged from 50% at the lowest dose to 88% at the highest dose (compared with placebo 14%, dobutamine 70%). A dose-response relationship was demonstrated for levosimendan on increases in CO and SV, and reductions in PCWP during the infusion (for all, p< or =0.001). Headache (9%), nausea (5%) and hypotension (5%) were the most frequently reported adverse events at higher dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing of levosimendan with a 10-min bolus of 6 to 24 microg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.05 to 0.2 microg/kg/min is well tolerated and leads to favorable hemodynamic effects.

Overview of the relationship between ischemia and congestive heart failure.

Ischemic heart disease is the principal etiology of heart failure in the Western world. Myocardial ischemia is important in cardiac remodeling, a process that leads to a progressive change in the shape and size of the heart and significantly worsens the prognosis of patients with heart failure. Preventing ischemic events, therefore, is an important goal in the management of patients with coronary artery disease. Statins have been shown to reduce the number of ischemic events in these patients, whereas the benefit of beta-blocker and aldosterone antagonist therapy on ischemic causes of heart failure remains unclear. Several large trials involving patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction or heart failure have shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce the incidence of progressive heart failure, death, and ischemic events, thus establishing ACE inhibitors as first-line therapy for these patients. Other lines of evidence have suggested that ACE inhibitor therapy may also benefit patients with preserved left ventricular function, a hypothesis that is being evaluated in three large, controlled, randomized trials. One of these trials, the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, was terminated prematurely because it demonstrated the significant positive effects of the ACE inhibitor ramipril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular function. A growing body of data confirms the relationship between ischemia and heart failure and the benefits of ACE inhibitor treatment in a broad range of high-risk patients.

Differential anti-ischaemic effects of muscarinic receptor blockade in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease; impaired vs normal left ventricular function.

AIMS: In patients with coronary artery disease acetylcholine (a muscarinic agonist) causes vasoconstriction. The effect of atropine (a muscarinic antagonist) on coronary vasotone in patients with normal or impaired left ventricular function is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four patients who required atropine infusion (to supplement heart rate response) during atrial pacing (pacing was conducted to assess ischaemia as part of an experimental protocol) were studied; 17 patients had normal and seven impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction < or =0.40). Two control groups were selected from a large database (from patients in whom atrial pacing was carried out but to whom atropine was not administered) to match the normal (n=20) and dysfunction (n=10) groups. In the normal left ventricular function group atropine increased rate pressure product by 12 +/- 4%, as compared to those without atropine (P < 0.05). Left ventricular end diastolic pressure increased less in the atropine group (+40 +/- 8% vs +78 +/- 6%;P < 0.05). Arterial norepinephrine increased similarly in both groups, but coronary flow (as assessed by using a thermodiluting method in the coronary sinus) increased 23 +/ -4% more in the atropine group (P < 0.05). Further, there were lower levels of myocardial lactate production and ST-segment depression in the atropine group [lactate extraction +13 +/- 6% (atropine) vs -19 +/- 4% (controls), ST-segment depression 1. 3 +/- 0.6 (atropine) vs 1.8 +/- 0.2 mm (control), both P < 0.05 between groups]. In contrast, in the dysfunction group the overall effect of atropine was less pronounced. CONCLUSION: In patients with normal left ventricular function atropine improves coronary flow and reduces myocardial lactate production and ST-segment depression during atrial pacing, suggesting a reduction in myocardial ischaemia.

The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Aldosterone is important in the pathophysiology of heart failure. In a doubleblind study, we enrolled 1663 patients who had severe heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of no more than 35 percent and who were being treated with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, a loop diuretic, and in most cases digoxin. A total of 822 patients were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of spironolactone daily, and 841 to receive placebo. The primary end point was death from all causes. RESULTS: The trial was discontinued early, after a mean follow-up period of 24 months, because an interim analysis determined that spironolactone was efficacious. There were 386 deaths in the placebo group (46 percent) and 284 in the spironolactone group (35 percent; relative risk of death, 0.70; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.82; P<0.001). This 30 percent reduction in the risk of death among patients in the spironolactone group was attributed to a lower risk of both death from progressive heart failure and sudden death from cardiac causes. The frequency of hospitalization for worsening heart failure was 35 percent lower in the spironolactone group than in the placebo group (relative risk of hospitalization, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.77; P<0.001). In addition, patients who received spironolactone had a significant improvement in the symptoms of heart failure, as assessed on the basis of the New York Heart Association functional class (P<0.001). Gynecomastia or breast pain was reported in 10 percent of men who were treated with spironolactone, as compared with 1 percent of men in the placebo group (P<0.001). The incidence of serious hyperkalemia was minimal in both groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Blockade of aldosterone receptors by spironolactone, in addition to standard therapy, substantially reduces the risk of both morbidity and death among patients with severe heart failure.

Sustained benefit at 10-14 years follow-up after thrombolytic therapy in myocardial infarction.

AIMS: To investigate whether the benefit of thrombolytic therapy was sustained beyond the first decade. We report the 10-14 year outcome of 533 patients who were randomized to treatment with intracoronary streptokinase or to conventional therapy during the years 1980-1985. METHODS AND RESULTS: Details of survival and cardiac events were obtained from the civil registry, from medical records or from the patient's physician. At follow-up, 158 patients (59%) of the 269 patients allocated to thrombolytic treatment and only 129 patients (49%) of the 264 conventionally treated patients were alive. The cumulative 1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 91%, 81% and 69% in patients treated with streptokinase and 84%, 71% and 59% in the control group, respectively (P=0.02). Reinfarction during 10-years of follow-up was more frequent after thrombolytic therapy, particularly during the first year. Coronary bypass surgery and coronary angioplasty were more frequently performed after thrombolytic therapy. At 10 years approximately 30% of the patients were free from subsequent cardiac events. Independent determinants of mortality were elderly age, indicators of impaired residual left ventricular function, multivessel disease and an inability to perform an exercise test at the time of hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Improved survival after thrombolytic therapy is maintained beyond the first decade. Age, left ventricular function, multivessel disease and an inability to perform an exercise test were independent predictors for long-term mortality, as they are predictors for early mortality.

Drug-induced heart failure.

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome that is predominantly caused by cardiovascular disorders such as coronary heart disease and hypertension. However, several classes of drugs may induce heart failure in patients without concurrent cardiovascular disease or may precipitate the occurrence of heart failure in patients with preexisting left ventricular impairment. We reviewed the literature on drug-induced heart failure, using the MEDLINE database and lateral references. Successively, we discuss the potential role in the occurrence of heart failure of cytostatics, immunomodulating drugs, antidepressants, calcium channel blocking agents, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiarrhythmics, beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents, anesthetics and some miscellaneous agents. Drug-induced heart failure may play a role in only a minority of the patients presenting with heart failure. Nevertheless, drug-induced heart failure should be regarded as a potentially preventable cause of heart failure, although sometimes other priorities do not offer therapeutic alternatives (e.g., anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy). The awareness of clinicians of potential adverse effects on cardiac performance by several classes of drugs, particularly in patients with preexisting ventricular dysfunction, may contribute to timely diagnosis and prevention of drug-induced heart failure.

Acute anti-ischemic effects of perindoprilat in men with coronary artery disease and their relation with left ventricular function.

Long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition may reduce ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease, but whether it protects against acute ischemia or the effects of preexisting left ventricular (LV) dysfunction on potential anti-ischemic properties is unknown. We performed a double-blind trial in 25 patients with exercise-induced ischemia. The effects of perindoprilat on pacing-induced myocardial ischemia were examined. Fourteen patients received perindoprilat and 11 patients received placebo. Based on LV function, 2 subgroups were formed in the perindoprilat group: 7 patients with LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <0.40), and 7 patients with normal LV function. After receiving the study medication, the pacing test was repeated. During the first pacing test both groups developed ischemia. After perindoprilat administration, the increase in systemic vascular resistance and LV end-diastolic pressure were significantly blunted (p <0.05). Further, the ischemia-induced increase in arterial and cardiac uptake of norepinephrine was inhibited by perindoprilat, and the increase in atrial natriuretic peptide was less pronounced; also, ST-segment depression was reduced by 32% compared with placebo (all p <0.05). In the group with LV dysfunction, perindoprilat reduced LV end-diastolic pressure significantly by 67% and myocardial lactate production was prevented, but this did not happen in the group with normal LV function. In addition, the increase in arterial norepinephrine was reduced by 74% and 33%, respectively (p <0.05). These results indicate that perindoprilat reduced acute, pacing-induced ischemia in normotensive patients. In patients with (asymptomatic) LV dysfunction these effects were more pronounced than in patients with normal LV function.